Inside the rumoured Liverpool-Manchester rail link plan
Train journeys between Liverpool and Manchester could soon be half as quick if the rumoured rail link goes ahead.
The quicker rail link has been on the wishlist of the Greater Manchester and Liverpool mayors after the HS2's northern leg was axed.
The multi-billion pound rail link, which would cut journey times between the cities by 20 minutes, could become a reality if it receives government funding in the Chancellor Rachel Reeves' £113 billion spending review today.
Journeys between the cities usually take between 45 and 55 minutes, with multiple stops in between.
The government is expected to announce funding for the project today, a source told Metro.
Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham said the Victorian rail infrastructure is 'now acting as a brake on growth,' while Steve Rotheram, the Liverpool City mayor, argued that the faster link is 'something that the people in the North quite rightly deserve.'
It comes after the Chancellor announced £15 billion funding to transport projects in the North and Midlands last week, including for Greater Manchester buses and the Stockport tram extension, a new rapid transit link in Liverpool, and the new West Yorkshire and Leeds tram system.
The £3 bus cap will also remain in place for at least two more years, the Chancellor confirmed.
Here is everything that has been revealed about the new rail link so far.
The Liverpool-Manchester Railway could 'supercharge economic growth' with a £15 billion boost and 22,000 new jobs during the construction, which could start in the early 2030s, the region's leaders said.
Plans show the express rail link would have only three stops between Manchester Piccadilly and Liverpool Lime Street.
The proposed stops would be at Manchester Airport, Warrington Bank Quay and Liverpool Gateway, although the exact gateway location has not been confirmed yet.
Liverpool Lime Street, the seventh busiest train station outside London, and Manchester Piccadilly would be revamped.
The city's stations have become 'bottlenecks' with limited platforms and track capacity, Rotheram said.
The new railway would help alleviate the 'immense pressure' on the existing network, the mayors said.
The areas around each station, will be redeveloped as new 'growth zones,' with new homes, jobs and regeneration in the pipeline ahead of the new rail link.
As many as 500,000 new homes could be build along the rail corridor.
People in Liverpool reacted to the news on social media, with many saying there should be a direct rail link to John Lennon Airport first.
One person said: 'Create a direct link to John Lennon Airport, South Parkway is a total waste of time for people trying to use our airport.'
Another Liverpool resident said: 'Manchester has the most to gain out of this plan – not Liverpool.'
Burnham said: 'Just over 200 years ago, the world's first passenger railway was built to connect Liverpool and Manchester, transforming the nation's fortunes for centuries. But Victorian infrastructure is now acting as a brake on growth. More Trending
'A new Liverpool-Manchester Railway would be shorter than both London's Elizabeth line and East West Rail connecting Oxford and Cambridge, but would punch well above its weight in both growing the UK's economy and better connecting our high-growth sectors.
'For too long, such major infrastructure projects in the UK have been delivered in a top-down way.
'We want to work hand-in-hand with government to plan and deliver this railway from the ground up, enabling us to maintain our growth momentum for Greater Manchester. A new, locally-led delivery model will mean we can build our pipeline of regeneration, new homes, skilled jobs and green growth around the rail line with real certainty.'
The northern mayors travelled to Westminster ahead of the spending review to ramp up the pressure on the government to back their plans.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Man, 28, dies after crash that closed A14 for hours
MORE: I tried out every Londoner's worst nightmare and spoke to other commuters
MORE: Map reveals the most up-and-coming sex positions in major UK cities
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
More funding will not improve Britain's utterly incompetent police
One of the major factors contributing towards the growing sense of decay in Britain's public realm – what some have started to call 'scuzz' – is successive governments trying to cook the Treasury's books by running national policy through councils by stealth. Most voters doubtless assume, not least because politicians continue to pretend, that their council tax is about paying for things like bin collections, road repairs, and urban beautification, all of which have been cut and cut again over recent years. But in reality, many councils spend up to 70 per cent or more of their budgets servicing policies, such as social care and services for children with special needs, which are set in Whitehall. Yesterday's spending review was another case in point. Rachel Reeves announced an increase, albeit one that police chiefs think will be woefully inadequate. But dig into the details, and it becomes clear she expects that to come in large part from increases in council tax. It's a cunning setup, in low political terms. Voters will see their taxes going up – but who can they blame? Their local authority, in the first instance, rather than the Chancellor. Perhaps their local police and crime commissioner too, if they know that PCCs get to set an additional policing 'precept' on council tax bills. The diffusion of authority makes it harder for people to hold anyone accountable, either for the increase or for the state of policing. When PCCs were introduced by the Conservatives, the idea was that they would help to increase scrutiny of the police by replacing anonymous boards with a single, elected individual who could champion the public interest. Yet public awareness of the posts is so low (turnout in PCC elections is invariably risible) that this seldom happens in practice. Whilst some PCCs have been more effective than others, as a whole they have done little to halt or even slow the growing alienation between voters and police forces which seem, too often, to have very different priorities. Last year, analysis by the Daily Telegraph found that, years after the shocking stat was first reported, it is still the case that in almost half the country the police solve literally zero burglaries – a fact which sits very uncomfortably next to high-profile reports of sending six officers to arrest two parents for complaining about their child's primary school on WhatsApp. And whenever there is serious public disorder, there is almost always a gulf between the swift and muscular response overwhelmingly favoured by voters when polled and the hands-off, softly-softly strategies employed by police chiefs. Ultimately, it's one more thing for the Conservatives to learn, from their most recent period in government, how not to do it. Driving change in the culture of the police is certainly possible. New Labour did it, and after 14 years of Tory-led government we are still living with the forces they forged. But it takes active pressure from the top, not farming the job out to minor functionaries nobody has heard of. In the meantime, and as with so much else in Britain, we're going to be stuck footing a bigger and bigger bill for a state which works less and less well.
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Lincolnshire Police chief constable Paul Gibson warns of job cuts
The chief constable of Lincolnshire Police has warned 400 staff and officer jobs could be cut if the force cannot secure extra funding by comes after Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the government's Spending Review, which includes a 2.3% real terms yearly funding increase for policing in England and Constable Paul Gibson said this was not enough for Lincolnshire and would leave the force facing a deficit of almost £70m. He said he had begun negotiations with the Home Reeves told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme she did not "accept" the need for cuts to police jobs. Speaking during a hotseat with BBC Radio Lincolnshire presenter Frances Finn, Mr Gibson said the Home Office had recognised Lincolnshire as a "significant outlier" in terms of funding."If we don't get more money by October, then, unfortunately, I have to start consultation to reduce our organisation significantly," he Gibson said cuts to officer numbers could result in reductions to services that were "hugely important" to communities, including neighbourhood, roads and rural policing and crime prevention said: "I have to make sure that I balance the budget, and if I can't do that then I have to reduce resources, which obviously will be felt within the communities across our great county."The chief constable said he had a meeting planned with Policing Minister Dame Diana Johnson for early July, and he would be "pitching for more money"."I'm as optimistic as I can be, but I can't guarantee money will come along," he April, Lincolnshire Police announced previous planned cuts to 400 jobs had been delayed due to a new £5.7m government funding speaking on BBC Radio Lincolnshire, Mr Gibson said this was "one-off money" to provide "stability" for six months. 'Working hard' A report by His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue, released in May, rated Lincolnshire Police inadequate at investigating crime, responding to the public and managing offenders and Gibson said he appreciated the findings of the report would be "concerning" for residents, but he said funding had a "massive impact" on the level of service the force could said: "It's [the report] not as good as I wanted it to be, that's absolutely clear, and there's no doubt that there are things we need to do better. I completely accept that."We're working incredibly hard in the background to make sure we are investigating crimes better, supervising criminal investigations better, meeting the requirements of victims better." Caller Chris Fairweather, from Old Leake, near Boston, told the chief constable she had not been visited by officers after reporting a garage break in at her said tools and equipment had been stolen, but she had received a letter from police a week later to say the case had been Gibson said it was "just not possible" to visit the scene of every crime, and officers had to work out the likelihood of solving a said: "Finance, whether we like it or not, has a major impact upon what you're able to do, in terms of the quality of service you can deliver."Later in the discussion, Mr Gibson said: "I know that people are concerned about policing – they always want more, quite understandably."But I also need to make sure that I balance that with my staff, who are operating in difficult circumstances."They get assaulted quite frequently. I write to them, I speak to them, almost daily, in terms of someone who's been punched, kicked, spat at."The Home Office has been approached for comment. Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
The Herald Scotland
40 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
UK Government ‘putting its money where its mouth is' with Acorn £200m
The scheme, which proposes storing emissions from across Scotland under the North Sea, had previously been overlooked for support despite repeated calls from the Scottish Government and others for it to be backed. With the UK Government also pledging to support the Viking carbon capture and storage (CCS) project in the Humber, Mr Miliband insisted the two schemes will 'support industrial renewal' with 'thousands of highly skilled jobs'. According to the sector, Acorn could support about 15,000 jobs at its peak, with up to 20,000 jobs at the Viking project. As it develops, it is planned the Acorn site will link up with the former oil refinery at Grangemouth via more than 200 miles of pipelines. An existing 175 miles of gas pipes will be repurposed for this, with 35 miles of new pipeline also being built, allowing CO2 from the Grangemouth site to be transported to Acorn's storage facilities under the North Sea. The move is seen by many as being key in securing a future for the facility, where some 400 workers were recently made redundant. Speaking as he visited the site near Peterhead, Aberdeenshire, Mr Miliband said: 'This Government is putting its money where its mouth is and backing the trailblazing Acorn and Viking CCS projects. 'This will support industrial renewal in Scotland and the Humber with thousands of highly-skilled jobs at good wages to build Britain's clean energy future. Read More 'Carbon capture will make working people in Britain's hard-working communities better off, breathing new life into their towns and cities and reindustrialising the country through our Plan for Change.' Mr Miliband visited the site the day after Rachel Reeves promised funding for Acorn in her spending review – although the Chancellor did not put a figure on how much support would be given in her statement to MPs. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said afterwards: 'The £200 million funding confirmed for the Acorn carbon capture project will help to support the design and preparation as it continues to progress. 'This is about revitalising our industrial communities and creating long-term economic opportunities for Scottish workers.' Tim Stedman, chief executive of Storegga, the lead developer of Acorn, said: 'We warmly welcome the UK Government's support for the Acorn project and the commitment to development funding that will enable the critical work needed to reach final investment decision.' He added the 'milestone' is 'key not only for Acorn but for establishing Scotland's essential CCS infrastructure needed to grow and scale the UK's wider carbon capture and storage industry'. Mr Stedman continued: 'We look forward to working with Government in the months ahead to understand the details of today's commitment, and to ensure the policy, regulatory and funding frameworks are in place to build and grow a world-leading UK CCS sector.' Graeme Davies, executive vice-president at Harbour Energy, which is leading the Viking project, said the commitment in the spending review 'sends a strong signal' that the project is 'an infrastructure-led economic growth priority' for the Parliament. He added: 'We will work with Government on the critical steps needed to progress Viking CCS towards a final investment decision.' However climate campaigners at Friends of the Earth said the money should instead be invested in public transport, energy efficiency and measures to support oil workers to transition to jobs in the renewables sector. Caroline Rance, head of campaigns at Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: 'This is an enormous handout of supposedly scarce public money that will only directly benefit greedy oil and gas companies. 'Politicians are paying hundreds of millions to keep us locked into an unaffordable energy system which is reliant on fossil fuels and is destroying the climate. 'Carbon capture technology has 50 years of failure behind it, so businesses, workers and the public are being sold a lie about its role in their future. 'Building new fossil fuel infrastructure will undermine the energy transition and embolden oil firms to keep on drilling in the North Sea. 'Both the UK and Scottish governments should instead be backing climate solutions that can improve people's lives such as upgrading public transport, ensuring people live in warm homes and creating green jobs for the long-term.'
