Tourism Growth Roadmap Speech To Business Events Industry Aotearoa (BEIA)
Events like MEETINGS are so important for bringing incredible opportunities to our regions, building valuable connections with our offshore markets and strengthening our business events sector.
Minister for Tourism and Hospitality
Tēnā koutou katoa. Thank you for the warm welcome. It is my pleasure to welcome you all to MEETINGS 2025.
First, I would like to acknowledge Mayor Wayne Brown attending MEETINGS 2025 today and a special acknowledgment to Ngāti Whatua Orakei for their pōwhiri and welcome.
I would also like to recognise Tataki Auckland Unlimited and in particular the Auckland Convention Bureau for their dedication and hard work advocating for Auckland as a world-class visitor destination.
Last but not the least, I'd like to extend a heartfelt thank you to some incredible individuals who make events like this possible, a huge thank you again to BEIA Chief Executive Lisa Hopkins and Board Chair Martin Snedden.
Your leadership across the business events in New Zealand and creating such vibrant and energetic gatherings like MEETINGS 2025 are truly appreciated and make a difference to New Zealand.
To our local and international buyers, exhibitors and media – thank you for making the journey from around the world to join us in Auckland.
Events like MEETINGS are so important for bringing incredible opportunities to our regions, building valuable connections with our offshore markets and strengthening our business events sector.
There is no doubt that New Zealand's business events industry is on the rise – and that's thanks to the fantastic organisations and individuals like you in this room today.
You are the driving force behind a growing pipeline of high-value deals across sectors. These opportunities are helping boost productivity, support local communities, and grow our regions.
Together, we are putting New Zealand as a top place to do business – and the conversations and connections you make over the next few days will help us even further.
Events like this are a powerful reminder of what it takes to deliver world-class experiences – whether its state-of-the-art venues, exceptional food and catering, smooth logistics, or engaging content.
Beyond their direct economic benefits, business events connect us, foster new ideas and drive innovation across industries. I want to acknowledge the vital role you all play – not just as the professionals of tourism and hospitality, but as ambassadors of New Zealand.
Your commitment lay the foundation for successful events and help position our country as a world leader in the excellence we are known for.
Increasing tourism and creating a strong economy is a key focus for the next few years, and the economic contribution of the business events sector is a critical element to success.
Business events punch well above their weight in attracting high-value international conferences to our regions and main centres throughout the year, and MEETINGS is a prime example of this.
I hope you enjoy your Auckland experience and participate in the amazing visitor experience while you are here.
As Minister for Tourism and Hospitality, I have two priorities for the portfolio.
My first priority is to grow international tourism by both increasing the number of international visitors to New Zealand in the short term, and doubling the value of tourism exports by 2034.
My second priority is to grow the number of Kiwis in tourism and hospitality jobs which will further support our wider economic growth objectives.
Our business events sector plays a huge role in showcasing New Zealand as a progressive, entrepreneurial destination and will play a significant role in achieving our goal of doubling tourism exports.
Business event participants spend an average of $175 more per day than other visitors, and importantly, often visit in the off-peak period between March and November, boosting tourism and economic activity year-round. This is exactly why we are making positive changes to support its growth.
In April, alongside the Minister of Health and the Minister for Regulation, I was thrilled to announce a change to the Medicines Act. The change will allow for medicines to be advertised that have not yet been consented by Medsafe at medical conferences in New Zealand.
This shift removes a long-standing barrier and opens the door to hosting more international medical conferences and trade shows, unlocking an estimated $90 million in future revenue.
On top of that, we're continuously working to attract high-value incentive business to New Zealand. It's all part of our effort to make our country a go-to place for significant business events.
As part of my Tourism Boost package, I provided $3 million to Tourism New Zealand to make an additional 15-20 bids for business events in 2026 and beyond through its existing Conference Assistance Programme.
This investment has already supported Tourism New Zealand to win three bids valued at $7.5 million.
Our message is clear, New Zealand is open for business. We are looking forward to welcoming more business events and conferences to New Zealand and hosting them in our great facilities.
Tourism is our second largest export earner and a crucial component of our workforce, and we cannot understate the benefits it provides to our country.
We're committed to continue growing the sector, which is why today, I am announcing the launch of the Tourism Growth Roadmap. The Roadmap follows my recent Tourism Boost package and is the second step towards doubling our tourism export value by 2034.
The final Roadmap has been carefully developed based on the conversations I have had with industry leaders since taking over the portfolio and reflects what I've heard is important to you.
The first package of investment will continue to prioritise increasing international visitor volumes, with around 80 per cent of the investment going towards demand initiatives and 20 per cent towards supply initiatives.
I am also announcing a $35 million investment from the International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy to deliver the first stage of the Roadmap.
Yesterday, the Prime Minister and I announced $13.5 million in new funding to Tourism New Zealand to uplift marketing activity in our core markets of Australia, the United States and China.
This investment is expected to generate around $300 million in spending and deliver an extra 72,000 international visitors to our shores.
These are big numbers, but this is only part of the full $35 million package we're unveiling today.
I am also committing a further $6 million in new funding to uplift marketing activity in our emerging markets of India and Southeast Asia.
We know that Tourism New Zealand does an important job of marketing our country internationally, acting as the primary influence for approximately 14 per cent of international holiday visitors. I expect these investments to result in almost $360 million in incremental visitor spend in the economy.
As I have been saying today, I see the business events sector as an incredibly valuable visitor market for supporting tourism growth.
That is why I'm thrilled to announce I am committing an additional $3 million to Tourism New Zealand to boost business events attraction for a further year. This reinforces the important role that all of you play, and I am excited to see the positive outcomes from this investment.
I am also providing a $5 million boost for major events attraction. Major events drive economic benefits to New Zealand through international visitation and additional direct spend in the host region.
To complement these demand initiatives, I am investing in specific regional tourism infrastructure projects.
Last week, alongside Minister Potaka, I announced $4 million to improve visitor experiences along the Milford Road corridor. This investment is co-funded and will be delivered by the Department of Conservation.
As you all know, Milford Sound Piopiotahi is one of our most iconic destinations and a huge drawcard for international visitors. This investment will support improved visitor experiences, infrastructure and reduced congestion.
We have an enormous opportunity on our hands.
Tourism has the potential to become our biggest export earner – we've done it before, and I believe we can do it again. It will take significant effort from us all, and the industry is united with shared purpose, aspirations, and enthusiasm.
Achieving this will require action on the supply-side and I have asked my officials to begin a review of our tourism system to support this. This includes looking at issues surrounding our workforce:
data
infrastructure
funding
our regions and communities
aviation and cruise connectivity
and the overall visitor experience that we offer.
We're looking at what is working well and what do we need to change to ensure we are fit for the future.
The key to our success will be working together.
There is plenty of work to do and I am excited to continue working alongside the tourism and hospitality sector to build on the incredible foundations already in place.
Ladies and Gentlemen, the next few days are packed with opportunities.
New Zealand is open for business, and we welcome the opportunity to attract more business, exhibition and incentive travellers to New Zealand and grow our economy. Together, let's maximise the value tourism brings to our beautiful country!
Thank you again.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
4 hours ago
- Newsroom
‘Insulted' Wayne Brown and council tell Govt to stick its local government reform
'The cheek,' exclaimed Mayor Wayne Brown, as he led criticism of a Government bill that tells councils what they should focus on and how they should behave. 'The temerity.' Brown is not only angry at Wellington trying to force councils nationwide to act the same, he's irritated ministers don't recognise how distinct Auckland Council is from the rest, and boiling over at an attempt to impose a state-declared code of conduct. He's threatening to write a code of conduct and send it to Parliament to bring MPs' behaviour under control. Auckland councillors voted by a large, voice majority on Thursday to tell the coalition in a submission to Parliament that it cannot support the Local Government (Systems Improvement) Amendment Bill and doesn't need Beehive politicians telling Auckland what to do. The Government has given councils and others just four weeks to submit on the bill, despite it recasting local government's main focus, setting out 'core' services and eliminating 'four wellbeings' such as cultural, community and environmental priorities. It argues the rules are needed to make councils provide better core services of roads, rubbish and water and stop spending on nice-to-haves, thus limiting the chance of rates increases. Councils nationwide argue the real driver of high rates is the cost of infrastructure they are being forced to shoulder. As well as the 'core services' edict, the bill contains a range of changes including removing a requirement for six-yearly service delivery reviews, adding new principles on openness of information for elected councillors, and requiring councils to report on use of contractors. In Auckland, the strength of the pushback, from almost all political persuasions around the council table at a policy and planning committee meeting, was compelling. For the mayor and the policy committee chairman Richard Hills, who have worked hard to find ways of cooperation with Wellington, the bill has caused disappointment and frustration. There was much criticism of a coalition of political parties that had promised devolution and deregulation ending up attempting to regulate local government and take away its decision-making and flexibility. The committee passed a motion, inspired by the mayor's strong rejection of the bill, that read: 'The policy and planning committee oppose this bill as it does not adequately acknowledge that Auckland Council has special legislation that applies to Auckland Council and any new legislation that affects Auckland Council to this degree should be negotiated with us in partnership.' The partnership wording plays back to the Government its own reputed desire to have Auckland Council support its initiatives in housing, infrastructure and planning reforms – and in an upcoming City Regional Deal. Two councillors abstained, citing concerns about the current lack of definitions for the 'four wellbeings' in the Local Government Act and council policies. One, Maurice Williamson, backed the overall motion opposing the bill but voted against officials' proposed submissions on specific aspects. Retiring councillor Chris Darby renamed the proposed law the 'Local Government (Especially Auckland and its People) Neutering Bill because it neuters this council and its communities'. He said it was an insult it had got this far without proper consideration of the international city of Auckland and had been put together by 'Johnny-come-latelys that are so badly informed.' He defended the 'four wellbeings' as dynamic considerations that guided him in decision-making. 'There's a lot in this bill that is kicking mud in the face of not just this council but the people of Auckland.' Manukau councillor Lotu Fuli said the move was 'real overreach. We've said all term long we don't want Wellington to be running Auckland and this is an attempt to do that.' She argued 'core' council business was people and communities. 'It's what makes us human, our music, our dogs we keep at home … and therefore they are core to what we should do.' Wayne Brown took particular umbrage at Auckland's special status, with 30 percent of the population and its own special statute, being ignored by the one-size-fits-all approach to constrain councils nationwide. Worse, ministers had not consulted Auckland Council before introducing the bill in July with a deadline for public submissions by August 27. 'We are a product of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act and we are not like the others. 'For instance the standardised code of conduct: The problems of Gore are not the problems of Auckland. 'The very fact that a Government whose standard of behaviour inside their own thing is appalling should have the temerity to tell us about standards of behaviour is a bit rich,' Brown said. 'This is a third of New Zealand. We don't really need any of this actually. We'll decide what wellbeings for Aucklanders are. 'The whole point is that we are different… the cheek of them to suggest that we are going to do something by the 27th of August for a third of New Zealand without even coming to talk to us is a good enough reason for us to oppose the whole bloody thing.' He said right at the start of its submission Auckland Council should say: 'Where are you? How dare you post us a letter and tells us we've got to behave. It's insulting. I'm quite prepared to put in there that we'll form a group here for a code of conduct for their behaviour and send it down to them and see how they like it.' Another retiring councillor, Manurewa's Angela Dalton, said the bill was a 'one-size-fits-all. This is just so far away from localism it isn't funny.' She was mystified how central government came to think removing the 'four wellbeings' would lead to rate decreases or constraints on rate increases. 'There seems to be a view there's some mamby pamby stuff going on and we're all sitting around hugging each other.' Many things the council did were forced on it by other legislation. 'We have a role to be leaders for our city and our people. If that means giving a damn then we will give a damn. Because if we don't, central government won't be there. They're actually proving that at the moment. They are not there for our people. 'I just want to see the evidence, the data and the analysis that says the four wellbeings is costing us more.' Measures in the bill such as removing a requirement for councils to consider tikanga Māori in appointing council company directors were 'just appalling.' Dalton said she'd love to throw the bill back at the Government and say 'you've got to be kidding.' 'For a Government that is right into people being in control of their own destiny and removing regulation and rules, look what they're doing to the councils: 'This is what you will do and we are going to take this power off you.'' Councillor Julie Fairey said of the Government's moves: 'It's not supposed to be a parent-child relationship … It should not be the case we have this parent coming in over the top all the time.' Recalling repeated rejections of Auckland's advocacy for a bed night levy to fund development and destination functions, her message to Wellington was: 'If you are worried about rates, let central government give us some power to raise funds in some other ways.' Committee chair Hills noted all the accountability demands on councils that didn't apply to central government like having to consult for six months on annual budgets. 'And we have to provide a balanced budget every year, by statute. They don't have to do that. We do.' He defended the consideration of the four wellbeings as having highlighted and helped address issues like homelessness and public safety. 'It's annoying to have to get told how bad we are,' he said. 'I hope the Government can come back to us and look at a different model.' The council will submit against the overall bill, opposing specific measures on the grounds of unclear policy rationale, unclear definitions and risks that alternative paths to improve efficiency might be negated.
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Hotel operator in favour of bed nationwide bed levy if no alternative options found
Photo: 123RF A hotel operator says he is in favour of a nationwide bed levy, if no alternative revenue-generating options are found. It comes as Auckland's mayor Wayne Brown asked the government to reconsider its opposition to a bed night levy. Brown has long campaigned for a bed tax on visitors to help fund destination marketing and events. Chief operating officer of Sudima Hotels and Hind Management Les Morgan told Morning Report he supported a levy "if no other choice was given to us". "I think that's the starting point that we want to ensure that all sorts of other options for generating funding for these events is explored," he said. "We certainly want to be seen to be supportive. We want to be part of the architecture to ensure that it's designed correctly." Consultation on Auckland Council's annual plan, which included the proposal for a bed night visitor levy, received more than 13,000 pieces of feedback. Morgan said a levy would become too complicated if it was only introduced in Auckland. "We have something like 16 regional councils across New Zealand. If every council was to impose a different rate, how would that be. "If you journey down the country, would you face 5 percent in one town and 10 percent in the other. "A lot of us sell New Zealand Inc overseas. How are we to explain to a tourist that if arrive here you might pay a different tax?" Having the levy ringfenced for major events held in New Zealand made sense, Morgan said. "If you think of New Zealand collectively, there's an opportunity. Auckland alone can't raise enough funds, for instance, to attract a World Cup. But New Zealand can. "So if there was some framework within that where a percentage of the national pot was put aside to attract these major events, "I think that makes sense that we work together." However, he accepted there was some risk of adding further costs on overseas visitors. "I personally have just come back from a sales trip to China and the Chinese market are are very price sensitive at the moment and so are others. "Our visitors to our shores already face a lot of levies and taxes. They face the IVL at the border, potentially face visa costs, they face surcharges on the aeroplane tickets, they get here and pay GST. They play fuel tax like we do, alcohol tax like we do." "Tourism in New Zealand contributes something like $4.1 billion per annum in GST. So there is a lot of tax coming in. The risk is New Zealand is becomes more expensive." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Kerrin Leoni calls out Wayne Brown over cherrypicking candidate events
Wayne Brown and Kerrin Leoni. Photo: RNZ A contender for Auckland's mayoralty is accusing incumbent Mayor Wayne Brown of cherry-picking candidate events that skew towards an older demographic. RNZ reported this week that Mayor Wayne Brown had agreed to share the stage with Auckland councillor and mayoral candidate Kerrin Leoni at Grey Power North Shore's ' Let's Talk About Auckland ' event on 19 September. Facing the media on Thursday morning for the first time since she announced her fiscal plan , Leoni said it was not good enough that the event was the only time her and Brown were set to go head-to-head. "It's great that he has finally accepted to do something, but I'm really disappointed that he hasn't accepted any invitations for debates so far," she said. "There's a huge question as to why he's going with Grey Power. Is it because he's a 78-year-old man?" Leoni said Brown was avoiding debating her directly, by opting for Grey Power's event, where candidates would each give a 7-10-minute speech and partake in an audience Q&A. "It's an important part of the mayoral election for debates to go ahead and he's declined all of them to date. It's shocking for democracy in our city. How has he given anyone a chance to hear what his polices are?" Leoni said. "If he wins, it will be based on name recognition or because he's an incumbent and not anything else." She said Brown was also refusing to engage with young voters, after rejecting youth-focused debate requests. The University of Auckland Debating Society has confirmed their event is going ahead despite only Leoni responding to its invite . "If he [Wayne Brown] doesn't turn up that's bad luck for him. But I will definitely be there," she said. "Auckland Grammar is another one that had to be cancelled." Auckland Grammar School confirmed to RNZ it wanted to hold a mayoral debate this year but could not due to candidate availability. Grey Power North Shore president Trish Deans said North Shore residents were prepared to press the candidates on important issues affecting the whole city. "We aren't a soft option. Residents like us are polite, but come voting time we deliver a strong message to any candidate," Deans said. "Superannuants struggle with the cost of living and rates. Wayne and Kerrin will have to convince us that their way forward will work. We want to know that within 20 years, we're not going to last that long ourselves, that we've left something valuable behind. "We're not just a group that care about us, we care about Auckland." A spokesperson for Brown's campaign denied he was ignoring any age group. "Wayne is very focused on his job as Mayor and delivering for the people of Auckland," they said. "He engages with a very wide range of groups, ages and communities in that role. He is not focusing on seeking out debating competitions." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
