Engineers question Government target to decarbonise electricity sector by 2050
The Irish Academy of Engineering has highlighted what it called "the absence of a plan to deliver the 350 large energy infrastructure projects needed in the electricity sector".
The organisation has called for the development of sufficient liquified natural gas capacity to address the security of supply risk "identified continually" in the State's National Risk Assessment since 2014.
It said if targets of electrifying heating and transport by 2050 are to be met, the power requirement in Ireland will increase from 34 terawatt hours in 2024 to about 80 terawatt hours.
The organisation said this would require the completion of a programme of over 350 large energy infrastructure projects.
The organisation said: "Government has set a target to achieve a zero-emissions electricity system by 2050 - and accepted the imposition of enormous interim financial penalties by the EU if this objective is not achieved - without first understanding and demonstrating how it is feasible."
It said this had been done without estimating how much this would cost and what impact it would have "on the already high prices consumers pay for their electricity".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
3 hours ago
- The Journal
Debunked: Viral video of Trump berating the Irish government over immigration is fabricated
IN A VIDEO showing a White House press conference, Donald Trump railed against the Irish government, calling the Taoiseach and Tánaiste 'criminals' and 'evil'. That speech, however, never happened. The footage that appears to show the US president ranting about Simon Harris and Micheál Martin has been viewed tens of thousands of times on Facebook, despite being an AI-generated hoax. The actual footage comes from a recent announcement by Trump about an investment by the US electronics company Apple. However, in the fabricated version of the video, the audio has been switched out with what appears to be an AI-generated rant against immigration in Ireland. 'You who say Irish identity, sovereignty, and culture is backward,' Trump appears to say in the hoax video, before smiling toward Apple CEO Tim Cook, standing awkwardly next to him. 'I will punish, humiliate and belittle you, for your sick globalist and woke ideology, anti-Irish agenda'. The fabricated audio, which is filled with misinformation, goes on to depicts migrants as a threat to women and children and the Irish government as EU puppets. The speech, however, is fake. The footage is an exact match for a video posted by the US Public Affairs Network C-SPAN on 6 August, in which he announced that Apple had pledged to invest $100 Billion into America. Advertisement Trump also spoke on other issues, including insulting TV hosts such as Stephen Colbert, and saying news about the administration's handling of the Epstein situation was a 'hoax'. He did not, however, address Simon Harris or Micheál Martin, or talk about immigration in Ireland during that press conference. The audio in the fabricated video appears to be generated by Artificial Intelligence software. While the accent of the speaker is American, and the tone of the voice is not unlike Trump's, it does not sound like him. The rhythm of the speech is unnatural, and sentences are broken up in odd ways that don't make sense, possibly in an attempt to keep the audio in sync with Trump's mouth movements in the video. However, despite these flaws, the video appears to have duped many people. 'Never thought I would agree with him but in this case I do', says one comment with more than 200 likes, posted under a Facebook video. A reply saying 'that's fake AI' garnered only five emoji responses. Other posts disagreed with the message in the video, but also seemed to be convinced that the footage itself was real. 'He should talk about crime,' one comment read. 'He's the biggest criminal in history.' That version of the fabricated video has been viewed more than 72,000 times since being posted to Facebook on 10 August. Want to be your own fact-checker? Visit our brand-new FactCheck Knowledge Bank for guides and toolkits The Journal's FactCheck is a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network's Code of Principles. You can read it here . For information on how FactCheck works, what the verdicts mean, and how you can take part, check out our Reader's Guide here . You can read about the team of editors and reporters who work on the factchecks here . Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... It is vital that we surface facts from noise. Articles like this one brings you clarity, transparency and balance so you can make well-informed decisions. We set up FactCheck in 2016 to proactively expose false or misleading information, but to continue to deliver on this mission we need your support. Over 5,000 readers like you support us. If you can, please consider setting up a monthly payment or making a once-off donation to keep news free to everyone. Learn More Support The Journal
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Ceasefire, sanctions avoided in win-win summit for Putin
The summit was a win-win for Russian President Vladimir Putin. Not only has he managed to avoid US sanctions being imposed on Russia and secondary tariffs on its trading partners, as US President Donald Trump had threatened only a week ago, it now appears that he has convinced the US President that a ceasefire is not necessary to end the war in Ukraine. Mr Trump's latest comment on Truth Social said it all: "The best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement." Going straight to a peace agreement jettisons, what has been until now, a shared US, Ukrainian and European policy that a ceasefire must be agreed first before any substantial peace talks take place on the key issue of occupied territory. Russia opposed US ceasefire proposals in March and April so the logical conclusion is that Mr Putin convinced Mr Trump during their three-hour meeting to drop the idea of a ceasefire. We can expect Mr Trump to place pressure on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to agree to entering peace talks soon when they meet in Washington on Monday. Only last Tuesday all EU member states except Hungary endorsed a statement that only "meaningful negotiations" can take place "in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities". The UK shares the same position. Mr Trump's 180-degree turn will cause unease in Europe but it is hard to see how European leaders can now bring the conversation back to the need to first establish a ceasefire. Mr Putin also managed to make the summit more about US-Russia relations and shared business opportunities, rather than Ukraine. Yesterday's press conference in Alaska lasted all of 12 minutes and journalists were granted no questions. Mr Putin spoke for nine of those minutes, and delivered a rambling historical narrative about Alaska's Russian heritage and US-Russian cooperation during World War II. No one had come to hear that. When he did briefly mention, what he termed, "the situation around Ukraine", he stuck to his familiar script. "We need to eliminate all the primary roots, the primary causes of that conflict, and we've said it multiple times," he said. So Mr Trump's promise on Thursday to enact "very severe consequences" on Russia if it did not agree to a ceasefire during the Alaska meeting has come to nothing. Instead, Russia's leader has come away from the summit with a commitment to go straight to peace talks and that does not bode well for Ukraine.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Budget 2026: put the focus on what is important
Over the next couple of weeks, as the Autumn political season starts to kick in, debate on October's budget will get underway in earnest. As ever, there will be a cacophony of demands from interest groups and lobbyists, looking for more spending or lower taxes for their particular cause. The job of the Government, of course, is to look through the noise to what is important. Despite the generous amount of €9.4 billion set aside for budget measures, this will not be easy. Money will be quickly eaten up through spending pressures in providing State services. Plans to hike vital investment expenditure need to be allowed for. And the demands on the table already would take up the €1.5 billion set aside for tax reductions a few times over. Yet while the choices will be sharp in some areas, context is needed. This is not shaping up to be a 'tough' budget. The promised package is still nearly three times the size of the last pre-Covid budget in 2019. The first job of the Government, indeed, is to start returning annual budgets to more sustainable levels, reducing them from the huge spending rises required during Covid-19 and to tackle the cost-of-living crisis. Claims that households are still squeezed need to be met in two ways. One is by appropriate increases in welfare and other support packages. The other is by continuing to improve the provision of services in areas such as health, education and childcare. These are much more effective in the longer-term than another round of universal cash supports. But by engaging in a blatant pre-election manoeuvre last year to repeat these 'once-off' supports again, Ministers have created a rod for their own back this time around. READ MORE Statements from Ministers that there would be no cost-of-living package this time appear to have become more equivocal in recent weeks. But giving a lot of money out again through these payments to all households is an inefficient use of State cash. If the Government does not bring this process to an end in the first budget of its new term, then – barring a big squeeze on the State finances – it never will. The plan to increase vital State investment is a key reason why there needs to be some restraint elsewhere. Realistic budgeting for the provision of State services also needs to be restored, ending the annual overruns in areas like health. Relying on corporate tax to keep outperforming as a way to pay for spending coming in ahead of target each year is not a good strategy. The other reason for caution is the uncertainty faced due to the policies of Donald Trump. Despite the trade deal between the EU and US, the economic and political backdrop for Ireland remains risky and unpredictable. Having cash in reserve and pursuing a strategic approach have seldom looked more important.
