Motorbike-riding ‘goons' attack Kenya protesters
Protesters demanding justice for a man who died in police custody were beaten by mobs armed with whips while police stood by in central Nairobi.
Demonstrators react near a burning motorbike during a protes in Nairobi on June 17, 2025. Hundreds of men armed with whips and clubs attacked groups of protesters in Kenya on Tuesday as they demonstrated against the recent killing of a man in police custody, AFP journalists saw. Tensions have risen as the east African country approaches the first anniversary of massive Gen Z-led protests sparked by tax rises, which the government has been desperate to avoid this year. (Photo by SIMON MAINA / AFP)
Hundreds of men armed with whips and clubs attacked protesters in Kenya on Tuesday as they demonstrated against the recent killing of a man in police custody, AFP journalists saw.
Tensions have risen as the east African country approaches the first anniversary of massive Gen Z-led protests sparked by tax rises, which the government has been desperate to avoid this year.
A more cautious finance bill means protests have been limited this year, but people have come back to the streets over the death of 31-year-old teacher Albert Ojwang in police custody earlier this month.
Protest over death of teacher in police custody
In central Nairobi, the epicentre of last year's demonstrations, small groups of protesters gathered peacefully, calling for an end to police brutality and the resignation of a senior officer they blame for the death.
But a mob of men on motorbikes, known in Kenya as 'goons', arrived soon after, armed with whips and clubs, said AFP journalists at the scene.
'The goons attacked us. They cornered us and beat us with whips and the police were just watching them do it,' Hanifa Adan, one of the leading voices from last year's demonstrations, told AFP.
ALSO READ: Kenyan author and literary giant Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o dies
Shop owners hastily closed their stores as AFP witnessed police officers firing tear gas into the crowds.
One armed man told AFP he had been hired by the Nairobi governor's office, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
'They told us that we are coming to protect the shops, I didn't know it would turn out like this,' said the man, who was carrying a club, adding that he was paid 1,000 shillings (around $8) and 'just wanted the money'.
Kenya has history of politicians using armed mobs
Kenya has a history of politicians using armed mobs.
Earlier this year, President William Ruto was accused of paying 'goons' to follow his cavalcade around a tour of Nairobi to prevent protests.
Ruto adamantly denied paying any mobs after the tour descended into widespread violence and robberies against bystanders and had to be cut short.
ALSO READ: Kenyan court extends investigation into four filmmakers arrested for BBC documentary
'We are turning into a lawless country,' Ndungi Githuku, of civil rights group Kongamano La Mapinduzi, told AFP at Tuesday's protest.
'We see hundreds of paid goons, with whips and weapons, crude weapons, coming to brutalise our people,' he said.
A helicopter could be seen hovering over the central business district.
Last year's protests
'There are many people on boda bodas (motorbikes) who have infiltrated the peaceful demonstrations,' motorbike driver Rashid, who asked not to give his full name, told AFP.
Last year's protests peaked when thousands stormed parliament on June 25 where lawmakers were debating the unpopular finance bill.
Rights groups say at least 60 people were killed during the protests in June and July 2024, and dozens more were illegally detained by security forces in the aftermath.
NOW READ: 2024 recap: The five most significant protests around the world
– By: © Agence France-Presse
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
an hour ago
- eNCA
UK MPs eye decriminalising abortion for all cases
LONDON - UK MPs are expected to vote Tuesday on an overhaul of abortion laws in England and Wales which would end contentious prosecutions of women for terminating a pregnancy. Currently, a woman can face criminal charges for choosing to end a pregnancy after 24 weeks or without the approval of two doctors, under laws which technically still carry a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The issue has gained attention in the UK due to recent court cases. In one a woman was cleared by a jury at trial, while another was released from prison on appeal. A proposal put forward by Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi seeks to change the law to ensure that no woman would be committing an offence by terminating her own pregnancy at any time. "Women are currently being arrested from hospital bed to police cell and facing criminal investigations on suspicion of ending their own pregnancy," Antoniazzi told AFP. "My amendment would put a stop to this," she said, adding it was "the right amendment at the right time". Abortion in England and Wales is a criminal offence under the Offences Against the Person Act, passed in 1861 during the Victorian age and which carries carrying a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The Abortion Act 1967 made terminations legal in certain circumstances, including by permitting it up to 23 weeks and six days of gestation if done by an authorised provider. Abortions are allowed in limited circumstances after this time, such as if the mother's life is in danger or there is a "substantial risk" the child could be born with a serious disability. An update to the law introduced during the Covid-19 pandemic allows women to take abortion pills at home up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy. In May, Nicola Packer was acquitted after taking prescribed abortion medicine when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks for taking such medication at home. The 45-year-old told jurors during her trial, which came after a four-year police investigation, that she did not realise she had been pregnant for so long. "It was horrendous giving evidence, absolutely awful," she told The Guardian newspaper last month. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children has however called the proposed amendment "the greatest threat to unborn babies in decades". - 'Optimistic' - Antoniazzi's amendment would not change any of the laws regarding the provision of abortion services, including the time limits. And anyone assisting a woman in getting an abortion outside the remits of the law, such as medical practitioners, would still be liable for prosecution. Some 50 organisations, including abortion providers, medical colleges, and women's rights groups, have backed the amendment. They say six women have appeared in court in England charged with ending or attempting to end their own pregnancy outside abortion law in the last three years. Carla Foster was jailed in 2023 for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant. The Court of Appeal eventually suspended her sentence. Antoniazzi said police have investigated "more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortion in the last five years including women who've suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths". "This is just wrong. It's a waste of taxpayers money, it's a waste of the judiciary's time, and it's not in the public interest," she told the BBC Tuesday. Some 180 MPs in the 650-seat parliament have publicly backed the change. It "has widespread support from MPs across the political spectrum and I am optimistic the Commons will support it," said Antoniazzi. Lawmakers will have a free vote, meaning they can decide based on their views, not what their party tells them. Northern Ireland decriminalised abortion for women in 2019. Scotland is currently reviewing its abortion laws.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Escalation or diplomacy? Outcome of Iran-Israel conflict uncertain
Smoke plumes arise from the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) corporation building in the north of Tehran after it was hit by an overnight Israeli strike. Image: AFP Israel has inflicted damage on strategic sites and killed key figures within Iran's military leadership during five days of aerial attacks that showed no sign of abating Tuesday, but whose ultimate outcome is unclear, analysts say. Israel says its offensive aims to eliminate Iran's nuclear programme and ballistic missile production capabilities. The Israeli government has not ruled out triggering a wholesale removal of the clerical system set up after the 1979 Islamic Revolution that has remained implacably opposed to Israel's existence. Yet even if Israel succeeds in ousting Ayatollah Ali Khamenei or killing him, the supreme leader will not necessarily be replaced by more moderate forces and the risk exists of further escalation, analysts warn. Diplomacy, meanwhile, remains at a standstill as Israel pounds Iranian targets and Iran hits back with its own strikes on its foe, heightening fears of a wider and prolonged conflict. 'Existential' crisis In television interviews, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has not ruled out killing Khamenei, although a US official said President Donald Trump had vetoed assassinating the supreme leader. Israel, whose intelligence service is widely acknowledged to have deeply penetrated Iran, has killed a host of key figures including the head of the Revolutionary Guards and armed forces in a huge blow. "This is existential, the most profound of all the crises the Islamic republic has faced," said Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa programme at the London-based Chatham House think tank. "This is designed to decapitate the leadership of the Islamic republic and degrade the nuclear and broader capabilities of the regime," she said. Rather than an immediate turnaround, what could result is "an unravelling over time" with the Israeli action putting an "accelerant" on a process of change already happening within Iran due to dissatisfaction with the authorities, she said. For Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Non-proliferation Program at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, Israel's military operation "is about regime change and not eliminating the nuclear programme". "If the regime falls, then it will be an enormous success," he said of the operation Israel dubbed "Rising Lion" -- a likely reference to the beast which adorned the pre-revolutionary Iranian flag. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Proxies Even in the event of a change in leadership, Gregory Brew, senior analyst for Iran and energy at risk analysis firm Eurasia Group, said Khamenei could be replaced with a figure who may be even more hardline and pose a greater danger to Israel in the conflict's aftermath. "Kill Khamenei, make him a martyr to the hardliners and empower a new supreme leader who may be much less risk averse. Or leave him to die or resign in likely disgrace after the war, his credibility in ruins. Which move produces a government better suited to Israel's interests?" Brew said. Iran's ability to cause regional mayhem through its proxies Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Gaza Strip has been severely degraded by Israeli operations since October 2023. But Tehran still backs the Huthi rebels in Yemen who have attacked Gulf shipping, while Iran can strike energy facilities or undertake cyberattacks. "It remains to be seen if Iran will seek to engage in grey zone activities, including cyberattacks," said analysts at US-based think tank Soufan Center. Nuclear diplomacy Israel's air strikes have put an end, for now, to the latest track of talks seeking to end the standoff over the Iranian nuclear programme, which the West and Israel fear is aimed at making the atomic bomb. Analysts say the future of any diplomatic progress lies with the United States and Trump, who has so far resisted Israeli pressure to become directly involved in the conflict. "Netanyahu's goal is to bring Trump into the war," said David Khalfa, co-founder of the Atlantic Middle East Forum think tank. "But I think he will stand back and let Israel continue to weaken Iran to force it to negotiate" with the Islamic Republic in a weaker position, Khalfa said. Israel has hit the Natanz nuclear site during its attacks, but has not been able to strike the Fordo enrichment facility, which is located deep underground. Analysts believe Israel could only damage it with the help of American bunker-busting bombs. Ali Vaez, Iran analyst at the International Crisis Group, argued in an article for Foreign Affairs that Israel would be unable to wipe out the Iranian nuclear programme even in a prolonged conflict. "A diplomatic settlement represents the best and most sustainable way for Trump to avoid both a nuclear Iran and a protracted military entanglement," Vaez said. AFP
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Xenophobia is an attack on democratic life and must be stopped (Part 1)
To voice xenophobic statements and behaviour, as Gayton McKenzie has done, is to spit on the freedom of all South Africans, because freedom is universal. Excluding some means we do not have freedom. (Part one of a two-part series on xenophobia and democracy.) Gayton McKenzie's recent xenophobic statements have evoked some concern among political commentators and sections of the public. He is reported to have said that 'some of you here (have) the audacity to hire foreigners instead of South Africans'; 'I don't care how you used to do it. But for as long as I am the minister, there will be no foreigner that will work in an entity while a South African can do the same thing.'; and 'foreigners' employed by government departments needed to be 'out in three weeks… I said it, I want them out, get them out'. His utterances are not surprising since he has made similar public remarks before, and then, as now, there's been no remark from other members of the Government of National Unity (GNU) or the president himself. McKenzie, the leader of the Patriotic Alliance and Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture in the GNU, repeatedly enters this terrain — without facing consequences. We need to be clear why it is wrong to scapegoat poor people from other countries in the Global South. It's important to understand why we should be concerned as patriots and believers in democracy, not simply to remove McKenzie from the Cabinet and other individual expressions of displeasure. One of the reasons we should be concerned goes to the basis of freedom in South Africa, that the country, in the words of the Freedom Charter a nd the 1996 Constitution, belongs to all who live in it. That was first expressed in the Freedom Charter in 1955, and the charter was completely at odds with the notion of citizenship that came to be applied under apartheid South Africa. Then, all black people — and African people particularly — were denationalised and told, in the case of Africans, that their nationhood would be realised in the Bantustans, demarcated for African occupation and 'self-determination'. In post-apartheid South Africa, the emphasis on active and free citizens has itself contributed to denationalisation in that there is — in this discourse — no place allotted for people who have full rights as foreign nationals to participate in the South African body politic without being citizens. It was surprisingly part of the discourse of former UDF leaders when they celebrated the 40th anniversary of the front in 2023. (See here and here). We have to remedy this slippage and ensure the full rights of migrants to be present here, subject to them having relevant papers and not being without these due to the delay of Department of Home Affairs officials. If one says that freedom and liberties are allotted purely to those who have South African citizenship, you are running against the key principles of South African freedom which did not distinguish between the liberties of those who are citizens by virtue of birth in South Africa, and those who acquired rights to freedom in this country through other means. The notion of freedom advanced in South Africa derives from universalism, a desire to bring all people under its banner. This is not to say that there are not any rights allotted purely to citizens, but it is important that we put that in the context of South Africa belonging to all who live in this country. Hurtful attacks Freedom belongs to all, obviously — it is not freedom when some people are excluded. We must find the modalities for working this out in a way that does not repeatedly create hurtful attacks on foreign nationals, as with the poisonous food allegedly emanating from some of the spaza shops run by foreign nationals. When one examines the evidence, it's clear that a lower threshold is applied in making a claim of criminality against people who are foreign nationals. That lack of basic respect must end. It is important that we do not restrict our commentary on Gayton McKenzie's statements to whether or not he should remain a member of the Cabinet. McKenzie might be removed from the Cabinet, although it seems unlikely in the light of the low weight that is placed on xenophobic statements. But the problem of xenophobia remains. It will continue to be a serious question in that there is no clarity as to why or whether xenophobia is wrong, or whether we are confronted by xenophobic incidents in South Africa. It's important that we have people grow up in a country that does not condone any statements that are part of racism, and which does not require that the victim should be a citizen. There are certain values, mainly in regard to apartheid manifestations, but it does not seem to be a recognised moral question in people's minds to see xenophobia as serious wrongdoing. That must be remedied, because to voice xenophobic statements and behaviour is to spit on the freedom of all South Africans because, as mentioned earlier, freedom is universal. Excluding some means we do not have freedom. Naming Consequently, while the remedying of the question of xenophobia can be treated separately, it may be that it will not start to happen until the democratic foundations of the country are restored more generally. Commentary on xenophobia is inhibited by the hypersensitivity of ANC politicians who insist, as many autocrats have done in the past, on demanding that xenophobia is not called by that name. For example, then Police minister Nathi Mthethwa on 15 July 2010 said 'there is no such systematic thing as xenophobia in the country' and that violence against foreign nationals was perpetrated by 'criminal elements'. Just prior to this, the South African Communist Party stated that 'these are not xenophobic attacks… but acts of criminality'. It is simply crime in some cases, but generally there is a simple failure to treat xenophobia as a hate crime or other form of criminality. Feminists such as Adrienne Rich and African-American writers like James Baldwin have recognised the power of naming more generally, the name having a crucial impact on how a struggle or other phenomena are understood. Liberation movements were called terrorists by their opponents, and much of the discourse of the ANC and other liberation movements demanded that they be called by their name, freedom fighters, or alternatively a more neutral term like insurgents or armed militants. The power of naming is important for any attempt to combat xenophobia to succeed, because of statements to the media and other anti-xenophobic agencies by government spokespersons after xenophobic attacks not to call them xenophobia, but instead to call them 'crimes'. Such instructions are made aggressively, one suspects because the publicity is bad. McKenzie's threats against civil society and those fighting xenophobia are threats against our democracy. In a recent interview with The Africa Report, he said 'I will get rid of illegal foreigners. I will close this type of charity because we need patriotic charities in our country. I will close down the charities that are anti-government, that are anti-South African.' When asked if that included the Ahmed Kathrada Foundation, he said: 'I've never heard them speak about the poorest of the poor not having jobs. They must go to hell. I said it. They should go. They are a disgrace to the memory of Ahmed Kathrada.' We need to assert that in actions against xenophobia, we are in fact claiming our rights as heirs to South African freedom, as heirs to constitutionalism, the foundational values of the new democratic South Africa. These are being buried every year, and this very silence that we are now experiencing after the new xenophobic utterances of McKenzie is more important than the name 'Gayton McKenzie'. It has great importance as a claiming of democratic life and values in South Africa. Combating xenophobia in the rest of the world The question of xenophobia and combating it is in this context one of the true claims of fidelity to non-racialism, to tolerance and internationalism in South Africa. Beyond South Africa, both the late Pope Francis and the new Pope Leo XV have aligned themselves with anti-xenophobic forces and preached mutual respect. Pope Leo, from his earliest statements in masses and other occasions has taken up similar themes to Francis. At the same time, as both the Popes came to spread a message of peace and mutual respect, Donald Trump was elected to the US presidency for the second time with xenophobia at the centre of his message, as it had been in his previous presidency. We have had two contrasting examples in the world today at the level of world leaders, that of the Popes and that of Donald Trump. Obviously, there are other lesser figures who are making their marks in either of these directions or somewhere in between. South Africans, whatever their source of ethics, need to carefully consider the commentaries of faith-based organisations and others who have intervened on humanistic grounds. DM
