Only one in three women fleeing domestic abuse can be helped by refuges as services on ‘brink of collapse'
Only one in three women fleeing domestic abuse can be helped by refuges, the chief executive of Women's Aid has said, warning that the sector's services are on the brink of collapse.
Giving evidence to the Commons Public Accounts Committee, Farah Nazeer warned that she has seen more services close – or sit on the brink of closure – in the last 7 months than she has in the previous four years.
'We are in a real state of crisis and we are now at a point where we have a 65 per cent refusal rate into refuges, and a 50 per cent refusal rate into community based services', she said.
'You have survivors desperate to access services, and people don't go to services as a first resort, they go as a last resort - so they are at a point of crisis generally and [these services] are saying no.
'So, in the current equation, we have no way of even beginning to address this issue.'
The warnings come after construction began on two safe houses for survivors of domestic abuse and their children, which are being built as a result of The Independent's hugely successful Brick by Brick campaign.
The campaign, in partnership with Refuge, raised more than £500,000 in total and the two safe houses are expected to be completed by spring.
Explaining the problem facing services, Ms Nazeer said: 'Demand is as high as it ever was. Demand has become more complex since Covid - people have lived in circumstances that are very challenging for longer period of times.'
Meanwhile, funding has become more volatile, meaning that services are 'haemorrhaging very experienced staff', she said.
Giving evidence alongside Ms Nazeer, Nicole Jacobs, the domestic abuse commissioner for England and Wales, warned that 'we haven't touched the sides of what we need to do' when it comes to tackling violence against women and girls.
While Ms Jacobs said she doesn't want to ignore the 'strides that have been made' in this area, she added: 'The fact is, we still have some very chronic fundamental problems that have been left unaddressed.'
The deep concerns come as Lib Dem home affairs spokesman Josh Babarinde continued to push for a new law specifically making domestic abuse a crime.
Currently domestic abuse is only covered by other crimes, such as assault or grievous bodily harm.
Mr Babarinde used an adjournment speech in parliament to push for a specific law to be created as part of the Crime and Policing Bill going through parliament.
It comes after ministers admitted they have no idea how many people guilty of domestic abuse are in Britain's jails. A number were allowed out early as a result of measures taken to tackle overcrowding.
Mr Babarinde told The Independent: 'It is extraordinary that it is impossible to say how many people in prison are guilty of domestic abuse. How on earth can the government commit to halving violence against women and girls over the next decade (a very good aim) if the MoJ isn't even measuring domestic abuse?
'And how can we know what interventions are successful at reducing reoffending among domestic abusers if the government is not able to measure their reoffending rate? It is a scandal.'
The government has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
UK households rush to 'hold physical cash' as warning issued to millions
Households are seeking a safety net in time of global volatility, according to the Bank of England's chief cashier UK households have been issued a warning to "hoard physical cash" as Brits scramble to respond amidst economic uncertainty and fear of shortages. According to the Bank of England's chief cashier, households are seeking a safety net during this period of global volatility. Victoria Cleland stated on Tuesday that UK households were creating a cash contingency fund, similar to their actions during the Covid and cost of living crises. She noted that the Bank had observed a significant rise in the number of banknotes in circulation in recent months. "At a time of uncertainty, at a time of crisis, people do move to cash. They want to make sure they have literally got something under the mattress," said Ms Cleland. "Even in the UK, there will be times where networks are down and you can only be paying in cash." Cleland mentioned that consumers want cash "to be there but they're not necessarily using it". Last year, Ron Delnevo, chair of the Payment Choice Alliance, which advocates for the long-term future of cash services, declared it was "completely unacceptable" that some shops were refusing cash. "The vast majority of the public want cash to be honoured as a payment," he stated. "These businesses are letting down the public." Kate Osborne, the Labour Party MP for Jarrow and Gateshead East, who has signed the early day motion, expressed: "It is a fundamental right that people should be able to use cash as a legal tender. "When you are trying to budget, particularly if you are on a low income, cash is a simple way of doing it. I understand that many people are not using cash much of the time, but there should be choice for all. "We are seeing more and more retailers offering card-only payments, and it causes problems in constituencies like mine where we've got a high number of people who are digitally excluded or may choose not to do electronic banking." The Bank of England has suggested that in the coming years, alternative digital payment methods will likely become increasingly accepted and utilised, reports Birmingham Live. In 2017, debit cards surpassed cash as the most frequently used payment method in the UK.
Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
Why millions in the UK are stashing cash ‘under the mattress' again
Why millions in the UK are stashing cash 'under the mattress' again There is more cash than normal in circulation right now according to the Bank of England and this is the reason why People are said to be hoarding cash in the UK (Image: PA ) Households across the UK are said to have been hoarding physical cash amidst escalating economic uncertainty and worries over power outages. The Bank of England's chief cashier, Victoria Cleland, has observed a surge in people creating a financial buffer, just as they did during the Covid and cost-of-living crises. She revealed that there had been a noticeable climb in the amount of banknotes in circulation recently. She said: "At a time of uncertainty, at a time of crisis, people do move to cash. They want to make sure they have literally got something under the mattress." Cleland pointed out that even in the UK, there could be situations where payment networks failed, and cash was the only solution. Nevertheless, Cleland noted that while consumers desired the availability of cash, it was not always actively used by them. Payment methods other than cash are likely to be used more over the years, according to the Bank of England (Image: KALA STUDIO via Getty Images ) "Even in the UK, there will be times where networks are down and you can only be paying in cash," said Cleland, adding that people wanted cash "to be there but they're not necessarily using it". For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here Article continues below Last year Ron Delnevo, chair of the Payment Choice Alliance, a campaign group that works for the long-term future of cash services, was critical of retailers refusing cash payments, reports Birmingham Live. Delnevo said it was "completely unacceptable" that certain stores were rejecting cash. "The vast majority of the public want cash to be honoured as a payment," he declared. "These businesses are letting down the public." Labour MP for Jarrow and Gateshead East, Kate Osborne, who backed an early day motion, emphasised: "It is a fundamental right that people should be able to use cash as a legal tender. "When you are trying to budget, particularly if you are on a low income, cash is a simple way of doing it. "I understand that many people are not using cash much of the time, but there should be choice for all. "We are seeing more and more retailers offering card-only payments, and it causes problems in constituencies like mine where we've got a high number of people who are digitally excluded or may choose not to do electronic banking." In the coming years, the Bank of England has suggested that alternative digital payment methods will likely become increasingly accepted and utilised. Indeed, as early as 2017, debit cards surpassed cash as the most frequently used payment method in the UK. Article continues below
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Reeves rules out disability benefit cuts U-turn but says rules may be tweaked
Rachel Reeves has ruled out a U-turn on disability benefit cuts but said she was 'taking into account' representations from Labour MPs, and could tweak the rules to qualify for the benefits. The chancellor argued that 'the welfare system is not working today' and the changes the government was making were needed because 1,000 people a day were newly claiming disability benefits. Reeves said the spending plans she set out on Wednesday were all fully costed, but refused to rule out further tax rises in the budget this autumn in an 'uncertain world'. Pressed on whether she would change her mind on disability benefit cuts, she said: 'No, we're not going to be changing that. It is important that we reform the way the welfare state works, so that there is a welfare state there for people.' 'We are the only developed country where the number of people in the labour market is lower than it was before Covid, the number of economically inactive people of working age is rising.' But the chancellor indicated that ministers could review the changes they were planning to make to the rules for qualifying for personal independence payments (Pips). Reeves told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: 'We are reviewing the criteria to get Pips and of course we'll take into account those representations. We've already announced that we are reviewing the criteria for accessing personal independence payments. 'Even with these changes we will substantially be increasing the amount of money we are paying in sickness and disability benefits during the course of this parliament.' In March, Labour announced plans to save £5bn a year by overhauling the welfare system, including by cutting personal independence payments for disabled people. The proposals triggered alarm among Labour MPs, and ministers have been considering tweaks before a vote expected later this month. Under the government's planned changes, claimants would not qualify for Pips unless they scored a minimum of four points on a single daily living activity. Assessments score the difficulty from 0 to 12 that claimants face in a range of living activities such as preparing and eating food, communicating, washing and getting dressed. Reeves also indicated that the government was open to lifting the two-child benefit cap, saying that it was among 'a range of ways in which we can lift children out of poverty'. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Speaking the morning after the spending review, Reeves denied the characterisation that she was a 'Klarna chancellor' who was setting out plans to 'buy now, pay later'. 'I don't accept that at all. The idea that yesterday I racked up a bill that I'm going to need to pay for in the future, that's just not right. Last year, I had to increase taxes. I have now allocated that money in the spending review on health, security and economic growth, but everything yesterday was fully costed and fully funded from the budget last year.' Reeves said none of the plans she outlined on Wednesday would require tax rises. However, she repeatedly refused to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget and insisted that 'the world is very uncertain at the moment'. 'I think it would be very risky for a chancellor to try and write future budgets in a world as uncertain as ours,' she told LBC. But she added: 'I won't have to repeat a budget like the one that I did last year.' Pressed on whether the government's spending plans assumed that councils would raise council tax by 5%, Reeves said this was a cap set by the Conservatives and that councils could choose to raise tax by less.
