Apple watchOS 26 Put to the Test: Is Workout Buddy a Game Changer?
Watch this video on YouTube. Workout Buddy: Personalized AI for Fitness Enthusiasts
The AI-powered Workout Buddy stands out as the flagship feature of WatchOS 26. Using artificial intelligence, this tool analyzes your performance metrics to deliver tailored feedback and motivational prompts. Whether you're aiming to improve your endurance, strength, or overall fitness, Workout Buddy adapts to your goals, offering a personalized coaching experience. Users can even customize the voice feedback to suit their preferences, adding a layer of personalization to their workouts.
However, the feature comes with certain limitations. Workout Buddy requires constant internet connectivity, an iPhone 15 Pro or newer, and headphones to function optimally. Its reliance on cloud-based AI processing introduces potential issues, such as occasional inaccuracies in activity tracking or fabricated metrics, often referred to as 'AI hallucinations.' These inaccuracies can be particularly frustrating for users who rely on precise data for structured training. Additionally, the dependency on connectivity makes the feature less practical for outdoor enthusiasts or those in areas with limited internet access. Revamped Workout Interface: Streamlined but Imperfect
The workout interface in WatchOS 26 has been redesigned to improve usability and simplify navigation. Settings are now categorized into four distinct sections: Data metrics and views
Structured workouts and goals
Dynamic music playlists
Voice alerts, including Workout Buddy feedback
This reorganization aims to reduce setup time, allowing users to focus on their exercise routines. The new layout is particularly beneficial for those who frequently adjust their workout parameters, as it consolidates key settings into an intuitive structure.
Despite these improvements, the interface is not without its flaws. Navigating through options can feel cumbersome, especially during high-intensity workouts when quick adjustments are necessary. The lack of a more responsive or gesture-based control system limits the practicality of these changes. While the redesign represents progress, it may require additional refinements to fully meet the diverse needs of Apple Watch users. Liquid Glass UI: Subtle Visual Enhancements
The liquid glass UI introduces subtle aesthetic changes to WatchOS 26, most notably on the pin unlock screen. This design update enhances the visual appeal of the Apple Watch, offering a sleek and modern look. However, the impact of this feature is limited by the small screen size and processing constraints of the device. For most users, the liquid glass UI will likely go unnoticed during daily use, serving more as a minor cosmetic upgrade than a functional improvement. Expanded Productivity Features and System Updates
In addition to fitness-focused updates, WatchOS 26 brings new productivity tools to the Apple Watch. The inclusion of the Notes app allows users to create and sync notes directly from their wrist. This feature is particularly useful for jotting down quick reminders or ideas on the go. However, the app's lack of editing capabilities restricts its utility for more complex tasks, such as organizing detailed lists or revising existing notes.
Other system updates include minor tweaks to notifications and settings, aimed at improving overall convenience. For example, notifications are now more context-aware, providing smarter suggestions based on your activity. While these changes enhance the user experience, they are incremental rather than fantastic, offering small but meaningful improvements to daily interactions with the device. Challenges and Opportunities for Future Development
While WatchOS 26 introduces several promising features, it also highlights key challenges that Apple must address in future updates. The reliance on constant connectivity for features like Workout Buddy limits their usability in offline or remote environments. This is a significant drawback for users who frequently engage in outdoor activities or live in areas with inconsistent internet access. Additionally, the occasional inaccuracies in AI-generated metrics underscore the need for more robust processing capabilities.
One potential solution lies in the development of on-device AI processing. By allowing the Apple Watch to handle AI computations locally, Apple could reduce latency, improve accuracy, and enhance the overall reliability of features like Workout Buddy. This advancement would not only address current limitations but also pave the way for more sophisticated applications of AI in wearable technology. WatchOS 26: Progress with Room for Growth
WatchOS 26 represents a meaningful step forward for the Apple Watch, particularly with the introduction of the AI-powered Workout Buddy and a revamped workout interface. These updates demonstrate Apple's commitment to enhancing the fitness and productivity capabilities of its wearable devices. However, the reliance on connectivity, occasional inaccuracies, and limited offline functionality highlight areas where further development is needed. As Apple continues to refine its wearable technology, future iterations of WatchOS could unlock the full potential of these features, offering a more seamless and reliable user experience.
Unlock more potential in AI-powered Workout Buddy by reading previous articles we have written.
Source & Image Credit: DC Rainmaker Filed Under: Apple, Gadgets News, Top News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Jim Acosta says he was ‘honored' to interview AI Parkland victim amid intense backlash
Amid the intense backlash he is currently facing over an 'interview' he did with an AI version of a student killed in the 2018 Parkland high school shooting, former CNN anchor Jim Acosta told The Independent he was 'honored' to help the victim's family remember their son. The conversation featured Acosta speaking to an animated image of Joaquin Oliver, who would have been celebrating his 25th birthday on Monday. According to Joaquin's father Manuel, the avatar was based on a real photograph of his deceased son and was trained on general information and knowledge from his writings and social media postings. At the start of the interview, which was posted to Acosta's Substack page, the AI Oliver is asked what happened to him, prompting the model to answer in a somewhat robotic monotone. Additionally, besides the avatar sounding computerized, the motions of its face and lips appear jerky and erratic. 'I appreciate your curiosity,' the avatar said. 'I was taken from this world too soon due to gun violence while at school. It's important to talk about these issues so we can create a safer future for everyone.' The AI model went on to talk about the need for 'a mix of stronger gun control laws, mental health support, and community engagement' when asked how to curb gun violence. 'We need to create safe spaces for conversations and connections, making everyone feel seen and heard. It's about building a culture of kindness and understanding,' it added. Acosta also touched on some more casual topics in his conversation with the AI Oliver, such as asking the avatar about movies and the NBA. Following the interview, Acosta brought on Manuel to discuss his decision to use an artificially generated version of his son and whether he planned to continue to do so going forward. 'I understand that this is AI,' Manuel said. 'I don't want anyone to think that I am in, some way, trying to bring my son back. Sadly, I can't, right? I wish I could. However, the technology is out there.' Manuel, who has become an outspoken gun control advocate since his son's death, also noted that the AI version of his son could help elevate the conversation about gun safety. 'We can just raise the voices,' he said. 'Now, Joaquin is going to start having followers… he's going to start uploading videos. This is just the beginning.' Another reason Manuel and his wife Patricia created the AI version of Joaquin, he noted, was just to hear their son's voice again. 'Patricia will spend hours asking questions. Like any other mother, she loves to hear Joaquin saying, 'I love you, mommy.' And that's important,' he told Acosta. 'I really felt like I was speaking with Joaquin. It's just a beautiful thing,' Acosta asserted to Manuel. Acosta, who launched an online Substack show after leaving CNN earlier this year, quickly faced outrage when he posted the interview online. Critics described it as 'one of the most unhinged and grotesque things' while wondering why Acosta would even take part in it. 'This is so insane and evil. It should never be done. I'm speechless,' Reason's Robby Soave tweeted, prompting Acosta to respond with a video of Manuel pushing back on the criticism over the interview. 'Joaquin, known as Guac, should be 25 years old today. His father approached me to do the story… to keep the memory of his son alive,' Acosta declared. 'Today he should be turning 25 years old, and my wife Patricia and myself – we asked our friend Jim Acosta to… have an interview with our son because now, thanks to AI, we can bring him back,' Manuel said in the social media video response. 'It was our idea, it was our plan, and it's still our plan,' he continued. 'We feel that Joaquin has a lot of things to say, and as long as we have an option that allows us to bring that to you and to everyone, we will use it.' Manuel ended the clip by asking critics to 'stop blaming people about where he's coming from, or blaming Jim about what he was able to do,' insisting that if 'the problem you have is with the AI, then you have the wrong problem.' Instead, Manuel concluded, the focus should remain on mass shootings. 'The real problem is that my son was shot eight years ago,' he stated. 'So if you believe that that is not the problem, you are part of the problem.'Asked about the criticism he's faced online over the interview, Acosta told The Independent that he'd essentially reiterate much of what Manuel had to say about the backlash in his video. 'I think I would say this - the family of Joaquin reached out to me to see if I would help them remember their son,' Acosta said. 'My heart goes out to them and I was honored to help them in this moment. I think Joaquin's father makes a good point that if you're bothered more by this than the gun violence that took his son, then there is something truly wrong with our society.' Meanwhile, Acosta's conversation isn't the first time that any of the victims of the Parkland shooting had been brought back via AI. Oliver, along with the voices of several other students and staff who were killed in the massacre, was used in a robocalling campaign for gun control last year called The Shotline. 'Six years ago, I was a senior at Parkland. Many students and teachers were murdered on Valentine's Day that year by a person using an AR-15 assault rifle,' the voice of Oliver stated in the call that was sent to lawmakers. 'It's been six years, and you've done nothing. Not a thing to stop all the shootings that have continued to happen since.' The voice added: 'I'm back today because my parents used AI to re-create my voice to call you. How many calls will it take for you to care? How many dead voices will you hear before you finally listen?' Additionally, AI avatars have been used to simulate victim impact statements in criminal cases. In May, for instance, an AI version of a man who was killed in a road rage shooting addressed the alleged killer in court. 'I believe in forgiveness, and a God who forgives. I always have and I still do,' the animated model of the victim said. The judge in the case appeared moved by the video, which was produced by the victim's family. 'I loved that AI, thank you for that. As angry as you are, as justifiably angry as the family is, I heard the forgiveness,' the judge said. 'I feel that that was genuine.'
Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Tesla, Elon Musk sued by shareholders over Robotaxi claims
Aug 5 (Reuters) - Elon Musk and Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab were sued by shareholders who accused them of securities fraud for concealing the significant risk that the company's self-driving vehicles, including the Robotaxi, were dangerous. The proposed class action was filed on Monday night, following Tesla's first public test of its robotaxis in late June in the company's Austin, Texas, hometown. That test showed the vehicles speeding, braking suddenly, driving over a curb, entering the wrong lane, and dropping off passengers in the middle of multilane roads. Tesla's share price fell 6.1% over two trading days after the test began, wiping out about $68 billion of market value. Musk and his electric vehicle maker were accused of repeatedly overstating the effectiveness of and prospects for their autonomous driving technology, inflating Tesla's financial prospects and stock price. Shareholders said this included Musk's assurance on an April 22 conference call that Tesla was "laser-focused on bringing robotaxi to Austin in June," and Tesla's claim the same day that its approach to autonomous driving would deliver "scalable and safe deployment across diverse geographies and use cases." Tesla did not immediately respond on Tuesday to requests for comment. Chief Financial Officer Viabhav Taneja and his predecessor Zachary Kirkhorn are also defendants. Expanding robotaxis is crucial for Tesla as the company faces falling demand for its aging electric vehicles and a backlash over Musk's politics. Musk, the world's richest person, wants to offer the service to half the U.S. population by year end, but must convince regulators and assure the public his technology is safe. Monday's lawsuit in Austin federal court is led by Tesla shareholder Denise Morand, and seeks damages for shareholders between April 19, 2023 and June 22, 2025. A Florida jury on August 1 found Tesla 33% responsible for a 2019 crash involving its self-driving software, which killed a 22-year-old woman and injured her boyfriend, and ordered it to pay about $243 million in damages to victims. Tesla blamed the driver and plans to appeal. The case is Morand v Tesla Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, No. 25-01213.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Lucra Taps Autosana to Turbocharge QA with AI
NEW YORK, NY, August 5, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- Lucra, opens new tab, the leading provider of social gamification technology, today announced a strategic partnership with Autosana, opens new tab, a platform for AI-powered UI testing, as part of Lucra's broader efforts to integrate AI thoughtfully and selectively across its product development pipeline. Initial results from the pilot are already driving meaningful impact: Lucra has significantly reduced the manual workload required to validate product releases—freeing up engineering and quality assurance resources while increasing overall test coverage. 'With over 15 years in mobile development, I've seen firsthand how painful and time-consuming UI testing can be—especially for end-to-end flows,' said Michael Schmidt, CTO of Lucra. 'Autosana is a game changer. It's the first solution I've used that makes robust, automated UI testing truly accessible. We were able to automate the majority of our regression suite in a matter of hours instead of weeks or months, and the self-healing capabilities mean we spend far less time maintaining brittle tests. It's saved our team countless hours already and fundamentally changed how we approach QA.' Lucra's current regression suite includes over 250 manual test steps, requiring 1–2 hours of effort for each full run. In under 15 hours of work, the team has already automated approximately 70% of these steps using natural language instructions. Compared to the months of setup required for traditional UI test scripting—work that previously consumed nearly a full-time engineer—the return on investment has been immediate. Autosana's self-healing architecture has eliminated the brittleness of legacy UI testing frameworks. As Lucra continues to expand test coverage, the QA team is now able to focus more on feature validation and bug identification—while overnight test cycles handle regression automatically. This partnership is part of Lucra's deliberate approach to AI—investing in purpose-built tools that deliver real operational value while continuing to build proprietary systems internally. By combining thoughtful external integrations with in-house innovation, Lucra remains committed to delivering best-in-class technology to its partners and users. About Lucra Lucra is the leading provider of social competition services, offering hospitality, entertainment, and media brands the ability to natively integrate competitive gameplay into their digital platforms. Clients like Five Iron Golf, Puttshack, Backyard Sports, Dave & Buster's, TouchTunes, and more use Lucra's white-label technology to power tournaments and challenges, build loyalty, and drive new revenue. Learn more at opens new tab. About Autosana Autosana is a cloud-based tool for mobile teams to run natural language end-to-end tests. Eradicates the need to write/maintain E2E tests and manual testing. Seamlessly integrates into your CI and GitHub, supports both iOS and Android, and is framework-agnostic (React Native, Flutter, Swift, etc). No code, no setup, just catching bugs before users do. Visit opens new tab. Media Contact Michael Maddingmichael@ ### SOURCE: Lucra Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire
