logo
A surprising lesson from Antarctica: Life flourishes even under 500 feet of ice

A surprising lesson from Antarctica: Life flourishes even under 500 feet of ice

Yahoo14-04-2025
When an iceberg the size of Chicago broke off from one of Antarctica's massive floating glaciers in January, a team of scientists working nearby quickly pivoted, steering their ship to explore the newly-revealed seafloor.
What they found surprised and amazed them.
'We didn't expect to find such a beautiful, thriving ecosystem. Based on the size of the animals, the communities we observed have been there for decades, maybe even hundreds of years," said Patricia Esquete of the Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies and the Department of Biology at the University of Aveiro, Portugal.
She was part of an international team of scientists from the Schmidt Ocean Institute working in the Bellingshausen Sea. When they got word that a new iceberg, named A-84, had broken off, they shifted their work to see what was revealed on a seabed that had been covered by almost 500 feet of ice for centuries.
Less than two weeks later, they were in place and began using autonomous underwater vehicles called gliders to quickly inventory what proved to be a thriving ecosystem that had lived for hundreds of years with no light and few nutrients.
'We seized upon the moment, changed our expedition plan, and went for it so we could look at what was happening in the depths below,' said Esquete.
Douglas McCauley, a professor of ocean science at the University of California, Santa Barbara, was impressed the research team was flexible enough to divert course to take those observations.
"Some of the best discoveries come when disciplined scientists that have spent years planning every minute of a cruise years in advance are brave enough to go: 'OMG a gigantic iceberg just calved off – let go see what was under that!'" he said.
It proved to be a fortuitous diversion of their ship, R/V Falkor (Too). In water as much as 4,200 feet deep the team from the Schmidt Ocean Institute found a surprisingly flourishing ecosystem that included icefish, giant sea spiders, octopus, corals and sponges.
They suspect they've found several new species, but determining that will take time.
Such opportunities to see what lives in these areas are rare, said Andrew Thurber, a professor of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology at UC Santa Barbara who specializes in Antarctic research.
With the advent of remote submersible robots it shouldn't be hard to work under significant ice, he said, but it remains a serious technological challenge for marine science.
It's not just "Send a robot under the ice and it comes back with cool data," he said. "In reality, they often have issues and with hundreds of meters of ice over their head – the odds of getting home become bleak."
One of the mysteries of the discovery is what these sea creatures have been eating. Close to a mile down, with a 500-foot layer of ice between them and the sun for centuries, there's not a lot of choice when it comes to dinner.
"These communities are very far removed from the sun and this source of energy," said Thurber.
In the deepest depths of the ocean, sea inhabitants rely on a constant rain of nutrients that slowly sinks down from the surface.
Called "marine snow," it's composed of dead animals, plants, feces and other organic materials. The name comes from the fact that it looks like "little white fluffy bits" slowly falling through the water column, according to the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration.
But the newly-uncovered area has been covered by ice for centuries, cut off from surface nutrients. The discovery of so much life – and such big life – was unanticipated, said Thurber.
"We would expect there to be an animal community that is more like what is in the deep-deep sea, which is smaller animals and incredible diversity but not large animals except in unique cases," he said.
Instead there were large invertebrates. "That is why this is such a surprising discovery," he said.
The scientists hypothesize that ocean currents are moving nutrients around and that the currents are possibly the mechanism that sustains life beneath the ice sheet, though how that works precisely isn't yet known.
The iceberg, named A-84, broke away from the George VI Ice Shelf, one of the massive floating glaciers attached to the Antarctic Peninsula. Ice shelves are permanent floating sheets of ice that connect to a landmass, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center. Such ice shelves are an important part of the earth's cryosphere.
The breaking off of this huge iceberg is an example of the ongoing shrinkage happening at the earth's poles over the past few decades as part of climate change.
This raises a question of what to do with the newly-opened areas.
"Open seafloor can either be an area to expand industry but also opens up pristine habitats with unknown biodiversity, potential for drug discovery, and often long lived species that are susceptible to human activities," said Thurber.
Should the areas be turned into marine conservation areas or exploited, most likely for fishing?
"I think that is something that we, as a global collaborative community charged with management of the Antarctic, are faced with in light of our rapidly changing globe," he said.
One of the biggest questions for the scientists is whether the sea creatures that had been happily living in an ecosystem covered by ice will fare now that the ice is gone.
"Some of them can move. Some of them, though, are embedded in that seabed. So they're anchored in place and they of course, will not be able to move," said Jyotika Virmani, executive director of Schmidt Ocean Institute.
"Until we go back or until scientists go back in a few months or a year, it's really difficult to say how this ecosystem is going to evolve," she said. "But the the fact that we have this baseline information is phenomenal."
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Iceberg breaks off from Antarctica, reveals flourishing life
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. Cuts Antarctica's Only Research Icebreaker Ship under Trump Budget Squeeze
U.S. Cuts Antarctica's Only Research Icebreaker Ship under Trump Budget Squeeze

Scientific American

time15 hours ago

  • Scientific American

U.S. Cuts Antarctica's Only Research Icebreaker Ship under Trump Budget Squeeze

Many ships have tried to reach the floating tongue of Thwaites Glacier —a 130-kilometer-wide conveyor belt of ice that slides off West Antarctica's coast and splinters into the sea. Thwaites is rapidly destabilizing, and precise mapping of the seafloor and ocean currents surrounding it are urgently needed to know how much damage the crumbling glacier and resulting sea-level rise could do to coasts worldwide. Only one vessel—the U.S. research icebreaker Nathaniel B. Palmer (NBP)—has successfully penetrated the area's phalanx of sea ice and billion-metric-ton icebergs to reach a critical location on Thwaites, widely considered the world's most dangerous glacier. The NBP has made about 200 research cruises to Antarctica in the past 30 years, in many cases reaching places never before visited. But if the Trump administration has its way, this will all come to an end in October. The NBP's expeditions along remote parts of the Antarctic coast have gathered voluminous data that are critical to U.S. interests. If the Thwaites glacier were to implode, it could raise the average global sea level by 65 centimeters, and it could potentially trigger wider Antarctic ice sheet collapse that could raise global sea level by more than three meters. Marine science shows that a disproportionate brunt of that rise would inundate the Gulf of Mexico and eastern U.S. coasts. Frequent measurements in Antarctica's remote locations are needed to project how quickly this might happen. Expeditions also monitor marine ecosystems that are rapidly shifting as a result of climate change and affecting the large commercial fisheries in surrounding waters. Yet Antarctic science experts and officials told me that the administration is imposing such severe budget cuts on the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) that the organization has no realistic option but to terminate its lease for the NBP after 30 years. The U.S. is 'losing the only research [icebreaker it has] in the Southern Hemisphere,' says Michael Jackson, the NSF's former section head for Antarctic sciences, who left in December. A replacement vessel —if one is even funded—'will probably take 10 years to build,' he says. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. This latest move caps what feels like a major U.S. retreat from Antarctica, says Theodore Scambos, a polar glaciologist at the University of Colorado Boulder. For 27 years, the U.S. had operated two research icebreakers in the region. But in 2024 NSF dropped its lease for the smaller of the two craft because of budget shortfalls. That and the impending loss of the NBP marks 'a general decline of America in the science and exploration fields,' Scambos says. 'And I hate that.' This loss will have widespread consequences, according to a wide range of scientists, logistics experts, former NSF officials and former diplomats interviewed for this story. It will hamstring U.S. influence in the Antarctic at a time when geopolitical competition and resource exploitation are intensifying in the region. It will also undermine scientists' ability to monitor rapid changes in Thwaites and other remote areas—at the very moment climate impacts on the continent are accelerating. Researchers first learned of the NBP 's situation on May 30, when the Trump administration released its full fiscal year 2026 budget request for NSF to Congress. The termination was buried in a single sentence on page 102 of the 222-page document. The budget request also stipulated a 70 percent funding cut for polar science research projects overall. 'None of us saw that coming,' says Patricia Yager, a polar marine biologist at the University of Georgia, who called the move 'shocking.' In response to a request for comment from Scientific American, an NSF spokesperson confirmed via e-mail that NSF had proposed terminating the lease of the NBP in Trump's 2026 fiscal year budget request but provided little additional information. Although the U.S. Coast Guard has three icebreakers— Polar Star, Healy and the newly commissioned Storis, a former commercial icebreaker—none can fill NBP 's role. Healy is continually committed to Arctic duties; sending it to Antarctica and back to do even a single day of scientific work would require 60 days of travel. Storis, which has a troubled history, will also be used in the Arctic. And Polar Star is simply not equipped for the kind of research the NBP does. 'The Palmer is the most amazing research tool that we have; there's nothing like it anywhere in the world,' Yager says. It can plow through meter-thick sea ice at three knots with little more than gentle side-to-side rocking. And it can remain at sea for 65 days, a vital capability given that a round trip to Thwaites takes nearly two weeks from the nearest port. Waiting for vast rafts of sea ice and icebergs to shift and open a passage can add many more days. When the NBP is in Antarctic waters, it continuously collects data. Multibeam sonar captures a three-dimensional map of the seafloor, revealing features such as undersea canyons that influence the stability of coastal glaciers. Another sonar system traces sediment layers below the seafloor, which can provide important records of past climate periods. Even in rough seas and high winds, the ship's dynamic positioning system allows it to hover within a few feet of its intended location while technicians do the delicate work of collecting sediment cores or piloting remote-operated submersibles on the seafloor. The NBP can carry and launch two helicopters, which proved decisive during a 2010 cruise, allowing researchers to leapfrog over impassable sea ice and install instruments for monitoring crustal movements and glacial retreat as far as 200 kilometers away. The impending loss of the NBP means five Antarctic missions, slated for October 2025 through April 2026, now hang in limbo. The NSF is scrambling for ways to salvage at least some of them. For example, the agency might send the University of Alaska Fairbanks's Arctic research vessel Sikuliaq all the way down to Antarctica in January to perform a major ecological survey that has been conducted annually since 1999. The survey covers 2,000 kilometers along the Antarctic Peninsula's coast and out past the lip of the continental shelf. It measures the abundance of krill and phytoplankton—which anchor the region's ecosystem—and monitors deep ocean currents. In recent decades this survey has revealed important changes in ocean mixing that have caused the winter sea ice season in this relatively temperate section of Antarctica to shorten by roughly 100 days a year. But the Sikuliaq is already in high demand in the Arctic, for up to a dozen expeditions per year. And compared with the NBP, it has fewer berths for scientists, can spend fewer days at sea and has more limited ice-breaking capabilities—effectively excluding it from Thwaites and other heavily iced sections of the Antarctic coastline. A few other countries have research icebreakers, including the U.K., Germany, Australia, South Korea and China. It is possible that a couple U.S. researchers could occasionally find ride-along spots. But that may not advance U.S. research priorities, Scambos says: 'You're not going to get somebody else's icebreaker to bring you and 20 of your colleagues and undertake a major mission that has U.S. research interest behind it.' The NSF spokesperson stated that the agency 'has started the process to identify vessels and partnerships to continue support of marine science.' A new icebreaker that would eventually replace the NBP is in early design stages, but it would take a decade to build. The work on this new Antarctic research vessel has been moving slowly for a variety of reasons, even prior to the start of the current Trump administration. The NSF spokesperson stated that the agency 'has paused source selection activities' for the next stage of development. Since the 1950s the U.S. has maintained a larger scientific presence on the Antarctic continent than any other nation, by way of research stations, ships, remote air transport and exploratory teams that drive vehicles in long traverses across the ice sheet. For now, NSF plans to try to keep operating the three U.S. land bases in Antarctica—the Palmer, McMurdo and Amundsen-Scott South Pole stations—because the harsh environment would cause them to rapidly deteriorate if they were not staffed. But spending an ensuing decade without a research icebreaker could have major geopolitical consequences. Antarctica is Earth's largest remaining territory not unilaterally controlled by any particular nation. The U.S. has long backed the Antarctic Treaty, under which nations set aside any territorial land claims they've made and reserve the continent for scientific research. If international commitment to the treaty ever faltered, however, nations might pursue territorial claims on the continent, and those claims would be bolstered by having maintained research stations, communications hubs, deep water ports and air transport and driving routes. 'Operations and logistics are 100 percent necessary for U.S. national security interests,' says William Muntean III, a former senior adviser for Antarctic affairs and a deputy representative for the U.S. State Department to the annual Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. The scientific research conducted there is a fundamental part of that equation. 'In the Antarctic Treaty System,' Muntean says, 'knowledge is what equals power.' That's because the rules of play for Antarctica and its surrounding seas are constantly negotiated and monitored by more than two dozen countries with research stations there—and any negotiations become especially heated when it comes to resource extraction. For years commercial vessels have plied the coastal seas for Antarctic toothfish (sold in restaurants as 'sea bass') and krill. The U.S. and a handful of other countries have sought to establish several marine protected areas around the continent where fishing would be prohibited, but they have encountered resistance from Russia and China. Negotiations often hinge on data collected from research vessels, such as those that document changes in ecosystems. In this way, Muntean says, 'knowing what is actually happening in Antarctica gives a country the ability to then influence' what happens. Right now the NBP remains moored at the main pier in Punta Arenas in southern Chile—its standard departure point for Antarctica. The ship's fate is on hold until early September, when Congress returns from recess. 'The budget request is always just a policy document,' says Alexandra Isern, a former assistant director of the NSF. In the NSF's pending request, she says, the Trump administration is putting 'a line in the sand' for what it wants. Funding bills that were sitting in Congress before recess add confusion. Senate bill 2354, which passed out of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies in mid-July, appears to restore full funding to the NSF. The corresponding House bill restores roughly two thirds of the proposed cuts. Isern says 'members [of Congress] are big supporters of the Antarctic program,' but neither of those bills mentions the NBP or the new icebreaker intended to replace it. Jackson fears that Congress will cave to pressure from the Trump administration and neither the NBP nor the other polar research funding will be saved. In the meantime, polar researchers across the U.S. continue to prepare for science missions that may or may not happen. Some have already shipped their scientific gear south to Chile in case their cruise happens after all. Others will have to do so in the coming weeks, before Congress returns. Amid the uncertainty, Oscar Schofield, a biological oceanographer at Rutgers University, sees a clear message. The administration is already stripping climate data from government websites, preparing to halt EPA regulation of carbon dioxide emissions and quietly discussing plans to scuttle a state-of-the-art NASA satellite that monitors carbon dioxide—allowing the spacecraft to burn up in the atmosphere. Canceling the NBP, he says, looks like 'a political decision of not wanting to support climate change research.' In this decision, Schofield sees an important lever of soft power being abandoned. 'Since World War II,' he says, 'there was always a strong belief that if the U.S. had the strongest scientists and the strongest engineers, it would serve national security.' Those generational investments, he says, are now being undone.

How long tubes of mud could reveal how Antarctica is changing
How long tubes of mud could reveal how Antarctica is changing

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

How long tubes of mud could reveal how Antarctica is changing

Why would anyone brave hand-numbing cold, icy winds and rough seas - sometimes working through the night - to dig up mud from the Antarctic seabed? That is what an international team of particularly adventurous researchers did earlier this year in the remote Antarctic Peninsula, on a mission aiming to reveal centuries of scientific secrets about the Southern Ocean. Scientists around the world will now share and analyse these precious mud samples to work out how human activity - including a century of industrial whaling - affected Antarctica and the rest of our planet. The research is part of a global effort to understand the relationship between the ocean and the climate. A history of ocean life Researchers used a special coring drill - a bit like a huge apple-corer - tethered to a research ship, to drill at depths of up to 500m. They collected more than 40 long cores, or tubes, of seafloor sediment from locations around the peninsula. This is one of the richest habitats for marine life in Antarctica, and a focal point for fishing, tourism and - before it was banned in the 1980s - industrial whale hunting. Collecting the sediment gives insight and clues to the past, "like a book of history", explained lead researcher Dr Elisenda Balleste from the University of Barcelona. "What is living in the seas now, what was living in the seas in the past and evidence of our human impact" is recorded in layer upon layer of sediment over centuries, she said. By preserving and dating those layers, and analysing what they contain, researchers can build a picture of the history of Antarctic marine life. Once on board the ship, the cores were frozen and transported to Barcelona and Dr Balleste's laboratory. From there, carefully extracted pieces of this Antarctic mud will be sent out to several academic institutions around the world. Scientists will scan and date the sediment layers, work out what microbial life they contain, measure levels of pollution and calculate how much carbon is buried in the mud. It is part of a mission - the Convex Seascape Survey - which involves universities and research institutions around the globe working together to better understand how our ocean and climate are connected. Claire Allen, an oceanographer from the British Antarctic Survey who has studied Antarctica's past for more than 20 years, said that cores like these were particularly valuable. "Before 1950 - before there was any kind of monitoring capacity in Antarctica - sediment cores and ice cores are the only way that we can get an insight into any of the climatic or physical properties that have changed over time," she said. The DNA fingerprint from whale hunting The newly collected samples being stored for DNA analysis have to be kept at temperatures low enough to stop all biological processes. Dr Balleste took them out of the industrial-sized freezer where they are being stored to show them to us, very briefly. "They're kept at minus 80 degrees to stop them degrading," she explained. These small pieces of the seabed - frozen in time at temperatures that preserve genetic material - will be used for what is known as environmental DNA analysis. It is an area of science which has developed rapidly in recent years. It gives researchers the ability to extract genetic information from water, soil and even air, like a fingerprint of life left behind in the environment. Dr Carlos Preckler, from King Abdullah University in Saudi Arabia, is leading this part of the research and will be trying to measure how almost a century of industrial whaling in Antarctica affected the ocean and our atmosphere. Carbon - when it is released into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide - warms up our planet like a blanket. So, as the world struggles to reduce those emissions, any processes that absorb and lock significant amounts of carbon might help to rein in global warming. "We know whales have a lot of carbon in their bodies, because they are huge animals," said Dr Preckler. What he and his colleagues want to know is how much of that carbon gets buried in the seafloor - and locked away from the atmosphere - when the animals die. "We can measure whale DNA and the carbon in the sediment," explained Dr Preckler. "So we can measure what happened before industrial whaling removed most of the whales in the [Southern] ocean," he added. That, the researchers say, will provide a measure of how much whales - simply by existing, being huge and living out their natural lives - remove carbon from our atmosphere and help in the fight against climate change.

argenx to Host R&D Webinar Highlighting ARGX-119 on September 16, 2025
argenx to Host R&D Webinar Highlighting ARGX-119 on September 16, 2025

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

argenx to Host R&D Webinar Highlighting ARGX-119 on September 16, 2025

August 19, 2025Amsterdam, the Netherlands – argenx (Euronext & Nasdaq: ARGX), a global immunology company committed to improving the lives of people suffering from severe autoimmune diseases, today announced it will host a webinar, titled 'R&D Spotlight | Pioneering MuSK Biology with ARGX-119' on Tuesday, September 16, 2025, at 2:00pm ET. The webinar will be the first of a 'mini' series highlighting the argenx pipeline and research and development strategy. argenx management and scientific leadership will be joined by key opinion leaders, who will discuss the development of the MuSK agonist program, ARGX-119, and its potential to treat neuromuscular diseases, including congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). A webcast of the event can be accessed on the Investors section of the argenx website at A replay of the webcast will be available on the argenx website for approximately one year following the presentation. About argenx argenx is a global immunology company committed to improving the lives of people suffering from severe autoimmune diseases. Partnering with leading academic researchers through its Immunology Innovation Program (IIP), argenx aims to translate immunology breakthroughs into a world-class portfolio of novel antibody-based medicines. argenx developed and is commercializing the first approved neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) blocker and is evaluating its broad potential in multiple serious autoimmune diseases while advancing several earlier stage experimental medicines within its therapeutic franchises. For more information, visit and follow us on LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube. Contacts Media: Colin McBeancmcbean@ Investors: Alexandra Royaroy@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store