
HS2 rail line branded an 'appalling mess' and its opening is delayed past 2033 as focus switches to saving money after costs rose by £37BILLION
The disastrous HS2 rail project will not open as planned in 2033, a senior minister confirmed today, as a damning report reveals that its costs have soared by an astonishing £37billion.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander branded the building of a new line linking London and Birmingham with the North an 'appalling mess' and told MPs she saw 'no route' to getting trains running in eight years' time.
Instead the scheme will now focus on saving taxpayers' money even if it means delaying its opening, she told the Commons this afternoon.
She warned that phase 1 of the project between London and Litchfield could end up being 'one of the most expensive railway lines in the world' after years of cost overruns and delays.
And she warned there was evidence of sub-contractors defrauding the scheme.
The project was announced in 2010 by then Conservative Transport Secretary Philip Hammond.
But ever since it has been beset by controversy over its route amid ballooning costs - including spending £100million on a tunnel for bats.
Reports suggest the first phase will not open to passengers until 2035 at the earliest.
The Transport Secretary said she has accepted 89 recommendations from an independent review into infrastructure projects which was spearheaded by former Crossrail chief executive James Stewart.
She told MPs that the word '''affordable'' was clearly not part of the HS2 lexicon', adding: 'Quite simply, there have been too many dark corners for failure to hide in.
'The ministerial taskforce set up to provide oversight of HS2 had inconsistent attendance from key ministers, including the then-transport secretary and the then-chief secretary to the Treasury.
'The Government has re-established the taskforce with full senior attendance, as per the review's recommendations – and new performance programme and shareholder boards will offer much-needed oversight and accountability.
'Secondly, the report highlights HS2 could cost the taxpayer millions more than planned. We'll stop this spiralling any further by delivering all the recommendations on cost control.
'That starts with HS2 fundamentally changing their approach to estimating costs – it includes certainty over funding which the spending review has given, and it also means HS2 working with suppliers so their contracts incentivise saving costs for taxpayers.
'As far as I'm concerned, suppliers should make a better return the more taxpayer money they save.'
Mike Brown, former Transport for London (TfL) commissioner is set to become the new chairman of HS2 Limited - the company in charge of the project.
The review hit out at spending, including £2billion laid out by the Tory government on the route between Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds before they scrapped it.
More than £250million was also spent by HS2 Ltd on failed designs for a new station at Euston.
The company was reportedly asked to provide a cheaper alternative, but ended up nearly doubling the price in the second design.
Earlier this month a whistleblower who lost his job after accusing HS2 executives of fraud over the true cost of the project won more than £300,000 in compensation.
Risk management expert Stephen Cresswell repeatedly raised concerns that the cost of the high speed rail line - which could end up landing the taxpayer with a bill of more than £80billion - was being 'actively misrepresented'.
The consultant was told by one HS2 executive to 'disregard' scenarios he had prepared which forecast a 'significant' increase in the price to the public, an employment tribunal heard.
As a result, Mr Cresswell warned that he found himself in a 'very uncomfortable position' of having a 'very different' view to the high speed rail line company's 'documented position'.
The tribunal heard that in a meeting with bosses he said 'fraud had been committed because he understood fraud to be making false statement so as to secure a benefit'.
After losing his job, Mr Cresswell took HS2 to an employment tribunal, claiming he had his contract terminated and been denied other work as a result of blowing the whistle.
After the rail firm admitted that he had not given adequate levels of protection following his disclosures he has now been awarded £319,070 in damages.
In response, campaigners said it was not to late for Labour to consider scrapping high speed rail over years of 'catastrophic mishandling'.
HS2 Ltd previously said investigations into Mr Cresswell's claims found no evidence of fraud or illegal activity.
Last month a DfT spokesperson said: 'We take all whistleblowing allegations seriously and it is important that individuals are given appropriate levels of protection, which clearly was not the case for Mr Cresswell.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
32 minutes ago
- BBC News
Gloucester have spent 'wisely'
Gloucester have spent their money "wisely" this season, believes director of rugby George Cherry and Whites released 13 senior players this summer, with 13 new faces signed heading into the 2025-26 narrowly missed out on a place in the Premiership play-offs last season, finishing fifth in the table, just two points behind Bristol despite winning the same number of matches."The way we've recruited for next season is we've got a bigger squad, we've got an unbelievable amount of talent," Skivington told BBC Radio Gloucestershire."We're a more talented squad next year, there's a few [new players] we're hedging our bets on - some are going to come through, some aren't. "They haven't all got the experience of 200 caps in the Premiership but we've spent our money really wisely and for Gloucester that is really important. The model is different." Making Gloucester a sustainable club has been the aim of the owners for a number of years since the Covid-19 the 10 Premiership clubs, Gloucester were the closest to breaking even when the most recent set of accounts was released for 2022-23, although their debt still totalled £541,000 that players including full-back Santiago Carreras, centre Chris Harris and back-row Ruan Ackermann, who amassed more than 400 club appearances between them, are among those exiting Gloucester have increased their squad size from 35 to 40 for next signings blend youth and experience and include Ireland fly-half Ross Byrne, South African back row James Venter and New Zealand prop Nepo Laulala plus full-back Ben Redshaw, scrum-half Mike Austin and centre Will said it would have cost a "huge amount of money" to keep some of the players who have left and that the club is working towards more strength in depth. "We lost a couple of lads in key positions this season and we had to really anchor down, push people in and there were some really costly games for us," he said."I think we've spent our money smartly over the next couple of years." Gloucester have not finished in the Premiership play-offs since Skivington was appointed in 2020, but he believes they took a "massive step forward" last term after finishing ninth in the table the previous signing of scrum-half Tomos Williams proved to be a masterstroke, with the Welshman helping spearhead a new-look attacking style, and going on to win Premiership player of the Seb Atkinson, fly-half Charlie Atkinson and second row Arthur Clark have also all been called up to Steve Borthwick's England training squad this week, before their match against France."Tommy was outstanding and got all of the headlines but if you look at Arthur Clark, Freddie Thomas, the spine of our team was young Gloucester boys," Skivington said."Everything is done with purpose and I think we've got a really young, hungry squad with some really good senior players sitting in there which will drive the squad forward. Everyone, bar one or two, is on two or three-year deals."


Sky News
35 minutes ago
- Sky News
Assisted dying bill does 'not meet needs of patients', says Royal College of Psychiatrists
The Royal College of Psychiatrists' lead on assisted dying has told Sky News she is approaching Friday's vote by MPs "with professional trepidation". The medical organisation said the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in its current form did "not meet the needs of patients". It has also expressed concern over the shortage of qualified psychiatrists to take part in assisted dying panels, concerns around capacity assessment, and whether or not assisted dying will be interpreted as a treatment – because that would have a profound impact on the psychiatrist's decision-making process. Friday will be the first time the bill has been voted on in its entirety since last year's yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55. MPs are allowed to have a free vote on the bill, meaning they can decide based on their conscience instead of following party lines. The bill's supporters have said it is coming back to the Commons with better safeguards after more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent on it to date. But opponents claim the process has been rushed and that changes to the bill mean it is weaker than when it was first introduced. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Dr Annabel Price, the lead for the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill at the Royal College of Psychiatrists ( RCPsych), said: "We know that there is a strong association between a wish to hasten death and depression, and that there isn't adequate opportunity within the bill to assess somebody's needs and also to make sure that those needs are met, which might have an impact on their continued wish to want to end their life." The RCPsych was one of the first royal colleges to voice concerns about the bill in its current form. These fears have since been echoed by two more royal colleges, physicians and pathologists. It has provided written evidence to the bill's scrutiny committee, while Dr Price has provided oral evidence. She said the organisation had "actively engaged with parliamentarians throughout the process" and expressed concerns in two public statements. But despite all of this, the concerns raised have not been addressed, it is claimed. This has prompted worries because, under the bill, psychiatrists would have a leading role in assessing a patient's mental capacity when an assisted death has been requested. They would be on a panel alongside doctors, social workers, and a legal expert. The panel would not be expected to meet the patient during the process. Panel role 'doesn't map on to job of psychiatrist' Dr Price said the idea of making a clinical assessment of a patient's mental health ran contrary to everything a psychiatrist had been trained to do. She said: "The panel role doesn't really map on to the professional job and training of a psychiatrist. What psychiatrists are trained to do is the assessment and treatment of mental illness. "The panel role is really to check what the two other doctors have done and whether that patient meets the eligibility criteria. "And if they do, then they must be granted assisted dying. That doesn't really give room to identify meeting an unmet need, like depression for example, but there are lots of things that may be unmet, social difficulties, untreated pain and other physical symptoms, where that person might no longer want to die. "And it doesn't really give room for a psychiatrist to do what they're trained to do and where their expertise lies, which would be essentially a checking role." Clarification call Dr Price said other areas of the bill also needed urgent clarification. She said: "When somebody has a mental illness, our job is to see if we can treat that mental illness. The other area in the bill that hasn't really been addressed is the psychiatrist's responsibility around suicide prevention. "When we meet somebody who wants to end their life, we have a duty to that patient and that duty may involve assessing that patient under the Mental Health Act to try to manage the mental health aspects that may be making them want to die. And there really isn't enough detail as to how we do that, how we square those two roles and duties. That needs more attention." Dr Price added: "The Mental Capacity Act was designed to support people who can't make decisions for themselves to be able to have decisions made in their best interest for them. "There is nothing in the provision of the Mental Capacity Act that talks about a decision to end one's own life, so this is a new decision. "We don't currently have anything that maps on to that clinically and so the Mental Capacity Act, we have stated very clearly, is not sufficient to be a sufficient safeguard in assisted dying and that we need to rethink how capacity is assessed."


ITV News
39 minutes ago
- ITV News
Five ways HS2 has wasted money as government announces further delays
It will be at least another ten years until we will be able to catch an HS2 train from Birmingham to London, with the line now not expected to be complete until 2035 - and coming in billions of pounds over budget. More than 44 miles of tunnels have now been completed, with research estimating the project could create 30,000 new jobs in the West Midlands. HS2 was originally due to run between London and Birmingham, then onto Manchester and Leeds, but the project has been severely curtailed by spiralling costs, despite being scaled back. In Parliament on Wednesday, 18 June, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said there is 'no reasonable way to deliver' the high-speed railway on schedule and within budget. She said she will accept all recommendations from a review by James Stewart into how HS2 has been managed up until now. In a statement to Parliament, the Secretary of State condemned the 'litany of failure' of HS2, citing spiralling costs, ineffective oversight and broken promises. The review states: "There is no single explanation for the failings of the HS2 Programme. "External disruptors (Brexit, the war in Ukraine, Covid-19 and a high inflationary period) have undoubtedly had an impact, but fundamentally a combination of the Government, DfT as Sponsor and Shareholder, HS2 Ltd as the delivery entity, and the private sector supply chain have failed to be able to deliver a project of the original scale and size of HS2." So, what are some of the main failings of the project? Here at ITV News Central we have pulled together a list. 1. Cancelled Phase 2 The original route was set to run from London to Birmingham, with two separate legs running from the Midlands to Leeds,and Manchester. Due to soaring costs, in 2021, Boris Johnson announced the scrapping of the Leeds leg, with Rishi Sunak cancelling the leg to Manchester in 2023. The cost of scrapping phase 2 works is estimated at around £2bn. 2. Delayed completion of Phase 1 As the opening of Phase 1 to Birmingham is pushed back further and further, costs continue to soar. The review highlights that without action; "Phase 1 alone risks becoming one of the most expensive railway lines in the world - with costs ballooning by £37 billion". When the project was first drawn up in 2009, the estimated cost for the entire project, including Phase 1 and 2, was £37.5bn. The most recent figures estimate it will cost between £49bn and £56.6bn, despite the second phase being cancelled. 3. Contractors The review states that; " HS2 Ltd has lacked the capability to deal with the size and complexity of the HS2 Programme." It goes on to say that the model chosen for the project was wrong, but there was a "failure to change course when problems arose." Extra costs are also down to problems with some of the building work. In November last year, issued were found on some of the bridges built on the line between London and Birmingham. Steel firm Severfield identified welding problems on a number of its structures, including nine bridges on the HS2 line, with repair work costing more than £20m to fix. At the time, HS2 said: 'We have identified a number of welding defects related to steel fabrication work undertaken by one of our suppliers. 'This will not impact on the safety or quality of the operational railway which is being designed to the highest standards.' In total more than 500 bridges are being built along the route from London to Curzon Street in Birmingham. 4. Desire to build the best HS2 was a project sold on speed. The promise was trains travelling between London and Birmingham at speeds of up to 225mph. This meant a straight line was required to be built between the two cities to ensure speed of trains. The route was to go through the Chilterns AONB, with extensive tunnels required to keep trains out of sight and ensure the natural area was protected. The scope of the plans kept changing, driving up costs. Pressure from protestors and constituents left MPs voting to increase the tunnel length through the Chilterns, in turn costing more money. The review found many key decisions have been driven by schedule rather than cost, stating: "Pressure from politicians to maintain momentum, fear of HS2 being cancelled, and the belief that costs will increase as a result of delay have featured strongly." 5. Pace of decision making Since it was initially approved in 2012, the HS2 project has been through Brexit, a global pandemic and seven different Prime Ministers. The James Stewart review highlights the pace of decision making as one of the main disruptors for the project, with no buffer in place for politics. It says: "Any project of this size and scale delivered across multiple decades is going to be impacted by politics. "When I looked at comparator projects – Tideway, Sizewell C, even Crossrail – there was a buffer to the politics, either with external shareholders, regulators or joint sponsors. "The HS2 Programme has had no such buffers and has been subject to evolving political aims, which pushed forward on the schedule before there was sufficient design maturity and caused progressive removals of scope." The review found trust between stakeholders needs to be restored as the project moves forward. It says: "The significant and consistent cost overruns that have been a feature of the project have undermined trust in HS2." Following the publishing of the review, the Transport Secretary, Heidi Alexander, said: "This must be a line in the sand. This government is delivering HS2 from Birmingham to London after years of mismanagement, flawed reporting and ineffective oversight. "Mark Wild and Mike Brown were part of the team, with me, that turned Crossrail into the Elizabeth Line – we have done it before, we will do it again. "Passengers and taxpayers deserve new railways the country can be proud of and the work to get HS2 back on track is firmly underway. " The Transport Secretary confirmed Mike Brown will be taking over as HS2 Ltd Chair, working alongside CEO Mark Wild to deliver a programme reset, including reviewing the costs and schedule, renegotiating HS2's large construction contracts, and reviewing HS2 Ltd's skills and structure. The Transport Secretary has asked Mark Wild to be ready to provide an update on revised costs and delivery timescales at the end of the year.