Escalation Is Key Fear for Markets After Strike, Analysts Say
(Bloomberg) -- The key question for markets following Israel's strike on Iran is how much worse things will get, say strategists.
Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future
Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry
NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban
Do World's Fairs Still Matter?
NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire
Israel has launched airstrikes against Iran's nuclear program and military targets. Defense Minister Israel Katz called the move 'preemptive,' while Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the strikes would last until the threat is removed. The tension weighed on markets: Oil surged, Asian stocks and global equity futures fell, and the dollar reversed earlier losses as traders sought familiar havens.
Here's what market watchers from Sydney to Paris are saying:
Nicolas Forest, chief investment officer at Candriam in Brussels
'The attack on Iran is a classic risk-off factor that leads to a decline in stocks and a flight to quality. The sharp rise in oil prices, if it continues, could negatively impact growth and inflation, reinforcing the potential risk of stagflation already present with the tariff war. The oil price rally is clearly not in the interest of the Trump administration'
Kim Forrest, a US-based chief investment officer at Bokeh Capital Partners
'It seems like Israel has taken it upon itself to destroy the nuclear bomb building capabilities of Iran and that's not what we've seen in the past. It's unclear what will happen throughout the night... We'll see if cooler heads can prevail'
'This is very serious. It's surprising the market isn't down more. Do I expect things to get lower in the coming hours? Heck yeah, I expect it to be lower by the time I wake up but it'll also depend on who's talking and what's happening'
Alexandre Baradez, chief market analyst at IG in Paris
'This is likely to put the current rally on European and US indexes on hold. The stock market was getting expensive so this will encourage investors, particularly retail, to take some profits now'
Alexandre Hezez, chief investment officer at Group Richelieu in Paris
'This goes against what central banks were expecting for oil prices and could potentially change their scenario by heating up inflation and slowing growth'
Matt Maley, a US-based chief market strategist at Miller Tabak + Co.
'The comments about doing whatever it takes, Netanyahu saying this is just the beginning and the references to self defense — they are preparing for a serious retaliation. The last time Iran retaliated nothing got through but nobody knows what will happen next'
'My question is what happens with the Strait of Hormuz? Iran can shut that down and that's 13 million barrels of oil everyday not to mention natural gas and they have the ability to shut that down. Will they want to do that or limit what can go through? I don't know'
'The assumption that this will be a quick affair is a risky one... If this turns into something lengthy and the Strait of Hormuz gets impacted oil can go above $100 very quickly and that puts pressure on global growth. I don't want to overstate it because we simply don't know if things will get worse or not. The real risks are very high right now'
Michael O'Rourke, chief market strategist at JonesTrading in the US
'I'm really just trying to get the best grip I can on the situation and obviously it's fluid — but there should be more risk involved to the markets than the strikes last year'
'The market has had a tremendous rally without much of a correction so that places the market in a more vulnerable place. It's one of those situations where we've had an escalation and the question is: what does Iran do as a response? Do they have a harder strike back? That's the looming question in my mind. During the course of this rally markets have been relatively complacent so that's a key risk with where we are today'
'There's now a very likely outcome that there's a retaliatory event over the weekend and that will keep people on the sideline and a little tentative'
Billy Leung, investment strategist in Sydney at Global X ETFs
'It's a sharp reversal from last night's bullishness, when tech optimism, soft inflation, and light positioning had the market leaning risk-on — a direct Israeli strike on Iran cuts through that narrative instantly'
'This mirrors past flashpoints like the Soleimani strike in 2020, tanker attacks in 2019, where we saw the same initial reaction: oil bid, Treasuries and Swiss franc stronger'
'The key now is whether this stays contained — history shows markets often fade the shock if escalation is limited'
Wei Liang Chang, a Singapore-based macro strategist at DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
'There could be a knee-jerk reaction in markets, as Middle East geopolitical risks return to to the fore'
'Markets will assess the impact of the strike and watch for risks of an escalation'
'Risky assets could see a pare back, while safe havens such the yen and US Treasuries could be bid'
Matthew Haupt, portfolio manager in Sydney at Wilson Asset Management
'Seeing classical risk off moves with bonds and gold bid, along with a spike in oil. Quite often these moves are faded after the initial shocks. What we are watching now for is the speed and scale of the response from Tehran, that will shape the duration of the current moves'
Charu Chanana, chief investment strategist in Singapore at Saxo Markets
'Whether this risk-off tone sticks now depends on the next 24-48 hours. If Tehran's response is limited and energy flows remain uninterrupted, experience suggests the premium can bleed out fairly quickly. But any sign of retaliation or supply disruption would keep volatility elevated and push oil and safe-haven assets higher.'
Rodrigo Catril, a Sydney-based strategist at National Australia Bank
'One theme to watch is whether the dollar's safe haven attributes are being diluted by the US administration's trade policy (tariffs), fiscal profligacy and its challenge to the rule of law. Evidence to date suggests that is the case'
'Israel's unilateral move, if confirmed, also highlights how the world order is potentially changing'
'The US is seemingly stepping away from a leading geopolitical role, opening the door for others to pursue their own agenda'
'The concern here would be that Israel is just one and others could follow in the belief that the US won't be there to stop them'
'Geopolitics is becoming a more disruptive force for markets, adding another layer of uncertainty. Safe havens will go bid but the dollar may not'
--With assistance from Marcus Wong, John Cheng, Bailey Lipschultz, Winnie Hsu and Ruth Carson.
(Adds further analyst comments.)
American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination
New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years
The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software
US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom
As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining?
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Football club investor Eagle files for US IPO, Bloomberg News reports
(Reuters) -Eagle Football Holdings, one of the most active investors in global football clubs, has confidentially filed for a U.S. initial public offering, Bloomberg News reported on Friday. Reuters could not immediately confirm the report. The France-based company submitted a draft registration statement to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the report added, citing a company statement. The firm has been working with UBS Group AG on the potential IPO, the report said. Eagle Football, run by U.S. businessman John Textor, holds stakes in multiple football clubs including Olympique Lyonnais, Crystal Palace and Brazil's Botafogo. The SEC and Eagle Football did not immediately respond to request for comment outside regular business hours. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Hamilton Spectator
35 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Marines take over some security in LA while cities across US prep for ‘No Kings' rallies
LOS ANGELES (AP) — After a week of protests over federal immigration raids, about 200 Marines moved into Los Angeles on Friday to guard a federal building in the city while communities across the country prepped for what's anticipated to be a nationwide wave of large-scale demonstrations against President Donald Trump's polices this weekend. The Marine troops with rifles, combat gear and walkie-talkies took over some posts from National Guard members who were deployed to the city after the protests erupted last week . Those protests sparked dozens more over several days around the country, with some leading to clashes with police and hundreds of arrests. The Marines had not been seen on Los Angeles city streets until Friday. They finished training on civil disturbance and have started to replace Guard members protecting the federal building west of downtown, so the Guard soldiers can be assigned to protect law enforcement officers on raids, the commander in charge of 4,700 troops deployed to the LA protests said. The Marines moved into Los Angeles before Saturday's planned 'No Kings' demonstrations nationally against Trump's policies, which will also happen the same day as a military parade in Washington, D.C., when troops will march and tanks will rumble through the streets of the nation's capital. The Marines' arrival also came a day after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that had directed Trump to return control of Guard troops to California. The judge had ruled the Guard deployment was illegal, violated the Tenth Amendment, which defines the power between state and federal governments, and exceeded Trump's statutory authority. The judge did not rule on the presence of the Marines. Military mission Some 2,000 National Guard troops were deployed to Los Angeles this week. Hundreds have provided protection to immigration agents making arrests. Another 2,000 Guard members were notified of deployment earlier this week. None of the military troops will be detaining anyone, Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, the commander of Task Force 51 who is overseeing the 4,700 combined troops, said. 'I would like to emphasize that the soldiers will not participate in law enforcement activities,' Sherman said. 'Rather, they'll be focused on protecting federal law enforcement personnel.' Roughly 500 National Guard members have been used to provide security on immigration raids after undergoing expanded instruction, legal training and rehearsals with the agents doing the enforcement before they go on those missions. By mid-afternoon Friday, more than a dozen Marines were stationed outside the 17-story Wilshire Federal Building, replacing some members of the National Guard at various entrances. They mostly appeared to be checking tickets from members of the public who were there to renew their passports. The building is the same place Democratic U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla on Thursday was forcefully removed from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's news conference and handcuffed by officers as he tried to speak up about the immigration raids. There were no protesters around the building. Occasionally, a passing driver shouted from their window, registering a mix of anger and support for the military presence. Sherman said the U.S. Marine Corps is responsible for guarding U.S. embassies overseas so they are well-trained on how to defend a federal building. California vs. Trump California Gov. Gavin Newsom has called the troop deployment a 'serious breach of state sovereignty' and a power grab by Trump, and he has gone to court to stop it. The president has cited a legal provision that allows him to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' A federal judge said in a ruling late Thursday that what is happening in Los Angeles does not meet the definition of a rebellion and issued an order to return control of the Guard to California before the appeals court stopped it from going into effect Friday. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump thanked the appeals court Friday morning. 'If I didn't send the Military into Los Angeles, that city would be burning to the ground right now,' he said. The court will hold a hearing on the matter Tuesday. Under federal law, active-duty forces are prohibited by law from conducting law enforcement. The Trump administration has characterized the city as a 'war zone,' which local authorities dispute. Recent protesters have drawn a few hundred attendees who marched through downtown chanting, dancing and poking fun at the Trump administration's characterization of the city. There have been about 500 arrests since Saturday, mostly for failing to leave the area at the request of law enforcement, according to the police. There have been a handful of more serious charges, including for assault against officers and for possession of a Molotov cocktail and a gun. Nine officers have been hurt, mostly with minor injuries. An 8 p.m. curfew has been in place in a 1-square-mile (2.5-square-kilometer) section of downtown. The city of Los Angeles encompasses roughly 500 square miles (1,295 square kilometers). Protests have ended after a few hours with arrests this week largely for failure to disperse. No Kings The 'No Kings' demonstrations are planned in nearly 2,000 locations around the country , according to the movement's website. A flagship march and rally is planned for Philadelphia, but no protests are scheduled to take place in Washington, D.C., where the military parade will be held. Participants are expected to seek to de-escalate any potential confrontation, organizers say. In Florida, state Attorney General James Uthmeier warned that any protesters who become violent will be dealt with harshly. States face questions on deploying troops Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, has put 5,000 National Guard members on standby in cities where demonstrations are planned. In other Republican-controlled states, governors have not said when or how they may deploy troops. A group of Democratic governors in a statement called Trump's deployments 'an alarming abuse of power.' Washington state Gov. Bob Ferguson took to social media Friday to call for peaceful protests over the weekend, to ensure the military is not sent to the state. 'Don't give him an excuse to try and federalize the National Guard like he did in California,' he said. Military parade The military parade in Washington which Trump had unsuccessfully pushed for during his first term — will also feature concerts, fireworks, NFL players, fitness competitions and displays all over the National Mall for daylong festivities. The celebration Saturday also happens to be Trump's birthday. The Army expects as many as 200,000 people could attend and says putting on the celebration will cost an estimated $25 million to $45 million . ___ Taxin reported from Santa Ana, California. Baldor contributed from Washington. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


The Hill
35 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the government's terms
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a 'golden share' — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership,' the two companies said. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work and what investments would be made. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans.' The Japan-based steelmaker had been offering nearly $15 billion to purchase the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in a merger that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, yet he expressed optimism in working out an arrangement once in office. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' said Trump, although it was unclear what he meant by suggesting that the federal government would determine what U.S. Steel does as a company. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' Still, Nippon Steel has never said it was backing off its bid to buy and control U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction. Trump reserves the authority to issue further actions regarding the investment as part of the order he signed on Friday. ___ Associated Press writer Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report.