US seizes record $225 million from crypto investment scammers
US law enforcement has seized over $225 million in cryptocurrency allegedly stolen from dozens of American victims as part of a sophisticated investment scam, the Justice Department said Wednesday.
It's the largest-ever seizure of funds stolen in so-called 'crypto confidence' scams, which dupe people into investing in fraudulent cryptocurrency schemes, the department said.
The scam affected more than 400 people worldwide, including dozens of Americans, and caused millions of dollars in losses, according to a criminal complaint unsealed Wednesday. The scammers conducted 'hundreds of thousands' of transactions in an effort to launder the stolen cryptocurrency, according to the Justice Department.
The US government now has possession of the stolen crypto and will be working to return as much of it as possible to victims, Shawn Bradstreet, a special agent in charge at the Secret Service, said at a news conference on Wednesday.
Losses from crypto investment scams have surged in recent years. Victims reported nearly $4 billion in crypto-related investment losses in 2023 compared to $2.57 billion in 2022, according to the FBI. That number increased to $5.8 billion in 2024.
The FBI and Secret Service are trying to do more to sound the alarm that the crypto-investment scams could ruin Americans' lives and those of their loved ones. CNN reported last year on one American man in his 80s who took his own life after losing all his savings to scammers.
A large volume of crypto confidence scams— also referred to as 'pig butchering' — are conducted by networks of scammers in Southeast Asia, according to US law enforcement. A CNN investigation has traced some of the schemes to large compounds along the Myanmar-Thailand border.
In this case, investigators traced at least some of the fraudulent activity to the Philippines.
'These scams prey on trust, often resulting in extreme financial hardship for the victims,' Bradstreet, the Secret Service agent, said in a statement.
For some US law enforcement officials, Wednesday's crackdown is a welcome sign that the Trump administration will continue to pursue prolific networks of crypto scammers.
An April memo from Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche accused the Biden administration of using prosecutions to effectively impose regulations on the cryptocurrency industry, raising concerns among some law enforcement agents that the new department leadership would not aggressively pursue crypto scams.
The memo also disbanded the Justice Department's National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team, which the Biden administration set up in 2022 to pursue criminal misuse of crypto and other digital assets.
But Jeanine Pirro, the interim US attorney for the District of Columbia, said at a news conference Wednesday that prosecutors would go after the scammers.
'This is an unregulated Wild West,' Pirro said of crypto-related crime. 'But it's not just an unregulated Wild West. It's the Wild North, East and South.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
25 minutes ago
Appeals court says DOJ cannot represent Trump in appeal of E. Jean Carroll case
American taxpayers will not be paying for the ongoing appeal of President Donald Trump's $83 million defamation case, a federal appeals court determined on Wednesday. A panel of judges on the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday denied Trump's request to have Justice Department lawyers argue in his appeal of columnist E. Jean Carroll's defamation case against Trump. A New York jury last year ordered Trump to pay the former Elle magazine columnist $83.3 million in damages for defaming her in 2019 when he denied her accusation that he sexually assaulted her in the dressing room of a Bergdorf Goodman department store in the mid-1990s. Trump has denied all allegations. DOJ lawyers had argued that since some of Trump's alleged conduct fell within the scope of his role as president, the Justice Department should be able to defend the president in court. "Substitution is required because once the Attorney General certifies that a defendant is acting within the scope of his office or employment, the United States is the party defendant unless and until a court rules to the contrary," they argued. ABC News has reached out to Trump's legal team for comment. Oral arguments in Trump's appeal of the case are set for June 24. Last week the 2nd Circuit denied Trump's request
Axios
29 minutes ago
- Axios
Handcuffed Democrats become symbol of Trump's crackdown on dissent
A string of Democratic officials' arrests and clashes involving federal agents has sent a message about the way the administration responds to dissent: with force, or the threat of it. The big picture: Critics say the Tuesday arrest of New York City comptroller Brad Lander was the latest example of the administration backing force in the face of immigration-related dissent. The Department of Homeland Security said Lander was arrested for assaulting law enforcement and impeding a federal officer, though Gov. Kathy Hochul said it was her understanding any charges against him had been dropped. But Raha Wala, the Vice President of Strategy and Partnerships at the National Immigration Law Center, said it was one moment "in a series of absurd overreactions to the very simple notion that people should have their day in court." Driving the news: Images of Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) and Lander being handcuffed and Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) facing a federal indictment crystalized burgeoning fears among Democrats about Trump's willingness to sidestep norms to crush dissent. Padilla's forceful removal from Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's press conference earlier this month was kerosene on escalating tensions over Trump's federalization of the National Guard in response to the Los Angeles protests without the state's consent. American Oversight Executive Director Chioma Chukwu said the administration's movement of troops "absolutely is an abuse of power." Friction point: The jarring images of Democrats' detainments and removals correspond to what Wala said is "an even more jarring reality." He argues the administration is pursuing an "unprecedented authoritarian playbook ... on the backs of immigrant communities." Wala sees a "completely unprecedented and un-American assault on basic due process rights" that has started "in the immigration context but ... won't end there." The other side: White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson questioned in a statement to Axios why "so many Democrat officials feel emboldened to brazenly break the law and ... complain when they are held accountable." She said Democrats who have been removed or arrested are "disingenuously characterizing their behavior with the help of the Fake News media." What they're saying: "The disturbing incident in Los Angeles reflects this administration's alarming tendency to use federal officers to squelch dissenting voices," writes Kareem Crayton, vice president of the Brennan Center for Justice's Washington, D.C. office. "An unabashed government stamping out dissent through force ignores the commitment to unfettered political discourse that defines American law and traditions," he wrote. Zoom out: A common issue area threads the arrests, removals and protests: the administration's aggressive deportation tactics. In Lander's case, he was arrested while attempting escort a defendant out of immigration court, as Immigration and Customs Enforcement has surged courthouse arrests. Similarly, Baraka's arrest came during a conflict at an ICE detention center in May that also involved three House Democrats. While the trespassing charge Baraka faced was dropped, Rep. LaMonica McIver was later charged with assaulting, impeding and interfering with law enforcement. She plans to plead not guilty. And Trump earlier this month suggested Gov. Gavin Newsom should be next. Newsom, in response, characterized Trump's comment as "an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism."
Axios
29 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Democrats probe FBI handcuffing of Padilla
The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee is scrutinizing FBI agents' forcible removal and handcuffing of Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) at the agency's Los Angeles headquarters last week, Axios has learned. Why it matters: It is the latest salvo in an escalating tit-for-tat between Democrats and the Trump administration over federal law enforcement's use of physical and legal force against elected officials. In a letter to FBI Director Kash Patel, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) labeled the Padilla incident "the most recent in a string of increasingly flagrant abuses of power by the Trump Administration to deter congressional oversight and intimidate Members of Congress." The FBI declined to comment on the matter. Driving the news: Raskin, the Judiciary Committee's ranking member, is asking Patel for a "detailed accounting of the FBI's operational involvement" in Padilla's forcible removal, according to a copy of his letter first obtained by Axios. That includes a timeline of the incident, information on the chain of command involved in authorizing or overseeing the FBI agents' actions and the "specific justification" for the use of force against Padilla. He also demanded all internal documents and communications related to the incident, as well as a statement from the FBI about whether its agents violated federal law prohibiting assault against a member of Congress. Zoom in: Raskin is also asking the FBI to conduct its own investigation into the incident and to arrange a briefing for him. The briefing, he wrote, should address whether an internal probe is underway and if any disciplinary action has been taken against the agents involved. Patel, a loyalist to President Trump, is highly unlikely to accede to any of Raskin's demands. What he's saying: " Can you explain why asking government officials to answer basic questions is such a threat to this Administration that it would resort to such tactics against a United States Senator?" Raskin wrote to Patel.
