"Why Are You In My Country?" American's Racist Rant Against Indian Man Sparks Outrage
"Why are you in my country? I don't like you guys here. There are too many of you guys here. Indians! You guys are flooding all the white countries. I am tired of it. Americans are sick of this sh**. I want you to go back to India," he says.
"Tired of this fu**** brown people invading the country. fu**** bullshit," the American says, contunuing his rant.
Watch the video here:
Anti Christian behaviors pic.twitter.com/VCsquG6ieg
— Abrahamic Lincoln (@AbrahamicLs) July 6, 2025
The video has sparked massive outrage, with many condemning the American man's behaviour as unacceptable and discriminatory. Some have called for action against the individual, while others have highlighted the need for greater awareness and understanding between cultures. One user wrote, "Nothing, they're just intimidated by Indians! They know how talented, capable, and progressive we are. It only shows their insecurities. They see us as a threat."
Another commented, "Who are you to ask him to leave the USA? Who gave you the permission? He is an American. He is successful, but you are not, so it's not his problem. Who told u that USa is a white country? USA belongs to non-Christian, non white, red INDIANS."
A third said, "If all migrants leave America today, the country wouldn't even exist anymore, and the land would go back to the native people." A fourth added, "You do know that white people are not originally from America, right?"
This incident is part of a growing trend of hate crimes and xenophobic attacks against Indians and other minorities in Western countries. Indian Americans often face discrimination in various domains like the workplace, housing, education, and public spaces, often tied to skin colour, religion, or cultural stereotypes. While they are among the most educated and affluent ethnic groups in the US, with over 4.2 million people of Indian origin, discrimination remains a significant issue.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
21 minutes ago
- Economic Times
tsla: Elon Musk's net worth dips by $14 Billion in a single day, Here's what investors are saying
Wall Street Grows Wary of Musk's Political Maneuvers Elon Musk Net Worth Takes a Major Hit ADVERTISEMENT Tesla's Sales and Shareholder Confidence Slipping ADVERTISEMENT Musk-Trump Rift Adds Fuel to the Fire The America Party: Strategic Move or Political Overreach? ADVERTISEMENT Musk Political Party Yet to Find Favor Among Investors FAQs Why did Elon Musk lose $14 billion in a single day? What is the 'America Party'? Tech billionaire Elon Musk, known for his sweeping influence in both the corporate and political arenas, suffered a sharp blow to his personal wealth and business standing on Monday. With Tesla shares tumbling 7 per cent, Musk's net worth fell by approximately $14 billion in a single day—an erosion tied closely to Wall Street's growing unease over his escalating political drop follows Musk's announcement of a new political outfit, the 'America Party,' and his increasingly public rift with U.S. President Donald Trump, a development that analysts say has distracted from Tesla's core business performance, as per a report by announcement of Musk's political venture comes at a time of volatility in the electric vehicle (EV) sector and heightened scrutiny of regulatory frameworks under the Trump administration. In a client note issued Monday, William Blair analyst Jed Dorsheimer downgraded Tesla stock from 'Buy' to 'Hold,' citing what he called a 'less favourable federal regulatory credit environment' resulting from recent legislation.'Investors are growing tired of the distraction,' Dorsheimer wrote, referring to Musk's increasing political theatrics and public feuds. The sentiment was echoed across trading desks, with Tesla's shares plunging by $24 apiece during an otherwise uneventful day for the broader Tesla's market value taking a dip, Musk's personal wealth—which remains the largest in the world—now stands at $391 billion, down from $405 billion the previous day, according to Forbes estimates. Despite the decline, he still maintains a commanding lead of over $100 billion compared to the next richest net worth slide comes amid a 32% drop in Tesla stock since President Trump's second term began—a stark contrast to the 4% gain logged by the S&P 500 benchmark in the same struggle is not confined to the stock market. Analysts at J.P. Morgan reported Monday that the company is headed toward its worst annual vehicle delivery numbers since 2022. Data from the first two quarters of 2025 reveal significant declines in deliveries, attributed in part to waning public sentiment towards Musk polling data compiled by Silver Bulletin indicates that 55% of Americans now hold an unfavourable view of Musk, up from 45% at the end of last year. The souring of opinion spans party lines—Democrats, Republicans, and independents alike have all expressed declining confidence in the Tesla CEO, as per a report by Forbes.'The concern isn't just political,' noted Wedbush analyst Dan Ives, a long-time supporter of Tesla stock. 'Musk diving deeper into politics and now trying to take on the Beltway establishment is exactly the opposite direction that Tesla investors and shareholders want him to take.'Initially viewed as a strategic alliance between two high-profile power players, the Musk-Trump relationship has deteriorated rapidly over the past few weeks. Musk reportedly contributed $288 million toward Trump's re-election campaign last year, positioning himself as a key political their alignment began to unravel following disagreements over Trump's recently signed fiscal package, which the Congressional Budget Office warns could expand the national debt by $3.4 trillion. Their feud reached a public climax last week when Trump labelled Musk a 'TRAIN WRECK' in a scathing post, while Musk retaliated by accusing the Trump administration of misrepresenting the controversial Epstein Files—a post he later launch of the 'America Party' is seen by some observers as an effort to channel public dissatisfaction into political capital. However, financial markets appear unconvinced, interpreting the move as a distraction from Tesla's operational priorities at a time when competition in the EV market is a twist of irony, Musk's losses on Monday—nearly $14 billion—were nearly equivalent to the total market capitalization of Rivian, Tesla's closest American rival in the EV Musk doubles down on political ambition, industry watchers and financial analysts are raising alarms over the implications for Tesla's long-term trajectory. With analysts now sounding cautionary notes and shareholders increasingly vocal in their discontent, questions remain about how Musk plans to balance corporate leadership with his emerging political the 'America Party' may yet shape U.S. political dynamics, its immediate impact on investor sentiment has been unambiguously negative. For now, the market message is clear: stakeholders would prefer the world's richest man to steer clear of Capitol Hill and return focus to the factory personal wealth dropped by approximately $14 billion on Monday, July 7, 2025, after Tesla shares fell by 7%. This sharp decline is tied to investor concerns over Musk's growing political involvement, particularly the launch of his new political outfit, the 'America Party.'The 'America Party' is a new political movement launched by Elon Musk. Although full details remain limited, it appears to be Musk's attempt to influence U.S. politics independently, diverging from traditional party lines and challenging political norms—an effort many investors view as a distraction from his business priorities.
Economic Times
21 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Multilateralism must Trump US-first policy
Donald Trump's America-first stance reflects his belief that the US has lost global dominance, and he aims to restore the US to its former glory by ensuring that the world 'respects' the US. On Sunday, Trump injected himself into the summit of the BRICS group of nations in Rio de Janeiro, warning countries that aligning with the 'anti-American' policies of the grouping would attract a 10% tariff. At the summit, BRICS leaders expressed 'serious concerns' about the rise in unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures'. Though the US was not mentioned by name, the signals were clear. Whether it is BRICS, of which the US is not a member, or the Quad, of which it is, what is increasingly clear is that the Trump administration is focused on pursuing an 'America for itself' policy. Washington has hosted two Quad foreign ministers' meetings in the last six months, with a focus on security. There is little doubt that this recalibration is driven by China's ambitions and influence in the Indo-Pacific region. But then, Trump's US is not the poster child for steady ties-consider the renewed engagement with Pakistan. The BRICS summit was about what lies ahead-how emerging economies deliver on their promises. Contrary to Trump's apprehension, the US remains the pre-eminent global power. That explains China's response to the 10% additional tariff. The Rio summit and the Quad foreign ministers' meeting point to the same thing: multilateralism remains the only viable response. To ensure that the world does not move from a US-dominated world order to one defined by the Beijing-Kremlin combine, countries like India need to step up and engage more globally to build a multilateral system that is fit for the 21st century.
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
1993 serial blasts: Bombay HC says Abu Salem's 25-year jail term prima facie not over yet
The Bombay High Court on Monday prima facie observed that gangster Abu Salem, who has been sentenced to life imprisonment in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case, has not completed 25 years of incarceration to qualify for remission of his sentence. Salem has claimed that he has completed nearly 25 years in prison as per extradition treaty between India and Portugal and therefore he should be given a tentative date of release from jail. The HC admitted Salem's plea seeking remission and premature release from jail argued through senior advocate Rishi Malhotra and advocate Farhana Shah 'As per the Supreme Court judgment, it is recorded that the date of arrest is October 12, 2005. On completion of 25 years of incarceration, the central government is bound to exercise the powers of remission and release the applicant. Prima facie, it is clear that the 25 years of incarceration is yet to be completed,' a bench of Justices Ajey S Gadkari and Rajesh S Patil observed and admitted the plea. Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh for Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) sought dismissal of Salem's plea stating that honouring the 25-year period mentioned in assurance will arise only when the 25 years were to expire, which will happen on November 10, 2030. The MHA said that it would abide by the period of 25 years at an appropriate time subject to remedies, which may be available. Salem, who was transferred from Taloja Central Prison in Navi Mumbai to Nashik Central Prison last year, was extradited to India from Portugal on November 11, 2005. He was placed under arrest on November 24, 2005, and subsequently tried for the offences he had been charged with. In September 2017, Salem was convicted in the Mumbai serial blasts case. Two years earlier, in 2015, he had been sentenced to life imprisonment for the 1995 murder of Mumbai-based builder Pradeep Jain. On July 11, 2022, the Supreme Court observed that the central government was bound to advise the President to exercise his powers of remission to release Salem after he completes 25 years in prison, in accordance with the sovereign assurance given by the Indian government to Portugal at the time of his extradition. However, the court declined to extend any special privilege to commute or restrict the sentence imposed on him. In October last year, Salem argued before the special court designated under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) that he had neared 25-year term and same included time spent as an undertrial and later as a convict, along with nearly three years of remission he was entitled to under prison rules. In December, 2024, the special court rejected Salem's claim, after which he approached the High Court. The MHA's affidavit in response stated that the plea was 'entirely misconceived, baseless and is based on a misplaced understanding of law'. The Centre further said that the petitioner should approach the SC for further clarification as it would be the appropriate forum. The MHA said that the petitioner's calculation was 'not correct' and he has 'attempted to combine two separate conviction periods undergone in separate cases to arrive at a conclusion' that he completed a conviction period of 24 years and nine months on December 31, 2024. However, the MHA in its May, 2025 affidavit claimed that till March 31, 2025 he had served 19 years, 5 months and 21 days. The HC will hear the plea in due course.
