What's next as Trump takes over DC police, deploys National Guard
'This is liberation day in D.C. and we're going to take our capital back,' said Trump, who has long floated plans to overhaul the District, which is governed by a council of elected representatives and a mayor.
'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people, and we're not going to let it happen anymore,' the president told a packed White House press briefing room.
With D.C. police now under federal control, here's what to expect next.
Bondi, DEA chief to run point
Trump's declaration of taking over the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) delegates authority of the city's police force to Attorney General Pam Bondi.
A few hours after Trump's announcement, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser said she would follow the executive order and had reached out to Bondi to meet.
Trump also announced he was designating Terry Cole as MPD's interim federal commissioner. Cole was confirmed just under three weeks ago to lead the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).
Trump at his press conference lauded Cole as the 'most highly recommended person' and 'one of the top in the country.'
'He better be. Terry, if not, I'm going to get rid of you so fast,' Trump joked.
MPD Chief Pamela Smith said she was in contact with federal partners, telling D.C. residents the announcement meant residents should expect an 'enhanced presence' in the city.
One expert thinks it could have longlasting efforts on the department – and not in a good way.
Tahir Duckett, executive director of the Center for Innovations in Community Safety and an adjunct professor at Georgetown Law, said some in the D.C. police force may get frustrated by reassignments and being overseen by a federal force that does very different work from community policing.
It could also shake DC residents and further hamper crime-fighting.
'It's going to break down community trust, which any police officer will tell you, that the only way that you actually solve murders [or] armed robberies, is when you have really deep trust,' Duckett said.
Congress to intervene
Trump is taking over MPD by invoking a provision of the D.C. Home Rule Act, a law Congress passed in the 1970s that established a city council and gave it and the mayor control over local affairs.
The provision, Section 740, provides Trump – and any U.S. president – some temporary ability to unilaterally seize control of MPD in emergency situations, but it also provides key levers for congressional intervention.
Trump already met the initial requirement to provide written notification to Congress of the takeover within 48 hours. House Oversight Committee Republicans confirmed receipt on Monday.
With the notifications delivered, Trump can unilaterally take over the police force for up to 30 days. Congress must pass a joint resolution to extend it further, which could leave Democrats in the position of voting against it, thus providing the GOP with a prime opportunity to portray the opposing party as 'soft on crime.'
'Congress will work with President Trump to restore law and order in Washington, D.C.,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) wrote on X.
Lawmakers could also vote at any time to immediately take away Trump's control of MPD, and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said he would introduce such a measure. But Republicans' majorities in both chambers make any rebuke unlikely.
Congress is also on recess until after Labor Day.
Trump has additionally previously floated a federal takeover of the city more broadly, but that would require congressional approval.
800 National Guard troops to patrol DC
Beyond the MPD takeover, Trump said on Monday that he's deploying 800 D.C. National Guard troops as the push to rid the capital of crime moves forward 'very rapidly.'
Last week, the president had ordered federal law enforcement officials to patrol Washington streets for a week, an effort led by the U.S. Park Police with officers and agents from the FBI, DEA, ICE and other groups.
'The Metropolitan Police Department and the federal authorities will be supported in the effort, a really big effort, [by] the 800 DC National Guardsmen that we'll put on and much more if necessary,' Trump said. 'If necessary, we're going to move service members directly to joining the guardsmen. And that'll take place very rapidly.'
The announcement drew sharp pushback from Democrats, arguing the capital's crime rates don't align with Trump's drastic move. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) argued there's 'no basis' for the takeover and suggested Trump 'get lost.'
Trump controversially deployed more than 2,000 members of the National Guard in June to Los Angeles to crack down on protests over the administration's immigration policies, a move that bypassed the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D).
'The president operates like he is the governor of D.C., and the governor of a state can deploy the National Guard in times of emergency. Here, I think there's an argument that there's no particular urgency,' said Paul Schiff Berman, a former dean of the George Washington University Law School.
'Even if there is an emergency with regard to some law enforcement priorities, it's not at all clear that the President really has the authority to unilaterally suspend the mayor's other governmental responsibilities.'
Trump says he'll appoint judges, end no-cash bail
Citing crime concerns, the president also shared plans to appoint new D.C. judges and end no-cash bail as part of his crackdown.
'We're going to be appointing some judges. You know, we have some open spots, and we're going to take people — because the judges are letting killers out,' Trump said at Monday's press conference.
The president has the power to nominate D.C.'s local judges, and they must clear Senate confirmation. Trump added that Bondi, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and others had already recommended several candidates.
'We've got 10 open spots, and we can probably create some more. We need them,' Trump said.
D.C.'s local trial court had 13 vacancies as of July 18, and its appeals court had two openings, according to the city's Judicial Nomination Commission.
Trump also blasted no-cash bail systems in cities such as D.C., New York and Chicago. Illinois was the first state to eliminate cash bail as a condition of pretrial release back in 2023, while D.C. largely removed cash bail back in the 1990s.
'This dire public safety crisis stems directly from the abject failures of the city's local leadership. The radical left City Council adopted no cash bail,' Trump said.
'We're going to change no cash bail. We're going to change the statute and get rid of some of the other things, and we'll count on the Republicans in Congress and Senate to vote. We have the majority, so we'll vote.'
DC attorney general considering legal options
D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb (D) is leaving the door open to taking legal action against the president.
'We are considering all of our options and will do what's necessary to protect the rights and safety of District residents,' Schwalb said in a statement.
Schwalb rebuked Trump's assertion that crime is out of control in D.C., pointing to recent data showing violent crime is down 26 percent so far in 2025.
'The Administration's actions are unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful. There is no crime emergency in the District of Columbia,' Schwalb said.
But it remains unclear whether courts would have the power to review Trump's emergency declaration taking over MPD or otherwise intervene.
And for the D.C. National Guard, Trump has greater control compared to state units across the country.
The force in D.C. is always under the command of the president, not the mayor. That's in contrast to Trump's bid to federalize the California National Guard, which remains under a legal challenge from Newsom.
'One of the most important bulwarks against authoritarian rule in the United States is the fact that we have a Federalist system with shared sovereignty, so that the president or the federal government generally can't simply take over states,' said Berman.
'The problem is that D.C. is not a state. And so it gives the President more leeway. And that's really dangerous.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
The Post's Eric Adams support: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 13, 2025
The Issue: The Post's editorial urging President Trump to endorse Mayor Adams for re-election. Wasn't it the New York Post that featured photos of Mayor Adams greeting busloads of illegal immigrants at Port Authority ('The Post says: Endorse Adams Apple,' Editorial, Aug. 8)? Have you already forgotten about the billions of dollars that taxpayers shelled out to house, feed and educate illegals? Advertisement Have you forgotten about all the corrupt politicians Adams surrounded himself with in his administration? One would think The Post would do the right thing for New Yorkers and instead ask President Trump to endorse Curtis Sliwa. Ruth Adler The Bronx Advertisement The Post's support for Eric Adams illustrates a lack of innovation. New York City is primed for a change, which requires the insights of Sliwa. Any other candidate inhabits a 'business as usual' mentality. Advertisement God willing, enough people will stop the madness and give Sliwa his due. Jonathan Kiddrane Queens I urge all New Yorkers to get behind Adams. Advertisement I believe that he cares about New York City and is well aware of the mistakes he has made in his first term. Above all else, he cares about the quality-of-life issues in all five boroughs. He does not want to brainwash us, seize property, close family businesses or make our neighborhoods less safe. Whether you live in Chinatown, Little Italy, Forest Hills, Harlem or elsewhere, Adams will advocate for you. Ken Karcinell Hewlett Adams is the greatest sleazeball since Jimmy Walker during the Roaring '20s. Yes, Andrew Cuomo is distasteful and Zohran Mamdani is over the moon, but going to bat for Adams indicates rabid insanity. Advertisement Doug Brin Brooklyn Has the New York Post lost its mind? How, for the love of God, could you ask President Trump to endorse Adams for re-election? Advertisement Adams has been a complete disaster since his first day in office. Cuomo and Mamdani — the despicable communist — are even worse. Sliwa is the only viable candidate with a chance to bring some semblance of sanity back to our once-great city. John Lucadamo Advertisement Westchester County While The Post raises legitimate questions about Cuomo's record, endorsing Adams overlooks how many of his policies resemble those of Mamdani and Cuomo. Trump would be wise to refrain from any endorsements to avoid involvement in the federal scrutiny the next mayor will likely face over a range of ludicrous campaign proposals. Michael Mulhall Advertisement Moseley, Va. The Issue: The possible cancellation of 'The Howard Stern Show' following a dropoff in listeners. Howard Stern lost his edge years ago when he suddenly went woke ('Bye bye booey: Staff coasting,' Aug. 10). For most of his career, he eschewed good taste and battled critics, going out of his way to be politically incorrect. The more outrageous he was, the funnier he got, and that earned him a tremendous following. But, as Howard's longtime fans know, he is driven by money. When Stern realized his brand of humor could get him canceled, he became a soft liberal. Bill Calvo Brooklyn This is not the old Howard Stern; he is kissing up to the targets, like the woke people he once hated. I have a better opinion of Stern staffers Gary Dell'Abate and Fred Norris than I do of Stern. He shouldn't be offered any extension of his show. The time to pull the plug is now. Sheldon Fosburg Staten Island Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
Mamdani's ‘war' against Trump spells bad news for NYC
Zohran Mamdani's 'Five Boroughs Against Trump' tour makes oodles of sense for him — but only at the expense of the rest of the city. Not just because the last thing New Yorkers need is a mayor seeking a war with the White House, since they'd inevitably be the cannon fodder. More: Centering the mayoral debate on countering President Donald Trump encourages everyone to ignore all the issues Mamdani doesn't want voters thinking about, like how to make the streets and subways safe, the public schools functional and the local economy growing. It also prevents any focus on his privilege and inexperience, his cop-hatred, his obsessive loathing of Israel and the unworkability of pretty much his entire 'positive' agenda. Truth is, it mainly appeals to the vanity of his Democratic Socialists and their cheerleaders: Already imagining that their guy's surprise victory (in a Democratic primary) puts America on the brink of a new socialist era, they now get to also dream of Mamdani somehow turning the tide against Bad Orange Man. Except that he can't 'stand up' to Trump (beyond boring bits like the legal efforts to claw back improperly canceled grants that Mayor Eric Adams already has under way). Indeed, no mere mayor of any city can. Check the US Constitution: You'll find no mention of a mayoral power to check the president, Congress or for that matter the Supreme Court. And in the real world, a Mayor Mamdani declaring war on Trump would entail setting City Hall on fire and expecting the White House to burn down. New York City has zero leverage over the federal government, except perhaps 1) Wall Street's money — which socialists can't direct except via their trust funds — and 2) whatever power the national media has left — when the media's already done its damnedest to stop Trump. The feds, meanwhile, can screw New York eight ways to Sunday, starting with cutting back on the hundreds of billions it sends our way. Nor can local government 'withhold' New Yorkers' taxes, as some whiz kids in the Legislature suggest. State Attorney General Tish James, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg and a few complacent judges have already waged their worst lawfare against Trump, while then-Mayor Bill de Blasio did what he could against the Trump businesses that remain here. 'Trump-proofing' the city — the new tough talk from progressives around the country — is an empty threat, too: Federal law almost always trumps state and local ordinances. Playing tough guy and talking big is sure to give Mamdani lots of outraged outtakes for his social media. But he is writing checks that the people of NYC will have to pay.
New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
What to expect from Friday's Trump-Putin summit on US soil: Will a peace deal actually be reached?
WASHINGTON — President Trump's Friday meeting with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin may be the most-watched Washington-Moscow summit in decades — but don't expect any major decisions to be made as the US president seeks a 'more firm understanding' of how to end Moscow's war on Ukraine, sources and experts tell The Post. Trump, 79, plans to treat the meeting as a 'listening exercise' rather than a high-stakes negotiation, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday. While Putin, 72, has set audacious conditions for agreeing to a cease-fire with Ukraine, the US has made no concrete decision to date on whether to support them, sources familiar with the matter tell The Post. What Russia wants Among the demands reportedly pushed by Putin — almost entirely unchanged from the start of the war nearly three-and-a-half years ago — is the formal recognition by the US and Ukraine of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts as Russian territory, despite Moscow being unable to secure them in 11 years of trying. Advertisement 4 Russia's President Vladimir Putin and President Donald Trump attend a meeting on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Osaka, Japan June 28, 2019. REUTERS This recognition would include the roughly 30% of Donetsk and Luhansk that Russia does not control. The Kremlin also seeks a freezing of the current front lines. Advertisement The desires were communicated to Trump by Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, who met with Putin at the Kremlin last week, according to European officials. However, Russia has not made these demands public, which is one reason why Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky would like a sitdown with Putin — to get the terms direct from the horse's mouth. Russia has also pushed for Ukraine to formally agree to never join NATO, a halt to shipments of Western weapons to Ukraine and a prohibition on NATO-aligned soldiers from setting foot on Ukrainian territory. 4 Putin and Trump last saw each other in 2019. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement Despite the White House insisting the war will be the primary topic, Russian officials have indicated they see the Alaska summit as a prime opportunity to discuss potential deals with the US — including opening up Alaskan airspace to Russian flights. 'We hope that the upcoming summit will give impetus to the normalization of bilateral relations,' Russia's deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov told state media site Izvestia, noting that restoration of air traffic could be a possible topic. The Arctic and economic cooperation are also topics that interest Russia, Putin adviser Yuri Ushakov said, noting that the Kremlin hopes the meeting will lead to Trump going to Russia in the future. However, Russia observers have expressed concerns over the Alaska location — particularly as Moscow's hardliners have long 'lamented the loss of Russia's larger territorial extent throughout history,' George Barros of the Institute for the Study of War said Tuesday. Advertisement 'Russian nationalists have manufactured a pseudo-historical argument for why America's purchase of Alaska [in 1867] was illegitimate, and that Alaska is therefore actually legally Russian,' he said. 'This is all nonsense, of course.' 'The Russian nationalist doesn't respect the United States, but rather invents territorial disputes with its neighbors and seethes at Russa's diminished geography.' What Ukraine wants Zelensky, 47, has called Moscow's demands untenable for establishing a cease-fire, but has signaled openness to some concessions — so long as they are made as part of a final peace deal. Ending the war after more than three grueling years would be a positive for Zelensky, as his country has been ravaged by missile strikes, mines and Russian infantry. But the Ukrainian leader has been clear he will not accept peace at any price. 4 In this photo taken from video released by Russian Defense Ministry Press Service on Thursday, July 31, 2025, a Russian Giatsint-S self-propelled gun fires towards Ukrainian positions on an undisclosed location in Ukraine. AP Zelensky has been adamant that Ukraine receive security guarantees, like NATO membership or nuclear weapons, to ensure Russia doesn't invade again in the future. 'It is impossible to talk about Ukraine without Ukraine, and no one will recognize that. That's why this conversation may be important for their bilateral track, but they cannot decide anything on Ukraine without us,' Zelensky told reporters in Kyiv Tuesday. 'I hope the US president understands that and takes into account.' What Trump wants Advertisement Friday will give the president a chance to observe Putin with his own eyes to better assess whether the Russian dictator is 'tapping [him] along' with empty promises of peace, as Trump himself has occasionally suggested might be the case. 'Only one party that's involved in this war is going to be present, and so this is for the president to go in and to get, again, a more firm and better understanding of how we can hopefully bring this war to an end,' Leavitt said. 4 Various aircrafts are seen at Anchorage Ted Stevens International Airport in Anchorage, Alaska, United States on July 2, 2024. Anadolu via Getty Images Secretary of State Marco Rubio similarly described the summit as a 'feel-out meeting, to be honest.' Advertisement 'The president talked to Putin on the phone three or four times, OK? And nothing has come of it — or at least we haven't gotten to where we want to be,' he said. 'And so the president feels like, 'Look, I've got to look at this guy across the table. I need to see him face-to-face. I need to hear him one-on-one. I need to make an assessment by looking at him.'' Trump made ending the war in Ukraine one of his major 2024 campaign promises, and securing a peace deal would provide a major bulwark for his foreign policy legacy. To that end, Trump is expected to raise the issue of land swaps between Russia and Ukraine to gauge Putin's reaction. The US president will also speak to European leaders ahead of Friday's meeting in addition to after the sitdown, sources familiar with the preparations say. 'The next meeting will be with Zelensky and Putin, or Zelensky and Putin and me. I'll be there if they need, but I want a meeting set up between the two leaders,' Trump said Monday. 'There'll be some land swapping.'
