
Outrage as seniors are 'kicked out' of their homes in retirement mecca to make way for luxury housing boom
A senior living facility in Florida is under fire for 'evicting' elderly residents to secretly make way for upscale luxury apartments as the infamous retirement hot spot undergoes a baby boom transformation.
Oasis Living Quarters, a senior care facility in Fort Lauderdale, came under intense scrutiny in March after allegedly telling some of its 180 residents they'd have to leave their homes without giving proper notice or obtaining the correct permits, Local 10 News reported.
The facility is now facing massive fines after a building inspector discovered construction he described as being 'much like hotel rooms' while many of the seniors are still living at the facility.
City officials are slapping Oasis with $1000 daily fines for 'unpermitted construction' - work they claim is a covert effort to capitalize on demand for luxury housing in sun-soaked Fort Lauderdale.
In a city long considered a paradise for retirees, a wave of anger and disbelief has been rising among residents and their families, many of whom are elderly and need extra care.
'It's heart-wrenching,' Jim Woods, whose mother was forced out of the facility in April, told CBS News.
'Some residents don't know what's going on.'
On March 5, Oasis residents were summoned to an emergency meeting where management abruptly informed them that they had until the end of the month to vacate.
The change left many feeling 'blindsided' and unprepared for such a sudden upheaval, with families demanding answers from building management.
'We are all depressed,' Alonso and Patseta Lawhorn, who have lived at the Oasis facility for more than eight years, told NBC Miami News in March.
'Some people had to go to the hospital and some people got sick,' they added.
'I suffer from hypertension and I have one kidney and my spleen is out and my husband suffers from PTSD, and everybody is all stressed and sick.'
According to residents, all units of the facility - Independent Living, Assisted Living and the Memory Care Unit - were impacted in the mass move.
'We have to move out because they are dismantling the memory care unit,' Steven DeLeon, whose 83-year-old family member lives there, told NBC.
Milton Amengual, whose 94-year-old mother had only moved into the facility three months prior to the 'mandatory' meeting, also joined other families grappling with the shock.
'My mother is nervous. She hasn't slept in a few days just thinking about the fact that she has to move,' Amengual told Local 10.
According to Oasis, the move was because the facility would be undergoing renovations to 'enhance the overall experience' (pictured: letter from Oasis management about renovations)
'She at first thought she did something wrong - but I said, no you didn't do anything wrong.'
According to Oasis, the move was because the facility would be undergoing renovations to 'enhance the overall experience'.
However, just days later, moving trucks and vans were already filling the facility's parking lot, concealing torn-out drywall and beginning to remodel units - all while residents were still in the process of finding new homes.
Last month, Fort Lauderdale building inspector Andrew Gebbia visited the facility in response to multiple complaints about the treatment of elderly residents.
During that visit, he uncovered unpermitted construction tied to the controversial conversion into Waterview Rental, prompting a scathing 30-page report that outlined dozens of violations.
The work, Gebbia explained, involved the 'replacement of kitchenettes, structural plumbing and electrical, and replacement of split-unit ACs', as reported by Local 10.
'As I walked through the building, I observed renovations being done in a number of rooms, much like hotel rooms,' Gebbia said, Local 10 reported.
'There were no permits issued for this work, so I issued a stop work order, left it on the counter in the main entrance,' he added.
The released state inspection report detailed a series of unusual exchanges between inspector Gebbia and Oasis administrator Steven Gottlieb, raising further questions about the facility's conduct.
While Gebbia accused the facility of kicking out residents while secretly converting the complex into luxury apartments, Gottlieb denied that any evictions had taken place, as reported by the outlet.
Instead, the administrator blamed the departure of residents since the inspector's last visit to natural deaths and rude nursing staff, rather than any forced evictions.
Also last month, Oasis was hit with a court injunction over the alleged evictions, after a civil court judge sided with a grieving attorney who had been advocating for the vulnerable seniors, as reported by Local 10 News.
On April 2, Broward County Circuit Judge William W. Haury, Jr. issued a court order requiring Oasis to stop evicting residents. The facility's attorneys requested that he overturn the order - which he didn't.
Oasis was also facing citations from the Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration for violating rules meant to protect residents.
On Tuesday, it was announced that the senior living facility will now be fined $1,000 a day by the city if they don't come into compliance within 15 days.
'To me, this is why I'm so aggressive with this particular case,' Fort Lauderdale Building Committee Vice Chair Donald Karney III said during a meeting Tuesday morning, Local 10 reported.
'They've done these people extremely dirty and that's why I'm being such a stick in the mud about it.'
Karney also declared that he's 'going after big money for the city and giving them the same amount of time they gave these poor old people to get out of their places they call homes'.
With just 15 days to comply, many believe Oasis has no realistic chance of meeting the deadline, which could mean mounting fines soaring into the tens of thousands - potentially exceeding $100,000, the outlet reported.
Notably, the Oasis administrator skipped Tuesday's meeting, but members are demanding his presence at the next one scheduled for July 22.
Oasis Living Quarters management did not immediately respond to DailyMail.com for comment.
Fort Lauderdale, commonly known as a hub for retirees, is now appealing to young families as the city is witnessing a massive baby boom transformation.
According to the Downtown Development Authority's recent annual report, there has been an 83 percent increase in families with kids since 2018.
In the past five years, there has been a 47 percent increase in families with children under five years old migrating to the sunny area.
New data also suggests that families have chosen to flock to the downtown area because of its $10 million infrastructure expansio n, including the renovation of Huizenga Park and its enhanced dining scene.
Young families have also found that the area is a bit cheaper than that of nearby West Palm Beach or Miami, where the average rent is $3,000 a month, compared to $2621 in downtown Fort Lauderdale.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Leaders of the Jan. 6 riot take revenge against US after securing pardon from Trump
Five former members of the Proud Boys are looking for a little revenge after getting a pardon from Donald Trump, filing a $100million lawsuit against the Department of Justice. One of the first moves of Donald Trump's second term was to pardon all January 6 defendants which included members of the far right Proud Boys. Former Proud Boys chairman Enrique Tarrio, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, Ethan Nordean and Dominic Pezzola have filed the suit in Orlando federal court. While Tarrio received a pardon, the other four plaintiffs had their sentences commuted. The lawsuit said all four applied for pardons on May 13. They claim their constitutional rights were violated when they were prosecuted for their participation in the attack on the U.S. Capitol. The suit seeks unspecified compensatory damages plus 6% interest and $100 million plus interest in punitive damages. 'There was hostages in this country,' Tarrio said during a news conference Friday afternoon. 'It's not about any other country today, and that's why this lawsuit is so important to bring back law and order into our system.' The lawsuit claims the men were arrested with insufficient probable cause and that government agents later 'found' fake incriminating evidence. They also claim they were held for years in pretrial detention, often in solitary confinement. 'The Plaintiffs themselves did not obstruct the proceedings at the Capitol, destroy government property, resist arrest, conspire to impede the police, or participate in civil disorder, nor did they plan for or order anyone else to do so,' the lawsuit said. Tarrio, Biggs, Rehl and Nordean were all convicted of seditious conspiracy and other crimes for their participation in the Capitol riot that sought to stop Congress from certifying former U.S. President Joe Biden ´s win over President Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election. Pezzola was acquitted on the conspiracy charge but convicted of stealing a police officer's riot shield and using it to smash a window. After returning to office earlier this year, Trump granted pardons to almost all of the more than 1,500 people who stormed the Capitol. The U.S. Justice Department didn't immediately respond to a message seeking comment. Speaking to a media gaggle packed into his White House office the night of the inauguration, Trump said he was pardoning about 1,500 defendants and issuing six commutations. Ex-Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio was a guest of honor at the Reagan Tribute at Mar-a-Lago – just two weeks after his prison sentence was commuted by President Donald Trump's executive order Zachary Rehl (pictured left) and Ethan Nordean (pictured right) are two of the plaintiffs in the suit He also directed the attorney general to seek dismissal of about 450 pending criminal cases against Jan. 6 defendants. The pardons fulfill Trump's promise to release supporters who tried to help him overturn his election defeat four years ago. 'These are the hostages,' he said while signing the paperwork in the Oval Office. Trump declared at his indoor parade earlier that day that he will sign pardons for 'a lot of people' who were convicted for the attack on the U.S. Capitol as the crowd cheered enthusiastically. 'We won, we won, but now the work begins,' Trump said to start his remarks at the end of the parade in the packed Capitol One Arena in Washington, DC. Tarrio, one of the biggest names to get a pardon, has since said he plans to run for public office. He was sentenced in September 2023 to serve 22 years in prison after he was convicted of seditious conspiracy for his role in the January 6 attack – even though he was not present at the Capitol that day. And just two weeks later, Tarrio was among the guests of honor during a Reagan Tribute event at Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida. Tarrio, who was chairman of the Proud Boys at the time of the Capitol attack, said he would neither 'support' nor 'condemn' the riot. The far-right activist did insist, however, that he did not 'sympathize' with lawmakers who were terrified in their offices that day. At least 37 members of the Proud Boys were arrested, charged or indicted for alleged roles in the Capitol riot by January 2022. By then, Tarrio was no longer a leader of the group. He served as chairman from 2018 to 2021. The House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack subpoenaed Tarrio to testify in November 2021 and in February 2022, he gave a deposition to the committee investigators and two members.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Judge paves the way for college athletes to earn millions
A federal judge has paved the way for college athletes to earn millions after approving a settlement between an Arizona State swimmer and the National Collegiate Athletic Association on Friday. Almost five years ago, Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing with college athletes. Under the newly approved settlement, each school will now share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion over the next 10 years to thousands of former athletes who were previously prohibited from collecting revenue, the Associated Press reported. Most of the athletes who will reap the rewards of this suit will be football and basketball players at the biggest sports schools. House said in a CBS Sports article from May 2023 that he was inspired to pursue the lawsuit by Arizona State's music students who could get paid to play at Carnegie Hall. "I always thought it was interesting that … if [those musicians] can monetize this, take it to the farthest reaches, I couldn't because I was an athlete doing my own aspirations and dreams," House said. 'That just didn't sit well with me and confused me a lot,' he added. CBS Sports reported that the NCAA had made claims that compensating athletes would cause issues in the locker room. "I know there are quarterbacks getting millions of dollars. I'm not getting that. Good for them. I want them to actualize that," House said in response. He continued: 'I can imagine [locker room issues] in maybe some places where younger athletes have egos and haven't developed as much. I blame that on the culture. I don't blame that on NIL [name, image and likeness]. If your culture is that fragile, that weak, you as a university need to fix that.'


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS College sports changed forever as judge approves groundbreaking move
Judge Claudia Wilken has approved the settlement in the House v. NCAA case - which now paves a pathway to allow colleges and universities to directly pay their athletes and changes the dynamic of American collegiate athletics forever. A decade ago, college athletes were treated as amateurs and were not directly compensated for their contributions to athletic departments, nor were they able to be paid by outside companies. With the rise of name, image, and likeness agreements in 2021, athletes could sign endorsement deals with companies and collectives of donors could pool money which could be given to athletes. Now, with this landmark settlement, the NCAA's member institutions will be allowed to pay their athletes directly in the form of revenue sharing agreements. The focal point of this case began with Arizona State swimmer Grant House, who sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences at the time - the SEC, Big Ten, Big XII, ACC, and Pac-12 - to lift restrictions on revenue sharing. Wilken gave approval to a final proposal after months of negotiating multiple finer points of the deal - including roster limits.