logo
This doctor calls LGBTQ+ rights ‘satanic'. He could now undo healthcare for millions

This doctor calls LGBTQ+ rights ‘satanic'. He could now undo healthcare for millions

The Guardian23-05-2025

Steven Hotze, a Republican donor from Texas, has spent decades fighting against LGBTQ+ rights, with campaigns seeking to roll back protections for people he has deemed 'termites', 'morally degenerate' and 'satanic'.
The Houston-area physician is not well-known in mainstream politics, and his efforts targeting queer and trans people have generally been local, with limited impact.
His latest cause could be different. Hotze, 74, has sued the federal government to roll back healthcare coverage for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), the HIV prevention medication. The case is now before the US supreme court, which is expected to rule in the coming weeks. A decision in his favor could upend healthcare access for LGBTQ+ people across the country – and derail a wide array of preventive treatments for tens of millions in the process.
'People will die,' said Kae Greenberg, staff attorney with the Center for HIV Law and Policy, which filed a brief in the case. 'Preventive healthcare saves lives, and this case is about whose lives we consider worth protecting. It's about cutting off people's care based on them being gay or substance users or living their lives in a way the plaintiffs do not approve of. It's using the law to legitimize bigotry.'
The case, Kennedy v Braidwood, originated with Hotze's Christian healthcare firm, Braidwood Management, which filed a lawsuit in 2020 objecting to the federal requirement that his company's insurance plan cover PrEP. Braidwood, another Christian business and two individuals argued the daily PrEP medications 'facilitate and encourage homosexual behavior', saying the government violated their religious beliefs by making them support 'sexual promiscuity'.
Braidwood challenged the requirement under the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, that insurers and group health plans cover preventive services, a provision that includes diabetes and cancer screenings, medications to reduce heart disease risks, contraception and vaccinations. Along with opposing PrEP, Hotze explicitly objected to STI screenings, counseling for alcohol use and childhood obesity interventions.
A Texas district court sided with Braidwood, saying the US violated the firm's religious freedom. The ruling also found that a taskforce of medical experts that recommended the preventive services covered by the ACA was unconstitutional because the experts hadn't been confirmed by the Senate, and therefore health plans should not be required to cover the care.
The US government appealed the ruling on the taskforce, which is the issue now before the supreme court. The coverage mandates have remained in effect as the case has progressed, though the individual plaintiffs have been shielded from covering the services. The Trump administration has continued to defend the taskforce's constitutionality, and the supreme court is not weighing religious objections.
If the supreme court sides with Braidwood, it could lead to widespread loss of access to free preventative healthcare, with one study finding 39 million people received the threatened services. A 2023 Yale study estimated the loss of free PrEP could result in more than 2,000 preventable HIV infections within one year.
The outcome of the case could threaten coverage for every service recommended by the taskforce, not just the provisions opposed by the right. 'We're talking about people who cannot afford this care, who will have to choose between a mammogram and rent,' added Susan Polan, associate executive director of the American Public Health Association.
The high-stakes case, and Hotze's role in it, have flown under the radar. But research from progressive watchdog organization Accountable.US, which shared its findings with the Guardian, reveal the rightwing activist's long history of pushing fringe ideologies before getting a signature cause before the supreme court.
Hotze and his lawyers did not respond to requests for comment.
In 1982, 31-year-old Hotze launched a petition in the city of Austin to legalize housing discrimination against gay people, the AP reported at the time. Heading a group called Austin Citizens for Decency, Hotze called gay residents 'criminals' and 'sodomites', saying: 'The issue is not housing. The issue is whether we allow our city council to grant public sanction to homosexual activity.' He said protecting LGBTQ+ people from discrimination is 'like thieves or murderers trying to gain political power'. Hotze said in one interview he was less concerned about 'property rights' and more worried about the 'deviant, perverted lifestyle'. Voters overwhelmingly rejected his referendum.
In 1985, Hotze backed a group of eight 'anti-homosexual' Houston city council candidates identified as the 'straight slate'. On ABC News, he stated, 'We're intolerant of those who participate in homosexual activity.' All eight candidates lost.
Hotze runs the Hotze Health & Wellness Center, which has been in operation since 1989; Braidwood is his management firm that employs the center's staff. He has marketed hormone therapies to treat a wide range of conditions and sold a vitamin product called Skinny Pak, the New York Times reported. Over the years, he has donated extensively to the Republican party and Texas politicians, including Senator Ted Cruz.
Hotze's public anti-LGBTQ+ activism picked up after the supreme court legalized gay marriage nationwide in 2015, with Hotze launching a 'Faith Family Freedom Tour' and using the same homophobic language from his activism decades prior. Hotze said he was fighting a 'wicked, evil movement' that celebrates anal sex, telling the Houston Chronicle: 'Kids will be encouraged to practice sodomy in kindergarten.'
During the tour, he said 'satanic cults' were behind gay rights, brandished a sword during a speech, and likened his fight to battling Nazis, the Texas Observer reported. That year, he and other rightwing activists successfully campaigned to repeal an equal rights Houston ordinance.
At a 2016 evangelical conference, Hotze was filmed describing the LGBTQ+ rights movement as 'termites [that] get into the wood of the house and … eat away at the moral fabric'. In 2017, Hotze rallied for Roy Moore, the failed Alabama senate candidate accused of sexually coercing teenagers in the 1970s.
Hotze has also recently promoted anti-trans causes, testifying in 2023 in favor of a school district policy requiring staff to notify parents if students change their names or pronouns. Trans people, he said, 'have a reprobate, perverted and morally degenerate mind'.
His ACA case was not his first effort to undo federal civil rights protections. In a case that began in 2018, Braidwood sued the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), challenging a ban on anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination in the workforce. Braidwood said it enforces a 'sex-specific dress code that disallows gender-non-conforming behavior', the courts summarized, prohibiting women from wearing ties and men from wearing nail polish. Hotze said he won't employ candidates engaged in 'sexually immoral' behaviors.
In 2023, an appeals court ruled that a religious freedom law protected Hotze's rights to enforce dress codes and refuse to hire LGBTQ+ people.
In that case, and in the one now before the supreme court, Hotze has been represented by America First Legal, the rightwing legal group co-founded by Stephen Miller, Donald Trump's influential adviser. The organization has brought a string of lawsuits, including efforts to undo trans rights and complaints accusing companies of discriminating against white men.
Hotze has also been represented by Jonathan Mitchell, an anti-abortion lawyer behind Texas's so-called 'bounty hunter law' that allows private citizens to sue providers or people who 'aid or abet' the procedure.
American First Legal and Mitchell did not respond to inquiries.
Gabbi Shilcusky, Accountable.US senior investigative specialist, noted that Hotze's supreme court case was founded on hypotheticals: 'He's not hiring men who wear nail polish or are asking for PrEP. This is manufactured to build upon his most fringe beliefs and not about actual issues he's being confronted with in his company.'
Hotze has in recent years made headlines outside of anti-LGBTQ+ advocacy. In 2020, during George Floyd protests, he left a voicemail for the Texas governor urging that he 'kill the son of a bitches', referring to demonstrators. Later that year, the Food and Drug Administration sent his company a warning advising it was promoting 'unapproved and misbranded products' for Covid.
In 2022, Hotze was charged with unlawful restraint and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in an elections dispute. Hotze hired a contractor who claimed a local air conditioner repairman was holding fraudulent ballots in his truck. The contractor ran his vehicle into the man's car and held him at gunpoint, according to prosecutors, who said the voter fraud claims were false. Hotze was later charged with aggravated robbery and organized criminal activity from the incident.
Hotze pleaded not guilty, and this week, a newly elected DA dropped the charges, accusing his predecessor of bringing a politically motivated case. The criminal case did not stop his attacks on voting rights; in October, just before the election, he filed a lawsuit against the local registrar seeking to invalidate tens of thousands of voters.
It's unclear if Hotze will succeed at the supreme court. In oral arguments last month, some justices, including conservatives, appeared skeptical of the arguments by Hotze's lawyers. The case hinges on whether the taskforce members who make ACA recommendations are akin to department heads requiring Senate approval or are 'inferior' officers. Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett at times appeared sympathetic to the notion that the experts are not sufficiently independent so as to merit a congressional vote.
The case is part of longstanding attacks against the ACA, with legal strategies focused on religious claims as well as objections to how the law was crafted. Hotze previously challenged the ACA in a failed lawsuit that began in 2013, an effort he promoted with a bizarre original song called 'God Fearing Texans Stop Obamacare'.
Even if Hotze fails, the threats to PrEP and LGBTQ+ healthcare will continue, said Jeremiah Johnson, executive director of advocacy group PrEP4All, noting the Trump administration's continued funding cuts and dismantling of HIV prevention, and ongoing rightwing efforts to attack civil rights under the guise of religious liberty.
The case also comes as the FDA is considering a new injectable PrEP considered a major prevention breakthrough, he said. 'We're at the precipice of science delivering real pathways to ending this epidemic, but if we turn our backs now on all these protections, including private insurance through the ACA, we're not just going to backtrack on progress, we're going to lose out on that promise for the future.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SBS's Insight accused of betraying people living with chronic fatigue syndrome who appeared on program
SBS's Insight accused of betraying people living with chronic fatigue syndrome who appeared on program

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

SBS's Insight accused of betraying people living with chronic fatigue syndrome who appeared on program

People living with chronic fatigue syndrome who appeared on SBS's Insight program have accused the broadcaster of betraying them in the final cut, which presented what they claim is a potentially harmful and unscientific narrative and favoured a person who said she had 'cured herself' by 'listening to her body'. The SBS ombudsman is investigating their individual complaints, as well as one from Emerge Australia, the national advocacy body for patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). There are hundreds of negative comments about the episode on the program's social media pages. One participant who is a carer for his wife and daughter, Peter McCluskey, has told the SBS ombudsman the final broadcast 'compounded the invalidation and gaslighting that patients and carers endure daily'. McCluskey wrote a first-person piece for SBS about his family's experience, which was published ahead of the episode airing last month. 'The editorial decisions made by Insight undermined what we naively thought was the very purpose of the episode and breached multiple clauses of the SBS code of practice,' he wrote in a complaint seen by Guardian Australia. He accused SBS of '… sidelining science, clinical expertise, and the lived experience of patients – all under the guise of balance'. 'Rather than giving voice to a stigmatised and misunderstood community, the program re-traumatised it.' Sign up to get Guardian Australia's weekly media diary as a free newsletter The chief executive of Emerge Australia, Anne Wilson, accused SBS of presenting what she described as 'a harmful narrative' by giving disproportionate airtime to one person who said she had recovered from ME/CFS, and then to have contracted and recovered from rheumatoid arthritis without medical care. She said she had 'cured herself' by 'listening to her body' and was now running marathons. Wilson accused Insight of undermining decades of scientific research, education and advocacy by not challenging the narrative. 'Scientific evidence states that there is no recovery from rheumatoid arthritis and less than 10% of people with ME/CFS return to pre-illness functioning,' Wilson said. 'Of further concern, this person claimed their recovery was due to attitude alone, implying that recovery is a choice or can be achieved through effort alone. There are no proven treatments for ME/CFS and there is no cure. The small number who recover are the lucky few.' Emerge was approached by Insight producers to provide people to appear on the show and agreed to because of the program's 'positive reputation as well-researched, serious journalism', Wilson said. 'We were pleased the program chose to feature the often-overlooked challenges of living with invisible illnesses such as ME/CFS, long Covid, fibromyalgia and similar conditions. Sign up to Weekly Beast Amanda Meade's weekly diary on the latest in Australian media, free every Friday after newsletter promotion 'We were, however, extremely disappointed by the unbalanced narrative portrayed in the episode. Ironically, the episode accurately reflected the gaslighting experienced by many living with invisible illnesses.' Another participant, Allie Rawlings, said she agreed to be part of the studio discussion because she believed SBS had integrity, but she was disappointed with the edited program which was broadcast. 'The content aired bore little resemblance to the contributions I made during filming, stripping away the nuance, complexity, and intent of my perspective,' she told the ombudsman. Another complainant, Lauren Beasley, said she had hoped the episode would bring clarity and compassion about her illness to the wider public. 'Instead of platforming the full spectrum of experiences, the episode centred disproportionately on a highly individualised recovery narrative – one based on mindset, willpower, and personal agency,' Beasley wrote. A spokesperson for SBS said Insight's remit is to examine topical issues from a variety of perspectives. 'We generally receive a range of feedback, as we did for this topic, and we'll be responding to these audience members in line with our usual practices,' the spokesperson said. 'Like all of our content, Insight is subject to the SBS Code of Practice, which states that SBS will share a diversity of views and perspectives, and requires our news and current affairs programs to provide balanced and impartial coverage. We appreciate the contribution of the participants who shared their lived experiences in the studio and helped to raise awareness of the important issue of invisible illness.'

Calls for one MILLION more blood donors as stocks drop dangerously low after reserves struggled to recover in wake of NHS cyber attack: How you can help
Calls for one MILLION more blood donors as stocks drop dangerously low after reserves struggled to recover in wake of NHS cyber attack: How you can help

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Calls for one MILLION more blood donors as stocks drop dangerously low after reserves struggled to recover in wake of NHS cyber attack: How you can help

The NHS needs one million more blood donors following the cyber attack that crippled it's supply, officials have said. Low blood stocks prompted officials to issue an 'amber alert' over supply for hospitals last year and NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) said that more must be done to avoid a 'red alert', which means that blood supply is so low that there is a threat to public safety. Officials described the last year as 'challenging' for blood stocks, highlighting how just two per cent of the population keep the nation's blood stocks afloat. This means just under 800,000 people sustained the whole of England's blood supply over the past 12 months and NHSBT said one million donors are needed to meet demand. NHSBT said that there has been a rise in the number of people who registered to be donors in the last year, but only 24 per cent of these have gone on to donate. The amber alert was triggered in July 2024 after a cyber attack on London hospitals. And blood stocks have remained low ever since, officials said. It said there is a 'critical' need for more donors who have the so-called universal blood type - O negative blood - which is needed for treatment in emergencies. There is also a need for more black donors, who are more likely to have specific blood types which can help treat people with sickle cell disease. NHSBT chief executive Dr Jo Farrar said: 'There are many thousands of people who donate regularly and help us keep patients alive. Thank you. You are amazing. You keep the NHS going and save and transform thousands of lives a year. 'Our stocks over the past 12 months have been challenging. If we had a million regular donors, this would help keep our stocks healthy - you'd truly be one in a million. 'Please book an appointment today, experience how good it feels to save lives, and come and do it again in a few months.' Two thirds of the blood collected is used to treat people who rely on blood transfusions including people with cancer and those with blood conditions. One family is backing the campaign for more donors due to their own experience receiving regular blood transfusions. Four-year-old Isaac Balmer, from Hull, was born with hereditary spherocytosis - a genetic blood condition which causes red blood cells to break down faster than normal, leading to severe anaemia and other complications. He receives blood transfusions every 12 weeks. His mother Jasmin Suggit, a newborn hearing scanner at the hospital where Isaac receives his treatment, said: 'It's been a rollercoaster; Isaac's haemoglobin levels fluctuate, and when they drop significantly, he becomes lethargic and jaundiced. 'But when he receives his transfusion, you see the colour return to his cheeks, and his energy levels soar before our eyes. It is incredible. 'During his transfusions, he refers to donor blood as 'Hulk blood' and imagines himself becoming stronger and healthier, but this wouldn't be possible without the real life, everyday superheroes who keep Isaac and others like him alive, thanks to their regular blood donations.' Health Minister Baroness Merron said: 'The NHS is in urgent need of more lifesaving blood donors from all backgrounds. We are working alongside NHS Blood and Transplant to make donating blood easier than ever before, opening up new donor centres and making appointments available closer to home.'

Common food item could lower your risk of heart disease & type 2 diabetes, boffins claim
Common food item could lower your risk of heart disease & type 2 diabetes, boffins claim

The Sun

time3 hours ago

  • The Sun

Common food item could lower your risk of heart disease & type 2 diabetes, boffins claim

BUTTER could actually reduce your risk of heart disease, scientists say. Having a teaspoonful a day was found to cut the risk of getting type 2 diabetes by a third. The study, published in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, found that butter boosts 'good' cholesterol - which helps to remove harmful fats known to cause heart attacks and strokes. Scientists from Boston University tracked 2,500 men and women over the age of 30 over decades, noting what they ate and how many went on to develop heart disease. Those who ate five grammes of butter a day or more were 31 per cent less likely to develop Type 2 diabetes - usually caused by poor diet and lifestyle - than those eating little or no butter. Margarines - often promoted as 'healthy' alternatives for butter - increased the risk of diabetes by more than 40 per cent and heart problems by 30 per cent. Researchers put it down to the unhealthy 'trans fats' used in margarines from the 1970s onwards - now largely ditched by spread manufacturers. Eating a portion of beans a day could also slash your risk of deadly heart attack or stroke, new research shows. Beans - whether they're dried, canned or frozen - can boost heart and metabolic health, according to scientists. Daily portions of chickpeas and black beans could serve as a "simple, cost-effective" way to reduce the risk of chronic diseases, they said. The new study links chickpeas to improved cholesterol levels, which blacks beans seemed to reduce inflammation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store