
Is it safer to be a nurse than a doctor in the age of AI? Google DeepMind CEO shares a surprising take
Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis believes AI may surpass doctors in diagnosis but won't replace nurses, highlighting the irreplaceable role of human empathy. In a *Wired* interview, he emphasized that while AI can assist in clinical tasks, the compassionate care provided by nurses is uniquely human—suggesting empathy could be our most enduring asset in an AI-driven future.
Agencies As AI advances, experts like DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis suggest that emotionally intelligent and hands-on roles will remain crucial. Hassabis believes AI may assist doctors but not replace nurses' empathy. As artificial intelligence tightens its grip on nearly every industry, a quiet but profound truth is emerging: it may be the most emotionally intelligent among us—not the most highly qualified—who survive the next wave of automation. While corporate titans and tech pioneers debate the ethical and economic fallout of an AI-powered future, Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis has offered a humanizing perspective that might surprise you. In a recent interview with Wired , Hassabis suggested that while artificial intelligence may one day outperform doctors, it will likely fall short of replacing nurses. 'Maybe a doctor and what the doctor does and the diagnosis, one could imagine that being helped by AI tools, or even having an AI kind of doctor,' Hassabis explained to Wired . 'On the other hand, like nursing—I don't think you'd want a robot to do that. There's something about the human empathy aspect… that's particularly humanistic.'
In other words, the future of work may not depend solely on your degree, but on your ability to comfort, connect, and care—qualities machines still cannot mimic. This revelation adds nuance to the growing anxiety surrounding AI-led job disruptions. Just weeks ago, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy warned that AI advancements would lead to reductions in workforce across the company. Nvidia's Jensen Huang echoed this during a public interview, acknowledging that while AI will eliminate some roles, it will also create new ones.
But Hassabis believes the real shift will come in the next five to ten years. 'As in the past, what generally tends to happen is new jobs are created that are actually better, that utilize these tools or new technologies,' he told Wired .
Hassabis's argument gains added depth when placed alongside the words of Geoffrey Hinton, the Nobel-winning "Godfather of AI." Hinton, who left Google in 2023 to freely express his growing concerns, recently suggested something few would have expected: train to be a plumber. 'It's going to be a long time before AI is as good at physical manipulation as us,' Hinton said during an appearance on The Diary of a CEO podcast. 'A good bet would be to be a plumber.' According to Hinton, while AI may revolutionize legal research and data-heavy desk jobs, it will struggle with hands-on work—like tightening a leaky faucet or holding the hand of a frightened patient. In an era when jobs are often judged by titles and salaries, it's ironic that roles like nursing and plumbing—often undervalued and overworked—are emerging as some of the most future-proof careers. These professions require human traits that no algorithm can code: intuition, improvisation, and above all, compassion.
It's a compelling twist in the AI narrative. The conversation is no longer just about who is smartest or most productive. It's also about who is most human. As Hinton warned, AI might one day control power grids and surpass human cognition—but it won't know how to comfort a crying patient or navigate the mess under your kitchen sink. As Hassabis puts it, there are things 'we won't want to do with a machine.' And that may just be our saving grace. As Big Tech races toward artificial general intelligence, some of the brightest minds behind the revolution are urging caution—and compassion. While machines may soon write better code, draft legal memos, or even suggest medical diagnoses, they still cannot feel. And that, perhaps, is why jobs rooted in empathy and physical presence—nursing, caregiving, plumbing—may outlast the digital storm.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
33 minutes ago
- Hans India
Young scientists urged to ‘Co-create with farmers'
Tirupati: The Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Tirupati celebrated a major milestone on Tuesday as it held its 6th Convocation, conferring degrees upon 255 students. The event underscored the institute's remarkable journey from being the youngest IISER to emerging as a premier national research hub. Delivering the convocation address, chief guest Samir S Somaiya, Chairman & Managing Director of Godavari Biorefineries Ltd. and Chancellor of Somaiya Vidyavihar University, spoke passionately about the need to reconnect with one's heritage and its deep-rooted relevance to scientific advancement. Drawing on his expertise in biorefining, he underlined the urgent need to transition from an oil-based to a soil-based economy. Somaiya encouraged the young scientists to 'co-create with farmers,' advocating for a future where modern agricultural innovation aligns with traditional knowledge systems. 'Our past holds answers to our future. Science should not forget its roots,' he said. Prof Jhillu Singh Yadav, Chairperson of the Board of Governors, urged graduates to become agents of change by addressing national challenges in agriculture, sustainable chemistry, and the green manufacturing of semiconductors and enzymes. 'Identify manufacturing processes that do not pollute the environment,' he advised. 'Be a good scientist and use your knowledge for the development of the country. You must play a role in realising the vision of a Viksit Bharat.' This year, degrees were awarded across multiple programmes: 22 PhDs, 8 Integrated PhDs, 3 MS degrees, 141 flagship BS-MS dual degrees, 69 Professional Master's degrees, 6 BS degrees and 6 BSc degrees. Prof Santanu Bhattacharya, Director of IISER Tirupati, presented the Director's Report, highlighting the institute's rapid academic and infrastructural growth. 'Our vision has always been to create an ecosystem where curiosity is nurtured and ground-breaking research is a way of life,' he said. He also noted that the institute's undergraduate laboratories, described by Nobel laureates as 'five-star labs,' stand as a testament to this commitment. Top honours were awarded to Anish Mukhopadhyay, who received the Institute's Gold Medal for the BS-MS Programme (Biology). RC Vishnu Prasanth (Mathematics) and R Vigneswaran (Physics) earned Silver Medals, while Asma Shirin T was recognised as the Best Graduating Student of the BS-MS Programme. Arjit Shankar Banerjee stood as the best student in campus activities. The event was attended by In-charge Registrar Inderpreet Singh Kohli, board members, faculty, students and their families.


Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
AI may make doctors more important than nurses. It's about time
One of the most effective prisms through which to understand how people and societies have changed since the Palaeolithic to the Anthropocene is to examine the relationship between tools and people. Simply put, humans make machines and machines, in turn, shape them. The last few centuries — a temporal blip in the species' history — have witnessed increasing degrees of abstraction. Numbers, the written word, money (increasingly less tangible) and now AI, are not just technologies. They shape what and who societies value. With machines able to remember and analyse information, and predict outcomes, a new set of values is in the offing. And for all the anxiety around AI, this change might not be all bad. Demis Hassabis, Nobel laureate and CEO and co-founder of Google DeepMind, said that while AI and robotics may be able to replace doctors, especially in diagnosis, it will likely be unable to replace nurses. His statement flags a broader possibility: Professions based on knowledge and abstract skills could become increasingly obsolete, and tangible, emotional labour more valuable. AI will not be refilling the gas on the AC compressor any time soon. It will not comfort an ageing relative in a meaningful way, nor make sure that a child is loved when both parents are at work. In essence, the jobs that are often seen as less skilled today could well become the most valuable. Hierarchies of labour have been papered over in the name of what the market, guided by an ethereal, invisible hand, demands. Now, as the most lucrative professions of today – doctors, investment bankers, software engineers, lawyers — face an impending existential crisis, perhaps it's time to value others. Not just economically, but socially. Teachers, nurses, nannies — those who cook in homes and raise other people's children, those whose skills keep homes functioning — AI might create a new elite. It's about time.


Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Ex-Google executive predicts a dystopian job apocalypse by 2027: 'AI will be better than humans at everything... even CEOs'
The End of Human Superiority? — StevenBartlett (@StevenBartlett) You Might Also Like: Is it safer to be a nurse than a doctor in the age of AI? Google DeepMind CEO shares a surprising take Divided Visions of the AI Future Not Just About Jobs, It's About Power In a thought-provoking episode of the 'Diary of a CEO' podcast, former Google X executive Mo Gawdat delivered a powerful prediction that's turning heads across industries: Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) will not just challenge white-collar work — it could soon replace many of its top decision-makers, including who previously served as the chief business officer at Google's innovation arm, didn't hold back. 'AGI is going to be better than humans at everything, including being a CEO,' he said. 'There will be a time where most incompetent CEOs will be replaced.'This warning comes amid rising public curiosity — and concern — about how AI will reshape the future of work . But Gawdat's perspective offers a sharp contrast to the often-optimistic vision shared by many industry has seen the future up close. His own AI-powered startup, focused on emotional intelligence , was developed by just three people — a feat he claims would have previously required 350 personal experience and decades in tech, he dismissed the common narrative that AI will create more jobs than it destroys. 'The idea that artificial intelligence will create jobs is 100% crap,' he said believes even roles requiring creativity and emotional nuance — from podcasters to video editors — are under threat. 'We're now in a short window of augmented intelligence, where we still work alongside AI,' Gawdat explained. 'But it's quickly moving toward machine mastery.'More than just a tech transition, Gawdat sees this moment as an existential reckoning for society.'We were never made to wake up every morning and just occupy 20 hours of our day with work,' he said. 'We defined our purpose as work — that's a capitalist lie.'He envisions a future that might seem utopian: one where people are free to focus on creativity, community, and joy, supported by universal basic income and freed from the grind of conventional getting there won't be easy. Gawdat warns of a 'short-term dystopia' by 2027, marked by mass unemployment and economic instability if governments and institutions don't act urgent tone stands in contrast with other tech figures like Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA, who remains bullish on AI's potential to uplift workers. Huang argues that prompting and training AI is itself a sophisticated skill, and that the technology will augment human effort rather than erase Mark Cuban champions AI literacy through youth-focused initiatives, while Meta's AI scientist Yann LeCun dismisses doomsday narratives altogether, insisting humans will remain in Gawdat isn't alone. AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei have also voiced grave concerns about unchecked AI development. Amodei, in a recent podcast appearance, predicted that up to 20% of entry-level white-collar jobs could vanish within five tension is palpable. While some advocate for open innovation, others call for tight regulations to prevent reckless fears that in the hands of profit-driven leaders, AI could deepen inequality. 'Unless you're in the top 0.1%, you're a peasant. There is no middle class,' he stated, highlighting the potential for AI to consolidate power and concern echoes growing divisions within Silicon Valley itself. Amodei recently lashed out at Huang for misrepresenting his cautious stance on AI, accusing the NVIDIA boss of spreading 'outrageous lies' to downplay the has also warned against a 'race to the bottom' in AI development, advocating instead for a responsible and transparent path — one that companies like Anthropic claim to model through open research and ethical the gloom, Gawdat remains hopeful for what lies beyond the upheaval — a society where AI relieves us of soul-crushing labor and gives us back our time, relationships, and his closing words are a reminder of how serious the stakes are:'This is real. This is not science fiction.'