‘You sit out the best bowler in the world after 7-day break': Ravi Shastri slams Gambhir, Gill for resting Jasprit Bumrah in Edgbaston Test
When asked by former England batter Michael Atherton at the toss, skipper Shubman Gill said that though Bumrah was fit, the management believed that the speedster will be of more importance during the third Test at Lord's, starting July 10.
'Just to manage his workload. We did get a good break and this is an important match for us. But the third Test being at Lord's, we think there'll be more in that pitch so we'll use him there,' Gill said as India unveiled three changes to the line-up. Seamer Akash Deep was roped in to replace Bumrah while Washington Sundar and Nitish Kumar Reddy replaced Shardul Thakur and Sai Sudharsan.
Shastri did not approve of India's idea to rest a fully-fit Bumrah for a crucial match after a run of poor results in Test cricket since October 2024. In their last nine Tests, India have won only one match, making it their worst run in whites in over a decade. Holding captain Shubman Gill and head coach Gautam Gambhir accountable for the decision on the broadcast, Shastri said there 'no ifs and buts' about Bumrah resting for this match. While Bumrah and the management had iterated that he would be in contention to play at best three matches due to his workload, Shastri said it shouldn't up to the pacer to pick and choose which matches he would play.
"This becomes a very important Test match" 👀
Ravi Shastri on the impact of Jasprit Bumrah missing the second Test 🇮🇳 pic.twitter.com/df2Y7sXWDA
— Sky Sports Cricket (@SkyCricket) July 2, 2025
'This is a very important match, they've had a week off. I'm little surprised Bumrah is not playing this game. It should be taken out of the player's hand. It should be the captain and the head coach that should decide who should be playing the 11. This is an important game in the context of the series, he should be playing this game more than anything else. Lord's can come later. This is the important game where you have to counter-punch almost straightaway.
'Play this one. Make it 1-1 and then give him the option: you want to rest at Lord's, rest at Lord's. You think he'll rest at Lord's? No chance if you win this.
'If you look at the run, India has had, this becomes a very, very important test match. You've lost three against New Zealand, you've lost three against Australia. You've lost the first Test match here and you want to get back to winning ways. You have the best fast bowler in the world, and you make him sit out after seven days of rest, it's something very hard to believe,' lamented Shastri.
Bumrah was the pick of the India bowlers in the Leeds Test, claiming his 14th five-wicket haul in the first innings of the match where he also became the first Asian bowler to record 150 SENA wickets.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
IND vs ENG 2nd Test: 'Shubman Gill looked fantastic, very solid' - Ravi Shastri hails gritty hundred at Edgbaston
Shubman Gill (AP Photo) NEW DELHI: Former India head coach Ravi Shastri showered high praise on Shubman Gill after the young Indian batter notched up his seventh Test century on a gripping first day of the second Test against England, describing it as a "disciplined performance" where Gill "looked fantastic and very solid. " Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! Gill, coming in at No. 4, displayed remarkable poise and application to remain unbeaten on 114 off 216 balls, an innings studded with 12 boundaries. His knock, which helped India reach 310/5 at stumps, was his second century in as many matches after a match-defining 147 at Headingley last week. Poll Do you think India can reach a total of 450 runs in this innings? Yes, definitely Maybe No, unlikely "Shubman Gill has worked hard on his defence," said Shastri on Sky Sports. "When he last came to England, he played with hard hands, pushed at the ball — a bit like Virat Kohli . But now, the top hand is much more in control. He allows the ball to come to him, trusts in his defence, and has all the shots in the book when he goes on the attack." Yashasvi Jaiswal press conference: On Shubman Gill, confusion in India team selection and more Highlighting the vital 99-run unbeaten partnership with Ravindra Jadeja (41*), Shastri added, "India will be pretty happy. This stand has got them out of what could've been a spot of bother. But tomorrow morning is crucial — they'll need another 150 at least. They can afford to lose just one wicket in the first hour." Former England captain Nasser Hussain echoed Shastri's sentiments, noting the importance of capitalising on the strong foundation. "As Ravi said, they should be getting this total up to 450 and beyond tomorrow. My eyes are on India - can they make up for their mistakes last time?" Hussain also acknowledged England's tireless bowlers, saying, "It was a flat pitch. You can't fault the effort. But this 99-run partnership turned the game. Before it, England were ahead - unlike Headingley." As Day 2 beckons, all eyes remain on India to consolidate and avoid another Headingley-style collapse. Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Dale Steyn flummoxed, calls out Gambhir's 'madness' in Bumrah call: 'It's like Portugal not playing Cristiano Ronaldo'
Jul 03, 2025 06:11 AM IST Former South Africa fast bowler Dale Steyn, on Wednesday, lashed out at the Indian team management, comprising captain Shubman Gill and head coach Gautam Gambhir, for not playing Jasprit Bumrah in the second Test match against England in Birmingham. India replaced Bumrah with Akash Deep in the line-up, which was among the three changes they made for the match. India's Jasprit Bumrah, left, carries refreshments for captain Shubman Gill during a break on day one of the second cricket test match between England and India at Edgbaston(AP) Steyn could not wrap his head around the fact that India chose to rest Bumrah for the Edgbaston Test, saying it was similar to Portugal benching Cristiano Ronaldo. 'So Portugal have the best striker in the world in Ronaldo and they chose not to play him. That's madness. That's like India having Bumrah and choosing not to play, umm, him… wait, oh, no, what! shit I'm confused,' Steyn tweeted. Why was Jasprit Bumrah not picked for 2nd Test? If one thing was clear about the Indian team touring England was that Bumrah would play just three Test matches in order to manage his workload. The decision as taken after a strict advice from the BCCI medical team, as revealed by chief selector Ajit Agarkar during squad announcement in May. With India down 0-1 in the Test series following the loss in Leeds, experts urged the management to not rest Bumrah for the second game in Birmingham, especially after the 31-year-old picked up a five-wicket in the first innings in the opening Test match amid a no-show from his fellow quicks. But Gambhir and Gill paid no heed to the call as they announced that Bumrah would warm the bench during the Edgbaston Test. 'Just to manage his workload. We did get a good break and this is an important match for us. But the third Test being at Lord's, we think there'll be more in that pitch so we'll use him there,' Gill explained at the toss. India ended Day 1 in the second Test at 310 for five after the captain scored a second consecutive ton in the series.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 hours ago
- First Post
India solid on Day 1 but Bumrah's absence and team balance raise deeper questions
Shubman Gill's century anchored India to 310/5 on Day 1 of the 2nd Test against England, but questionable team selection, especially the exclusion of Jasprit Bumrah, raises concerns about team's strategy in their series comeback attempt. read more Shubman Gill may have scored the crucial hundred that tied India's innings together on day one, his 114 at number four the backbone of a more than respectable 310/5; however, after a thrilling day's play, he may well not be the captain who will go home the happiest. Inserting India in almost perfect batting conditions, on a surface with very few demons, England would have been well aware that a repeat of Headingley, where the tourists piled on the runs for the loss of very few wickets, was highly likely again. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Instead, they looked much-improved with the ball, giving the impression that they are only growing into this series. Chris Woakes was very disappointing at Headingley, his performance one of his worst on English soil. Today, he was back to the sort of consistency that has come to be expected of him, in particular unlucky not to take more wickets in the morning session. Brydon Carse bowled with pace and menace, despite the placid surface, and Ben Stokes captained intelligently and provided the wicket of Yashasvi Jaiswal at a crucial moment. In short, even on a day that ultimately ended pretty much honours even, England looked like a team with real forward momentum, while India appeared a little uncertain in themselves. India's team selection raises eyebrows In truth, India put themselves on the back foot before a ball had even been bowled, their team selection for this Test raising more than a few eyebrows. The headline grabber was, of course, the omission of Jasprit Bumrah – predetermined to only be playing three Tests in this series, he was always going to be left out at some point, but it felt an odd decision at this stage on multiple fronts. The first is schedule-related. With the management of Bumrah's workload – after his injury layoff – the driving force behind his planned absences, this seems a strange time to give him a rest. There has been a week's gap between the first Test at Headingley and this one – ample time for a fast bowler to fully recover from the toils of a five day game. This then seemed like the perfect opportunity for Bumrah to play back-to-back Tests without causing undue strain on his body. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Only multiplying this is the fact that if there ever was a point in a series that India needed the world's best fast bowler on their side then it is this one. After the defeat at Headingley, the tourists' margin for error in this series has been considerably reduced. Another defeat might well be terminal for their prospects – the list of teams who have come back from 2-0 in a series is monumentally small. On top of that this Test is being played on a surface that might generously be described as benign, and with Bumrah's excellence the one area where there is a vast gulf in class between these two sides, having a bowler who can create something out of nothing – no matter the conditions – could have been a hugely advantageous point of difference. However, the handling of Bumrah's selection has not been the only place off the field that Indian thinking has looked muddled; the makeup of the side as a whole appeared curious from the outside. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Arguably, one of India's biggest mistakes at Headingley was neither committing fully to the strengths of their batting nor bowling attacks. The selection of Shardul Thakur, in an attempt to bolster both, ultimately did neither – the allrounder ultimately contributing only a pair of cheap final day wickets and five runs across two innings. Their response to this potentially match-losing bit of first Test hedging? Double down at Edgbaston, with Nitish Kumar Reddy and Washington Sundar brought into the side. Instead of leaning into either batting or bowling strength, India have once again opted to try and find that elusive sweet spot in the middle straddling the two. To an outsider, it appears they have simply reinforced the batting strength of the tail while making their top order weaker and without strengthening their bowling attack – it's a bold strategy, let's see if it pays off. There is, of course, a long way to go and India have not started badly in this Test, however, they may well rue the shaky foundations on which they are trying to build their comeback in the series. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
