Moldova says Russia helped pro-Moscow MP flee long jail sentence
The case of Alexander Nesterovschii, who could not be reached for comment, is the latest in which Moldova's pro-European government has accused Russia of meddling in its political landscape. Moscow denies the allegations.
In a statement, the Russian embassy said the allegations of interference in the lawmaker's case were unfounded and unacceptable. It said it had called on the Moldovan authorities to "refrain from provocative speculation".
Moldova's security service released a video which it said showed Nesterovschii entering the embassy in Chisinau on March 18, a day before a court sentenced him to 12 years in jail.
He was found guilty of illegally channelling money to a pro-Russian party associated with fugitive businessman Ilan Shor at local elections in 2023, as well as the 2024 presidential vote and a national referendum on Moldova's EU aspirations.
Nesterovschi denied the charges, calling them politically motivated.
The security service said that on the day of his sentencing he was driven in a white car with diplomatic plates that is also visible in the video to the Russian-backed Transdniestria region that broke away from Moldovan control in the early 1990s.
"This type of activity is part of the mechanism of hybrid aggression directed against the Republic of Moldova," Alexandru Musteata, director of Moldova's Security and Intelligence Service, told a briefing.
Moldova's government, which is trying to lead the formerly Soviet agricultural economy into the European Union by 2030, has repeatedly accused Russia of meddling and trying to destabilise it.
Moldova holds a parliamentary election this autumn that will be a test of the popularity of the pro-EU government's course.
On Tuesday, Moldovan authorities said they had detained Eugenia Gutul, a pro-Russian governor of Moldova's Gagauzia region, on charges of illegal political funding as she tried to leave the country. Gutul said the charges were politically motivated.
A court ruling then ordered her to be kept in custody for at least 30 days.
Police say that another lawmaker, Irinna Lozovan, who is facing similar charges, is hiding from law enforcement. Lozovan also said the charges were politically motivated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-Judge in US crosshairs warns Brazil banks not to apply sanctions locally
By Ricardo Brito and Brad Haynes BRASILIA (Reuters) -Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who recently had sanctions imposed on him by the U.S. government, told Reuters that courts could punish Brazilian financial institutions for seizing or blocking domestic assets in response to U.S. orders. Those remarks raise the stakes in a standoff that has hammered shares of Brazilian banks caught between U.S. sanctions and the orders of Brazil's highest court. In a late Tuesday interview from his office in Brasilia, Moraes granted that U.S. law enforcement regarding Brazilian banks that operate in the United States "falls under U.S. jurisdiction." "However, if those banks choose to apply that law domestically, they cannot do so — and may be penalized under Brazilian law," he added. His remarks underscore the potential consequences of a Monday ruling by fellow Supreme Court Justice Flavio Dino, who warned that foreign laws cannot be automatically applied in Brazil. That ruling was followed by a sharp rebuke from the U.S. State Department's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs, which warned on social media hours later that Moraes was "toxic" and that "non-U.S. persons must tread carefully: those providing material support to human rights abusers face sanctions risk themselves." The U.S. Treasury Department slapped the sanctions on Moraes last month under the Global Magnitsky Act, a law designed to impose economic penalties on foreigners deemed to have a record of corruption or human rights abuse. The order accused him of suppressing freedom of expression and leading politicized prosecutions, including against former President Jair Bolsonaro, a staunch Trump ally on trial before Brazil's Supreme Court on charges of plotting a coup to reverse his loss in the 2022 election. Bolsonaro has denied any wrongdoing and denounced the case as politically motivated. In his interview, Moraes said decisions by foreign courts and governments can only take effect in Brazil after validation through a domestic process. He said it is therefore not possible to seize assets, freeze funds or block the property of Brazilian citizens without following those legal steps. The global reach of the U.S. financial system means foreign banks often restrict a wider range of transactions to avoid secondary sanctions. Moraes said he was confident that the sanctions against him would be reversed via diplomatic channels or an eventual challenge in U.S. courts. But he acknowledged that for now they had put financial institutions in a bind. "This misuse of legal enforcement places financial institutions in a difficult position — not only Brazilian banks, but also their American partners," he said. "That is precisely why, I repeat, the diplomatic channel is important so this can be resolved quickly - to prevent misuse of a law that is important to fight terrorism, criminal organizations, international drug trafficking and human trafficking," he added. The U.S. State Department did not immediately respond to request for comment. Moraes had "engaged in serious human rights abuse," said a Treasury Department spokesperson. "Rather than concocting a fantasy fiction, de Moraes should stop carrying out arbitrary detentions and politicized prosecutions." NO CHOICE The clash could have serious consequences for Brazilian financial institutions, said two bankers in Brazil, who requested anonymity to discuss the matter candidly. Most large banks are supervised by the U.S. government in some way due to their international presence or exposure, either through a foreign branch or issuance of foreign securities, said the former director of an international bank in Brazil. The choice for these banks, under pressure from the U.S., may be to invite sanctioned clients to seek a different institution to keep their assets, the banker added. The director of a major Brazilian bank said that, in practice, Monday's court ruling means any action taken by Brazilian banks based on rules involving the U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control, which oversees U.S. sanctions, will need approval from Brazil's Supreme Court. At the same time, he added, failing to comply with an OFAC decision could cut a bank off from the international financial system. "Brazil doesn't really have a choice," said the banker. "Given how interconnected everything is, and the disparity in economic power between the U.S. and Brazil, we're left in a position of subordination. There's not much we can do." He stressed that the court would need to come up with a solution "that doesn't put the financial system at risk." Shares of state-run lender Banco do Brasil, where most federal officials including judges receive salaries, fell 6% on Tuesday, the largest drop among Brazil's three biggest banks. The bank said in a Tuesday statement it was prepared to deal with "complex, sensitive" issues involving global regulations. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US government pushes for 10% Intel stake amid US-China chip war
The US government could become the largest shareholder in Intel, one of the most important US technology companies, marking the first time Washington has sought ownership in a Silicon Valley icon. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday confirmed the US government is vying for a 10% stake in Intel, part of an unusual deal that would deepen the Trump administration's financial ties with the major chipmaker. The move comes weeks after US President Donald Trump called for Intel's CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign due to what he claimed was a conflict of interest. This allegation was linked to Tan's previous role as a venture capitalist in China. Although rare, it is not unprecedented for the US government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the recession in 2008, when the government injected nearly $50 billion (€42.94bn) into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker when it was on the verge of bankruptcy. At the time, even that bailout was seen as controversial despite GM's hardships because it was perceived as blurring the lines between state control and US free market principles. Unlike many European companies, US ones have insisted on a complete separation between government and private ownership of enterprises. The government ended up with a roughly $10bn (€8.6bn) loss after it sold its stock in GM. A misreading of the CHIPS act? Intel historically led the world in semiconductor production, tied in particular to PC production and Microsoft. When the iPhone launched in 2007, Intel-dominated PC chips nonetheless failed to win a foothold in smartphones and tablets. ARM-based chips, which are used by Apple and Samsung, became the mobile standard, leaving Intel stuck in the declining PC market. Intel has also lagged in the AI race, with their traditional central processing units not being well-suited for AI workloads. On the other hand, competitors like Nvidia have surged ahead. The CHIPS and Science Act, often referred to as just the CHIPS Act, was a bill passed in August 2022 by former US President Joe Biden in order to boost the local US semiconductor industry. COVID-19 supply chain disruptions and US–China tech tensions highlighted how dependent the US had become on foreign-made chips, not just for consumer electronics, but also defence, cars, AI and infrastructure. In November 2024, the US Department of Commerce finalised an agreement to grant Intel up to $7.86bn (€6.75bn) in direct funding through the CHIPS Act to support their semiconductor manufacturing and advanced packaging operations across Arizona, New Mexico, Ohio and Oregon. Related Japan's SoftBank continues US investment as it moves to gain 2% stake in chip maker Intel Trump reverses course on Intel CEO amid US-China chip showdown Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the program, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the CHIPS program. The company has received about $2.2bn (€1.89bn) of the $7.8bn (€6.75bn) pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve US taxpayers if it is turned into Intel stock, which he said would be in the form of non-voting shares so the government wouldn't be able to use the stake to sway how the company is managed. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC as he explained why Trump is pushing for the deal. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.' The notion of the US government holding a huge stake in Intel would have seemed inconceivable back in the company's heyday when its processors were powering a personal computer boom that began in the mid-1970s. But Intel's ongoing struggles also means the US government is taking on a risky investment. Related Intel's stock tumbles after President Trump says its CEO must resign Intel announces more job cuts and drops projects in Europe in plan to save the company US government as biggest shareholder The US government's negotiations to become a major Intel shareholder are coming on the heels of a $2 billion (€1.7bn) investment Japanese technology giant SoftBank Group, disclosed late on Monday. SoftBank is accumulating its 2% stake in Intel at $23 (€19.70) per share — a slight discount from the stock's price when its investment was announced. Intel's shares surged nearly 7% to close at $25.31 (€21.74) on the news of SoftBank's big bet on Intel, coupled with Trump's plans for the company. SoftBank invests in an array of companies that it sees as holding long-term potential. It has been stepping up investments in the United States since Trump returned to the White House. In February, its chairman Masayoshi Son joined Trump, Sam Altman of OpenAI and Larry Ellison of Oracle in announcing a major investment of up to $500bn (€429.38bn) in a project to develop specific artificial intelligence infrastructure for OpenAI called Stargate. 'Semiconductors are the foundation of every industry," Son said in a statement. 'This strategic investment reflects our belief that advanced semiconductor manufacturing and supply will further expand in the United States, with Intel playing a critical role.' Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the US, which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world since he returned to the White House earlier this year for his second term in office. 'We want Intel to be successful in America,' Lutnick said during his CNBC interview. Intel is valued at about $110bn (€94.4bn), meaning a 10% government stake would equate to roughly $11bn (€9.44bn) at current prices. Other major shareholders include Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street. A 10% US government stake would almost certainly vault Washington ahead of Vanguard as Intel's largest single shareholder, unless structured as non-voting shares outside the normal count.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China to reportedly launch stablecoins to challenge dollar dominance
China to reportedly launch stablecoins to challenge dollar dominance originally appeared on TheStreet. China is reportedly considering allowing the usage of yuan-backed stablecoins for the first time, as per the latest Reuters report. The step would mark a major reversal in the country's crypto policy, which has so far resisted embracing the crypto ecosystem. The decision is part of its strategy to boost the global adoption of its national currency, sources familiar with the matter told the publication. A stablecoin is a type of cryptocurrency that tries to keep its price stable by being pegged to a fiat currency like the U.S. dollar or a commodity like gold. China's cabinet could review and approve the stablecoin roadmap later this month so that the yuan's global usage grows and it can potentially catch up with the U.S. administration's push for stablecoins, Reuters said by citing sources. As per one Reuters source, senior Chinese leadership is expected to meet for a study session by the end of August, which will focus on the yuan's global adoption and stablecoins. Senior leaders are expected to guide stablecoin usage and set clear rules for its role in business, as per the source. China wants to challenge dollar's dominance While China has been apprehensive of the global crypto economy and has banned it in the mainland, its desire for the yuan to challenge the likes of the USD as the standard global currency is pushing the dragon toward stablecoins. With President Donald Trump signing the GENIUS Act to drive the global growth of USD-pegged stablecoins, the U.S. is a leader when it comes to stablecoins, and it will be quite a challenge for China to catch sources, Reuters also reported that China is expected to potentially discuss the usage of stablecoins for cross-border trade and payments with some countries at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit to be held Aug. 31-Sep. 1 in Tianjin. Hong Kong and Shanghai will be the main centers to streamline the implementation of the stablecoin plan. As per DeFiLlama, the total stablecoin market is worth more than $275 billion at the time of writing, and the USD-pegged stablecoins dominate the market. China to reportedly launch stablecoins to challenge dollar dominance first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 20, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 20, 2025, where it first appeared.
