
At Veterans Affairs, Plan for Sweeping Cuts Tanks Morale
Tom Brenner/For The Washington Post
A staff member speaks to Veterans Affairs Secretary Douglas A. Collins before Collins testifies May 6 at a Senate hearing.
Morale is plummeting inside the Department of Veterans Affairs as tens of thousands of employees prepare for deep staffing cuts, raising alarms among staffers, veterans and advocates who fear the reductions would severely damage care and benefits for millions of the nation's former service members.
VA Secretary Douglas A. Collins has signaled plans to shrink the agency's workforce by 15 percent – or about 83,000 employees. Although agency officials insist front-line health-care workers and claims processors will be spared, the vague and shifting details of the Trump administration's downsizing plan have only fueled anxiety and speculation within VA's massive workforce.
The uncertainty is already taking a toll.
Thousands of employees across VA's health and benefits systems have opted for early retirement in two waves, which would pay them through Sept. 30 to get them to leave, according to internal data reviewed by The Washington Post. Many of these employees said they are opting to leave out of fear that they would be laid off anyway.
Many Democrats have already seized on President Donald Trump's VA cuts as damaging to veterans, and some Republicans worry about the political risks of firings and other reductions at the agency.
'The veterans now check in and ask us how we are doing,' one social worker at a hospital in the Great Lakes region told The Post. 'They see the news and are very aware of the circumstances and fearful of losing VA support that they depend on.'
A contractor at the VA medical center in Palo Alto, California, described employees as 'fearful, paranoid, demoralized.'
'There's some cracks starting to show,' said an ICU doctor at a Florida facility.
This account of turmoil within Veterans Affairs is based on interviews with more than two dozen current and former employees, most of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss internal deliberations. The Post also reviewed more than two dozen pages of internal agency records and communications.
In response to questions from The Post, VA spokesman Peter Kasperowicz pointed to problems in the agency that have existed for years.
'During the Biden Administration, VA failed to address nearly all of its most serious problems, such as benefits backlogs, rising health-care wait times and major issues with survivor benefits,' Kasperowicz said in a statement. 'The far-left Washington Post refused to cover these failures because it would have made the Biden Administration look bad.'
Specifically responding to the concerns employees shared about morale, Kasperowicz said The Post is to blame.
'The people you spoke with are probably being misled by The Washington Post's dishonest, far-left fearmongering,' he said.
With almost 500,000 employees, VA is the second-largest federal agency behind the Department of Defense and is in charge of providing health care to more than 9 million veterans through 170 VA medical centers and 1,193 outpatient clinics. In recent years, VA's budget and workforce have grown significantly – in part to accommodate the PACT Act, which caused disability claims and enrollment in the health-care system to surge.
Many people involved in planning the reductions have been required to sign nondisclosure agreements, leaving details about the looming cutbacks unclear. Some familiar with the plans said initial cuts will target the agency's central office, steps from the White House, where 19,000 people work administering the Veterans Health Administration, the Veterans Benefits Administration and the National Cemetery System.
But that would still leave tens of thousands of jobs at hospitals and clinics under threat of future cuts. Collins – under pressure from his workforce, Congress and veterans groups – has attempted to quell concerns by saying that he's seeking alternative cost-cutting measures in addition to layoffs and might not need to reach the initial proposal of 15 percent.
VA leaders have initially homed in on combining what they consider duplicative offices to cut jobs, according to the people familiar with the plans.
For instance, they are considering merging suicide prevention and homelessness programs with a mental health office to reduce the number of full-time employees supporting separate programs, according to an internal document obtained by The Post that shows preliminary proposals. Another proposal would combine a program for LGBTQ+ veterans with the Office of Health Equity, which identifies health-care disparities, and the Office of Whole Health, which organizes wellness programs.
Kasperowicz said 'no decisions have been made with respect to staff reductions.'
On Friday, a federal judge extended a pause on mass layoffs in 22 federal agencies, including VA, in a lawsuit against the administration's cuts filed by a federal workers' union. The pause could be short-lived, however, as the Trump administration has appealed to the Supreme Court.
Collins, a former Georgia congressman and an Iraq War veteran, has argued that VA has grown too bloated and must be streamlined. But veterans' groups and bipartisan lawmakers warn that rapid downsizing, particularly without a clear strategy, could harm veterans who depend on the agency for medical care, mental health support and disability benefits.
Veterans' groups have also warned that staff cuts would disproportionately affect veterans, who make up about a quarter of VA's workforce. Several groups, including a union organization, are organizing a rally on the National Mall on June 6 – the 81st anniversary of D-Day – in hopes of drawing thousands of protesters against the anticipated cuts.
'Iraq felt safer than being a VA employee currently does,' a veteran and VA communications worker privately told Hill staffers in a written submission shared with The Post. 'My leadership in Iraq cared about me as a human and didn't just see me as a number.'
Some Republicans expressed apprehension about the cutback numbers Collins shared when he testified in recent weeks before the Senate and House committees overseeing his agency.
'There's understandable concern among veterans and VA staff,' Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee Chairman Jerry Moran (R-Kansas) said at a May 6 hearing with Collins. 'We need to be strategic, not simply hit a number.'
Lawmakers pressed Collins on the cuts, but he said he would not share preliminary details publicly. He suggested to senators what the agency could do without, such as the small number of staff who design medical spaces, and that he aimed to reassign doctors and nurses who do administrative work rather than care for patients.
One psychiatrist told The Post that a significant portion of their time is spent coordinating care, reviewing safety issues and advising other clinicians – work that often goes unnoticed but is crucial to quality treatment.
'Doctor administration work is important and not replaceable by AI,' the provider said in response to concerns that this administration has encouraged the use of artificial intelligence to replace work done by humans.
During the House hearing on May 15, Collins and Rep. Mark Takano (D-California) sparred after the Democrat displayed an internal spreadsheet with calculated savings from a 15 percent reduction in every VA job classification, such as a proposal to eliminate 4,000 nurses estimated to save $1 billion.
'This is a leaked predecisional document that is not helpful,' Collins said, disavowing the document. 'I have made clear, we will not be cutting front-line health care.'
The pressure on VA comes at a pivotal moment, as the department continues to implement the PACT Act, landmark legislation expanding benefits for veterans exposed to toxins such as burn pits. That law triggered a surge in disability claims – but also prompted the agency to hit new milestones in claims processing speed.
As Collins moves ahead with his reorganization, staff shortages, growing workloads and a demanding return-to-office policy are already straining the system.
Employees hired before the pandemic with telework agreements had not expected to return to the office because their work agreements came before the public health crisis. Several have since decided to leave their jobs because they said their relocations would be untenable.
At a program that helps find housing and jobs for veterans in need in Palo Alto, one staffer has decided to leave because of the return-to-office policy, while another contractor is being eliminated as part of sweeping contract cuts across the agency, one employee said.
'I keep hearing like, 'Oh, the cuts won't affect patient care,' but it absolutely will,' the employee said. 'You can't function without support staff.'
At multiple facilities, employees say tight quarters caused by the department's return-to-office policy have made it harder to provide confidential care. Mental health specialists report that they now overhear colleagues' therapy sessions with veterans, and one office has plans to purchase noise-canceling headphones to restore some privacy.
An internal VA presentation from March projected a deficit of 57,000 workstations across the Veterans Health Administration, leaving little room for providers or patients in some locations. At one hospital, a suicide prevention specialist said they had to take phone calls outside because of overloaded WiFi.
Despite these accounts, Collins has dismissed reports of overcrowded conditions and denied that employees were working out of closets – a claim that is contradicted by a photo shared with The Post of a makeshift desk set up inside a storage closet. 'We're sardines packed in a can,' the employee who took the photo said.
Another employee shared a photo of multiple workstations set up inside a hospital room.
Kasperowicz said the return-to-office policy has been rolled out with the limitations of workspaces in mind, adding that more than 60,000 VHA employees have returned to the office starting May 5, while 45,000 have not because of exemptions or extensions. He declined to respond to specific claims without locations or other identifying details, which The Post agreed to keep confidential.
'While most of VA's dedicated employees understand the importance of being on-site, a small but vocal minority are telling tall tales in a desperate attempt to avoid returning to the office at all costs,' he said.
The overcrowding has led to a lack of parking at some facilities. At one hospital, employees were told in an email Friday that veterans have missed or been tardy for medical appointments because staff members had parked in the veterans-only parking lots.
'Despite these challenges, staff are expected to report to work on time and leave veterans parking for those who are receiving care and services,' the hospital director told employees.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Yomiuri Shimbun
5 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
700 Marines Deployed to L.A. as Immigration Protests Continue
Joshua Lott/The Washington Post Protesters are seen outside the Metropolitan Detention Center on Monday in Los Angeles. The Pentagon on Monday ordered a battalion of 700 Marines to Los Angeles as protests of the Trump administration's immigration policies spilled into a fourth day, escalating a confrontation between the White House and the country's most populous state. The Marines, summoned from an infantry unit typically trained for overseas warfare, will assist more than 300 National Guard members that President Donald Trump deployed to the city over the weekend, the first wave of roughly 2,100 activated so far for the mission, according to the Defense Department. The deployments follow demonstrations against immigration raids that at times turned violent. The Marines, stationed east of Los Angeles in Twentynine Palms, had started moving out Monday afternoon, a defense official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss ongoing operations. This marks the first time in six decades an American president has ordered such a military intervention without the approval of a state's governor. State and local officials in California – a frequent target of Trump's ire – denounced the move as incendiary. 'This is unprecedented that the president is using the military against his own people in this way,' said Los Angeles City Council member Hugo Soto-Martínez, whose district adjacent to downtown encompasses a range of immigrant communities. Most protests have been peaceful, state and local officials have said, even as they spread to cities across the country. 'U.S. Marines have served honorably across multiple wars in defense of democracy. They are heroes,' California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said on social media. 'They shouldn't be deployed on American soil facing their own countrymen to fulfill the deranged fantasy of a dictatorial President. This is un-American.' The Marines will deploy from a military base in Twentynine Palms, a three-hour drive east of Los Angeles in the Mojave Desert. They will focus on 'protecting federal personnel and federal property,' the Pentagon said in a statement, and they will partner with National Guard members who have been trained in crowd control and de-escalation. The mobilization is a significant move by the Pentagon. Typically, National Guard members, rather than active-duty troops such as the Marines, are mobilized for civil unrest missions at the behest of governors or the president. The Marines and Guard members under federal orders will serve in a support role and cannot participate in direct immigration or law enforcement operations. That would change if Trump invoked the Insurrection Act, which gives the president broader powers to conduct policing operations with troops under federal control. Troops being sent to Los Angeles are 'trained in de-escalation, crowd control, and standing rules for the use of force,' Northern Command, which oversees operations in North America, said in a statement. The activated units so far are drawn from combat units, not military police personnel, who specialize in civil disturbance response. The move was met with skepticism among some of the protesters in downtown Los Angeles on Monday. Amaris Leon, a 35-year-old lawyer from Sacramento, said he interpreted the deployment of Marines as an effort to set 'the military on civilians for exercising their First Amendment rights.' Trump is trying to rile people up, said Teri Merrick, a retired professor, 'so he can have an excuse to come in and stomp everybody down.' The protests began after a week of immigration raids in Southern California, which resulted in more than 100 arrests at workplaces that neighbors described as normally calm, including a doughnut shop and Home Depot stores. Demonstrators took to the streets in response, lighting the fuse that sparked days of widely broadcasted dust-ups. Portions of the 101 Freeway closed over the weekend when protesters clogged its southbound lanes, snarling already notorious traffic. Protesters hurled rocks at police cruisers, tear gas filled the air and phones captured videos of rioters torching self-driving vehicles, leading one robotaxi company to suspend part of its Los Angeles services. More than 50 protesters have been arrested, according to local law enforcement. The National Guard members had already improved the situation in Los Angeles, Trump said Monday. 'Thank goodness we sent out some wonderful National Guard – they really helped,' he said. 'A lot of problems that we're having out there, they were afraid to do anything. And we sent out the troops, and they've done a fantastic job.' But local officials said the deployment was unnecessary. The chaos from the protests was contained to 'a few streets downtown' that looked 'horrible,' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said on CNN. But there has not been, she added, 'citywide civil unrest.' California sued the Trump administration Monday over the deployment of California National Guard members to Los Angeles without Newsom's consent. The fallout from the protests appears to have deepened the political feud between Trump and Newsom, a potential 2028 Democratic hopeful. The Trump administration has been weighing the cancellation of California's federal funding, an unprecedented move that would decimate the state's budget. And Trump endorsed arresting Newsom on Monday after arriving on the South Lawn of the White House. 'I would do it if I were Tom,' Trump told reporters as he returned to the White House, referring to border czar Tom Homan. 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing.' Newsom responded minutes later in a social media post on X, calling it 'an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.' 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation – this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism,' he wrote. After a chaotic weekend, downtown Los Angeles residents woke to a jarring combination of calm streets and graffiti-marred buildings. Just outside the city's core, in the coffee-shop-studded neighborhood of Silver Lake, people casually walked dogs and sipped cortados as the workweek started. Yet the national spotlight remained glued to Hollywood's backyard, which was caught in the crosshairs of dueling political narratives: While right-leaning media looped videos of burning cars and street skirmishes, Democrats insisted that most protesters remained peaceful. Protests spread across the country after the Friday arrest of David Huerta, the 58-year-old head of the Service Employees International Union's California branch. Huerta was arrested after sitting in the path of federal agents targeting Los Angeles warehouse workers, and he now faces a felony conspiracy charge. The Service Employees International Union, which represents thousands of janitors, cooks, security guards and other service workers, organized rallies in more than a dozen states, with members and their supporters condemning immigration-enforcement tactics they cast as inhumane. Huerta was released from custody Monday on a $50,000 bond. Bill Essayli, the U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, wrote in a post on X that Huerta had 'deliberately obstructed' federal agents who were executing a warrant. 'No one has the right to assault, obstruct, or interfere with federal authorities carrying out their duties,' Essayli wrote. Some Los Angeles residents are bracing for more protests. Christian Frizzell, owner of the downtown Redwood Bar, was trying to decide whether to close early Monday. They usually stay open until 2 a.m. But he noticed a nearby credit union had boarded up its windows in anticipation of more protests. Back in 2020, his bar was damaged during Black Lives Matter protests. Still, he wasn't sure if Marines were the best choice to protect his property. 'It seems like a large escalation,' he said of the coming deployment. 'I wish they would try to cool it down.'

Japan Times
6 hours ago
- Japan Times
Los Angeles ICE raids fuel controversy over masked agents
Images of federal immigration agents wearing masks and balaclavas as they conduct raids in Los Angeles and other U.S. cities have ignited a politically charged debate over whether they are protecting their identities or engaging in intimidation tactics. Violent clashes between protesters and law enforcement in Los Angeles over the weekend were triggered by masked U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers rounding up alleged immigration offenders. Democratic lawmakers and civil rights groups say masks are an attempt by ICE agents to escape accountability for their actions and are aimed at frightening immigrants as they carry out Republican President Donald Trump's directive to crack down on illegal immigration. Republicans and ICE officials assert the face coverings are necessary to protect agents and their families from being targeted by "doxxing," in which their home addresses and personal information are posted online. "People are out there taking photos of the names, their faces, and posting them online with death threats to their family and themselves," Todd Lyons, the acting ICE chief, said last week. There are no federal rules or laws forbidding mask-wearing by law enforcement personnel, although historically they have been used to protect the identities of agents during undercover operations, said Jerry Robinette, a former ICE special agent in charge. A U.S. federal agent with a pepper ball gun walks back to his vehicle after making immigration arrests in Chicago on June 4. | REUTERS Armed masked ICE agents have also been seen arresting people in cities besides Los Angeles, often in plain clothes that sometimes lack clear identifying markings. One of the most notable arrests by ICE officials came in March when Turkish student Rumeysa Ozturk was confronted by several masked, plainclothed agents on a street in a Boston suburb. Her arrest and terrified reaction were captured in a video that went viral. Ozturk, arrested after co-writing an opinion piece criticizing her school's response to Israel's war in Gaza, was released from ICE detention in May after a judge's order. Masked ICE agents have been filmed arresting workers at a restaurant in San Diego and a gardener at a house in Massachusetts. ICE officers were prominently seen wearing masks during arrests at courthouses across the U.S. last month. Scott Shuchart, a top ICE policy official under former Democratic President Joe Biden, said it appeared ICE officers had increased the use of face coverings and tactical gear since Trump took office. Shuchart said an officer concealing their identity goes against typical American law enforcement practices. "In general, law enforcement personnel need to have name patches, badge numbers, or other indicia that the public can see and use to file complaints and ensure accountability and oversight," Shuchart said. Three former U.S. officials dealing with immigration enforcement, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said they did not recall ICE officers routinely using face masks while Biden was in office from 2021 to 2025. Mask-wearing by law enforcement agents is more common in countries such as Mexico and Russia with high levels of organized crime or political unrest, or during counterterrorism operations in countries including France. Boston's Democratic mayor, Michelle Wu, was criticized by the Trump administration last week when she compared masked ICE agents to the "secret police" and a neo-Nazi group. Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, the parent agency of ICE, called Wu's rhetoric dangerous. "Make no mistake, this type of rhetoric is contributing to the surge in assaults of ICE officers through their repeated vilification and demonization of ICE," McLaughlin said. Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, in May defended ICE officers using face coverings. A federal agent walks back to his vehicle after making immigration arrests in Chicago on June 4. | REUTERS "They've been doxxed repeatedly," Homan said. "I should know because I've been doxxed a thousand times myself." Homan cited an April protest outside his home in upstate New York after ICE arrested a mother and her three children on a dairy farm. The debate over ICE masks has also erupted on Capitol Hill. Last week, the Democrats' House of Representatives leader, Hakeem Jeffries, denounced the practice, saying ICE agents were trying to conceal their identities from the American people. Jeffries and others believe unidentifiable law enforcement officials are difficult to hold accountable when misconduct is alleged. He vowed that the masked ICE agents would be identified "no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes." His comments were decried by his Republican counterpart, House Speaker Mike Johnson. "They need to back off of ICE and respect our agents and stop protesting against them," Johnson told Fox News.


Japan Times
7 hours ago
- Japan Times
Kennedy dismisses all 17 members of U.S. CDC vaccine panel
U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has fired all members sitting on a U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention panel of vaccine experts and is reconstituting the committee, his department said on Monday. Kennedy removed all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said in a statement, and is in the process of considering new members to replace them. The ACIP panel is tasked with recommending which vaccines get placed on the CDC immunization schedule and who should get them, which helps determine insurance coverage. "Today we are prioritizing the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda," Kennedy said. "The public must know that unbiased science — evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest — guides the recommendations of our health agencies." All 17 sitting ACIP members were appointed under former President Joe Biden's administration, including 13 in 2024, HHS said. Not removing them would have prevented President Donald Trump's administration from choosing a majority of the committee until 2028. "That's a tragedy," former Food and Drug Administration Chief Scientist Jesse Goodman said of the firings. "This is a highly professional group of scientists and physicians and others ... It's the kind of political meddling that will reduce confidence rather than increase confidence." Kennedy, who for many years has questioned the safety and efficacy of vaccines, making claims contrary to scientific evidence, said the change was necessary because the committee is rife with conflicts of interest and most members receive funding from drugmakers. But ACIP members are required to declare any potential or perceived conflicts of interest that arise in the course of ACIP tenure and any relevant business interests, positions of authority or other connections with organizations relevant to the work of the ACIP. "Our worst fears have been realized," said one expert with close ties to the committee, adding that the vetting of ACIP members "is very, very rigorous." Kennedy and HHS provided no specific evidence of industry conflicts of interest among departing ACIP members. The CDC's web page for conflicts of interest, last updated in March, showed that one current member had recused herself from votes on a handful of vaccines because she had worked on clinical trials for their manufacturers. ACIP will convene its next meeting over June 25-27 at CDC headquarters in Atlanta, the department said. The change was first announced in an editorial written by Kennedy for the Wall Street Journal. At least one ACIP member who spoke on the condition of anonymity learned that they were being retired from the committee from the editorial and they believe none of the members had been notified by the CDC. ACIP members were required to disclose everything as part of the application process, including investments and all sources of income, the member said. Once the FDA approves vaccines for sale to the public, the ACIP role is to review data in a public meeting and vote on vaccine recommendations, which are then sent to the CDC director to sign off. The Affordable Care Act generally requires insurers to cover vaccines that are listed on the CDC vaccine schedule.