Paving over priorities: Why the Juneau-Douglas Second Crossing is the wrong investment for Alaska
The Mendenhall wetlands seen in winter (Photo by Mary Glaves)
Across Alaska, roads are falling apart. Potholes deepen in Fairbanks, washed-out culverts block salmon in the Mat-Su, and rural communities from Ketchikan to Kotzebue are left waiting on repairs that may never come. A trip on the Kenai Peninsula leaves your teeth rattling and your fishing poles clanking in the back of your rig. Our state's transportation system is in a state of disrepair.
And yet the state is poised to spend at least half a billion dollars building a second bridge across one of Alaska's most ecologically significant and beloved wetlands: the Mendenhall Wetlands in Juneau.
The proposed Juneau-Douglas Second Crossing – termed the Juneau Douglas North Crossing by DOWL, the engineering firm contracted to assess and build this structure – is being marketed as a strategy to reduce commute times, link the Douglas Island communities to emergency services, and promote development. But even if these reasons are held up under scrutiny – and none of them are as simple as they sound – the second bridge comes at a staggering cost estimated between $290-450 million. In a time when Alaska faces over $2 billion in deferred maintenance on existing roads and bridges, we must ask: Is this the best use of public funds?
Juneau has already developed more than 40% of its wetlands. In a state where habitat loss is often distant and gradual, the proposed Second Crossing represents an immediate and irreversible threat to an intact, high-value ecosystem. Once roads and bridges fragment this landscape, the consequences – disrupted migration, habitat degradation, declining fish and bird populations— are permanent.
The Juneau Douglas Second Crossing's installation bill could exceed half a billion dollars, which doesn't include annual maintenance costs. That's money that could fix existing infrastructure all over the state, such as roads that rural Alaskans use to access schools, groceries, medical care, and subsistence hunting and fishing grounds. Project funds could also easily maintain the bridge that currently exists between Douglas Island and the Juneau mainland.
Unlike these lifeline routes, the Second Crossing is a convenience project, not a necessity. Juneau's population is gradually shrinking. The most cost-efficient second bridges would shave only a few miles off driving time from the existing bridge. The roads and bridges in place today are not failing. This is a solution in search of a problem, and it comes at a cost that all Alaskans would bear.
This project just doesn't pencil out and is not fiscally responsible. The Mendenhall Wetlands are one of the most ecologically important habitats in Alaska, recognized globally as an Important Bird Area (IBA) by the National Audubon Society. A 5,000-acre ecosystem provides essential habitat for millions of migratory birds traveling the Pacific Flyway each year—including sandpipers, dowitchers, plovers, and waterfowl. These wetlands are also a critical nursery for salmon and trout, with rich tidal channels that shelter juvenile fish before they head to sea. The Mendenhall Wetlands have been called the Heart of Juneau.
It's not just birdwatchers and fishers who value the space. The Mendenhall State Game Refuge was designated in 1976 by the Alaska State Legislature. It was in part designated so hunters could pursue waterfowl and have an accessible place to hunt. In 2023, the Alaska Department of Fish & Game added over a dozen anadromous fish to the Anadromous Waters Catalog (AWC) fish streams after surveying the wetlands. A total of 230 species of birds have been documented within the wetlands – that's 69% of the 335 bird species for all of Southeast Alaska – including 36 different waterfowl species, according to Audubon Alaska. The Mendenhall Wetlands support one of Southeast Alaska's most popular and accessible waterfowl hunting areas, drawing hunters from across the region each fall and over 1800 annual local resident hunters (ADF&G).
For many, it's a tradition passed down through generations, a place where families hunt ducks and geese on public lands, some just minutes from their homes.
Building this road means more than just the loss of habitat. It means lost opportunities elsewhere. Alaska's existing road system is aging and underfunded. Major corridors in the Interior and Southcentral suffer from poor drainage and frost damage. Coastal communities face landslide risks and storm-damaged causeways. Ferry service remains unreliable for many Southeast residents. Every dollar spent on a vanity project like the Second Crossing is a dollar not spent on infrastructure Alaskans actually rely on.
Let's be clear: this is not a NIMBY (not-in-my-backyard) issue. It's a matter of statewide priorities. From Cold Bay to Prudhoe, we all have a stake in how limited public funds are used. Do we choose to invest in maintenance, safety, and real community needs, or spend lavishly on speculative development that benefits a few, while costing us all?
Alaska doesn't need another expensive, new road project. What we need is leadership that respects our budget, our wildlife, and our way of life. Preserving the Mendenhall Wetlands as a globally important ecosystem, a rich fish and wildlife habitat, and a cornerstone of Southeast Alaska's outdoor traditions is not just the right thing to do—it's the smart thing.
Let's repair what is broken. Let's protect what is working. And let's leave the Mendenhall Wetlands wild for the generations of Alaskans yet to come, like nature, and the state legislature intended.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alaska Sustainable Energy Conference 2025 left unspoken what Alaskans truly value
The Canning River, seen here in 2018, flows from the Brooks Range into the Beaufort Sea along the western edge of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. (Photo by Lisa Hupp/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) At the conclusion of the 2025 Alaska Sustainable Energy Conference much attention was given to profitability of fossil fuels, while far less was said about the meaning of 'sustainability' itself. In fact, both Alaskans and the principles of sustainability were notably absent from the conference's central themes and many of its attendees. From the outset, the federal government's priority appeared to be reassuring foreign interests of the United States' continued ability to sell off Alaska piece by piece. Conference organizers, led by Gov. Mike Dunleavy appeared eager as regulatory protections continue to be rolled back by the Trump administration. Federal officials, including U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright, and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin, expressed strong support for the further weakening of environmental safeguards to unilaterally advance long-contested development projects across Alaska. Many attendees represented corporate interests excited to profit from new extraction opportunities or potential buyers, watching to see if the administration follows through on promises to mine Alaska's oil, gas, and critical minerals. These companies appeared enthusiastic to exploit the land with minimal oversight and a lack of local consent. The audience was left with a misleading impression of Alaskan support. At the center of ongoing and proposed projects, such as Red Dog mine, Graphite One, and Ambler Road, was the largest item for sale: a natural gas reservoir on the North Slope. The proposed Alaska liquid natural gas pipeline, currently led by the Alaska Gasoline Development Corp. and New York-based Glenfarne Group LLC, would extract natural gas from subsurface carbon and transport it 800 miles south to Nikiski for export. The estimated almost $40 billion project promises only temporary jobs and infrastructure. Environmentally, natural gas poses risks similar to coal and oil. It is composed primarily of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Inevitable gas leaks during extraction and transportation can release up to 10% of methane before combustion, with the remainder ultimately emitted as carbon dioxide. These outcomes reflect outdated, combustion-based energy models. Regarding Alaska's wildlife and people, cabinet members seemed to dismiss concerns after brief visits, suggesting the animals are happy and that communities would benefit from further resource development despite evidence to the contrary. The 'resource curse' is a paradox that explains the economic dynamics of regions rich in natural resources, but limited in democratic representation. Extraction projects often introduce new workers, housing, and other infrastructure at great cost to local communities. Despite generating profits for corporate sponsors, these projects typically result in a net loss for the public. Workers are imported from out of state, while profits are exported. Local towns are then responsible for maintaining infrastructure without receiving corresponding benefits like revenue to support housing, health care or affordable energy. As finite resources are exhausted, companies maintain profit margins while community returns diminish. Once operations end, communities are often left with environmental damage and abandoned development, economically and socially worse off than before. Alaska's economy remains heavily reliant on oil and gas. As existing operations decrease in yield, public education and health care routinely face budgetary cuts. The natural gas reserve would only provide exports for a few decades, but its development would cause irreparable environmental damage, and leave Alaska facing another energy crisis within a generation. Why Gov. Dunleavy labeled this conference 'sustainable' remains unclear. It is unrealistic to claim the pipeline would benefit any of the roughly 190 communities beyond the Railbelt. While the state invests in LNG exports, rural towns reliant on diesel will face rising costs and health issues, including cancer risks. Regardless of one's stance on oil and gas, Chris Wright, the U.S. Secretary of Energy, himself stated: 'Energy… it's about people and math.' However, his equation solves for profit, while Alaska's equation for energy must begin and end with the voices and needs of the people. Scientists attending the summit this week in an official capacity were restricted to framing oil and gas as the primary development priority. This narrowed the conversation and sidelined discussions around advances in technology such as solar, wind, hydroelectric, and geothermal energy. Still, a handful of sustainability advocates attended as guests, business owners, protesters, and speakers. One speaker, Lesil McGuire, senior advisor with New Energy Alaska, an advocacy coalition that promotes renewable energy noted, 'Solar arrays can be propped up in a number of weeks.' As of 2020 solar energy has become cheaper to install and maintain than fossil fuels. Alaska needs energy infrastructure tailored to its unique environment, focused on long-term self reliance through renewable sources. Current examples include solar installations in the Northwest Arctic Borough, microgrid cooperatives, and heat pump incentives in Southeast Alaska. A cursory glance shows Alaska's capacity for renewable energy that could be faster to build and more cost effective than the LNG pipeline. In reality the conference didn't need to be held in Alaska, as Alaskans themselves played a minimal role. Led by Gov. Dunleavy, the 'Alaska Sustainable Energy Conference 2025' resembled government-backed promotion of the oil and gas industry and signaled extraction projects could move forward without oversight and regardless of local stakeholder's needs or opposition. International representatives seemed to be promised fuel for import, and out-of-state corporations appeared to be invited to profit at the expense of Alaska's environment. Renewable energy has been viable for decades and continues to become more efficient. Given a voice and a seat at the table, many Alaskans and Americans would likely favor local, self-sufficient renewables for lower prices and long-term reliability. Natural gas in Alaska will run out in this lifetime, do nothing to reduce costs in the majority of Alaskan communities, and may cause permanent harm to the environment. The United States and Alaska are not in need of a technological revolution in fossil fuels, but an information revolution in renewable energy. It is vitally important that all Alaskan voices are heard. Alaska values pristine wilderness, supports true sustainability, and is not for sale.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Paving over priorities: Why the Juneau-Douglas Second Crossing is the wrong investment for Alaska
The Mendenhall wetlands seen in winter (Photo by Mary Glaves) Across Alaska, roads are falling apart. Potholes deepen in Fairbanks, washed-out culverts block salmon in the Mat-Su, and rural communities from Ketchikan to Kotzebue are left waiting on repairs that may never come. A trip on the Kenai Peninsula leaves your teeth rattling and your fishing poles clanking in the back of your rig. Our state's transportation system is in a state of disrepair. And yet the state is poised to spend at least half a billion dollars building a second bridge across one of Alaska's most ecologically significant and beloved wetlands: the Mendenhall Wetlands in Juneau. The proposed Juneau-Douglas Second Crossing – termed the Juneau Douglas North Crossing by DOWL, the engineering firm contracted to assess and build this structure – is being marketed as a strategy to reduce commute times, link the Douglas Island communities to emergency services, and promote development. But even if these reasons are held up under scrutiny – and none of them are as simple as they sound – the second bridge comes at a staggering cost estimated between $290-450 million. In a time when Alaska faces over $2 billion in deferred maintenance on existing roads and bridges, we must ask: Is this the best use of public funds? Juneau has already developed more than 40% of its wetlands. In a state where habitat loss is often distant and gradual, the proposed Second Crossing represents an immediate and irreversible threat to an intact, high-value ecosystem. Once roads and bridges fragment this landscape, the consequences – disrupted migration, habitat degradation, declining fish and bird populations— are permanent. The Juneau Douglas Second Crossing's installation bill could exceed half a billion dollars, which doesn't include annual maintenance costs. That's money that could fix existing infrastructure all over the state, such as roads that rural Alaskans use to access schools, groceries, medical care, and subsistence hunting and fishing grounds. Project funds could also easily maintain the bridge that currently exists between Douglas Island and the Juneau mainland. Unlike these lifeline routes, the Second Crossing is a convenience project, not a necessity. Juneau's population is gradually shrinking. The most cost-efficient second bridges would shave only a few miles off driving time from the existing bridge. The roads and bridges in place today are not failing. This is a solution in search of a problem, and it comes at a cost that all Alaskans would bear. This project just doesn't pencil out and is not fiscally responsible. The Mendenhall Wetlands are one of the most ecologically important habitats in Alaska, recognized globally as an Important Bird Area (IBA) by the National Audubon Society. A 5,000-acre ecosystem provides essential habitat for millions of migratory birds traveling the Pacific Flyway each year—including sandpipers, dowitchers, plovers, and waterfowl. These wetlands are also a critical nursery for salmon and trout, with rich tidal channels that shelter juvenile fish before they head to sea. The Mendenhall Wetlands have been called the Heart of Juneau. It's not just birdwatchers and fishers who value the space. The Mendenhall State Game Refuge was designated in 1976 by the Alaska State Legislature. It was in part designated so hunters could pursue waterfowl and have an accessible place to hunt. In 2023, the Alaska Department of Fish & Game added over a dozen anadromous fish to the Anadromous Waters Catalog (AWC) fish streams after surveying the wetlands. A total of 230 species of birds have been documented within the wetlands – that's 69% of the 335 bird species for all of Southeast Alaska – including 36 different waterfowl species, according to Audubon Alaska. The Mendenhall Wetlands support one of Southeast Alaska's most popular and accessible waterfowl hunting areas, drawing hunters from across the region each fall and over 1800 annual local resident hunters (ADF&G). For many, it's a tradition passed down through generations, a place where families hunt ducks and geese on public lands, some just minutes from their homes. Building this road means more than just the loss of habitat. It means lost opportunities elsewhere. Alaska's existing road system is aging and underfunded. Major corridors in the Interior and Southcentral suffer from poor drainage and frost damage. Coastal communities face landslide risks and storm-damaged causeways. Ferry service remains unreliable for many Southeast residents. Every dollar spent on a vanity project like the Second Crossing is a dollar not spent on infrastructure Alaskans actually rely on. Let's be clear: this is not a NIMBY (not-in-my-backyard) issue. It's a matter of statewide priorities. From Cold Bay to Prudhoe, we all have a stake in how limited public funds are used. Do we choose to invest in maintenance, safety, and real community needs, or spend lavishly on speculative development that benefits a few, while costing us all? Alaska doesn't need another expensive, new road project. What we need is leadership that respects our budget, our wildlife, and our way of life. Preserving the Mendenhall Wetlands as a globally important ecosystem, a rich fish and wildlife habitat, and a cornerstone of Southeast Alaska's outdoor traditions is not just the right thing to do—it's the smart thing. Let's repair what is broken. Let's protect what is working. And let's leave the Mendenhall Wetlands wild for the generations of Alaskans yet to come, like nature, and the state legislature intended. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Behind the cameras: Gavel Alaska broadcasts the business of state government to Alaskans
Tulio Fontanella, a first-year production technician with Gavel, controls the cameras at a Senate Finance Committee meeting on Feb. 13, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon) Hours after a historic second veto of a bill to fund public education, Gov. Mike Dunleavy called a news conference on the governor's floor of the Alaska State Capitol. The shades were drawn, and a handful of reporters lined a long conference room table, as Dunleavy spoke and took questions for over an hour, explaining his criticisms and his veto. In offices throughout the rest of the building, legislators on all sides of the politically contentious debate on how to fund Alaska schools, watched from behind closed doors, as well as school district leaders, news outlets, and Alaskans across the state — live, via the cameras of Gavel Alaska. In the room, Gavel production crew Michael Penn operated a live camera broadcasting Dunleavy, with Tulio Fontanella sitting to the governor's right side, in a baseball cap, microphone in hand. During the May 19 news conference, Gavel Alaska was nearing the end of another legislative session. For nearly 30 years, Gavel has provided a free, public broadcast of the business of the state government to the rest of Alaska. A team of eight, mostly seasonal staff, operates cameras and broadcasts remotely from a ground floor production studio at KTOO Public Media, on Egan Drive along the waterfront of Juneau. 'It's kind of the C-SPAN of Alaska,' said executive producer Will Mader, referring to the nonprofit cable TV network that has streamed the U.S. government in Washington, D.C., since 1979. Above the chambers and committee rooms of the Alaska State Legislature, overlooking lawmakers' debates, governors' speeches, the prayers over floor sessions and the introductions of guests in the galleries, cameras and microphones capture the business of the State Capitol and Gavel broadcasts it live to Alaska. The team has just wrapped up covering another 120 day legislative session, with over 800 hours of live coverage broadcasting from the Capitol. The team of Gavel Alaska are used to dealing with technical problems, but now, they're facing a potential new hurdle of federal cuts. Gavel's crew finished the session at a sensitive time for public broadcasting. President Donald Trump has proposed large-scale cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides a share of funding to KTOO and public media across the country and state. Looking closely at Gavel Alaska gives a sense of the work that goes into giving the public access to state government. While the people in front of the cameras make the news, the people behind them rarely capture public attention. Behind the cameras On a late winter morning, Mader sits in front of a wall of monitors, gearing up for a busy day covering the Alaska State Legislature, which typically runs from January to May. Teams of two staff monitor three or four robotic cameras in each chamber of the House and Senate, the committee rooms, and the hallways. During hearings or floor sessions, they toggle between cameras to focus on who is speaking, add captions with names and titles, feature speakers' presentations and provide information for public comment. Mader said the most newsworthy topics are recorded and streamed on KTOO's statewide public affairs TV channel, KTOO 360TV. It's also transmitted via satellite through the Alaska Rural Communications Service statewide, for those without consistent internet. 'So it's available to anyone out in rural Alaska that can view it, just with an antenna,' he said. Though all hearings are livestreamed online, on some days there can be up to six committee meetings at a time, so Mader said that can be a challenge deciding which three to feature at once. 'We always cover House and Senate floor sessions, and we almost always cover finance (committee) meetings,' he said. 'The budget is always the No. 1 issue in session. So that's one reason for covering finance, as well as that it's the last stop for most legislation before it gets to the floor.' The Gavel broadcast launched in 1996, first with one cameraperson moving a manually operated camera between rooms of the Capitol to cover meetings, 'which isn't ideal, because people are facing all different directions,' Mader said. Eventually, the Legislature started some basic webstreaming with its own cameras. Ultimately the Legislature agreed to an informal partnership with Gavel and KTOO to provide a more quality broadcast. 'They share access to the cameras, and then they get a higher quality video feed from those cameras,' said Mikko Wilson, production manager at KTOO. The Gavel production at the Capitol saw a major technological upgrade in 2020, when grant funding and the purchase of new robotic cameras arrived at the same time as the COVID-19 pandemic. 'We had the quotes for the cameras. And I picked up the phone and said, 'Ship 'em. Send us the cameras, like we need the robots now!' Wilson said, smiling. 'And so that was my COVID project in 2020, pulling about 2 miles of cable and installing the 40-something-odd cameras inside.' At the controls are new seasonal staff, like fresh college graduates learning broadcast production, as well as veteran Alaska journalists, like longtime Juneau photojournalist Michael Penn and former TV broadcaster Bob Laurie. In a small studio off the main production bay, Laurie wrapped up covering a committee meeting and had time to talk. 'I try to really listen closely to what is being said, so that I can make sure I get the right names up, the right explainers, and kind of follow the flow of what is going on in the room. It takes a lot of focus for me,' he said. Laurie first covered the Legislature as a young TV reporter, for a highly contentious session in 1981. 'The leadership in the House, it took them a long time to organize…before they had their 21 votes together,' he said, to form a majority caucus. 'We didn't have the, you know, 121 day sessions, and people were dissatisfied with nothing getting through. Things were held up.' He said he slept on someone's floor while covering the action. 'I was the first full-time television reporter from outside Juneau to cover the Legislature,' he said. 'My competition followed about three days later — three days after I got on the air.' That launched a television reporting career, then work in state government, before Laurie returned to cover the session seasonally with Gavel. 'So this is nice, clean. This is raw. All we're doing is getting the different shots,' he said. 'This is what is actually happening, so people can see their representatives at work.' Some days Laurie is in the studio, and some days he's in the Capitol operating a camera to cover live events, like speeches from the governor or Alaska's U.S. senators. He said it's an opportunity for Alaskans to watch their elected officials in action. 'They can actually sit there and actually watch it and say, 'Oh, that's who I elected,'' he said. 'Whether it's good or bad. Without any editorial comment.' Across the hall, Tulio Fontanella is covering a Senate Finance Committee hearing a report on the state's oil revenues. He grew up in Juneau and just graduated from college with a degree in sports media. He said while there's some comparisons to sports broadcasting, it's much slower. 'There will be times that you'll stay on a wide shot, just because you don't know who's gonna talk next or how quickly they'll be done talking,' he said. 'There's other people who pause a long time before they start speaking, so it's a balancing act, getting that right.' His partner in the booth on captions, Robbie Gabel, who also grew up in Juneau, is also in his first year of broadcast production. 'I like when it's a little more hectic. It's a little slow. So it's fun when they're trying to get stuff in,' he said. 'I like it when it's more hectic and a lot more going on.' The crew is on duty whenever legislators are live, so that means long hours and sometimes weekends, especially when bills are being voted on, and final budget negotiations take place at the end of May. 'It's more complicated than someone would think,' Fontanella added. 'This type of television, you know, is somewhat simplified, but also still more complicated than anyone would guess. Like Will does so much planning for what we do. And Mikko, with all the tech mishaps or whatever needs to be set up — they do a lot of work.' Like C-SPAN, Gavel broadcasts the activities of all three branches of Alaska's government: the Legislature; the executive, such as governor's speeches or news conferences; and the judiciary, including oral arguments before the Alaska Supreme Court. At times, Gavel broadcasts emergency response updates, such as from the U.S. Coast Guard or National Weather Service; it provided updates when one of the strongest storms on record, Typhoon Merbok, hit in 2022, impacting more than 35 communities in Western Alaska. Gavel partners in Juneau and statewide Gavel Alaska is an independent press outlet, but those broadcasts require close coordination with public offices around the state. For broadcasting the Alaska Supreme Court, that's the court clerk's office; for the Legislature, that's daily coordination with the media team of the Legislative Affairs Agency, a nonpartisan support agency based in the Terry Miller Legislative Office on 6th Street behind the Capitol. The agency also provides webstreaming on the state's website of all legislative floor sessions and committee meetings, for the public record, said Tim Powers, the agency's chief technology and operations officer. 'So KTOO is going to do their high production quality for all the popular meetings, and we're still going to create the record for everything that may not be as popular, yeah, and won't have as high demand on television,' he said. The agency also coordinates all call-ins for the public to comment. 'You can testify on every bill in every committee in Alaska when they have public testimony, and that is not the case in other states,' he said. 'In some other states, you have to go to the State House to testify. In some other states, you're not allowed to testify, even if you do go to the State House, because they just don't take it. So it's unique, uniquely Alaskan, and I think it's a benefit to us,' Powers said. Powers said typically they see an estimated 1 million minutes per year of teleconferencing. 'Yeah, it's a lot of people connected,' he said. The Gavel livestream is watched closely by Alaska news outlets and journalists too, like Matt Acuña Buxton, who writes the political newsletter, the Alaska Memo. 'Literally — and I mean literally — I couldn't do my job covering the Alaska Legislature from Anchorage without Gavel Alaska's hard work,' he said. 'It's a lot more than just a camera in a legislative hearing, and Gavel's crews do so much behind the scenes to ensure we can see what's going on in Juneau, whether it be news conferences or the beloved hallway cameras. 'Their work with the broadcast during the day, which has to keep up with packed days of simultaneous hearings as well as the slow days, does a good job of balancing the big-ticket issues while also offering a wide look at things that you didn't know needed to be on your radar.' Federal funding under threat KTOO receives local funding, as well as federal funding, whose future is now uncertain. The partnership with the state to broadcast Gavel Alaska is an informal one. 'We don't receive any state funding for actually making this happen,' said KTOO manager Justin Shoman, 'So we're really relying on these other sources.' Since its start in 1996, the public television broadcast has been partly funded by the City and Borough of Juneau, to provide Alaskans access to the Capitol. Amid a long-running dispute on the location of Alaska's capital, the city's funding of the broadcast continues still today. 'Regardless of where the capital is in Alaska, it's still inaccessible easily to a large number of people,' Mader noted. 'So that's why I think, of all the states, having this service is most crucial in Alaska.' The Gavel Alaska staffing and production costs about $750,000 per year, Shoman said, with $455,000 funded by the city. The remaining roughly $295,000 is funded by a mix of sponsorships, underwriting, community donors and federal grant funding, including funding through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which also supports the general TV operations of KTOO. 'The majority of CPB funding goes to television. That's simply because television is more expensive to produce,' Shoman said. That federal funding is threatened now, as Trump has proposed steep cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Shoman and other supporters of public broadcasting in Alaska are actively advocating, including flying to Washington, D.C., and meeting with Alaska's congressional delegation, urging them to protect the funding. 'For those who are concerned with the future of Gavel Alaska and that level of government, accessibility and transparency — it is reliant, in Alaska, on some federal funding, and it's important that people know that,' Shoman said.
