Cannabis is becoming legal in Australia by stealth: Online providers prescribing marijuana and cannabis oil
But over the past four years there has been a historic shift in Australia's approach to its most popular illicit drug. Cannabis use is effectively being legalised by the growth of professional suppliers.
Leaked figures published Monday demonstrated how demand for medical cannabis is exploding. A single doctor at Montu, Australia's largest cannabis provider, wrote 72,000 prescriptions for the drug in two years, according to the Nine newspapers, a figure not challenged by the business.
Assuming the doctor averaged five days a week work for 46 weeks a year, that meant he or she issued 156 scripts each day. While the individual circumstances are unclear, Montu and its competitors are making cannabis relatively cheap and easy to obtain.
Amazon-like service
The company advertises 10-minute, $29 video calls with its doctors. Chronic pain and anxiety are two of the most common reasons for a prescription. Patients don't necessarily have to provide any further evidence they're ill.
Montu's wholesale cannabis supply business, Leafio, allows patients to order their drugs in a few minutes using a website almost as slick as Amazon's. Revenue last year was $263 million, according to The Age. On Google, the company has 1,192 reviews, averaging four stars. It has hired former health minister Greg Hunt to negotiate industry guidelines for prescribing cannabis over the phone and video calls.
A company spokesman said on Monday that some of its prescriptions are never used because they are for a different doses or cannabis products the patient decides they do not need. Others are repeat prescriptions for the same product.
'There is no requirement that the doctor appointment only takes 10 minutes,' the spokesperson said. 'The length of a consult is governed only by the time the doctor needs to perform a medical assessment which is dependent on the complexity of the medical history of the patient.'
Commercial drug market
The Government does not track the exact number of people who buy legal cannabis. But since legal medical use began in 2016, doctors have approved the drug 2.1 million times. Use accelerated in 2021 when a single, permanent licence was introduced for medical cannabis producers.
Demand quickly took off, helped by what Health Minister Mark Butler refers to as 'unscrupulous' medical cannabis companies. Some customers have reported being sent less cannabis than they paid for. Others were switched to brands, without their permission, more profitable for the supplier.
Doctors are concerned the system is being turned into a commercial drug market with little care for patients' health. 'The main problem is how do you differentiate a patient who is going to use it therapeutically from someone who is obtaining it to use themselves or give to someone else recreationally,' former deputy chief medical officer Nick Coatsworth said.
Three weeks ago a medical regulator, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency, warned cannabis doctors to be more careful and said there was evidence some cannabis clinics were 'over-servicing' and operating in 'ethical grey areas'.
'We don't prescribe opioids to every patient who asks for them, and medicinal cannabis is no different,' Medical Board of Australia chair Susan O'Dwyer said at the time. 'Patient demand is no indicator of clinical need.'
Lower IQs
Cannabis is legal in almost half of the US and Canada. In Australia, it is decriminalised in South Australia and the Northern Territory, which means there is no criminal penalty for recreational use. Small quantities are legal in the ACT.
It has long been Australia's most popular recreational drug. In 2022, 3 per cent of Australian adults and teenagers reported using it for medical reasons. In total, 12 per cent of people reported consuming cannabis in the previous year. Another updated survey on use is underway.
While the health system facilitates use of the drug, other arms of the Government argue against it. The Federal and State Governments fund the Drug and Alcohol Foundation, which argues that cannabis consumption leads to lower IQs, 'diminished life satisfaction and achievement' and a higher risk of psychotic disorders.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
9 News
42 minutes ago
- 9 News
Embarrassing reason Aussies are wasting hundreds of dollars every year
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here As Australians continue to battle the cost-of-living pressures caused by years of high inflation and interest rates, plenty are wasting hundreds of dollars a year on subscription services they never use, with many even having forgotten about signing up in the first place. Research released by Westpac this week revealed three in every 10 Aussies lose $600 a year on duplicate apps and services they don't use. It also found the average consumer spends an extra 20 per cent on subscriptions than what they realise – the equivalent of about $14 a month or $168 a year. Three in every 10 Australians waste $600 a year on apps they don't use. (Nine / Janie Barrett) "Convenience is clearly appealing to Australians and they're willing to pay for it. But our research has found these services might be running away from them a little bit," Westpac acting chief executive, consumer, Carolyn McCann said. "When we compared total estimated spend against customer transaction data, we could see customers are spending about $14 more each month than they think they are on subscriptions. "While subscription costs might not seem like much in isolation, they can quickly add up – especially if these are apps or services you no longer use. "This is hundreds or even thousands in potential savings that could be redirected elsewhere." Westpac also found its customers are spending more than $2200 a year on takeaway food. (Dominic Lorrimer) The research found that failing to cancel a service during a trial was the main reason people were spending more than they thought, while just under a third of consumers said they'd paid for a subscription they'd forgotten about. A similar proportion (31 per cent) said they found it too difficult to cancel certain services. Westpac also found Australians are spending $141 extra a year on subscriptions, an increase of 11.3 per cent from 2024. That comes as a number of popular streaming providers, including Spotify and Netflix , have increased their prices in consecutive years. Gaming services are the biggest money sinks for Australians, costing the average consumer $55.50 a month ($666 a year), followed by video streamers ($21.63 per month/$260 a year) and music ($16.98 a month/$204 a year). At the same time, Westpac also found its customers are spending a whopping $2200 a year on takeaway food. "Our data suggests customers are willing to spend on what makes life easier, with a significant uplift in spend on food services," McCann said. "But there's also growing awareness around value. "While spend on home and utility subscriptions recorded the second-highest spend growth, customers also said these services delivered the least value." Consumer national Australia finance money Cost of Living Westpac CONTACT US Property News: Rubbish-strewn house overtaken by mould asks $1.2 million.
The Age
2 days ago
- The Age
Popular at-home fetal monitors linked to stillbirths, newborn deaths
Australia's medical device watchdog is warning pregnant women against using popular portable fetal heart monitors, after the devices were implicated in six stillbirths and newborn deaths since 2022. The most recent death was on Tuesday, a spokesperson for the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) said. The sale of handheld fetal heart monitors – also known as portable fetal dopplers – was banned in Australia in September 2024 after a TGA review confirmed the devices were 'falsely reassuring' pregnant women that their distressed unborn babies had healthy heartbeats, leading to delays in seeking medical attention and death. But retailers have continued to sell the popular, though illegal, devices to would-be Australian parents. '[W]e are aware of devices being sold illegally through online platforms,' the TGA said in a statement, adding: 'There are no home-use [fetal] dopplers approved for supply in Australia by the TGA.' People who use the devices without specialised training can easily mistake the sounds of the mother's blood flow or the placenta as a fetal heartbeat, providing potentially inaccurate reassurance, obstetricians and midwives have warned. 'Using a home-use [fetal] heart monitor to check a baby's heartbeat may seem reassuring, but it can be dangerously misleading,' the TGA's alert read. There have also been cases where parents could not find a fetal heartbeat using the devices, causing unnecessary panic, the TGA said. A Google search for fetal monitors returns dozens of hits for portable dopplers for sale, including several Australian-based retailers, potentially attracting criminal and civil penalties.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 days ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Popular at-home fetal monitors linked to stillbirths, newborn deaths
Australia's medical device watchdog is warning pregnant women against using popular portable fetal heart monitors, after the devices were implicated in six stillbirths and newborn deaths since 2022. The most recent death was on Tuesday, a spokesperson for the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) said. The sale of handheld fetal heart monitors – also known as portable fetal dopplers – was banned in Australia in September 2024 after a TGA review confirmed the devices were 'falsely reassuring' pregnant women that their distressed unborn babies had healthy heartbeats, leading to delays in seeking medical attention and death. But retailers have continued to sell the popular, though illegal, devices to would-be Australian parents. '[W]e are aware of devices being sold illegally through online platforms,' the TGA said in a statement, adding: 'There are no home-use [fetal] dopplers approved for supply in Australia by the TGA.' People who use the devices without specialised training can easily mistake the sounds of the mother's blood flow or the placenta as a fetal heartbeat, providing potentially inaccurate reassurance, obstetricians and midwives have warned. 'Using a home-use [fetal] heart monitor to check a baby's heartbeat may seem reassuring, but it can be dangerously misleading,' the TGA's alert read. There have also been cases where parents could not find a fetal heartbeat using the devices, causing unnecessary panic, the TGA said. A Google search for fetal monitors returns dozens of hits for portable dopplers for sale, including several Australian-based retailers, potentially attracting criminal and civil penalties.
