Was Kim Sae Ron's audio informant never attacked by Kim Soo Hyun's side? New claims question Garosero's allegations
Speculations surrounding an alleged assault on the informant who provided the late actress Kim Sae Ron's audio recording have been circulating. However, those claims have now been officially debunked.
The Consulate General of South Korea in New York has stepped forward to clarify the situation. They stated that no Korean citizen has been arrested or detained within their jurisdiction in connection with any such incident. This revelation casts serious doubts over the sensational claims that initially sparked widespread media attention and public concern.
On May 18, the consulate released a statement addressing the rumors. They began circulating following a press conference hosted by the YouTube-based outlet Garosero Institute and Bu Ji Seok. Bu is the attorney representing the bereaved family of Kim Sae Ron. They had claimed that the informant who provided them with the alleged audio recording had recently been attacked.
The recording purportedly captured a private conversation involving Kim Sae Ron and contained sensitive information implicating actor Kim Soo Hyun. Many believe their claims implied that Kim Soo Hyun and his agency was somehow involved in the attack.
However, the South Korean consulate made it clear that no such case had been brought to their attention. Under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, any arrest or detainment of a Korean national abroad must be immediately reported to the appropriate consulate. The New York office confirmed that they had not received any notification from U.S. law enforcement agencies regarding such an incident.
In addition, speculation that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had opened a probe into the alleged assault was dismissed. The consulate clarified that they had no access to such information and emphasized that it was outside their purview. This further eroded the credibility of the original claims shared by Garosero.
Online, public reaction has been swift. Many netizens had already expressed doubts about the veracity of the informant attack story. They now believe the incident may have been fabricated or heavily exaggerated to drum up attention. Several commentators pointed out the lack of basic reporting protocols and verification, especially given the gravity of the accusations.
The situation stems from a press conference held on May 7. During the conference, an audio file was played in which a voice believed to be Kim Sae Ron's discussed her alleged past relationship with actor Kim Soo Hyun. In the conversation, she reportedly referred to engaging in a physical relationship with him while she was still in middle school.
Garosero justified the public release of the audio by claiming the informant who provided the clip had been violently attacked and needed protection. Yet with the consulate now firmly denying any record of such an incident, questions have arisen regarding the motivations behind releasing the tape and the legitimacy of the evidence.
While the dust has not yet settled on this scandal, the new clarification from the New York consulate is likely to shift the public narrative. Meanwhile, Kim Soo Hyun has yet to issue a direct response regarding this update.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cops seize vapes worth 1.25 lakh
Kolhapur: The Kolhapur police have seized Korean and Chinese vapes worth Rs1.25 lakh from a cigarette shop in the New Shahupuri area. The total value of prohibited nicotine and non-nicotine items recovered from the shop is estimated at Rs3.9 lakh, which includes foreign cigars and expensive imported cigarettes. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The shop owner, Shashikant Lakshman Patil, who runs the outlet named C Zone, was arrested and later released on bail. "We are finding out the source of the vaping devices. We received a tip about the sale of such e-cigarettes from that shop, and we carried out a surprise search," said Santosh Doke, police inspector of Shahupuri police station. According to the police, the vapes were being sold at prices ranging from Rs425 to Rs1,350. Officials suspect the devices may have been sourced through online platforms. Investigations are ongoing to trace the supply chain of the banned products.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tripura ADC inks MoUs with UK institutions
Agartala: The Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council (ADC) has signed three MoUs with prominent UK-based institutions in London recently, said ADC's ruling party TIPRA Motha founder Pradyot Kishore Debbarman on Thursday, reports Biswendu Bhattacharjee. The MoUs were focused on skill development, cultural promotion and academic exchange, marking a milestone in Tripura's global outreach efforts.
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court Ruling On Gun Companies: Supreme Court Blocks Mexico's Gun Lawsuit Against US Companies, ET LegalWorld
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday spared two American gun companies from a lawsuit by Mexico's government accusing them of aiding illegal firearms trafficking to drug cartels and fueling gun violence in the southern neighbor of the United States. The justices in a 9-0 ruling authored by liberal Justice Elena Kagan overturned a lower court's ruling that had allowed the lawsuit to proceed against firearms maker Smith & Wesson and distributor Interstate Arms. The lower court had found that Mexico plausibly alleged that the companies aided and abetted unlawful sales routing guns to Mexican drug cartels, harming its government. Advt Advt Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals Subscribe to our newsletter to get latest insights & analysis. Download ETLegalWorld App Get Realtime updates Save your favourite articles Scan to download App The justices embraced the argument made by the companies for dismissal of Mexico's suit under a 2005 U.S. law called the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act that broadly shields gun companies from liability for crimes committed with their products. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had decided in 2024 that the alleged conduct by the companies fell outside these Supreme Court decided that while it has little doubt that U.S. companies are aware of some unlawful sales to Mexican gun traffickers, Mexico's lawsuit failed to allege that the companies had aided and abetted such illegal firearms sales by deliberately helping to bring about the transactions."Mexico's plausible allegations are of 'indifference' rather than assistance," Kagan wrote. "They are of the manufacturers merely allowing some unidentified 'bad actors' to make illegal use of their wares." The case came to the Supreme Court at a complicated time for U.S.-Mexican relations as President Donald Trump pursues on-again, off-again tariffs on Mexican goods. Trump has also accused Mexico of doing too little to stop the flow of synthetic drugs such as fentanyl and migrant arrivals at the lawsuit, filed in Boston in 2021, accused the two companies of violating various U.S. and Mexican laws. Mexico claims that the companies have deliberately maintained a distribution system that included firearms dealers who knowingly sell weapons to third-party, or "straw," purchasers who then traffic guns to cartels in suit also accused the companies of unlawfully designing and marketing their guns as military-grade weapons to drive up demand among the cartels, including by associating their products with the American military and law enforcement. The gun companies said they make and sell lawful avoid its lawsuit being dismissed under the 2005 law, Mexico was required to plausibly allege that the companies aided and abetted illegal gun sales and that such conduct was the "proximate cause" - a legal principle involving who is responsible for causing an injury - of the harms claimed by Mexico. The Supreme Court, which heard arguments in the case on March 4, declined to resolve the proximate cause question after finding that Mexico's suit failed to adequately allege aiding and Arrocha Olabuenaga, the legal adviser for Mexico's Foreign Ministry, vowed that Mexico will continue pursuing its legal fight."While we are disappointed with the decision from this Supreme Court, we are convinced of the strength of our arguments and the evidence that upholds them, and we are encouraged by the support at home and abroad for Mexico's actions," he in the lawsuit had sought monetary damages of an unspecified amount and a court order requiring Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms to take steps to "abate and remedy the public nuisance they have created in Mexico."The Second Amendment Foundation, a gun rights group that backed the U.S. gun companies in the case, welcomed Thursday's ruling."The lawsuit, dreamt up by multiple gun control groups, had one goal - bankrupt the American firearms market by allowing civil liability to apply for the criminal misuse of its products," the group said in a social media post. "Thankfully the Supreme Court stepped in and squashed it."Gun violence fueled by trafficked U.S.-made firearms has contributed to a decline in business investment and economic activity in Mexico and forced its government to incur unusually high costs on services including healthcare, law enforcement and the military, according to the a country with strict firearms laws, has said most of its gun homicides are committed with weapons trafficked from the United States and valued at more than $250 million Perez Ricart, an international affairs researcher at Mexico's Center for Economic Research and Teaching (CIDE), criticized the ruling."Once again, the industry is shielded. It doesn't matter how many bullets cross the border or how many people are killed on the Mexican side. Bullets are not the only things that kill; so does the legal impunity guaranteed by Washington," Ricart said in a social media post.
