logo
LGBTQ+ leader: Dems should talk about ‘kitchen table issues, not about identity'

LGBTQ+ leader: Dems should talk about ‘kitchen table issues, not about identity'

Politico9 hours ago

SAN FRANCISCO — The leader of the largest PAC dedicated to electing LGBTQ+ people to office says Democrats should talk about 'kitchen-table issues,' not gender identity.
Evan Low, president and CEO of the LGBTQ+ Victory Fund, said he has been advising candidates specifically to avoid talking about trans people in sports — a focus of President Donald Trump and a rallying cry for conservatives.
Arguing the issue affects few people, the former Democratic California state lawmaker said in an interview, 'This is not a top 1, top 5, top 10 or top 30 issue.'
'We want to talk about kitchen-table issues, not about identity,' Low said. 'We are running to serve the people, not to distract on issues that divide.'
Low's remarks come amid widespread debate within the Democratic Party about how to win back working-class voters following the party's drubbing in November — and about how much or little to highlight issues of identity. But LGBTQ+ advocates are in Trump's crosshairs. The Republican president made anti-transgender attacks a centerpiece of his 2024 campaign, while the GOP regularly mocks Democrats over the issue.
Low, who last year lost his congressional race in Silicon Valley, said the need for LGBTQ+ candidates to run pragmatic campaigns has been heightened as Trump leans into cultural wedge issues like banning the use of 'nonbinary' or 'other' options from federal documents, cutting federal funding to schools that let transgender students play on the sports teams of their gender identity and barring transgender people from serving in the military.
Low said a growing number of successful campaigns are following the 'kitchen table' formula, and his organization has numbers to back it up. The Victory Fund — in its annual 'Out in America' report expected to be released today, which it shared first with POLITICO — found that the number of openly LGBTQ+ people serving in public office — 1,334 — has nearly tripled since Trump's first term.
Most of those LGBTQ+ elected are serving in local offices, but the group has also made gains at the top of the ballot and even within the Trump White House.
In 2018, Colorado Gov. Jared Polis became the first openly gay candidate to win a governorship. Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey and Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek followed in 2022. All three are Democrats. This year, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent became the highest-ranking openly gay official in U.S. history, as part of Trump's Cabinet and fifth in the line to the presidency.
According to Victory Fund, less than 3 percent of LGBTQ+ officeholders across the country are Republicans, while 89 percent are Democrats.
Polis, a former member of Congress, said he's rarely felt the need to discuss his identity in his runs for governor, instead simply answering questions about his sexuality if people asked. His first statewide campaign in 2018 primarily focused on three policy issues: providing taxpayer-funded preschool and kindergarten, lowering health care costs and expanding renewable energy.
'You answer any questions, and then you move on and talk about what you want to do,' Polis said. 'It's similar to how you deal with your faith. You're not running just to represent that faith.'
LGBTQ+ candidates' gains in representation might seem like a paradox considering the harsher climate the community has faced nationally in recent years as large tech companies roll back their diversity programs and Pride festivals once awash in corporate logos struggle to attract sponsors.
But Polis is a potential 2028 presidential contender. Delaware Rep. Sarah McBride became the first transgender candidate elected to the House last year. There's California Rep. Robert Garcia, who is gay and a rising star in House Democratic leadership, and New York Rep. Ritchie Torres, the first member who is both Afro-Latino and openly gay. There are now transgender legislators serving in eight statehouses, including in red states like Iowa, Missouri and Montana.
'In spite of this narrative that the LGBTQ community and trans people are a liability (for Democrats), they are winning in red states,' Low said.
Elliot Imse, executive director of Victory Fund, said LGBTQ+ people running for office don't need to make their identity a focus to make progress for the community. He added, 'Being an LGBTQ person and running for office is a radical act in itself.'
He said much of the recent gains in representation stem from the 'Rainbow Wave' of the 2018 midterm elections, when dozens of LGBTQ+ people ran in response to Trump's first-term win. When many of them succeeded, he said, it showed others it was possible for them to run as out candidates.
Imse said many elected in that wave year ran on issues like education and affordability, noting that a recent Gallup poll showed only 9.3 percent of adults identify as LGBTQ+.
'We are not going to win elections by pandering just to the nine percent of voters,' Imse said.
Focusing on everyday issues, he said, helps blunt vitriol against candidates and 'really takes away from their opponents' ability to paint them as radicals who are somehow not fit for leadership roles.'
Iowa state Rep. Aime Wichtendahl, the first trans lawmaker elected to the Iowa statehouse in 2024, can relate to the pragmatic approach. During last year's campaign, she said her Republican opponent attacked her with mailers that sought to cast her as a dangerous predator.
She said she ignored the mailers and kept knocking doors, talking to voters about the work she had done to help small businesses as a member of the City Council in Hiawatha, Iowa, a suburb of Cedar Rapids.
''There was no need to respond to it. If you respond to it, you make it a thing,' she said. 'Iowans are fair people. They will give anybody a chance if you speak to them directly.'
Top state and local LGBTQ+ politicians on LGBTQ+ Victory Fund's watch list
Victory Fund provided POLITICO with a first look at its 'Top 25 Out Power List,' naming the top LGBTQ+ elected officials to keep an eye on at the state and local levels. The group included 26 people on its list.
They are Colorado Gov. Jared Polis; Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey; Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek; Rhode Island House Speaker Joe Shekarchi; New York City Councilmember Erik Bottcher; California Assemblymember Chris Ward; California state Sen. Caroline Menjivar; San Antonio Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones; San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria; Vermont state Treasurer Mike Pieciak; Columbus City Council President Shannon Hardin; Providence Mayor Brett Smiley; Guam Lt. Gov. Josh Tenorio; Florida state Sen. Shevrin Jones; Nashville Metro Council member Olivia Hill; Hawaii state Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto; Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel; Maine state House Speaker Ryan Fecteau; Washington state lawmakers Laurie Jinkins and Jamie Pedersen; Connecticut state Treasurer Erick Russell; Texas state Rep. Lauren Ashley Simmons; Montana state Rep. Zooey Zephyr; Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes; Iowa State Rep. Aime Wichtendahl; and Illinois state Rep. Kelly Cassidy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Baffles With Sudden U-Turn on China Buying Iranian Oil
Trump Baffles With Sudden U-Turn on China Buying Iranian Oil

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Baffles With Sudden U-Turn on China Buying Iranian Oil

(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump on Tuesday appeared to undermine years of US sanctions on Iran, giving its biggest customer China the green light to carry on buying its oil as he seeks to bolster a ceasefire with Israel. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice US State Budget Wounds Intensify From Trump, DOGE Policy Shifts US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs Commuters Are Caught in Johannesburg's Taxi Feuds as Transit Lags The announcement on social media — which surprised both oil traders and officials in his own government — could undermine the central element of Washington's Iran policy under multiple administrations, which have sought to cut the regime's main source of revenue by making its top export off limits. 'China can now continue to purchase oil from Iran,' the president said on Truth Social, amid a flurry of posts demanding Israel and Iran cease hostilities. The statement landed only hours after Trump declared the Middle East rivals had agreed to a ceasefire, which got off to a shaky start with early breaches by both sides. It follows massive US airstrikes on several of the Islamic Republic's nuclear facilities Sunday, an offensive aimed at stopping Tehran from obtaining an atomic weapon. Oil prices extended losses after Trump's comments, with West Texas Intermediate futures sinking 6% to settle near $64 a barrel in New York. The market had already plunged in recent days as the threat to oil flows from the Israel-Iran conflict faded. US Treasury and State department officials handling Iranian oil sanctions were surprised by Trump's statement and uncertain how to immediately interpret it, according to people familiar with the situation. In the meantime, however, Treasury will continue to strictly enforce related sanctions, said one of the people, who asked not to be identified given the political and market sensitivity of the issue. The White House and Treasury Department didn't immediately respond to requests for comment, while the State Department referred questions to the White House. Tammy Bruce, State Department spokeswoman, declined to provide further specifics during a briefing Tuesday. 'I'm not going to get ahead of the president or try to guess what his strategy will be,' she said when asked about the comment. 'Things happen quickly and I think we'll find out sooner than later.' The apparent shift also comes as the Trump administration seeks to hammer out a new trade framework with China and climb down from a tariff war that saw duties reach levels high enough to cut all trade between the world's two biggest economies. The comments appeared to be Trump 'throwing a bone' to China and Iran for cooperating in their respective talks with the US, said Mark Malek, chief investment officer at Siebert. 'Most of us are thinking that it's just rhetoric at this point. But it definitely took me by surprise.' Allowing a specific carve out for China may be an effort by Trump to send positive signals to Beijing as he seeks a new tariff deal, said a person familiar with the president's thinking, also asking not to be identified. While the potential shift may ease some legal risks around China's buying of Iranian oil, it's unclear what impact the change would have on actual flows. China, the world's biggest importer, gets about 14% of its crude from Iran. But that figure is likely higher as some imports are masked as shipments from Malaysia, as well as the United Arab Emirates and Oman, in order to circumvent US sanctions, which Beijing doesn't recognize. Iran's oil, often purchased at a discount, is vital for China's substantial private refining sector, a crucial source of energy for its economy, which has struggled under the weight of a slumping property sector. 'The Iranian oil sanctions have been so significant for so long, but also with relatively muted enforcement,' said Daniel Tannebaum, former Treasury official and partner at Oliver Wyman. 'It would be premature to think that this policy — which would benefit both China and Iran — would go ahead without a longer term view of ensuring stability in the region, before just literally opening up the spigots to allow legal trade of Iranian oil by China.' Trump as recently as last month insisted all purchases of Iranian oil or petrochemical products 'must stop, NOW!' and that buyers would be subject to secondary sanctions and prevented from engaging in any business with the US. That threat built on previous warnings from his administration. In February, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Washington intended to squeeze Iran's oil exports to less than 10% of current levels, as it renewed the 'maximum pressure' campaign deployed during Trump's first term. As part of that effort, the US has sanctioned hundreds of oil tankers for their role in handling Tehran's petroleum and, absent an easing in those measures, some buyers may still take a more-cautious approach. The White House has also targeted Chinese entities that bought Iranian oil, something that could make other buyers wary. Likewise, secondary sanctions on Iran's sales remain in place and its not clear where the president's remarks will leave those. The sanctions were intended to force Iran to voluntarily give up uranium enrichment so that it would never be in a position to obtain a nuclear weapon. It's still unclear if US airstrikes over the weekend seriously damaged the country's nuclear facilities, while the International Atomic Energy Agency still doesn't know what happened to Tehran's stockpile of 409 kilograms (902 pounds) of highly-enriched uranium — potentially enough for 10 nuclear warheads. --With assistance from Alaric Nightingale, Julian Lee, Jordan Fabian, Alexander Pearson and Kate Sullivan. (Updates to recast, adds details and context throughout.) Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

NYC won't know mayoral primary results until at least July 1, but they may have a clue
NYC won't know mayoral primary results until at least July 1, but they may have a clue

USA Today

time28 minutes ago

  • USA Today

NYC won't know mayoral primary results until at least July 1, but they may have a clue

In primaries, the city uses ranked choice voting, but first-place results will offer a hint of who is ahead. Everyone eager to know when former Gov. Andrew Cuomo or Assembly Member Zohran Mamdani will win the June 24 New York City mayoral Democratic primary is going to be waiting a while. Unofficial results won't be announced by the city Board of Elections until July 1, and the results won't be officially certified until July 14. Since 2021, in primaries the city uses ranked choice voting, a system that allows residents to vote for up to five candidates in order from their most preferred to least. If no candidate gets more than 50% of first-place votes, which seems very likely based on polls of the crowded mayoral field, then the least-popular candidate is eliminated and their supporters' votes redistributed to other candidates based on their lower-ranked preferences. This process takes time, meaning voters will not likely know the results on election night, depending on how tight the margins are. In 2021, when current mayor Eric Adams (who is running for re-election this year as an Independent) secured victory, it took several days to determine just how close Kathryn Garcia, the runner-up, came to beating him after all the ranked-choice tabulations. But voters may have a clue based on the first-place results: While Cuomo has consistently led among first-place votes in polls, supporters of the candidates polling in third through sixth place − City Comptroller Brad Lander, his precedessor Scott Stringer, City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams and state Sen. Zelnor Myrie − appear less likely to rank Cuomo on their ballots than Mamdani. As a result, the most recent poll, a June 23 Emerson College Polling/PIX11/The Hill survey, showed Mamdani beating Cuomo 52% to 48% in the eighth and final round of the instant runoff, even though Cuomo had 35% of first-place votes, followed by Mamdani at 32%. Pundits such as Ross Barkan and City & State's Tom Allon, say that means Mamdani is very likely to win if he's ahead in first-place votes, has a good shot if he's losing by fewer than 5 percentage points for first place, and Cuomo is safe if he's winning first-plave votes by about 10 percentage points.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store