logo
Reeves can't afford to ignore the cost of government waste

Reeves can't afford to ignore the cost of government waste

Yahoo6 hours ago

The Government has let public sector waste, incompetence and inefficiency run out of control. No wonder Rachel Reeves is having to tell the Home Secretary there's not enough cash for the police and Border Force when the public wants an end to illegal migration and anti social behaviour, and no surprise the Deputy Prime Minister is railing against the shortage of cash for councils and housing when she needs billions extra to help all the new arrivals to the UK find subsidised accommodation and the public services to go with the homes.
But we are not in an entirely hopeless situation. There is plenty of money to be better spent, budgets to be switched and losses to be stopped. Fraud takes large sums from the welfare budget. Too many people claim benefits on a sickness note for life when they could work, some desperately manoeuvre for a false (but helpful) diagnosis.
We need a fairer system which is generous to those who are seriously disabled without threatening them with cuts, but does much more to help all the others into work. If you can work, and a job is available, you should not stay on benefits. There are the continuing over the top losses on bonds by the Bank of England which taxpayers have to pay for. No other Central bank sells bonds at big losses in the market as ours does, to add to taxpayer woes.
Total losses from mid 2022 to the full wind up of their bond portfolio next decade are estimated by the OBR to stand at a stunning £250 billion. Tell the bank to cut these losses, as the European Central Bank has done with its badly bought bonds.
Then there in the inexcusable waste that comes from big subsidies for the nationalised industries. Some of this waste is a direct response to prior poor policy.
There is no statement from the Government of how it will control the likely big cost of its steel intervention, necessitated by an energy policy that sells industry unaffordable power. The Budget gave a large pay award to well paid train drivers without asking for smarter working to boost productivity. This blank cheque system is utterly unsustainable: tell the management they will only get bonuses and high pay in future if losses are reduced and fare revenue is boosted from more travel.
The civil service expanded greatly to tackle vaccinations and lockdowns over Covid. It has grown more as we recover from the pandemic. It is unreasonable that when Ministers ask for some restoration of lost productivity, they are told they need to spend to save.
Those holding out hope for an AI moonshot may see some gains in due course, but we literally cannot afford to delay an enforced return to 2019 levels of productivity (hardly impressive at the time) any longer. That need not await a study of how to buy better computers.
There should be a ban on all external recruitment to the public sector, exempting key NHS personnel, uniformed staff and teachers. Ministers could authorise other special cases.
Natural wastage in the civil service could save 7 per cent per cent a year on staff bills as we seek to get back to 2016 manning levels. This high rate of industry churn means more opportunities for bright and energetic public officials, as there will be more internal opportunities as staffing is rearranged and focused on main tasks. Such individuals must be empowered to take real ownership over bureaucratic structures.
Perhaps the greatest cost – certainly in electoral terms – is the growing number of illegal migrants. The Government made changes to inherited policy which made a bad situation far worse. Numbers have shot up and the hotels are full.
Again, a ruthless dedication to getting value for money already being spent would help, and we are certainly not getting value for the big money we give to France to police their coast. How come the French can safely intercept a UK fishing boat and take it to
France for a court action over its paperwork, but they cannot stop a single people trafficking vessel at sea and do not prosecute the boat drivers?
The country will not accept paying more for less every year. If the Labour Government is able to get this reckless waste under control, the Chancellor's future Budgets will only condemn the party to electoral oblivion.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Getty Images and Stability AI face off in British copyright trial that will test AI industry
Getty Images and Stability AI face off in British copyright trial that will test AI industry

Washington Post

time43 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Getty Images and Stability AI face off in British copyright trial that will test AI industry

LONDON — Getty Images is facing off against artificial intelligence company Stability AI in a London courtroom for the first major copyright trial of the generative AI industry. Opening arguments before a judge at the British High Court are scheduled for Monday. The trial could last for three weeks. Stability, based in London, owns a widely used AI image-making tool that sparked enthusiasm for the instant creation of AI artwork and photorealistic images upon its release in August 2022. OpenAI introduced its surprise hit chatbot ChatGPT three months later. Seattle-based Getty has argued that the development of the AI image maker, called Stable Diffusion, involved 'brazen infringement' of Getty's photography collection 'on a staggering scale.' Tech companies have long argued that 'fair use' or 'fair dealing' legal doctrines in the United States and United Kingdom allow them to train their AI systems on large troves of writings or images. Getty was among the first to challenge those practices when it filed copyright infringement lawsuits in the United States and the United Kingdom in early 2023. 'What Stability did was inappropriate,' Getty CEO Craig Peters told The Associated Press in 2023. He said creators of intellectual property should be asked for permission before their works are fed into AI systems rather than having to participate in an 'opt-out regime.' Stability has argued that the case doesn't belong in the United Kingdom because the training of the AI model technically happened elsewhere, on computers run by U.S. tech giant Amazon. Similar cases in the U.S. have not yet gone to trial. Stable Diffusion's roots trace to Germany, where computer scientists at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich worked with the New York-based tech company Runway to develop the original algorithms. The university researchers credited Stability AI for providing the servers that trained the models, which require large amounts of computing power.

UK's Spectris says it would accept $5 billion takeover bid from US-based Advent
UK's Spectris says it would accept $5 billion takeover bid from US-based Advent

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

UK's Spectris says it would accept $5 billion takeover bid from US-based Advent

(Reuters) -Spectris would accept a 3.73 billion pound ($5.06 billion) bid from Advent if the U.S. private equity firm tables a formal offer, it said on Monday, sending shares in the British scientific instruments maker soaring by 70%. Advent's proposal valued Spectris at 37.63 pounds per share, including dividend, representing close to an 85% premium to Spectris's last closing price. Spectris, in a statement confirming a Bloomberg News report, said it was ready to accept an offer at that price if Advent were to table a formal offer. UK takeover rules require Advent to make a firm offer by July 7 or walk away. Shares in the London-headquartered company jumped 70% to 33.84 pounds, their highest since March 2024. Spectris is one of the largest takeover targets so far this year in Britain, which has been a hunting ground for buyers in recent years because of relatively cheap valuations. The proposal announced on Monday followed a number of earlier approaches from Advent, Spectris said. ($1 = 0.7377 pounds) Sign in to access your portfolio

BP Takeover Would Be a Longshot Due to Size and Complexity, Moelis Bankers Say
BP Takeover Would Be a Longshot Due to Size and Complexity, Moelis Bankers Say

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

BP Takeover Would Be a Longshot Due to Size and Complexity, Moelis Bankers Say

The chances that a rival oil company will take over BP Plc are slim right now, even as peers have been running the numbers, because of the firm's size and complexity, said bankers from Moelis & Co. 'We can't identify anybody in the US that would be a buyer,' Moelis Chairman and Global Head of Energy and Clean Technology Stephen Trauber said in an interview in London on Monday. 'We don't really see any others globally that are buyers that view the assets as must-have.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store