Former Mauritius Prime Minister arrested
Former Mauritius Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth has been arrested on charges of money laundering, the East African island country's Financial Crimes Commission (FCC) announced on Sunday.
The detention came a day after the FCC said its officers were conducting searches at Jugnauth's home and several other locations. Investigators discovered and seized 114 million Mauritius rupees ($2.4 million) after inspecting various locations, including the former official's residence, Reuters reported, citing the FCC.
'Mr. Pravind Jugnauth, former Prime Minister, has been arrested under a charge of money laundering. He will be detained at Moka Detention Centre,'
the state-owned agency said in a statement on Sunday.
Jugnauth denies the charges, his lawyer, Raouf Gulbul, told reporters early Sunday. In an interview with Bloomberg on Monday, Gulbul said the ex-prime minister was released Sunday night after hours of detention.
'Today he will furnish the bonds set by the court,'
the attorney stated.
READ MORE:
Ruling party suffers 'huge' defeat in East African state
Jugnauth had been the premier of the Indian Ocean archipelago from 2017 until losing a reelection bid for a second five-year term to the opposition in November. His administration was widely accused of corruption after recordings of politicians and business owners were leaked online days before the election.
Since taking office, the African nation's new prime minister, Navin Ramgoolam, has been critical of the previous government's handling of the economy. In November, Ramgoolam ordered an audit of the finance ministry, accusing it of providing
'wrong'
data to
'convey a false sense of economic progress.'
READ MORE:
The real Lion King: Who was the founder of the richest African empire?
Last month, the former governor of the Bank of Mauritius, Harvesh Seegolam, was detained and charged with conspiracy to defraud. He was eventually released on bail after the case was filed in court.
In December, Ramgoolam criticized the central bank for printing money to fund the Mauritius Investment Corporation (MIC), which the previous administration established in 2020 to support businesses dealing with the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
In a report to parliament, the prime minister described the move as
'an irresponsible act,'
claiming that it had
'deleterious effects on the monetary system, more so that the banking system was already flush with excess liquidity.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
6 days ago
- Russia Today
Tesla execs ‘questioned' Musk over denial of company plans
Some senior Tesla executives 'questioned' CEO Elon Musk after he publicly dismissed a Reuters story last year that the company had dropped plans for a low-cost electric vehicle, the news agency reported on Monday. Musk accused Reuters of 'lying (again)' in April 2024, following a report that Tesla had quietly shelved development of the so-called Model 2 EV and shifted its focus to self-driving robotaxis. According to people familiar with the matter, Tesla executives had already been told weeks earlier that the project was dead. Musk's denial post on X caught some managers off guard, prompting them to ask whether he had reversed course. He reportedly confirmed the plan was still shelved, leaving staff unsure of how to respond to suppliers and investors. The Model 2 was part of Musk's longstanding goal to bring affordable electric cars to the masses. First teased in 2020, it was expected to start at $25,000 — well below Tesla's current entry-level Model 3, which sells for $42,500. A year after Musk's denial, no such car has materialized, and neither Musk nor Tesla has confirmed that the project is canceled. Tesla is instead preparing stripped-down versions of the Model 3 and Model Y, now expected in 2025 after delays. 'The key is they'll be affordable,' engineering chief Lars Moravy told investors this April. Gary Black, a Tesla investor who manages money for the Future Fund LLC, said he didn't view Musk's statement as a 'denial' at the time, noting that Musk often makes 'brief and abrupt' comments that 'can be about anything.' Some Tesla executives reportedly raised concerns that denying the Model 2 was dead could mislead the public and even draw scrutiny from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Musk settled with the SEC in 2018 over a tweet about taking Tesla private, agreeing to have certain posts pre-approved by a lawyer – a requirement he reportedly ignores. The development comes as Chinese auto giant BYD has overtaken Tesla in global EV sales. The company's $10,000 Seagull hatchback helped BYD outsell Tesla in Europe for the first time in April. Musk dismissed BYD in a 2011 Bloomberg interview, questioning its quality and technology. Last week, the tech mogul, who had been leading the US Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), announced he would step down from the role to refocus on his companies, including Tesla, SpaceX, xAI, Neuralink, and X.
Russia Today
16-05-2025
- Russia Today
EU queen Ursula preached transparency – then did backdoor deals with Big Pharma
Well, this is awkward. How many times has Ursula von der Leyen, European Commission president and unelected de facto ruler of the EU, delivered sermons about transparency like she's the high priestess of some kind of parallel Brussels Vatican? And now the EU's own top court has called her out in a ruling for neglecting to practice what she preaches. Back in 2023, during her State of the European Union address, doing her finest impression of someone elected by the actual public, von der Leyen declared the need to douse any and all sketchiness in sunlight in order to 'not allow any autocracy's Trojan horses to attack our democracies from within.' 'Transparency should characterize the work of all the members of the Commission and of their cabinets,' she said as far back as 2019. 'I have asked commissioners…to engage more and be more transparent,' she proclaimed in a speech to EU parliamentarians last year. Transparency and accountability also figured prominently in her bid for reappointment by the EU's ruling elites last year. Great news! She can now finally embark on this noble mission, and begin her journey with little more than a simple glance in the mirror. Because the European Court of Justice – the body that rules on whether EU institutions have actually crossed into illegality, not just occupying their usual territory of elite-grade idiocy – has just decided that Queen Ursula's Commission can't just wave away a pile of her own Covid-era text messages by going, 'Whoops! They disappeared. Oh well, what do you do?' Which is basically what the Commission's response was to the New York Times when it asked to see those messages. And how did the Times know that these texts even existed? Because Ursula literally told them, bragging in an interview about how she scored so many vaxxes because she's super tight with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla. All this was for a piece spotlighting her Covid efforts, published in April 2021: 'How Europe sealed a Pfizer vaccine deal with texts and calls.' The article featured the same kind of glamour photography reminiscent of the good ol' days when Ursula was Germany's defense minister from 2013 to 2019, under former Chancellor Angela Merkel, and doing photo shoots in front of military hardware while accusations swirled that she had bungled the budget with shady defense contracts, even as the Bundeswehr was stuck using brooms for guns during a NATO exercise, as the Atlantic Council reported in 2015. 'For a month, Ms von der Leyen had been exchanging texts and calls with Bourla, the chief executive of Pfizer… Pfizer might have more doses it could offer the bloc – many more,' the NYT piece reads, referring to the 'personal diplomacy' that 'played a big role in a deal' for 1.8 billion Pfizer anti-Covid doses. So the Times hears about these text messages and was like, 'Oh, cool. Let's see!' Suddenly Queen Ursula became a lot less chatty. So the Times took the matter to the EU's own top court to get the disclosure. And now this court has said, in legal terms, that Ursula can't just ghost the Times – and the public by extension – without giving a real reason. That there has to be a 'plausible explanation to justify the non possession' of the texts. And also, the court says that 'the Commission has failed to explain in a plausible manner' why it thought that these messages were so trivial that they could be vaporized like they were just her Eurovision contest text voting and not a matter of public record which, by definition, should be maintained. Out of these little chats came €71 billion in Covid jab contracts with Big Pharma's Pfizer and AstraZeneca – 11 of them to be precise, totaling 4.6 billion doses, paid for with cash taken straight from EU taxpayers. Enough for ten doses for every EU citizen. Turns out that freewheeling it may have resulted in some consequences that could have been avoided had a diverse group of minds been engaged on the issue, as protocol normally dictates, and not just Ursula's. It's not like there hasn't been a costly fallout from all this. A big chunk of the EU, including Germany, Poland, Bulgaria, Hungary, Lithuania, Estonia, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, is shouting about surplus doses for which they're on the hook, urging Brussels to renegotiate the contractual terms with Big Pharma. Germany alone has reportedly trashed 200 million of them. Tricky to negotiate, though, when no one's even sure what the terms were, as the second-highest European court pointed out last year. 'The Commission did not give the public sufficiently wide access to the purchase agreements for COVID-19 vaccines… The Commission did not demonstrate that wider access to those clauses would actually undermine the commercial interests of those undertakings,' it ruled. The details of these contracts – how they were made, what they say, and how anyone's supposed to back out of them if citizens politely decline to max out their ten-jab punch card – remain a mystery. Back in 2024, Brussels more or less shrugged and suggested that it could really only be as transparent as the courts forced it to be. So hey, what can you do? 'In general, the Commission grants the widest possible public access to documents, in line with the principles of openness and transparency,' the EU said, underscoring that the lower court ruling 'confirmed that the Commission was entitled to provide only partial access.' Well, good news, guys! Your very own top court just ruled that you can now be a lot more transparent! So go crazy. Be the change that you keep saying you want to be in the world. Nothing is holding you back now. If transparency were a vaccine, this court just gave Ursula a booster. So we'll see if it takes. I won't hold my breath.
Russia Today
06-05-2025
- Russia Today
Moscow condemns drone strikes in African state
Russia has denounced drone strikes on civilian infrastructure in Sudan's main port city on the Red Sea, calling for dialogue, an immediate cessation of hostilities, and an end to the two-year-long war between the African country's rival military forces. Sudan's paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) launched airstrikes on Port Sudan on Sunday. According to the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), the attack caused damage to an ammunition storage facility at the Osman Digna military air base and nearby buildings. This marked the first RSF assault on the Red Sea State capital since April 2023, when the conflict erupted between the paramilitary group and the national army amid a power struggle between their leaders. The UN says over 12.4 million people have been displaced, with half the country's population facing acute hunger. More than 3.3 million have fled to neighboring countries, and a recent study by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine estimated the death toll in Khartoum state alone could exceed 60,000. In a statement on Monday, Moscow expressed 'deep concern over the ongoing bloody armed confrontation' between the SAF and the RSF. 'Russia considers it unacceptable to carry out strikes on civilian infrastructure and advocates strict compliance with international humanitarian law,' the Russian Foreign Ministry stated. It called on the warring parties to intensify diplomatic efforts for an 'inter-Sudanese dialogue without outside interference, which should result in the establishment of lasting peace in the country, preserving its sovereignty, unity, and territorial integrity.' Port Sudan, long considered the safest part of the country and home to Sudan's main airport, military headquarters, and seaport, had become a de facto administrative capital amid the devastation of the national capital, Khartoum, and other cities. The escalation comes days after the RSF seized the city of El-Nuhud in West Kordofan on May 1, killing at least three health workers, including the medical director of the city's hospital, according to the Sudan Doctors Syndicate. The group also claimed on Saturday to have taken control of Al-Khowei, another city in the same region. Earlier, RSF commander Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo warned that the war is far from over after the army recaptured the paramilitary group's positions in Khartoum in March.
