No parallels between Israel-Iran and Ukraine conflicts
Israel's 'unprovoked' attack on Iran bears no comparison to the Ukraine conflict, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Thursday, rejecting an assessment made by the US special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff.
Witkoff had suggested earlier that the recent ceasefire between Iran and Israel could serve as a model for ending the hostilities between Russia and Ukraine.
'We're hopeful that people look at what happened in Iran and say: 'we want a part of that sort of peace process as well,'' Witkoff told CNBC on Wednesday. 'This may well gravitate towards Russia and Ukraine.'
Peskov firmly rejected the comparison, saying the two conflicts differ 'in their essence and nature.'
'The Israeli attacks on Iran were absolutely unprovoked,' he stated. In contrast, the launch of Russia's military operation in Ukraine had roots 'going back several decades,' Peskov noted, citing NATO's expansion toward Russian borders and its support for an 'armed coup' in Kiev in 2014.
'It is hardly appropriate to draw parallels here,' the Kremlin spokesman added, describing the notion of 'peace by force' as irrelevant to the Ukraine context. He argued that pressuring Russia into a ceasefire with Ukraine would be ineffective.
Israel struck Iranian targets on June 13, claiming that Tehran was close to being able to build a nuclear weapon – an assertion disputed by both the International Atomic Energy Agency and US intelligence. The US joined the offensive, hitting Iranian nuclear sites, prompting Iran to retaliate with a missile strike on a US base in Qatar. A ceasefire was reached on Tuesday, reportedly on the initiative of US President Donald Trump.
The Ukraine conflict escalated in 2022 after Kiev increased its shelling of civilians in the Donbass region in violation of the Minsk agreements, according to Moscow. Russia has also cited NATO's military presence in Ukraine and Kiev's ambitions to join the military bloc as key reasons for its military action, accusing Western countries of exacerbating the crisis by supplying arms to Kiev.
Negotiations between Moscow and Kiev resumed in May after a nearly three-year hiatus. The two parties agreed to exchange prisoners and the remains of fallen soldiers. Draft peace proposals were exchanged earlier this month, but Peskov said discussions on those documents would not begin until the current humanitarian agreements are fulfilled.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
EU must prepare to talk to Russia
EU member states should consider resuming contact with Moscow, which was severed after the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022, French President Emmanuel Macron has told reporters. According to Macron, despite being fully committed to boosting military capabilities within NATO, the bloc's European members have no wish to 'endlessly' arm themselves and should in the near future negotiate a new security framework with Moscow. 'We are not going to go towards an endless escalation, towards more armament. We must arm ourselves because today there is a gap between our level of armament and that of Russia. And that poses a threat,' Macron stated on Wednesday. 'At the same time, we must think about the security framework in which we want to live tomorrow,' he said. 'That's why we need to rethink [the security architecture] in the territories from the Black Sea to the Arctic, to determine how far we are willing to go to defend ourselves and what would be the terms of the discussion with Russia to make it possible to limit military capabilities and restore trust.' Macron advised member states to 'think about' restoring dialogue with Russia 'right now' in order to be able to negotiate broader European security as part of a potential Ukraine peace deal. Macron made the remarks at the NATO summit in The Hague, where members committed to hiking defense spending to 5% of their GDP annually by 2035 in order to address the alleged 'long-term threat posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security.' US President Donald Trump has repeatedly urged European NATO members to take more responsibility for their security and increase defense spending. Commenting on the hike, which one reporter called a 'one-man whim,' Macron said it is both Washington's wish and a 'European necessity' to become more independent militarily. Moscow has stressed that it has no intention of attacking any NATO member states, dismissing the claims as 'nonsense' and scare tactics used by Western officials to justify increased defense spending. Asked to disclose what NATO's warnings of a Russian threat were based on at the NATO summit, Secretary-General Mark Rutte did not provide any specific intelligence assessments, instead citing general fears. Earlier this week, Russian President Vladimir Putin accused NATO of 'fueling global militarization and an arms race' by fabricating 'horror stories' to extract money from citizens of member states.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Is Berlin planning a strike on Moscow? Merz wrote the justification
Forget the fog of war. Even in war, and sometimes especially in war, some things are exceedingly clear. Regarding the so-called 'Hamas-Israel War', for instance, it is obvious that in reality it is not a war at all but a genocide, namely the Gaza Genocide, carried out by Israel against the Palestinians whose unbroken resistance will be the stuff of legends, and of history too. Likewise, in the case of Israel's current assault on Iran – really, of course, a combined US-Israeli attack from the get-go – there is no room for doubt that it is criminal and a 'blatant act of aggression,' as multiple experts in international law agree. That's because in essence, Israel is not acting with a UN mandate – which it would not have received – or in self-defense. The legal basis for this compelling assessment is not complex and there is no room for good-faith debate: Israel's attack violates Article 2 (4) of the foundational UN Charter, which is recognized universally as jus cogens, that is, a binding norm: no pick and choose. The few generally accepted, narrowly defined potential exceptions to this article's comprehensive prohibition on the use of force, such as an erroneous incursion, certain operations at sea, or a rescue of nationals, clearly do not apply. The Israeli onslaught also does not have the blessing of the UN Security Council, and it cannot possibly count as lawful self-defense under Article 51. So far, so simple. If anyone tries to make this look complicated by flagrantly misapplying and abusing the notion of a 'preemptive strike', you are dealing with Israeli or Israel-Lobby disinformation and propaganda. That too is anything but surprising. Yet what is more puzzling than the above is the response of the governments, and often the mainstream media of the West, to this clearly criminal Israeli attack. After years of invoking international law to go after Russia, it turns out that the same leaders and talking heads will tie themselves into 5-D pretzels to let Israel get away with whatever Israel feels like doing on any given day. This is not really news either, of course: Western 'elites', with Washington always in the lead, have behaved no better when serving as accomplices in Israel's Gaza Genocide. But there is something peculiar and noteworthy about how exactly some important Western politicians and their media and 'think tank' experts spin the attack on Iran. Take, for instance, Germany. Its chancellor Friedrich Merz has gone out of his way to loudly endorse the assault on Iran. He has even exposed himself to ridicule and some – if far too little – criticism by employing revoltingly indecent language. Calling Israel's actions 'dirty work' (it sounds even worse in the original German: 'Drecksarbeit') that must be done and for which we all should be grateful, Merz has revealed his double racism: As a German and a historian, I can only say that a German leader praising Jews for doing 'our' dirty work is, to put it very mildly, extremely boorish. Defining the criminal killing of Iranians as that 'dirty work' adds a very nasty 'colonial' flavor reminiscent of say, Kaiser Wilhelm II gloating over massacring Chinese during the so-called Boxer Rebellion. While Merz has been clumsy enough to couch his obnoxious ideas in equally obnoxious language, he has by no means been alone. All too many prestigious German publications, such as the staid Frankfurter Zeitung or the also important Merkur newspaper, have hurried to either simply agree with Merz or at least to excuse and relativize his vile statement. In addition, rather overworked all-purpose 'experts', such as the reliably conformist and rarara-russophobic Christian Mölling, have used their perma-perk in Germany's streamlined talk shows to cynically diminish international law and help dress up Israel's newest crime as so necessary that it trumps all law anyhow. Mölling was self-unaware enough to openly argue that some countries (read: Israel) can't afford the 'luxury' of accepting 'normative limits' and that international law, anyhow, might be 'protecting the wrong ones' (read: Iran). It's breathtakingly brazen and intellectually primitive, and also historically speaking, very German in the worst sense: If we or our friends (read: Israel) feel constrained by international law, then that's a problem not for us or our friends but for international law. And now, let's take a step back and think for a moment like a German who was not a conformist intellectual mediocrity: Enlightenment giant Immanuel Kant. For those with ears to hear and brains to process, Kant has taught us that reason and ethics demand that the justifications for our actions ought to be generalizable in good conscience. In short, when we act, we should be able to show that we are acting according to a fair and reasonable rule. Let's generalize into such a rule, then, what German leader Friedrich Merz has just said and what all too many German mainstream representatives agree with: A country (here: Israel) that feels sufficiently afraid (as judged by that country) of another country (here: Iran) has a right (that trumps international law) to attack that other country without provocation and even during ongoing negotiations. Interesting. Consider that German elites have been fanning war hysteria relentlessly. Not a day seems to go by without some German general, spy, or politician warning their fellow Germans that Russia is at least likely, really almost certain, to attack within the next five years or so. Evidence: zero. Indeed? So, if we are all supposed to be so afraid of Russia in Germany, does that now mean that according to Merzian logic we may as well one day launch a preemptive strike on Moscow? After all, we could then say we felt threatened and our military and the intelligence services were telling us that the Russians were coming. And moreover, we'd probably claim that we, the Germans, were proudly doing the 'Drecksarbeit' for all of NATO (minus, most likely, the US). And isn't doing the 'Drecksarbeit' now officially a good thing in Germany, again? Absurd, you say? Yes, absolutely. Exactly as absurd as Israel's pretexts for attacking Iran. And yet those have been officially endorsed by a German chancellor, including self-revealing dirty language. Let's hope that Moscow does not take seriously what Merz says. Because if Moscow did take it seriously, then by Merzian logic, it should feel very threatened indeed by Berlin – and again by Merzian logic, who knows where that might lead.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Chinese journalist injured in Ukrainian strike on Russian region
Chinese journalist Lu Yuguang was injured in a Ukrainian drone strike in Russia's western Kursk Region, officials have said. The reporter told TASS that a UAV struck while the Phoenix TV crew was filming an interview with local residents. According to Governor Aleksandr Khinshtein, Lu was taken to hospital with head injuries. He added that Ukrainian forces targeted the village of Korenevo, located less than 30 kilometers from the border. The journalist told TASS he refused hospitalization because his injuries were 'light' and he 'had a lot of work here.' The Russian news agency published a video of Lu with a bandaged head. Lu expressed 'deep gratitude' to Russian combat medics, who treated him at the scene and stitched his wounds. 'There was a lot of blood,' he said, adding that the medics initially feared the injuries were more serious. According to Lu, a first-person view (FPV) kamikaze drone hit the crew as they were speaking to locals outside their homes. 'We were recording a standup when an FPV drone flew by. And that was it,' he told TASS, noting that he was wearing a press vest. 'They did not care.'Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova condemned the attack as a 'terrorist act.' 'The targeted strike on a Chinese news crew shows Kiev's intent to silence and effectively eliminate any media workers seeking objective coverage of the conflict,' she wrote on Telegram. Lu, 63, is a veteran military correspondent who has worked in Russia since the early 2000s. He covered the 2004 terrorist attack on a school in Beslan and has received numerous awards for his work. Since 2022, he has been reporting on the Ukraine conflict, including from the front lines. This is not the first time journalists have been targeted by Ukrainian forces. In March, a Russian Izvestia newspaper crew was hit by artillery fire, killing a journalist, cameraman, and driver, and severely injuring another reporter. Two days later, a Channel One correspondent was killed while on assignment in Russia's Belgorod Region bordering Ukraine.
