logo
Surprise detail in Qantas sacking hearing

Surprise detail in Qantas sacking hearing

Perth Now24-05-2025

Australia's most iconic airline Qantas is set to pay millions in penalties after it unlawfully sacked more than 1800 ground staff.
The airline was thrice found to have acted unlawfully when it fired 1820 staff in favour of outsourced contractors during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic.
While an earlier compensation hearing before Justice Michael Lee found Qantas should pay $120m to impacted workers, a further three-day hearing sought to decide the additional penalty Qantas must pay for the 2020 decision. Qantas is set to pay a hefty penalty aftert illegally sacking 1820 ground workers. NewsWire/Tertius Pickard Credit: News Corp Australia
The Federal Court earlier found that Qantas had acted against protections in the Fair Work Act in its outsourcing and was partly motivated by a desire to prevent industrial action.
The airline appealed the decision to the full bench of the Federal Court and later the High Court, both of which were unsuccessful.
After losing the appeal, the union and Qantas went to mediation to determine how much Qantas would have to pay the outsourced workers for economic losses linked to lost wages.
The maximum penalty Qantas can be ordered to pay is $121m, on top of the compensation fund that is now in the process of being administered to workers.
Day 1 – Qantas 'deeply sorry'
On the first day of the hearing, Qantas people manager Catherine Walsh took the stand and issued an apology on the airline's behalf.
'I want to reinforce that we are deeply sorry, and we apologise for the impact on the workers, the TWU (Transport Workers Union), to the court for their time and to the family and friends that felt the impacts, we are deeply sorry,' she said.
'We hope we can get to the stage where there can be some finality for them in this.'
Noel Hutley SC, for the union. said Ms Walsh joined the company in 2024 and was a 'central cog' in addressing issues with culture that brought about this 'catastrophe'. Qantas chief people officer Catherine Walsh apologised and said the airline was 'deeply sorry'. Supplied Credit: Supplied
Yet, Mr Hutley put to Ms Walsh that she had not raised concerns with external advisers about since she joined the company.
'You never asked … why he behaved in an extraordinary fashion? It is extraordinary that nothing was said about a matter that was obviously an illicit reasoning for outsourcing,' Mr Hutley said.
While Justice Lee said Ms Walsh was a 'candid' witness, he criticised the airline's decision to call a witness who was not employed by the company at the time of the breach of the Fair Work Act.
'One would have thought if you were truly contrite, you would put someone in the witness box who was there at the relevant time,' he said.
'Who could say I was part of the organisation when this decision was made, and I've changed my tune.'
'And I gave them every opportunity to call Ms Hudson (Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson) or somebody else in that situation and a deliberate forensic decision was made for her not to be called I would infer.'
Mr Hutley said putting Ms Walsh on the stand had the look of choosing a person who 'could not be the subject of true investigation'.
'Ms Walsh had nothing to do with the events and … every time I cross-examined her about a particular event she said, 'well I wasn't there, I can't speak to that',' Mr Hutley said.
Day 2 – 'A once-in-a-lifetime opportunity'
Mr Hutley called for Qantas to pay the maximum penalty given its decision was the 'largest ever instance of the contravention of the Fair Work Act'.
He told the court that Qantas was faced with an 'once-in-a-lifetime opportunity' during the pandemic to save more than $100m per year. TWU lawyer Noel Hutley called for the airline to pay the maximum penalty of $120m. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia
Mr Hutley said the airline had the 'temptation of the potential to produce a massive profit'.
But Qantas barrister Justin Gleeson SC said any penalty close to the maximum would be 'manifestly unfair'.
'Qantas has accepted the seriousness of its conduct,' he said.
'The court can and should impose a significant deterrent penalty. However, it is in effect a first contravention (of the Fair Work Act).'
Day 3 – 'Stronger than Sunrise'
Meetings between Qantas senior managers, a group management committee (GMC) meeting and a board meeting came under the microscope in court on Wednesday.
One of the meetings between Qantas executives and lawyers discussed the legality of outsourcing ground handlers, the court was told.
It was said in the meeting that the proposal to outsource ground handlers was 'stronger than Sunrise' – a reference to the airline's ultra-long-haul Project Sunrise flights from Sydney to London and New York that are expected to begin in 2027.
'That appears to be some assessment as to whether the case for lawfulness is stronger than Project Sunrise,' Mr Gleeson said, referencing the meeting notes.
The airline has since reached an agreement with its pilots and crew who will work the ultra-long-range flights of more than 20 hours.
'Appalling act'
TWU secretary Michael Kaine said on Monday the airline's decision to get rid of a 'loyal workforce' was 'appalling' and the 'biggest case of illegal sackings in Australian corporate history'.
'The penalty to Qantas must reflect this and send a message to every other company in Australia that you cannot sack your workers to prevent them from using their industrial rights,' he said. TWU secretary Michael Kaine said the sackings were an 'appalling act'. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia
Mr Kaine said ground handling work for Qantas was now being undertaken by companies such as Swissport, which he alleged had 'severe understaffing' and a 'revolving door of fed-up workers'.
'This cannot be a business case for outsourcing and Qantas should not only pay the maximum legal penalty for its actions but commit to funding fair standards throughout its supply chain,' he said.
'We need to see Qantas held accountable to the fullest extent here.'
The hearing has now been adjourned, and Justice Lee has reserved his judgment.
The penalty amount will be revealed at a later date.
While Justice Lee is yet to decide exactly who will receive the money from the penalty imposed upon Qantas, there are three likely parties proposed.
The TWU is seeking a large majority of the penalty and also argued affected workers should receive further compensation.
Otherwise, the funds could go directly to the commonwealth.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Moira Deeming offers to delay John Pesutto bankruptcy proceedings for preselection guarantee
Moira Deeming offers to delay John Pesutto bankruptcy proceedings for preselection guarantee

ABC News

time30 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Moira Deeming offers to delay John Pesutto bankruptcy proceedings for preselection guarantee

Victorian Liberal MP Moira Deeming has offered to delay bankruptcy proceedings against former opposition leader John Pesutto if the party bypasses its rules and guarantees her preselection for next year's state election. Mr Pesutto tried to expel Ms Deeming, an outspoken first-term MP, over her attendance at an anti-trans-right rally in March 2023. The event, entitled Let Women Speak and categorised by supporters as a women's rights event, was gatecrashed by neo-Nazis. But Mr Pesutto's expulsion attempts backfired, and the Federal Court ultimately found he had defamed Ms Deeming on multiple occasions by conveying that she associated with neo-Nazis. Earlier this year, the court ordered Mr Pesutto pay Ms Deeming $2.3 million in legal costs, which he cannot afford. Lawyers for Ms Deeming have begun bankruptcy proceedings against the Hawthorn MP. He has less than three weeks to stump up the money or he'll be expelled from parliament. As part of his efforts to avoid bankruptcy, Mr Pesutto and his backers have approached the Liberal Party to provide a loan. While the proposal is still in development, it has growing support, with many Liberals keen to avoid a by-election in Hawthorn that would be triggered if Mr Pesutto declared bankruptcy. The fracas has derailed Opposition Leader Brad Battin's attempts to present the Coalition as an alternative government and is the latest front in a long-running internal factional fight. Ms Deeming and her supporters do not believe the party should be using members' money to assist Mr Pesutto. On Monday, Ms Deeming wrote to Mr Pesutto, Mr Battin and party officials outlining a proposal to withdraw the bankruptcy proceedings if her conditions were met, including the party guaranteeing her preselection. It's understood a challenge on her preselection has been prepared by local members and has a strong chance of succeeding. Ms Deeming asked the party to endorse by "special resolution however described in constitutional terms so that I enjoy the right to serve my community without any internal distractions, which is something denied to me to date". She also wanted Mr Pesutto to pay all the available funds he has, which she believes is $750,000, and that the remainder of his debt be deferred until March 30, 2027 to "give him sufficient time to secure the necessary funds and avoid bankruptcy". Ms Deeming also wanted the Liberal Party, through Mr Battin, to provide her and her family an "unreserved written and public apology for the way I have been treated, for the imputations against my reputations, and that all the false allegations and defamatory slurs directed towards me are rejected". Her other demands included all parties drawing a line under events and focusing on the election. "It is because of the extraordinary support that I have received from rank-and-file members that I make this offer with the intention that the funds they have raised to fight the Labor Party remain solely directed to that important objective,'' she wrote. The offer was expected to expire at 5pm on Wednesday. Liberal sources said the offer has gone down like a lead balloon, with one source labelling it "preposterous". "It hasn't sparked much interest at all,'' one senior party figure said. Others are enraged that Ms Deeming is trying to override the party's preselection processes. Mr Battin has been contacted for comment. Both Ms Deeming and Mr Pesutto declined to comment.

EU warning for Australia on China
EU warning for Australia on China

Perth Now

time42 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

EU warning for Australia on China

China is showing 'worrying signs' of deeper alignment with Russia's anti-West agenda, the EU's top diplomat in Australia has warned. The caution has come as Chinese President Xi Jinping and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin continue to step up co-operation against a backdrop of the raging war in Ukraine and simmering tensions in the Indo-Pacific. Ambassador Gabriele Visentin said on Wednesday what happens in Australia's neck of the woods is 'completely intertwined' with what happens in Europe. Ambassador Gabriele Visentin says China is showing 'worrying signs' of deeper alignment with Russia's anti-West agenda. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia 'I cannot possibly comment on the choice that the Australian government has on its defence policies,' the EU's envoy told the National Press Club. 'What I can say is that there is … a clear link between the Chinese and the Russian visions of what the new international rules-based order should be. 'We have seen maybe some worrying signs of military scaling up of China.' Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said last week said China's rapidly growing nuclear arsenal is driving 'security anxiety' in Australia. As of mid-2024, China's operational nuclear warheads exceeded 600, according to the US Department of Defence. That was nearly triple what the country was estimated to have in 2020. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth also earlier this month warned of an 'imminent' threat from China, saying Beijing could invade the democratically self-governing island of Taiwan as early as 2027. Such a move would deal a major blow to global supply of semiconductors – crucial components in modern tech – and massively disrupt vital trade routes. 'Let me be clear, any attempt by Communist China to conquer Taiwan by force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world,' Mr Hegseth told the Shangri La Dialogue. 'There's no reason to sugar-coat it. The threat China poses is real and it could be imminent. 'We hope not but certainly could be.' Mr Hegseth also called on Australia to boost defence spending in a meeting with Mr Marles, who holds the defence portfolio, on the sidelines of the conference. Asked how the EU might intervene in the event of a significant escalation in the Indo-Pacific, Mr Visentin was hesitant to outline any measures but said Europe had a 'vital interest' in keeping the region 'free'. 'I definitely think that the two theatres are completely intertwined,' he said. 'Forty per cent of the global trade towards the EU comes from the Indo-Pacific. 'Therefore, we do have a vital interest that the Indo-Pacific remains free and open. 'It's a matter of our wealth and our prosperity. 'So, of course we have to be aware of what a disruption of the status quo would mean for us as well.' The bloc deployed warships to the Red Sea in early 2024 to protect cargo ships from attacks by Islamist militants in Yemen emboldened by the conflict in Gaza. Mr Visentin also expanded on EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's comments last month saying she wanted a deeper 'strategic partnership' with Australia. 'It's not a military alliance,' he said. 'It's a partnership for co-operation on defence issues, including industrial things.' He added 'there is no scope for an understanding in terms of transfer of troops or mutual help and mutual assistance', unlike NATO, which guarantees blanket mutual defence if a member state is attacked.

Guy's email revealed in manager trial
Guy's email revealed in manager trial

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

Guy's email revealed in manager trial

Guy Sebastian personally negotiated a release from his contract to join manager Titus Day's new company in 2009 before their relationship ultimately soured, a court has been told. Mr Day is standing trial in the NSW District Court accused of embezzling more than $600,000 from the Aussie pop star. It's alleged that Mr Day failed to pay Mr Sebastian performance fees and royalties that were collected by his 6 Degrees talent agency, including $187,000 for performance fees when the Australian Idol winner supported Taylor Swift on her 2013 tour of Australia. Mr Day has denied doing anything dishonest or fraudulent and is fighting the allegations. He has pleaded not guilty to 34 counts of embezzlement as a clerk or servant and one count of attempting to dishonestly obtain financial advantage by deception. The court has been told that Mr Sebastian first became involved with Mr Day when he signed with the 22 Management company early in his career. At the time, Mr Day worked for 22 Management, which was owned by Sean Anderson. Titus Day is standing trial in the NSW District Court. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia Then, in early 2009, Mr Day told Mr Anderson that he was looking to form his own company, the court was told on Wednesday. 'He indicated to me that he was looking for something a little bit more than an employee role and whether I was open to a partnership or bringing him in as a partner in the business,' Mr Anderson told the jury on Wednesday. 'I indicated I wasn't quite ready to do that and so he said he was looking to start his own business. And I encouraged him to do it.' And when Mr Day formed 6 Degrees and went out on his own, Mr Anderson said Mr Sebastian followed Mr Day because of their close relationship. 'Guy indicated he had formed a great relationship with Titus and he wanted to follow Titus, which I expected would happen,' Mr Anderson said. 'I didn't have anyone in the business that had the music skills that Titus had, so I then negotiated a release from my contract with Guy and he left shortly after.' Pop star Guy Sebastian is suing Mr Day. NewsWire/Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia The court was told that 22 Management had a written contract with Mr Sebastian, but Mr Anderson had since not been able to find a copy. The court was told that Mr Sebastian's contract with 22 Management was due to expire in April 2010; however, he negotiated a release to join Mr Day when he went out on his own to found 6 Degrees. The jury on Wednesday heard details of a mid-2009 email exchange between Mr Anderson and Mr Sebastian as they negotiated the terms of the singer's exit from his managerial contract. Initially, Mr Anderson proposed that 22 Management be given a percentage of Mr Sebastian's gross income for the next two years – 10 per cent on the first year and 5 per cent on the following year. However, Mr Day replied saying that 22 Management was only entitled to 20 per cent of all gross income up until April 2010 and after that a 'trailing commission' on any work done that was negotiated by Mr Anderson's business. The court was told that 'trailing commissions' were negotiated by managers to cover them for their investment in young and up-and-coming performers in the event they become successful and later leave to join new management. It prompted Mr Anderson to propose new terms, including a 15 per cent split to 22 Management and a 5 per cent split to 6 Degrees as well as trailing commissions. Sean Anderson, the chief executive of Mr Sebastian's former management company 22 Management. Christian Gilles / NewsWire. Credit: News Corp Australia 'Titus should be doing somersaults with this outcome, if I was able to go out on my own and take the marquee client with me and earn commissions from day one, I'd be buying lottery tickets,' Mr Anderson wrote to Mr Sebastian in an email, the court was told. Mr Anderson also asked Mr Sebastian to perform at his 40th birthday free of charge, which he agreed to do as part of their amicable split, the court was told. The terms of Mr Sebastian's contract with 22 Management have been a key part of the trial. During his evidence, Mr Sebastian was grilled by Mr Day's defence about his deal with Mr Day in the early days of his contract. Mr Day's barrister Thomas Woods suggested to Mr Sebastian that he had agreed to 'look after' Mr Day down the track 'by compensating him for the lost commission during this early period' in 2009 when he was only earning 5 per cent. Mr Sebastian, during his evidence to the court last week, denied the assertion. '(Mr Day) wanted more than 5 per cent for that period but couldn't get it because of your arrangement with (22 Management) – you would look after him down the track when you were in a stronger financial position, and that was then what you did. That's what I'm suggesting to you,' Mr Woods said. 'Firstly, that's completely false … their agreement was a 15-5 agreement, and that was between them,' Mr Sebastian replied at the time. 'The concept that in 2014, that where I was already paying a lot of commission to Titus … that seems really ridiculous to me.' The trial continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store