US-SA Game of Thrones: Lights, Cameras and Genocide
A picture shows documents, belongings and skulls of victims ahead of the commemorations of the 30th anniversary of the Rwandan genocide at the Kigali Genocide Memorial in Kigali, on April 5, 2024.
Image: Picture: LUIS TATO / AFP)
Dr Nazreen Shaik-Peremanov
Metaphorical Orwellian allegories have become commonplace in contemporary international relations as never before. All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.
With the United Nations Security Council and General Assembly resolutions and domestic legislation, the Cambodian War Crimes Tribunal was established. So too, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia read in culpability arising from superior command responsibility, finding that subordinates have a duty of diligence and application of mind when acting on superior commands.
When the Khmer Rouge regime did not bow to Western ideologies, the US began bombing in the 1950s and 60s, the subsequent genocide was more directly attributed to external northern influences. Vietnam demonstrated the US's capacity to declare war on a nation that refused conformity to Western-dominated political ideals.
When the genocide was imminent in Rwanda, allied forces withdrew the last remaining Belgian soldiers on the brink of time. When 18 American soldiers were dragged through the streets of Mogadishu, Black Hawk Down did not sit by idly. Hastily, the US retracted. See: American lives matter more than those of others. American lives are more equal than those of others.
Costa Rica is a favoured nation housing US military launch pads in South America as if Greenland's space is not enough for so-called training exercises. As peacekeepers wailed over horns to the UN in Rwanda, the Hutus and Tutsis revelled in demonising genocide and crimes against humanity.
Pray tell, how did these atrocities come to pass? Erecting reinforced walls to keep Mexicans out of North America; deporting immigrants in open military aircraft to their home states, supplying arms and ammunition to one brother against the other to indoctrinate Western political thinking, collapsing entire villages across South America willfully to destroy a whole or a part of a nation because they were endowed with individual political intellect are but some of the atrocities.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Forcibly disappearing and kidnapping (rendition if you will) by US agents exercising extra-territorial jurisdiction in Peru, Mexico, Colombia, and the like are crimes against humanity, bordering on genocidal conduct.
Embarrassingly so, the truth of how this comes to pass is simple: if something does not adversely impact or threaten the north mainland of the US, then it does not matter at all. Atrocities are a bystander's collateral.
South Africa was no bystander in the Oval Room this week. South Africa will never be a bystander in international relations, nor will she become apologetic. Forming the guard of honour around South Africa's head of state, President Ramaphosa stood unflinchingly tall, almost as if he sat across, laying his balming hand on Trumptonia's shoulders, saying, 'It's alright, old Boy. Calm down. Breathe. Genocide does not exist in the South African dictionary.
It does exist in the US dictionary.' Since Minister Lamola's stature was disarming and simultaneously frustrating to the White House, perhaps the hope was that 49 refugee families would spin the wheel for the green card. Ernie Els's surpassed brilliance on the course has little whittle at Union Buildings, or the Kremlin, let alone the White House. Yet, there he was on a US presidential invitation with Retief Goosen. To do what? To speak of untold genocidal atrocities against the minority white farmers on South African soil.
South Africa's racially segregated history, perpetrated by the White minority, informs her history, and her crimes. Moreover, the charismatic leadership of Nelson Mandela ushered in a dispensation of unity, quelling White minority fears and Black majority zeal, along with the now President Ramaphosa as the ANC's aide.
In recent years, crime has escalated in South Africa. Stats SA reports on crimes committed in South Africa. White farmers setting killer dogs loose on black farm workers mauling them to death, somehow escapes the US beams. White Afrikaner farmers killing their farm help and feeding the bodies to pigs also escape the Nazi-like beam. So, too, do the Krugersdorp attacks on Black citizens, followed closely by killings perpetrated by Afrikaner Whites in Ventersdorp.
Orania has carved out a state of its own in South Africa, beautifully relying on the exemplary South African Constitution's article on the right to self-determination. The message is clear: WHITES ONLY. South Africa's democratic constitutional dispensation protects constitutional imperatives.
Musk has carved out his state in Austin, Texas, and at the Italian compound. The message is clear: MUSKIEANS ONLY. The US had sent South Americans, Indians and others back home in droves. So, when popcorn is not served but visual clips are played at the White House, we should learn that people in glass houses should not throw stones or arms or ammunition or nuclear armament or…erect fences for Mexican expulsion...
Freedom of speech is a hard-fought-for South African right, which was drenched in Apartheid censorship. The only limitation will be by a law of general application in an open and democratic society based on freedom, equality and dignity. So, it remains firmly a constitutional imperative for those wishing to express their thoughts, beliefs and opinions.
We know what genocide means, and will share its meaning with you, Mr President. Genocide is the willful killing or extermination by any acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, killing members of the group like collapsing South American villages or setting starved dogs on black farm workers; or causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group like exclusive Texas and Orania... Mr President.
We thank you, Mr President.
* Dr Nazreen Shaik-Peremanov University of Fort Hare Law Faculty and University of Cambridge Wolfsons College Scholar (former)
** The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


eNCA
an hour ago
- eNCA
Mexicans elect their judges under shadow of crime, corruption
Mexicans chose their judges Sunday in unprecedented elections that sharply divided opinion in a country plagued by rampant crime, corruption and impunity. The government and its supporters said the reform making Mexico the world's only nation to select all of its judges and magistrates by popular vote was needed to clean up a rotten justice system. Arturo Giesemann, a 57-year-old retiree, said his main motivation for voting was "the disgust I have with the current judiciary because of its corruption." Turnout appeared to be low as many voters struggled to choose from hundreds of largely unknown candidates. "We are not very prepared," said Lucia Calderon, a 63-year-old university teacher. "I think we need more information." In the western state of Jalisco, 63-year-old housewife Maria Estrada said she used her "intuition" as she did not know the candidates. Experts were concerned that the elections would politicize the justice system and make it easier for criminals to influence the courts with threats and bribery. AFP | Alfredo ESTRELLA While corruption already exists, "there is reason to believe that elections may be more easily infiltrated by organised crime than other methods of judicial selection," Margaret Satterthwaite, the United Nations special rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, told AFP. Hundreds of opponents of the reforms marched through Mexico City waving flags and banners with slogans including: "Hands off our democracy" and "No to electoral fraud." The elections send the judiciary "to its grave," said Ismael Novela, a 58-year-old company worker. "It was the last counterweight we had against the totalitarianism of the executive branch." - 'Regime of corruption' - President Claudia Sheinbaum hit back at her critics on the eve of the vote. "Those who want the regime of corruption and privileges in the judiciary to continue say this election is rigged. Or they also say it's so a political party can take over the Supreme Court," she said in a video message. "Nothing could be further from the truth," she insisted. The run-up to the vote was not accompanied by the kind of violence that often targets politicians in Mexico. But "it is logical that organised criminal groups would have approached judges and candidates who are important to them," said consultant Luis Carlos Ugalde, a former head of Mexico's electoral commission. Rights group Defensorxs has identified around 20 candidates it considers "high risk," including Silvia Delgado, a former lawyer for Sinaloa Cartel co-founder Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman. Another aspiring judge, in Durango state, spent almost six years in prison in the United States for drug crimes. - 'Good reputation' - Voters were tasked with choosing around 880 federal judges -- including Supreme Court justices -- as well as hundreds of local judges and magistrates. Another election for the remainder will be held in 2027. AFP | Rodrigo Oropeza Candidates are supposed to have a law degree, experience in legal affairs and what is termed "a good reputation," as well as no criminal record. To do a good job, voters "would have to spend hours and hours researching the track record and the profiles of each of the hundreds of candidates," said David Shirk, a professor at the University of San Diego. He believes that most of the corruption in Mexico's judicial system is in law enforcement agencies and public prosecutor's offices. "If you can avoid being prosecuted, you don't have to worry about the judge," said Shirk, who heads the Justice in Mexico research project. The judicial reforms were championed by Sheinbaum's predecessor and mentor, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who frequently clashed with the courts before stepping down last year. The main reason for the elections seems to be "because Lopez Obrador had a grudge against the judges," Shirk said.


Eyewitness News
3 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Mexicans elect their judges under shadow of crime, corruption
MEXICO CITY - Mexicans chose their judges Sunday in unprecedented elections that sharply divided opinion in a country plagued by rampant crime, corruption and impunity. The government and its supporters said the reform making Mexico the world's only nation to select all of its judges and magistrates by popular vote was needed to clean up a rotten justice system. Arturo Giesemann, a 57-year-old retiree, said his main motivation for voting was "the disgust I have with the current judiciary because of its corruption." Turnout appeared to be low as many voters struggled to choose from hundreds of largely unknown candidates. "We are not very prepared," said Lucia Calderon, a 63-year-old university teacher. "I think we need more information." In the western state of Jalisco, 63-year-old housewife Maria Estrada said she used her "intuition" as she did not know the candidates. Experts were concerned that the elections would politicize the justice system and make it easier for criminals to influence the courts with threats and bribery. While corruption already exists, "there is reason to believe that elections may be more easily infiltrated by organized crime than other methods of judicial selection," Margaret Satterthwaite, the United Nations special rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, told AFP. Hundreds of opponents of the reforms marched through Mexico City waving flags and banners with slogans including: "Hands off our democracy" and "No to electoral fraud." The elections send the judiciary "to its grave," said Ismael Novela, a 58-year-old company worker. "It was the last counterweight we had against the totalitarianism of the executive branch." 'REGIME OF CORRUPTION' President Claudia Sheinbaum hit back at her critics on the eve of the vote. "Those who want the regime of corruption and privileges in the judiciary to continue say this election is rigged. Or they also say it's so a political party can take over the Supreme Court," she said in a video message. "Nothing could be further from the truth," she insisted. The run-up to the vote was not accompanied by the kind of violence that often targets politicians in Mexico. But "it is logical that organized criminal groups would have approached judges and candidates who are important to them," said consultant Luis Carlos Ugalde, a former head of Mexico's electoral commission. Rights group Defensorxs has identified around 20 candidates it considers "high risk," including Silvia Delgado, a former lawyer for Sinaloa Cartel co-founder Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman. Another aspiring judge, in Durango state, spent almost six years in prison in the United States for drug crimes. 'GOOD REPUTATION' Voters were tasked with choosing around 880 federal judges - including Supreme Court justices - as well as hundreds of local judges and magistrates. Another election for the remainder will be held in 2027. Candidates are supposed to have a law degree, experience in legal affairs and what is termed "a good reputation," as well as no criminal record. To do a good job, voters "would have to spend hours and hours researching the track record and the profiles of each of the hundreds of candidates," said David Shirk, a professor at the University of San Diego. He believes that most of the corruption in Mexico's judicial system is in law enforcement agencies and public prosecutor offices. "If you can avoid being prosecuted, you don't have to worry about the judge," said Shirk, who heads the Justice in Mexico research project. The judicial reforms were championed by Sheinbaum's predecessor and mentor Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who frequently clashed with the courts before stepping down last year. The main reason for the elections seems to be "because Lopez Obrador had a grudge against the judges," Shirk said.


eNCA
3 hours ago
- eNCA
US debt market crisis looming, JPMorgan chief warns
SAN FRANCISCO - JPMorgan Chase chief executive Jamie Dimon voiced concern at the risk of a looming US debt market crisis sparked by the Trump administration's economic policies. "It's a big deal. It is a real problem," Dimon told Maria Bartiromo on FOX Business Network's "Mornings with Maria" show, according to an excerpt of the interview that will air in full Monday. "The bond market is going to have a tough time. I don't know if it's six months or six years," he said. Dimon cautioned that once investors become aware of the impact of rising debt levels, interest rates would skyrocket and markets would be disrupted -- a dangerous scenario for the world's biggest economy. "People vote with their feet," he stressed. Investors "are going to be looking at the country, the rule of law, the inflation rates, the central bank policies," he said, warning that "if people decide that the US dollar isn't the place to be," financing US debt will become more expensive. Historically, the United States has been able to rely on market appetite for low-interest US Treasury bonds to support its economy. Yields briefly climbed last week, amid concerns about President Donald Trump's divisive budget plan. The plan would, among other things, extend the gigantic tax breaks introduced during Trump's first term, spurring fears of a ballooning federal deficit. In mid-May, for the first time ever, the United States lost its triple-A credit rating from Moody's. When it announced the downgrade to Aa1, the ratings agency warned that it expects US federal deficits to widen dramatically over the next decade. The White House's back-and-forth announcements of towering tariffs slapped on countries around the world are also creating considerable uncertainty and thus market volatility. Dimon already warned in April of "considerable turbulence" facing the American economy, pointing to the impact of tariffs, trade wars, inflation and budget deficits. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Sunday downplayed Dimon's predictions of a debt market crisis. "I've known Jamie a long time, and for his entire career he's made predictions like this," Bessent said during an interview on CBS. "Fortunately, not all of them have come true." Bessent acknowledged that he "was concerned about the level of debt." But he said "the deficit this year is going to be lower than the deficit last year, and in two years, it will be lower again."