US-Somali airstrikes kill al Shabaab militants, hit weapons ship, government says
The airstrikes came hours after the Islamists attacked the strategic town of Adan Yabal, which lies about 245 km (150 miles) north of the capital, Mogadishu, and has been used as an operating base for raids on al Shabaab.
Al Shabaab has been waging an insurgency since 2007, seeking to seize power and rule based on its own strict interpretation of Islamic law, and it has been gaining ground since last month.
Several senior al Shabaab fighters were among those killed in an airstrike carried out by Somali forces and the U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) in the Adan Yabal district late on Wednesday, Somalia's government said.
"The targeted strike hit a site used by the militants as a gathering and hideout," the Ministry of Information said in a statement on the social media platform X, adding that no civilians had been killed in the strike.
A further airstrike was conducted by the government and AFRICOM on an unidentified and unflagged ship and smaller support vessels that were transporting weapons for al Shabaab within Somali waters, the ministry said.
The vessels were destroyed their occupants were killed, it added.
In a separate incident on Thursday near the southwestern city of Baidoa, the national army killed at least 35 al Shabaab fighters as they tried to attack a military base there, the ministry said.
Al Shabaab briefly captured villages within 50 km (30 miles) of Mogadishu last month, raising fears among residents of the capital that the city could be targeted.
Somali forces have recaptured the villages briefly seized last month, but al Shabaab has continued to advance in the countryside, leading the government to deploy police and prison guards to support the military, soldiers have told Reuters.
The outcome of the heavy fighting that broke out on Wednesday in Adan Yabal was not immediately clear, with government forces and al Shabaab giving conflicting accounts of who was in control of the town.
Al Shabaab said its forces had overrun 10 military installations during the fighting.
(Writing by George Obulutsa; Editing by Ammu Kannampilly and Helen Popper)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
Fragility of Congo–rebel peace deal exposed as both sides trade accusations
The Democratic Republic of Congo's (DRC) eastern region has seen a resurgence of tensions after the Congolese army accused the M23 rebel group on Tuesday of carrying out several attacks despite existing peace accords. The Democratic Republic of Congo's eastern region is experiencing renewed unrest involving the M23 rebel group despite existing peace negotiations. Both the Congolese army and the M23 group accuse one another of violating agreements and mobilizing forces, exacerbating tensions. Peace negotiations mediated in Washington and Doha face delays, with scheduled discussions and agreements unmet. To highlight the fragility of the current mediation process, Congo's army issued a warning that it reserved the right to respond to any further provocations. The army's statement claims that the attacks violate agreements negotiated in Washington and Doha to put an end to the long-running strife in the mineral-rich area. A day prior, M23 had accused Congolese forces of inciting more soldiers and breaking a statement of principles made in Doha on July 19 that promised support for a lasting truce, as reported by Reuters. The torrent of allegations comes as peace negotiations, which were supposed to start in Doha last week, face prolonged delays. Under the July 19 proclamation, both parties agreed to begin discussions on August 8 and reach a final agreement by August 18. However, neither delegation is currently present in Doha. M23 commander Bertrand Bisimwa alleged last week that the rebel faction had not received an official invitation to the negotiations. The organization also accused the Congolese army of mobilizing troops and military weapons in six different sites, indicating a potential escalation. Peace talks between the DRC and the M23 rebels The latest developments follow a series of diplomatic interventions aimed at resolving the crisis. On July 31, Rwanda, which has been accused of backing the M23 rebels, and the DRC held their first Joint Oversight Committee meeting in Washington, a direct result of mediation efforts by Qatar and the US. Earlier in March, Qatar hosted a new round of negotiations after DRC President Félix Tshisekedi attended a joint conference of Eastern and Southern African leaders in Tanzania in February, convened in response to escalating violence. The Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the East African Community (EAC) have attempted to mediate the conflict by appointing African leaders such as former Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta, former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo, and former Ethiopian Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn to lead peace efforts.
Wall Street Journal
6 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
National Guard Troops Begin Arriving in D.C. After Trump Deployment
President Trump has deployed roughly 800 members of the National Guard to the nation's capital and taken the city's police department under federal control. Photo: Annabelle Gordon/Reuters
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Will tariffs cause a Great Depression style crash?
Will tariffs cause a Great Depression style crash? originally appeared on TheStreet. U.S. stocks have been fairly battered by recent events, particularly in response to evolving tariff news. On April 2, President Donald Trump announced potentially draconian tariffs on the U.S.'s major trading partners on "Liberation Day." Mr. Market did not like it. 💵💰💰💵 Major indices lost over 12% in the next six days, until President Trump backtracked and said tariffs would only apply for 90 days, pending negotiations, etc. The S&P 500 index then recovered an amazing 28% from the low, creating the so-called TACO trade (Trump Always Chickens Out, meaning he offers harsh trade terms and pulls back, leading to stocks falling and bouncing). While tariffs are on pace to settle lower than feared in April, they'll still pose a surprisingly significant drag on the US economy, leading to worries over another Great Depression-style stock market reckoning. What is a tariff anyway? For starters, what is a tariff? A tariff is an import duty, or a tax, on imported goods to a country, the U.S. in this case. So, to be clear, a tariff is a tax paid by the importer, which then has to pass the tax (or part of it) on to somebody else or absorb it. That "somebody else" ultimately is the consumer. And there's the rub.U.S. personal consumption (private spending) accounts for more than two-thirds of the nation's GDP, which measures its total economic output. With higher tariffs come increases in costs of goods and services (inflation), leaving the consumer holding the bag, so to speak. Lower disposable income translates to reduced consumer spending overall, which is a poor omen for the economic situation generally, and a problem for corporate profits and potentially, stock prices. Tariff rates are much higher than last year As of August 7, the president's various tariff deals have gone into effect, with a base rate of 10% or more, depending on the deals reached with the Trump administration. This compares to negligible zero and 2.5% tariff rates for most countries that preceded President Trump's tariffs. That's a big jump, no matter how you slice the major U.S. trading partners, tariffs range from 10% for the UK to 50% for India. But most major U.S. trading partners (e.g., Japan & the European Union) settled on a 15% tariff rate, and made concessions for foreign direct investments (FDIs) into the U.S. Still other nations, such as China, Canada, and Mexico (the three largest U.S. trading partners), are in a negotiation period, with tariffs currently set at around 30% for all of them. Negotiations with China are set to conclude in November, so plenty of drama has yet to play out on that stage. Meanwhile, about 95% of Canadian and Mexican imports are exempt from the 30% tariffs due to the MCA (Mexican-Canadian-American trade agreement) negotiated by Trump in his first term. In the end, it may all be much ado about nothing if U.S. courts strike down the Trump administration's legal rationale for imposing the tariffs. Smoot-Hawley tariffs coincided with Great Depression The last time tariff rates were this high was nearly a hundred years ago, when the dreaded Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was implemented in 1930 to protect farmers and other key U.S. industries during the height of the Great Depression. Tariffs of around 20% were applied to most goods, leading to retaliatory tariffs by other nations. This sparked a global trade war, which saw trade fall by 65% between 1929 and 1934. Did the Smoot-Hawley tariffs cause the stock market crash of October 1929? Not directly, but the passage of the legislation by the U.S. House in May of 1929, approximately five months before the crash, caused the market to begin to wobble. More on tariffs: Billionaire fund manager explans why tariffs may not be a big deal after all EU and US automakers both lose big in latest tariff deal Tariffs will cost the liquor industry over $2 billion in sales All this set the stage for an era of protectionism, which augured poorly for an already nervous and overextended stock market. Excess leverage — that is, borrowing to speculate on stocks- was rampant. All of this unfolded against the backdrop of a global depression, and voila: Black Tuesday of October 1929. President Herbert Hoover signed the Smoot-Hawley tariffs into law in June 1930. Stocks limped along for years and hit new lows in 1932, before bottoming around FDR's inauguration in March 1933. The Smoot-Hawley tariffs were largely reversed in June 1934 in favor of bilateral trade agreements, and stocks continued to recover. Are we heading toward another market crash? The outlook for stocks is far from clear. On the one hand, President Trump's tariff regime has yet to show up materially in the data. Hence, stocks have not experienced a pronounced negative reaction since August 7, when President Trump's tariff pause officially ended, and tariffs took effect. However, stocks remain extremely jittery on tariff-related news, not unlike the stock market run-up to the 1929 the other hand, we have a market that is marking new all-time highs. In recent weeks, over two-thirds of companies have reported second-quarter earnings, and 82% of them beat EPS expectations, allowing the market to grind back from recent jobs-related losses. With most of the positive earnings data in the rearview mirror, however, one wonders what might fuel further upside in stocks. Overall, the macro picture is biased to the downside, what with the tariffs' effect still to be felt in real time, a weak jobs number for July, and an uptick in jobless claims recently raising fresh concerns about the U.S. economic trajectory. Is a crash like 1929's imminent? Hardly likely, given the absence of excess leverage or borrowing to speculate on stocks. Still, the market is overvalued by most measures of healthy price-to-earnings ratios (P/E) at 29.4; more normal market P/E ratios are on the order of 15 to 20. A look at the () (SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust) chart shows a solid rebound from August 1's disappointing NFP (non-farm payrolls) report (red oval). But price is still below the pre-NFP high, potentially setting up a double-top formation. (A double top formation is created when price makes two attempts to surpass a particular price level and fails, resulting in a subsequent price decline.) An alternative view is highlighted by the faster Tenkan Line (blue) still holding above the slower Kijun line (red). A move above the recent highs would suggest the uptrend is resuming, with price well above the cloud indicating that an overall uptrend remains in place. Active investors will want to pay close attention to the coming days' price action to see if a new pre-NFP high can be made, or if it's only a bear flag correction higher, with more downside in store and a potential major double-top reversal pattern forming tariffs cause a Great Depression style crash? first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 12, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 12, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
