US-Somali airstrikes kill al Shabaab militants, hit weapons ship, government says
MOGADISHU (Reuters) -Two joint Somali-U.S. airstrikes killed 12 al Shabaab militants in central Somalia and destroyed a ship carrying weapons for the al Qaeda-linked group, the Somali government said on Thursday, following recent advances by the Islamists.
The airstrikes came hours after the Islamists attacked the strategic town of Adan Yabal, which lies about 245 km (150 miles) north of the capital, Mogadishu, and has been used as an operating base for raids on al Shabaab.
Al Shabaab has been waging an insurgency since 2007, seeking to seize power and rule based on its own strict interpretation of Islamic law, and it has been gaining ground since last month.
Several senior al Shabaab fighters were among those killed in an airstrike carried out by Somali forces and the U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) in the Adan Yabal district late on Wednesday, Somalia's government said.
"The targeted strike hit a site used by the militants as a gathering and hideout," the Ministry of Information said in a statement on the social media platform X, adding that no civilians had been killed in the strike.
A further airstrike was conducted by the government and AFRICOM on an unidentified and unflagged ship and smaller support vessels that were transporting weapons for al Shabaab within Somali waters, the ministry said.
The vessels were destroyed their occupants were killed, it added.
In a separate incident on Thursday near the southwestern city of Baidoa, the national army killed at least 35 al Shabaab fighters as they tried to attack a military base there, the ministry said.
Al Shabaab briefly captured villages within 50 km (30 miles) of Mogadishu last month, raising fears among residents of the capital that the city could be targeted.
Somali forces have recaptured the villages briefly seized last month, but al Shabaab has continued to advance in the countryside, leading the government to deploy police and prison guards to support the military, soldiers have told Reuters.
The outcome of the heavy fighting that broke out on Wednesday in Adan Yabal was not immediately clear, with government forces and al Shabaab giving conflicting accounts of who was in control of the town.
Al Shabaab said its forces had overrun 10 military installations during the fighting.
(Writing by George Obulutsa; Editing by Ammu Kannampilly and Helen Popper)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-OPEC+ would struggle to cover major Iranian oil supply disruption
By Ahmad Ghaddar and Seher Dareen LONDON (Reuters) -Oil market participants have switched to dreading a shortage in fuel from focusing on impending oversupply in just two days this week. After Israel attacked Iran and Tehran pledged to retaliate, oil prices jumped as much as 13% to their highest since January as investors price in an increased probability of a major disruption in Middle East oil supplies. Part of the reason for the rapid spike is that spare capacity among OPEC and allies to pump more oil to offset any disruption is roughly equivalent to Iran's output, according to analysts and OPEC watchers. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are the only OPEC+ members capable of quickly boosting output and could pump around 3.5 million barrels per day (bpd) more, analysts and industry sources said. Iran's production stands at around 3.3 million bpd, and it exports over 2 million bpd of oil and fuel. There has been no impact on output so far from Israel's attacks on Iran's oil and gas infrastructure, nor on exports from the region. But fears that Israel may destroy Iranian oil facilities to deprive it of its main source of revenue have driven oil prices higher. The Brent benchmark last traded up nearly 7% at over $74 on Friday. An attack with a significant impact on Iranian output that required other producers to pump more to plug the gap would leave very little spare capacity to deal with other disruptions - which can happen due to war, natural disasters or accidents. And that with a caveat that Iran does not attack its neighbours in retaliation for Israeli strikes. Iran has in the past threatened to disrupt shipping through the Strait of Hormuz if it is attacked. The Strait is the exit route from the Middle East Gulf for around 20% of the world's oil supply, including Saudi, UAE, Kuwaiti, Iraqi and Iranian exports. Iran has also previously stated that it would attack other oil suppliers that filled any gap in supplies left due to sanctions or attacks on Iran. "If Iran responds by disrupting oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz, targeting regional oil infrastructure, or striking U.S. military assets, the market reaction could be much more severe, potentially pushing prices up by $20 per barrel or more," said Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad and a former OPEC official. CHANGE IN CALCULUS The abrupt change in calculus for oil investors this week comes after months in which output increases from OPEC and its allies, a group known as OPEC+, have led to investor concern about future oversupply and a potential price crash. Saudi Arabia, the de facto leader of OPEC, has been the driving force behind an acceleration in the group's output increases, in part to punish allies that have pumped more oil than they were supposed to under OPEC+ agreements. The increases have already strained the capacity of some members to produce more, causing them to fall short of their new targets. Even after recent increases, the group still has output curbs in place of about 4.5 million bpd, which were agreed over the past five years to balance supply and demand. But some of that spare oil capacity - the difference between actual output and notional production potential that can be brought online quickly and sustained - exists only on paper. After years of production cuts and reduced oilfield investment following the COVID-19 pandemic, the oilfields and facilities may no longer be able to restart quickly, said analysts and OPEC watchers. Western sanctions on Iran, Russia and Venezuela have also led to decreases in oil investment in those countries. "Following the July hike, most OPEC members, excluding Saudi Arabia, appear to be producing at or near maximum capacity," J.P. Morgan said in a note. Outside of Saudi Arabia and the UAE, spare capacity was negligible, said a senior industry source who works with OPEC+ producers. "Saudi are the only ones with real barrels, the rest is paper," the source said. He asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter. PAPER BARRELS Saudi oil output is set to rise to above 9.5 million bpd in July, leaving the kingdom with the ability to raise output by another 2.5 million bpd if it decides to. That capacity has been tested, however, only once in the last decade and only for one month in 2020 when Saudi Arabia and Russia fell out and pumped at will in a fight for market share. Saudi Arabia has also stopped investing in expanding its spare capacity beyond 12 million bpd as the kingdom diverted resources to other projects. Russia, the second largest producer inside OPEC+, claims it can pump above 12 million bpd. JP Morgan estimates, however, that Moscow can only ramp up output by 250,000 bpd to 9.5 million bpd over the next three months and will struggle to raise output further due to sanctions. The UAE says its maximum oil production capacity is 4.85 million bpd, and told OPEC that its production of crude alone in April stood at just over 2.9 million bpd, a figure largely endorsed by OPEC's secondary sources. The International Energy Agency, however, estimated the country's crude production at about 3.3 million bpd in April, and says the UAE has the capacity to raise that by a further 1 million bpd. BNP Paribas sees UAE output even higher at 3.5-4.0 million bpd. "I think spare capacity is significantly lower than what's often quoted," said BNP analyst Aldo Spanjer. The difference in ability to raise production has already created tensions inside OPEC+. Saudi Arabia favours unwinding cuts of about 800,000 bpd by the end of October, sources have told Reuters. At their last meeting, Russia along with Oman and Algeria expressed support for pausing a hike for July.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump claims 'done deal' with China … but is it, really?
[Source] President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that a U.S.-China trade deal is 'done' after two days of high-stakes negotiations in London, but observers say it just put Washington in a circle. Catch up The London meetings were prompted by a May agreement in Geneva that temporarily lowered punishing tariffs that had brought trade between the superpowers nearly to a halt. Trump's April duties had climbed to 145% on most Chinese goods, leaving U.S. businesses that rely on them struggling. The Geneva agreement lowered Trump's new tariffs to 30% and China's to 10%, establishing a 90-day window until Aug. 10 for a broader deal. The arrangement, however, fell apart due to conflicts over rare earth shipments and technology access. Beijing holds dominant market position in rare earth production — materials vital for products from automobiles to military hardware — leading U.S. industries to lobby Washington for action. Trending on NextShark: Where things stand After a pivotal phone conversation between Trump and Xi Jinping last week that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said 'changed everything,' negotiators reached what officials termed a 'framework' during extended talks at London's Lancaster House. 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me,' Trump posted on Truth Social Wednesday, noting that the U.S. will get 'a total of 55% tariffs' and China, 10%. The 55% U.S. tariff structure includes several components: 10% universal duties on most trading partners, 20% penalties aimed at China over fentanyl issues and 25% rates carried over from Trump's first presidency. The framework calls for China to deliver 'full magnets, and any necessary rare earths … up front,' while the U.S. will maintain Chinese student access to American universities. Trending on NextShark: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told lawmakers that 'there is no quid pro quo in terms of chips for rare earths.' China's Commerce Ministry, on the other hand, took a more reserved stance, calling the result a 'framework' from the 'first meeting' between the parties. On Thursday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian confirmed that a consensus has been reached and reiterated that Beijing will always honor its commitments. 'It is hoped that the U.S. will work with China to implement the important consensus reached by the two heads of state during their phone call, give full play to the role of the China-U.S. economic and trade consultation mechanism, enhance consensus, reduce misunderstandings and strengthen cooperation through communication and dialogue,' Lin said. The big picture Trending on NextShark: Despite Trump's positive assessment, analysts are questioning the deal's substance. It appears the framework only primarily returns both nations to their pre-April status, with elevated tariffs still in effect. 'What exactly are we getting that we weren't already getting before?' Veronique de Rugy, a senior research fellow with the libertarian think tank Mercatus Center, told The New York Times. 'This deal suggests there was never a real plan.' Fundamental trade disagreements — including China's large trade surplus and intellectual property concerns — remain untouched, while the World Bank this week lowered global growth projections, identifying elevated tariffs as a 'significant headwind' for most economies. The U.S. and Chinese governments must approve the framework before any implementation begins. Trending on NextShark: This story is part of The Rebel Yellow Newsletter — a bold weekly newsletter from the creators of NextShark, reclaiming our stories and celebrating Asian American voices. Subscribe free to join the movement. If you love what we're building, consider becoming a paid member — your support helps us grow our team, investigate impactful stories, and uplift our community. Trending on NextShark: Subscribe here now! Download the NextShark App: Want to keep up to date on Asian American News? Download the NextShark App today!
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel says missile launched from Yemen fell in Hebron; at least 5 Palestinians hurt
CAIRO (Reuters) -The Israeli military said on Friday a missile that was launched from Yemen towards Israel fell to earth inside the city of Hebron in the occupied West Bank, adding that no interceptors were involved. At least five Palestinians, including three children, sustained injuries from the missile's sharpnel that fell in Hebron, the Palestinian Red Crescent said in a later statement. The incident occurred amid an ongoing Israeli military campaign targeting nuclear sites in Iran that wiped out that country's entire top echelon of military commanders and also killed nuclear scientists. Yemen's Houthis, who usually claim responsibility for missiles launched towards Israel from Yemen, are allied to Iran.
