British Airways suspends flights to Dubai
British Airways has suspended flights to Dubai in the wake of US airstrikes on Iran in the early hours of Sunday morning.
The UK's flag carrier cancelled its two scheduled flights to Dubai and Doha, the capital of Qatar, that were set to depart from Heathrow Airport on Sunday afternoon, with BA saying no services will operate to or from the Gulf states for the day.
A spokesman for BA said safety teams will monitor the situation over the next 24 hours and decide whether the flights – which had already been diverting far to the south of the conflict zone – can resume on Monday.
The spokesman added: 'As a result of recent events, we have adjusted our flight schedule to ensure the safety of our customers and crew, which is always our top priority.
'We are contacting our customers to advise them of their options while we work through this developing situation.'
British Airways said all customers travelling to either Doha or Qatar from Heathrow Airport between Sunday and Tuesday will be given the option to rebook on to a later flight up to and including July 6, without charge.
Airlines have already been avoiding vast swathes of the Middle East since the war between Israel and Iran broke out on June 13, with airspace over much of the surrounding countries largely empty, according to data from Flightradar24.
Russian skies also remain closed to Western carriers, leaving a narrow strip of open airspace that requires jets headed for north east Asia to fly over Turkey, the Caspian and central Asia.
A British Airways flight to London from Chennai in India turned back after news of the US assault emerged, before later refuelling and safely completing the trip.
Major US airlines including Delta Air Lines and United Airlines suspended flights to Israel last week before separately cancelling flights to Dubai and Doha on Thursday.
Dubai is a popular destination for expats and holidaymakers. The city's Dubai International Airport is currently the busiest airport in the world, with more than 90m passengers travelling through it each year.
Dubai also hosts millions of international tourists each year, and is home to more than 240,000 British expats, according to figures form Expat Insider.
A further 20,000 British expats currently live in Qatar's capital city, Doha, which typically welcomes over 5m visitors each year.
British Airways' flights from London Heathrow to Saudi Arabia's capital, Riyadh are running as usual, according to information from Heathrow Airport.
Emirates flights to Dubai and Qatar Airways flights to Doha are also running as scheduled, according to Heathrow.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
18 minutes ago
- Sky News
Five reasons why we may not see anything more than rhetoric from Russia after US attacks Iran
On the surface, at least, Moscow is fuming. Russia's foreign ministry said it "strongly condemns" the US airstrikes on Iran, which it labelled a "dangerous escalation". Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's powerful security council, accused Donald Trump of starting "a new war", and others have called for Moscow to step in. "It's time for us to help Tehran," said Konstantin Malofeyev, a sanctioned Russian businessman who is close to Vladimir Putin. But this was to be expected. Iran has been a vital ally in recent years, selling weapons to Russia for its war in Ukraine, and the two nations signed a strategic partnership deal in January. So a robust verbal riposte was predictable. But the response so far feels more show than substance and if things don't escalate further, I doubt we'll see anything more than rhetoric from Russia. 0:54 There are several reasons why. Firstly, the strategic partnership deal doesn't contain a mutual defence clause. The pact does seek to deepen their defence cooperation, but neither country is obliged to provide military support to the other in the event of an attack. Secondly, if Moscow did want to join the conflict or even supply weapons to Tehran, it would be hard pushed to. Resources are focused on the war in Ukraine. Thirdly, Russia doesn't want to damage its warming relations with the US. Any kind of aid to Iran would likely jeopardise the tentative rapprochement. Fourthly, the Israel-Iran conflict is a helpful distraction from the Kremlin's war against Ukraine. With all eyes on the Middle East, any pressure there was from Washington on Moscow to reach a peace deal seems to have evaporated. Lastly, it's not Vladimir Putin who's spoken out, but the usual attack dogs. 2:02 Dmitry Medvedev, for example, is a senior figure but his fiery rhetoric is generally considered to be part of a Kremlin comms strategy rather than actual policy expression. Having said all that, though, Russia won't want the situation to escalate any further. Its regional influence took a battering when the Assad regime in Syria was toppled in December, and that influence would practically disappear if another Moscow-friendly regime in Iran were to fall. So for now, the Kremlin is frantically trying to find a diplomatic solution. Last week, Vladimir Putin held conversations with the leaders of Israel, Iran, America, China and the UAE, and those efforts continue on Monday when he'll meet Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi in Moscow. If the reports are true - that the US forewarned Tehran of the bombings and signalled they'd be a one-off - there's a good chance Moscow had prior knowledge too. Either way, Vladimir Putin's aim here is to play peacemaker, and to turn the situation to his advantage. If he can persuade Mr Araghchi to limit Iran's response to a symbolic one, and to then return to the negotiating table with America, he will have Donald Trump in his debt. The obvious place he'd want that repaid is Ukraine, in the form of withdrawing US support.
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
US updates travel advice for India with new warnings
The US State Department updated its travel advisory for India, maintaining a Level 2 classification but escalating warnings for various risks. New do not travel directives were issued for Manipur due to ongoing ethnic violence and for land border crossings from Nepal due to immigration issues. The advisory emphasises increased risks of violent crime, sexual violence, and potential terrorist attacks, especially for solo female travelers and in public venues. Warnings for northeastern states and the Jammu and Kashmir region, excluding Leh and eastern Ladakh, were strengthened or reiterated, reflecting recent incidents like the Pahalgam terrorist attack. Other retained cautions include prohibitions on satellite phones and GPS devices, risks in Maoist insurgency areas, and a continued warning about sexual violence.
Times
26 minutes ago
- Times
Businesses call for action on abuse of public-facing staff
Business leaders are urging the government to broaden legislative action to protect all public-facing workers amid soaring levels of violence and abuse. Some 42 per cent of workers in pubs, restaurants, hotels and transport said they experienced some form of abuse between October and March, a year-on-year increase of 19 per cent, according to the new figures from the Institute of Customer Service. An all-party parliamentary group, which works alongside the industry group UK Hospitality, whose members include retailers, hospitality groups, call centres and transport companies, has been tracking customer service across all sectors over the past five years. • Extra costs holding back hospitality sector, says Whitbread boss Over a third, or 37 per cent, of the 1,050 respondents to the organisation's latest survey said they had considered leaving their role because of incidents which include racial abuse and sexual harassment, while over a quarter said they had taken sick leave after such incidents. One in five workers said they had been threatened with violence, the highest level that the group had recorded. Jo Causon, chief executive of the Institute of Customer Service, said the research showed how 'frontline workers are facing unacceptable levels of assault and abuse from some customers'. Common assault is already an offence and the previous Conservative government had originally rejected calls to create a separate offence specifically linked to shopworkers, arguing it did not think it was 'required or will be most effective'. However, the retail industry argued that incidents were rising and Rishi Sunak's government reversed its position, although its plan to introduce a new offence was abandoned when parliament was dissolved for the general election. • Shops 'at breaking point' as thefts and abuse rocket While there has been a crackdown on retail crime, with a standalone offence of assaulting a retail worker in England and Wales set to be introduced as part of the government's Crime and Policing Bill, which is making its way through parliament, businesses are calling for the bill to be amended to include all those working in public-facing roles. In a letter to the government, 76 businesses said that current legislation provided 'only a partial solution to an endemic and preventable issue'. The signatories of the letter include Sky, Hays Travel, Wickes, Virgin Media 02, United Utilities and DPD. 'These professionals form the bedrock to our society and our economy,' the letter said. Causon added: 'Introducing appropriate protection for customer-facing workers is not only the right thing to do on a societal level, it is critical the UK's business performance isn't impacted by workers up and down the country taking time off sick or thinking about leaving their jobs altogether.'
