Russia carries out deadly air strike on Ukrainian prison
In the Dnipro region of central Ukraine, authorities said Russian missiles partially destroyed a three-storey building and damaged nearby medical facilities, including a maternity hospital and a city hospital ward.
A prison was hit in the village of Bilenke, (Ukraine's State Criminal Executive Service via AP)
Officials said at least four people were killed and eight injured, including a pregnant woman who was in a serious condition.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said that across the country, 22 people were killed in Russian strikes on 73 cities, towns and villages. 'These were conscious, deliberate strikes — not accidental,' Mr Zelensky said on Telegram.
Mr Trump said on Monday he is giving Russian President Vladimir Putin 10 to 12 days to stop the killing in Ukraine after three years of war, moving up a 50-day deadline he had given the Russian leader two weeks ago. The move meant Mr Trump wants peace efforts to make progress by August 7-9.
He has repeatedly rebuked Mr Putin for talking about ending the war but continuing to bombard Ukrainian civilians. But the Kremlin has not changed its tactics.
'I'm disappointed in President Putin,' Mr Trump said during a visit to Scotland.
Mr Zelensky welcomed Mr Trump's move on the timeline. 'Everyone needs peace — Ukraine, Europe, the United States, and responsible leaders across the globe,' Mr Zelensky said in a post on Telegram. 'Everyone except Russia.'
Yesterday, very important words were spoken by President Trump about how the Russian leadership is wasting the world's time by talking about peace while simultaneously killing people. We all want genuine peace – dignified and lasting: Ukraine, all of Europe, the United States,… pic.twitter.com/w1HjWbXFmw
— Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) July 29, 2025
The Kremlin pushed back, however, with a top Putin lieutenant warning Mr Trump against 'playing the ultimatum game with Russia'.
'Russia isn't Israel or even Iran,' former president Dmitry Medvedev, who is deputy head of the country's Security Council, wrote on social platform X.
'Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country,' Mr Medvedev said.
Since Russia's full-scale invasion of its neighbour, the Kremlin has warned Kyiv's Western backers that their involvement could end up broadening the war to Nato countries.
'Kremlin officials continue to frame Russia as in direct geopolitical confrontation with the West in order to generate domestic support for the war in Ukraine and future Russian aggression against Nato,' the Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said on Monday.
The Ukrainian air force said Russia launched two Iskander-M ballistic missiles along with 37 Shahed-type strike drones and decoys at Ukraine overnight. It said 32 Shahed drones were intercepted or neutralised by Ukrainian air defences.
The Russian attack close to midnight on Monday hit the Bilenkivska Correctional Facility with glide bombs, according to the State Criminal Executive Service of Ukraine.
Glide bombs, which are Soviet-era bombs retrofitted with retractable fins and guidance systems, have been laying waste to cities in eastern Ukraine, where the Russian army is trying to pierce Ukrainian defences. The bombs carry up to 3,000 kilograms of explosives.
At least 42 inmates were admitted to hospital with serious injuries, while another 40 people, including one staff member, sustained various injuries.
The strike destroyed the prison's dining hall, damaged administrative and quarantine buildings, but the perimeter fence held and no escapes were reported, authorities said.
Ukrainian officials condemned the attack, saying that targeting civilian infrastructure, such as prisons, is a war crime under international conventions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Trump makes decision on pardoning P Diddy after conviction
Donald Trump has said he is unlikely to pardon Sean 'Diddy' Combs following the music mogul's conviction for transportation to engage in prostitution, In an interview with Newsmax on Friday, the former president addressed speculation that he might offer Combs a presidential pardon, revealing he had been 'seriously considering' the possibility. However, Trump ultimately suggested the answer would be 'more likely a no'. 'Well he was essentially, sort of, half-innocent. I don't know what they do that he's still in jail or something,' Trump said. 'He was celebrating a victory but I guess it wasn't as good a victory.' EAD MORE: Sharon Osbourne breaks down in tears at Ozzy's funeral in heartbreaking scenes. READ MORE: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are set for new 'goldmine' offer - but could face issue. Combs, 55, was acquitted earlier this month of sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges related to ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura and another woman referred to as Jane. But he was found guilty on two federal counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, which was a violation of the Mann Act, and now faces up to 10 years in prison. His sentencing is scheduled for October 3. Trump recalls having a friendly rapport with Combs in the past as they were both prominent figures in New York. But he claimed that their relationship soured after Trump entered politics, pointing to Combs' vocal support of Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential race. 'When I ran for office he was very hostile,' Trump told interviewer Rob Finnerty. 'He made some terrible statements, so I don't know — it makes it more difficult to do.' When he was pressed on whether a pardon was off the table, Trump replied: 'I'd say so.' Behind the scenes, sources previously indicated that the idea of a pardon had moved beyond idle talk and was being taken seriously by the Trump team. One insider told Deadline it had progressed from 'just another Trump weave to an actionable event'. Combs' legal team has already filed for either an acquittal or a retrial. In a strongly worded motion, his lawyers argued that his conviction under the Mann Act was unprecedented and should be overturned. 'This verdict is unsound. And this conviction, rooted in a misapplied, overbroad statute, should not stand,' they wrote, and maintained that all parties involved in the so-called 'Freak-Offs' were consenting adults and that no commercial sex acts had taken place. They also claimed that Combs' activities were in the same vein as producing amateur adult films for private viewing, and therefore protected by the First Amendment. 'The men were paid for their time,' the motion continued. 'They enjoyed the activities and had friendships with Ms. Ventura and Jane and were not merely traveling to have sex for money.' If a full acquittal isn't granted, Combs' attorneys argue a retrial should be ordered due to 'severe spillover prejudice' from the inclusion of inflammatory evidence during the trial, including surveillance footage from a 2016 incident showing Combs physically assaulting Ventura. Combs remains in custody at a Brooklyn detention centre.
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Tech Secretary Peter Kyle won't apologise for what he said about Nigel Farage - 'it's true'
The Tech Secretary refused to apologise for saying Farage's opposition to new online safety rules puts him on the side of predators - suggesting Reform UK are "wilfully misleading" the public about what the new rules do Tech Secretary Peter Kyle has doubled-down on his attack on Nigel Farage, saying the Reform UK leader's opposition to a new online safety crackdown puts him 'on the side of predators.' Writing for the Sunday Mirror, Mr Kyle said he'd never apologise for the remark, made earlier this week, 'Because it's true.' And he revealed how the new law was already being used to prosecute online offenders. New online safety protections for children came into force on July 25. Since that date, so-called "risky" sites and apps have been expected to use age checks to identify which users are children and subsequently prevent them from accessing pornography, as well as other harmful content including self-harm, suicide, eating disorders and extreme violence. Farage's Reform UK party has vowed to scrap Online Safety Act if it ever gains power, claiming it was a threat to free speech. And Farage has said Kyle's comments about him were 'absolutely appalling'. Mr Kyle highlighted two cases where the new law had been used to prosecute and jail online offenders. Last year, Nicholas Hawkes, 39, sent explicit photos of himself to a 15-year-old girl. He was convicted under the new offence of cyber-flashing and sentenced to 66 weeks in prison. And Tyler Webb, 22, was the first to be charged with encouraging serious self-harm under the new act - and was sentenced to nine years and four months. Webb used the messaging app Telegram to repeatedly tell a vulnerable 22-year-old woman to cut herself, then to kill herself by hanging during a video call so she could watch. 'Let me be clear about what the Act does not do,' Mr Kyle wrote. 'It does not stop adults from posting or seeing anything online as long as it's legal and anyone who suggests that does not understand it or is willfully misleading.' He added: 'For years we fought for a safer internet for our children. I refuse to let anyone who is trying to use this issue for their own ends take that away.' 'I won't apologise, because it's true' Earlier this week Nigel Farage asked me to apologise for saying he was on the side of predators when he called for the Online Safety Act to be scrapped. But I won't do that. Because it's true. Under this law a 39 year old man was prosecuted for the new offence of cyber flashing because he sent a photo of his erect penis to a 15-year-old girl. These new categories of crimes are sadly necessary to combat crime in the modern world. But beyond these crimes the law takes steps to make the internet a safer place for children. If you're a parent, ask yourself this - do I want my child to see graphic violence and sexual content? Do I want kids as young as five to see porn on social media? Do I want strangers to be able to message my children - or anyone else's? And do I want them to be able to see my child's location when they're online? This is what the act does - it stops children from seeing things that they should not see - and that we would not want them to in the offline world - porn, extreme violence, suicide and self harm content, images and words that encourage and glorify eating disorders. But as well as blocking disturbing and upsetting images and messages from children's feeds, it also cracks down on child sex abuse images and videos. For the first time social media platforms have to detect and remove that horrific material which has shamefully lurked on the internet barely hidden from those sick enough to seek it out. It also means practical steps to protect children from strangers who want to do them harm. It stipulates that children's profiles and locations should be hidden to keep them safe by default. Because no adult should be able to message a child they do not know. And let me be clear about what the Act does not do - It does not stop adults from posting or seeing anything online as long as it's legal and anyone who suggests that does not understand it or is wilfully misleading. In my first week as Secretary of State I met with a group of bereaved families who have known the absolute worst of the internet. Some of those children were encouraged to kill themselves, others were egged on to do dangerous and ultimately fatal challenges and others still do not know exactly what role their child's online role played in their deaths. I have been clear that not only did we collectively fail their children but that I would do what I could to stop such awful deaths in the future. For years we fought for a safer internet for our children. I refuse to let anyone who is trying to use this issue for their own ends take that away. This government has a Plan for Change to keep children safe both online and offline so that they can live happy and fulfilled lives.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Talks held over making Trump first US president to be given Freedom of the City of London
Your support helps us to tell the story Read more Support Now From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference. Read more Talks have been held over giving Donald Trump the Freedom of the City of London during his state visit in September, in a highly symbolic move. According to a source, the proposal to give President Trump the honour was made because it would give the Corporation the opportunity to meet the US leader and make the case for free trade and against tariffs at the ceremony. It would also be a way of marking the UK receiving the first of the Trump trade deals with questions still over tariffs on steel. The president would helicopter in from Windsor Castle to the US ambassador's Winfield House residence in Regent's Park for the ceremony. The Independent was told: 'It would be an important honour for the president just as our countries prepare to mark the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence next year. President Donald Trump ( REUTERS ) 'More importantly it would be the perfect opportunity for the City to address the importance of free trade and the issues of tariffs. 'The symbolism of being allowed to herd your sheep across the bridge and not pay taxes is very important all things considered.' But while the president was understood to be keen on the idea of receiving the honour, the Freedom Applications Sub (Policy & Resources) Committee chaired by Sir William Russell, half brother of the actor Damian Lewis, has not been persuaded. According to sources the sub committee was warned that the award would be 'too controversial'. The Corporation rarely gives government leaders the honour and had to withdraw it from Myanmar'ss Aung San Suu Kyi after criticism of her government being involved with persecution of the Rohingya. However, the official explanation is that President Trump has not been in government long enough. A spokesperson said: 'By convention, only Heads of State or Government who have served a minimum of seven years in office are eligible to be considered for the Honorary Freedom. 'The decision to grant the Honorary Freedom rests solely with the Court of Common Council – our highest decision-making body – not with any individual elected member.' The last head of government to be awarded the Honorary Freedom was Baroness Margaret Thatcher, who was recognised after serving 10 years as prime minister. The Honorary Freedom has never been awarded to a sitting US president, although Dwight Eisenhower received it after the Second World War for his role as commander in chief of the allied forces. According to a source, the City may change its mind if there is a request from the government which has not been made yet. It means that the US president is facing a second snub in his state visit. It follows a decision not to ask him to address a joint sitting of the Houses of Parliament with the state visit happening the day after parliament rises for the conference season recess. This is despite the fact that when Pope Benedict came on a state visit in 2010 he was given the honour of addressing Parliamentarians in Westminster Hall even though it was the day after recess had begun. Trump's state visit - the first time an individual has been granted a second state visit - will take place between 17 and 19 September. It will include a state banquet hosted by the King with the president staying at Windsor Castle.
