I got my skin analyzed by a high-tech machine. The results horrified me.
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif. − I was relaxing by a pool, surrounded by beautiful actors, influencers and models, when I saw the ugliest photo of me ever taken.
I was attending a wellness retreat inspired by "The White Lotus" at the Four Seasons Westlake Village in Southern California. As part of the event, Khiel's − one of the brand partners − set up "Derma-Reader" stations outside, where attendees could get high-tech images taken of their skin to reveal potential issues lurking beneath the surface.
As a skincare enthusiast, I couldn't resist the opportunity to get a deeper look at my skin's health. And besides, I know I take great care of my skin anyway. What could go wrong?
When I got my photos back, my heart sank. Has my skincare routine been off this whole time? I spoke to dermatologists to get to the bottom of it. Thankfully, there's a lot more to the story.
How does the Derma-Reader work?
My own distress aside, the Derma-Reader uses some cool technology.
With fancy lights and advanced algorithms, the Derma-Reader analyzes skin across several categories, including wrinkles, dark circles and texture. It can also look below the surface, taking photos of UV damage and clogged pores you wouldn't see otherwise.
After taking these images, the machine then compares your results against those of 16,000 other skin profiles in its database. A representative told me the machine measures your skin specifically against other people in its database with similar skin profiles to you, giving a percentage score based on where you rank among them.
More: I stayed at a real-life 'White Lotus' hotel for a weekend. It was nothing like I expected.
Dr. Anthony Rossi, a dermatologist in New York, isn't familiar with Khiel's machine, but says he uses similar machines on his patients − and they really do work, so long as the analyses are done in the right context and the results are compared to a large enough sample size.
"That's the problem with these machines," he says. "If they're not rigorous enough, they don't always give you the best data."
My Derma-Reader results shocked me
I wasn't the only one who got a rude awakening from a Derma-Reader at the retreat. Other attendees expressed similar shock at their results throughout the day. "Were you also traumatized by the skin machine this morning?" I overheard one woman say to another after dinner.
OK, my results weren't that bad − at least that's what one of the Khiel's representatives told me. All my scores, even the lower ones, she said, are still in the "green" zone, meaning none are actually in bad shape.
The machine also gave me some good news too. I scored 100% in the "clogged pores" category, meaning my pores are, allegedly, nearly entirely free of blockages that could cause acne. Acne has been my biggest skin concern since I was a teenager, so that news came as a relief. My skin has been pretty clear for the past couple years, so maybe my breakouts era is finally behind me.
Still, the Khiel's representative said I do have room to improve, especially in the hydration department. My lowest scores − a 68% in wrinkles, a 64% in hydration and a 59% in crow's feet (I smile, sue me) − all could stem from dehydrated skin. I've been hitting the anti-acne products pretty hard since adolescence, which may be drying me out too much. Now could be the time to pivot my routine to focus on retaining moisture.
The score that stopped me in my tracks, however − and sent me into mild panic − was my UV damage result. My uncle died after a melanoma diagnosis about a year ago, so I know how important sun protection is not just for your complexion, but also for your overall health. The machine gave me a 74% in UV damage − not horrible, the Khiel's representative said, but, ideally, someone around my age should be at 80% or higher. I diligently apply an SPF mineral sunscreen to my face and neck − including my ears and eyelids − every day and reapply it if I spend time outside or sweat, so I found this score disheartening. Did I do something wrong?
I brought these concerns to two separate dermatologists − Rossi and Dr. Brooke Jeffy − to get some answers.
Should I be worried?
First off, Rossi told me, context can impact results. My analysis was done outside in the sun and in the morning, before I had water, so my scores were likely to skew dehydrated.
Also, in order to get a more accurate reading, these analyses should be done on clean skin. My analysis was done after I'd already applied sunscreen for the day. I asked the Khiel's representative onsite if this was OK, and she said it wouldn't make a difference.
Rossi, however, begs to differ.
"To really get a perfect reading, you want to have really nothing on your skin," he says. "Even the UV damage, it's hard because, if you have a sunscreen on you, it's going to reflect the light differently."
UV damage can also look worse than it actually is when viewed through a black-and-white filter, which is how it appears in Derma-Reader images. Based on how my skin looks outside these photos, Rossi says he suspects my UV damage isn't at a level that should overly concern me.
"I wouldn't say your UV damage is very bad," he says. "You don't have a ton of brown spots, and you don't have a ton of obvious wrinkles."
Also, a lot of my UV damage could have accumulated in childhood, before I started taking skincare seriously. I grew up in sunny Los Angeles and didn't start wearing sunscreen daily until I was 23.
Still, Jeffy says, I shouldn't be discouraged.
"I would say you're actually doing really well," she says. "How much exposure you had when you were much younger (might) play a role."
My takeaway
This experience did teach me a few things.
For starters, hydration is key, and I'll be prioritizing it in my skincare routine moving forward. Now that my acne is mostly under control, I'm not going to be afraid to reach for moisturizing products. Dr. Jeffy says it might also be time to incorporate retinol into my regimen.
I'm also going to stay diligent with sunscreen and reapply it more frequently. It's possible I sweat off more of it than I realize.
More: Sephora kids are mobbing retinol, anti-aging products. Dermatologists say it's a problem
Wearing sunglasses outside will also help mitigate crow's feet, Rossi says. He adds: "Besides Botox, you could tell yourself not to smile, but that wouldn't be fun."
Once I make these adjustments, Jeffy says it might be worthwhile to get another scan and see if my results have changed. If I do, I'll make sure I'm not wearing sunscreen and I've had plenty of water beforehand.
"You use this information to stay motivated to keep protecting, and then it would be interesting to get it done again, if you change your habits in some way," she says.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Skin cancer risk can increase with dangerous new trend, doctors warn
Dermatologists are warning about the dangers of a TikTok trend where teens create "sunburn tattoos." This entails allowing the skin to get sunburned while wearing stickers, tape or sunscreen in order to create artistic designs. Although some young adults told Fox News Digital that they use their skin as a canvas to create these sunburn displays for social media attention and because it "looks cool," skin care experts say this could be harmful to skin health. Sharpie Lip-liner Trend Goes Viral As Doctors Warn Of Potential Dangers "Regardless of how creative or harmless it appears, any sunburn is skin injury," Dr. Anthony Rossi, a double board-certified dermatologic surgeon in New York City, told Fox News Digital. "This 'sunburn tattoo' trend still involves deliberate UV damage to the skin, which — over time — can increase the risk of both immediate and long-term consequences." Read On The Fox News App Sunburn accelerates the skin's aging process and elevates the risk of skin cancers, including melanoma, the deadliest form. "A pattern that produces shapes might look cool in a photo, but it can create dangerous UV hotspots — and the damage is cumulative," cautioned the doctor, who is also the founder of the Dr. Rossi skincare line. 'Old People Smell' Is Real, Experts Say — Here's How To Avoid It As You Age Rossi shared how many of his older patients recall the days of using iodine, baby oil and sun reflectors to tan — and now they are dealing with the consequences. "I regularly see patients who had frequent tanning — whether via booths or exposure — during adolescence," he said. "By their 30s and 40s, many of them already presented with pre-cancerous lesions or actual skin cancers." "These can lead to multiple surgeries, scars and melanoma, which can metastasize and be fatal." Dr. Sara Moghaddam, a board-certified dermatologist and Mohs surgeon who practices at Delmarva Skin Specialists in Selbyville, Delaware, noted that the sunburn tattoo trend is concerning and significantly increases the risk of future skin cancer in teenagers. "Experiencing five or more blistering sunburns between the ages of 15 and 20 can increase an individual's melanoma risk by 80%," Moghaddam told Fox News Digital. When a sunburn occurs, the UV radiation damages the DNA within skin cells, which leads to mutations that can cause cells to grow uncontrollably, potentially leading to skin cancer, she said. The American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) confirms that every time the skin tans, it sustains some degree of damage. "As this damage builds, you speed up the aging of your skin and increase your risk for all types of skin cancer, including melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer," the AAD's website states. Both dermatologists said a spray tan may be a safer alternative to achieving a temporary "tan tattoo" look. "Spray tans utilize dihydroxyacetone (DHA), a sugar that reacts with amino acids in the skin's top layer, to create a temporary brown color," Moghaddam said. Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter "There's no evidence that DHA from spray tans is harmful; the color simply fades as the skin naturally exfoliates." Rossi cautioned, however, that spray tans come with some risk if inhaled improperly. He also warned that they don't protect against future burns. To protect the skin from sun damage and reduce skin cancer risk, the AAD recommends seeking shade when possible, especially if "your shadow is shorter than you," and to be mindful that the sun's peak hours are between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. A sun protection routine should include using broad-spectrum sunscreen and wearing UV-protective clothing, including wide-brimmed hats and sunglasses, when outdoors, experts advise. For more Health articles, visit Rossi added, "UV damage is insidious — it's not just about the short-lived image, but the lifelong consequence."Original article source: Skin cancer risk can increase with dangerous new trend, doctors warn Solve the daily Crossword
Cosmopolitan
5 days ago
- Cosmopolitan
Dermatologists and a Psychiatrist Explain The Gen Z Tanning Trend
In the year 2025, we all know the dangers associated with tanning and unprotected sun exposure. In my decade-long beauty editor career, I've written countless stories preaching sun safety. Dermatologists and aestheticians constantly stress the importance of staying out of the sun to prevent premature aging, and more importantly, skin cancer. Not to mention, there are legitimately hundreds of excellent sunscreen options to choose from on Sephora, Ulta, and Amazon to protect your skin. Despite all of this, it seems that Gen Z (and even Gen Alpha) have missed the memo—or simply chosen to ignore it. Tanning is back—and arguably bigger than ever. According to a recent survey from the American Academy of Dermatology, 28 percent of Gen Z respondents said getting a tan was more important to them than preventing skin cancer, and 70 percent reported having tanned skin. 'As a 50-plus-year-old dermatologist who has been seeing patients for decades, I can definitely say that Gen Z is tanning far more than Millennials and Gen X ever did," says board-certified dermatologist Noreen Galaria, MD. "I thought that tanning on purpose would go the way of smoking, but it's made a comeback and its harmful effects will last far longer than things like cardigans and platform sneakers," she adds. At first go, I chalked the current tanning obsession up Gen Z's current nostalgia for the early aughts and the rise of all things Y2K (hello low-rise jeans and bandage dresses, but after speaking with several dermatologists and psychologists, the reasons for the rise of tanning among teens and 20-somethings are far more complex. Not surprisingly, TikTok and Instagram have played a huge part in glamorizing tanning routines. "Videos about UV-oil hacks and watching the UV index as a tanning schedule are everywhere," says Anthony Rossi, MD, a board-certified dermatologist and medical advisor at JOYA Health. Young social media users take to #TanTok to trade tips on how to get the best tan and proudly show off their "color" the way you would a new haircut or manicure. They admire and emulate the deep tans of influencers and even celebrities, like Hailey Bieber, who has been known to combine Carroten with SPF to intensify her tan (for the record, beta-carotene, the main ingredient in Carroten increases sun sensitivity, reducing the effectiveness of sunscreen). 'There's a strong social component—both online and IRL—to tanning,' says Whitney Hovenic, MD, a board-certified dermatologist and co-founder SPF brand SPOOGE who also happens to be a mom to a Gen Zer. 'Girls hang out together outside, work on their tans, and compare tan lines. One of summer's accessories is a triangle-top tan line peeking out of their clothing. There's a strong message from social media that having a little color is desirable.' The irony in the resurgence of tanning is that Gen Z is more invested in skincare than previous generations. But all the exposure to skincare and cosmetic treatments has created a false sense of security. With endless GRWM videos, countless morning sheds, and images of celebrity makeovers, Gen Z has (wrongly) adopted an 'I can fix it later' attitude. 'This generation has the idea that they can damage their skin and then when the damage becomes visible, they can save up and get a procedure to reverse what they have done," says Dr. Galaria. She adds that this summer alone, at least a dozen teens have said to her, "Remember how Lindsay Lohan used to have all those freckles and sun damage as a teen? Well, she got some peels and lasers and now her skin is flawless, so if I do get sun damage, there are a ton of ways to reverse it." But what Gen Z doesn't know is that while you may be able to fix signs of sun exposure on the surface of the skin, below the surface, there is damage to your cells, which increases your risk of skin cancer. 'Just because you can reverse some of the visible signs of aging on the skin, doesn't mean you are decreasing your risk of skin cancer—especially melanoma," says Dr. Galaria. Gen Z is collectively open about its mental health struggles, so any psychological benefits tanning may have are especially appealing too. 'From a clinical standpoint, tanning does not directly boost serotonin in the brain but it may still enhance mood through other mechanisms,' says Shivangi Maniar, DO, a board-certified psychiatrist at House of Wellness Medical Corporation and medical advisor at JOYA Health. Dr. Maniar also cites a study that indicates that exposure to bright sunlight is associated with increased serotonin turnover, which may contribute to improved mood and reduced risk of depression; however, this effect is attributed to overall light exposure rather than the act of tanning itself. "For Gen Z, spending time outdoors to get that sun-kissed glow may offer a low-cost and accessible way to feel better physically and emotionally,' says Dr. Maniar. At the end of the day, while the resurgence of tanning is concerning and appears to be a step backwards in the progress we've made with skin cancer awareness and healthy skincare habits, experts agree it's an opportunity to reconsider the current discourse around tanning. 'Gen Z knows more about skincare than any generation before, yet many are still falling for dangerous trends," says Dr. Hovenic. "We have to change our messaging to make an impact because social trends and pressures are powerful and the consequences can be devastating." Lamees Hamdan, MD, an Integrative Medical Doctor and expert in biological longevity, believes that we've collectively vilified sun exposure, which is the wrong approach.' Dr. Hamdan states plainly that the reason people tan is because 'in truth, a tan looks nice and healthy and makes you feel more attractive.' For a generation obsessed with apperances, a desire to be tan makes sense. Instead of vilifying it, 'what we should have done is teach people to be sun smart—too much sun exposure is not good for you while too little is also not good for you because of vitamin D levels," says Dr. Hamdan. "We evolved to be outside as humans—there is a deep, primitive drive in all of us to want to have our bodies exposed to sunlight,' she says. 'The sun is a life force, but we need to learn how to use it wisely.' Taryn is a beauty writer and editor in digital media with more than 10 years of experience. She has covered the newest and most innovative skincare and beauty products, aesthetic treatments, and plastic surgery trends. Her stories touch on everything from the best products to treat hyperpigmentation to why fat grafting is the better alternative to filler. In addition to Cosmopolitan, she currently contributes to Allure, InStyle, PS (formerly POPSUGAR), Marie Claire, The Zoe Report, and Bustle. In addition to her writing, Taryn directs, produces, and writes short films that have appeared at numerous film festivals around the country. Whenever she has a free moment, you can find her hopping around New York City with her Maltese pup, Bryn, and probably daydreaming about being at the beach. Follow her on Instagram for the latest.
Medscape
31-07-2025
- Medscape
Medscape Readers Offer Their Opinion on UTI Management
I recently presented a clinical scenario of a 34-year-old woman who called the clinic after hours, reporting symptoms consistent with a urinary tract infection (UTI). The only in-person clinical care available at the time was the emergency department, and urgent care wouldn't open until the following morning. Given this history, I asked Medscape readers what they would do next. Thank you for the excellent participation and comments that you provided. It was wonderful to hear different perspectives. According to our reader poll, the most popular management option for this patient was a recommendation to visit the urgent care center on Saturday morning. This would be the most reasonable approach if there was some doubt as to the diagnosis of UTI. As I described in the previous article (and as one reader commented), there is a possibility that this patient might have a sexually transmitted infection, not a UTI. However, a brief screen for symptoms and sexual history could be performed over the phone and, if negative, would make the diagnosis of UTI much more likely. If clinical questioning indicates that the patient might be experiencing menopause, genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) becomes a consideration. Among women, postmenopausal dysuria can have multiple etiologies, but clinicians should strongly consider GSM as a potential diagnosis. GSM is a term that describes the genital, sexual, and urinary symptoms that affect over 80% of postmenopausal women. These symptoms can include vaginal dryness and burning, dyspareunia, and dysuria. So, how can physicians differentiate GSM from UTI? I focus on the anatomical location of discomfort. Is it around the urethra and vagina or deeper in the suprapubic area? UTI is more likely to be associated with urinary urgency and frequency, but if GSM is accompanied by detrusor instability — another very common condition — the lines between diagnoses can continue to blur. Finally, a pelvic examination with evidence of vaginal atrophy would suggest GSM. In my professional opinion, GSM is not a consideration in our 34-year-old patient. Instead, I agree with the 27% of respondents who wanted to treat her empirically with nitrofurantoin. Nitrofurantoin is well-tolerated and one of the three preferred antibiotics for uncomplicated UTIs among women, according to the 2010 guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. The other first-line antibiotics for uncomplicated UTI were trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and fosfomycin. Of these three recommended antibiotics, nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin are associated with the lowest rates of antimicrobial resistance, and nitrofurantoin is generally more readily available in pharmacies than is fosfomycin. Fluoroquinolones are less preferred for the treatment of UTI because of higher rates of antimicrobial resistance. In a study of 3779 adults with UTI presenting to US emergency departments between 2018 and 2020, 22.1% of Escherichia coli isolates were resistant to fluoroquinolones. As one reader astutely noted, fluoroquinolones can also promote myalgia, tendonitis, and tendon rupture. As for beta-lactams, inferiority to fluoroquinolones for clinical cure rates of UTI and concerns regarding the promotion of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase resistance of gram-negative bacteria limit their use in the treatment of UTI. A new antibiotic, gepotidacin, was approved in March 2025 for the management of uncomplicated UTI among female patients aged 12 years or older. Investigators compared gepotidacin vs nitrofurantoin among 3136 women with UTI in two randomized controlled trials. The treatment course of both gepotidacin and nitrofurantoin was 5 days. The investigators found that gepotidacin was noninferior to nitrofurantoin in the outcome of treatment success (defined by symptomatic plus microbiologic success) in one of the trials, and superior to nitrofurantoin in the other trial. Of note, treatment success for resistant phenotypes of E coli generally favored gepotidacin. Diarrhea occurred in 14% and 18% of women treated with gepotidacin in the two studies, respectively, whereas 4% of women treated with nitrofurantoin developed nausea. Although UTI is one of the most common bacterial infections worldwide, it does not receive the attention from researchers and clinicians that it should. So, it is exciting to have a new class of antibiotic to offer women with UTI, and treatment guidelines are currently being updated to incorporate data regarding emerging treatments for UTI. The future is bright! As always, thank you for your contributions to this series.
