logo
Raleigh's bronze tribute to George Washington gets a makeover

Raleigh's bronze tribute to George Washington gets a makeover

Yahoo26-05-2025

From his perch on Capitol Square, George Washington projects a jaunty self-confidence, his gaze steady, his chin lifted, his wig tied in a respectable bow — keeping a patriot's post with sword at the ready.
But after 168 years, even a founding father needs a good scrubbing, especially this ex-president in bronze, who's turned a bit green from corrosion in the four decades since his last bath.
So over the next week, the man on the $1 bill will get full restoration treatment down to a fresh coat of lacquer.
'He'll look better and last longer,' said Kara Deadmon, site administrator at the N.C. Capitol. 'He'll be a shiny bronze color.'
Washington's makeover, funded through a nonprofit support group, comes as the state continues to tinker with Raleigh's most visible downtown square.
An N.C. House proposal would add a statue of the Rev. Billy Graham, which would be the Capitol's latest addition since the Confederate monument removal in 2020.
Washington has kept steady watch over Fayetteville Street since 1857, when a reported and likely exaggerated crowd of 10,000 people witnessed his statue being dedicated on the Fourth of July — complete with brass bands and explosions.
'As the covering of the statue was removed,' raved The Weekly Standard, 'the roar of cannon brought vividly before our mind's eye many of the terrifying scenes in which the father of his country had stood by her, as her destiny paled and flickered, calm and unmoved as the inanimate figure before us.'
Raleigh held a special fondness for the commander-in-chief, having lost its original Washington statue in the 1831 fire that destroyed the Capitol. That marble monument from Italian sculptor Antonio Canova was widely considered a world masterpiece, depicting the first president in sandals and a Roman military kilt.
So even though the bronze statute was only a copy, one of more than 30 produced nationwide, it represented Washington's triumphant return to Raleigh — a symbolic arrival considering the drumbeats of secession pounding across the South.
As N.C. architectural historian Catherine Bishir has noted:
'By the 1850s, Washington's symbolic importance as father of the nation had grown with the years, as evidenced by the Washington Monument under construction in the nation's capital ... By this time, too, Washington's personification of national identity carried added meaning amid rising tensions between North and South.'
Washington was widely considered stiff as a statue in his own lifetime, described by filmmaker Ken Burns as 'opaque and unknowable.'
But as Raleigh's mascot for independence, none of Washington's awkwardness comes through — only his steely gaze fixed on righteousness, liberty and other important things.
So pardon his scaffolding.
Gallantry requires maintenance.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump reverses Army base names in latest DEI purge
Trump reverses Army base names in latest DEI purge

Politico

time13 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump reverses Army base names in latest DEI purge

President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that he plans to revert the names of seven major Army bases back to the Confederate generals for which they were originally named. 'We are also going to be restoring the names to Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rucker, Fort Polk, Fort A.P. Hill and Fort Robert E. Lee,' Trump said. 'We won a lot of battles out of those forts, it's no time to change.' Trump's announcement, during a speech to soldiers at Fort Bragg, follows Biden-administration era alterations in 2023 that changed the installation names to honor new, non-Confederate individuals. Those included changing Fort Hood to Fort Cavazos, for the Army's first four-star Hispanic general. The Army previously redesignated Fort Liberty, previously known as Fort Bragg, to its original name, but honoring Private First Class Roland L. Bragg, a World War II hero instead of the Confederate general Braxton Bragg. The service also redesignated Fort Moore, after Gen. Hal Moore and his wife Julia Compton Moore, for Fred G. Benning, who won the Distinguished Service Cross during World War I. The Army is taking the same approach for the bases tapped for renaming on Tuesday, finding award-winning soldiers with the same last names as the Confederate generals to name the bases after, according to a statement released by the service after the president's speech. The president gave no timeline for the name changes and it was not immediately clear whether the Army's bases would be renamed after Confederate generals or soldiers from different eras. One army official, granted anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak, said they were caught off guard by the rapid-fire developments, which could take months to Army did not immediately respond to POLITICO's request for comment. Though the Trump administration insisted the redesignations were in-line with laws that prevent the Pentagon from naming bases after Confederate leaders or battles, Ty Seidule, a retired Army brigadier general who was the vice chair of the Congressional Naming Commission, which is tasked with relabeling bases and U.S. military assets, said that Trump's decision went against the spirit of the new rule enacted after the George Floyd protests. 'The bottom line is he's choosing surname over service,' said Seidule, who's now a visiting professor at Hamilton College. 'It is breaking the spirit of a law that was created by the will of the American people through their elected representatives.' Seidule said that the commission, which was made up of three Republicans, one Democrat and four retired flag officers, spent 20 months seeking input from the public and got 33,000 responses to change the names of Army bases and other installations and assets named after Confederates, including several U.S. Navy ships. But he said the decision still reflected that the Trump administration 'realizes that Confederates chose treason to preserve slavery, and they are unworthy of having bases named for them in America in 2025.' On Tuesday, Trump criticized Biden at several points during his speech, which was full of asides about immigration, transgender Americans and the spending bill currently being debated in Congress. His political comments in front of hundreds of soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division led to a smattering of boos from the mostly uniformed audience when he criticized former President Joe Biden. Audience members also jeered when Trump mentioned California Gov. Gavin Newsom, whom the president clashed with over protests in California that were sparked by the Trump administration's immigration raids. Presidents normally avoid giving political speeches to military personnel. 'Do you think this crowd would have showed up for Biden,' Trump said at one point in his remarks. 'I don't think so.' 'We will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean and safe again,' Trump said, claiming parts of the city are under the control of international criminal gangs. The president has ordered 4,000 California National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, though so far only about 300 guardsmen have entered the city. The Marines are positioned outside Los Angeles, where they're undergoing training on crowd control, said one defense official who was granted anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media. The move to rename Army bases comes just days after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth moved to relabel a Navy vessel named after gay rights activist Harvey Milk as well as other ships named after civil rights leaders and women. Seidule, the retired Army brigadier general who served on the Biden-era naming commission, said that Trump's decision creates the risk that future administrations could take turns renaming the Army's bases. 'What happens if some other administration would name something after someone that one party thinks is just absolutely beyond the pale,' said Seidule. 'I think that this could absolutely be a tennis match.' Sam Skove contributed to this report.

A Small Fiscal Step for the GOP
A Small Fiscal Step for the GOP

Wall Street Journal

time17 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

A Small Fiscal Step for the GOP

Republicans in Congress talk a better spending game than they execute, and so far in 2025 they haven't cut a dime. They'll get their first chance when they vote this week on a modest spending-cut package sent by the White House. The House plans to vote this week on legislation to cancel $9.4 billion of discretionary spending. The cuts were proposed by the White House as part of a process known as rescission, which lets the President cancel previously approved funds if a majority of both houses of Congress agree. President Trump submitted the cuts in May, leaving Congress 45 days to vote.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store