Reforming the planning laws: ‘It was never going to be a short-term solution to the housing problem'
Ireland's national planning authority is about to enter a new era after the 2022 governance scandal that shook the organisation to its core.
In the coming weeks
An Bord Pleánala
will change its name to An Coimisiún Pleanála and a number of structural changes will take place under the Planning and Development Act 2024.
The organisation's 14 board members will become commissioners and they will solely decide on cases and have no role in the running of the organisation. A Chief Planning Commissioner will also be hired.
The chairperson Peter Mullan will become chief executive and will run the business side of things. He will report to a new governing board, which will have at least five and no more than nine members, to be appointed by the
Minister for Housing
.
READ MORE
The changes are designed to separate corporate decision-making and governance functions at the organisation and are the final step in restoring public confidence in the body and morale among the staff working there.
This section of the mammoth Planning and Development Act 2024, which is designed to reform how planning works in Ireland, is one of the first parts of the legislation to be commenced.
[
Public perception of planning system worsens while harsh reality of housing crisis hits homes
Opens in new window
]
This section, Part 17, is expected to go to Cabinet next week and be officially activated the following week.
The other main part of the legislation that will bring change to An Bord Pleanála is the introduction of mandatory statutory timelines for its decisions. Those timelines range from 18 to 24 weeks and there will be financial penalties for any failure to comply.
This part of the Act is not due to be commenced at the same time as the name change, though it is expected to be in place by the end of 2025.
All these changes are happening in the midst of a
housing crisis
, where builders and home buyers often point fingers at delays in Irish planning as one of the major contributory factors to the slow pace of building at a time when tens of thousands of new homes are needed every year.
So what impact will the changes to An Bord Pleanála have on the housing crisis and what other changes can we expect to see when the new legislation is fully commenced?
The context
It is difficult to talk about the changes coming at An Bord Pleanála without first recounting the upheaval at the authority over recent years.
In 2022 news broke of then deputy chairperson Paul Hyde's alleged conflict of interest on a number of cases. In 2023 he
received a suspended prison sentence
for failing to declare certain personal interests in a number of properties when a member of the planning body.
Former An Bord Pleanála deputy chairman Paul Hyde leaving court in Cork in November 2023. Photograph: Michael Mac Sweeney/Cork Courts
Chairman at the time Dave Walsh also took early retirement 'for personal and family reasons', creating a leadership vacuum.
An investigation into governance issues at An Bord Pleanála by senior counsel Lorna Lynch
concluded there were no sufficient grounds
to refer matters to the Minister for housing to determine if there was 'stated misbehaviour'.
She found, following an investigation into six governance areas involving a review of 175 case files, that there was no requirement for the planning board to initiate disciplinary action against any current or former employees.
The upheaval in management and a deficit in staffing led to a build-up of cases sitting with the board. At its peak there was a backlog of more than 3,600 cases, roughly double its usual roster of about 1,500.
[
James Browne has little power to fix the housing crisis. The status quo is in charge
Opens in new window
]
The national planning authority received approval from the Department of Housing to hire significantly more staff. It now has 290 full-time employees, up from 202 at the end of 2022, and 15 permanent board members.
This has resulted in a substantial reduction in the backlog, to 1,274 cases as of March 2025.
Mullan officially took over as chairperson in January 2024. He reflects on what has been an unprecedented period of disruption for the organisation.
'It was an existential crisis. The unethical and criminal behaviour of Paul Hyde brought this organisation to the very brink. We worked very, very hard to reestablish our reputation,' Mullan tells The Irish Times.
But how has the crisis affected staff and what do they think of the proposed changes?
A new name
Rebuilding the reputation of the organisation does not require a name change, or a change in governance, Mullan says, because he believes this has already been achieved.
But will it help? 'I think it will,' he says.
Other staff members were not so sure.
In May 2023 trade union Forsa, which represents a number of An Bord Pleanála staff, wrote to then minister for housing Darragh O'Brien outlining its opposition to the move.
The change in name 'reflects negatively on all who work in the organisation' and represents 'collective punishment' for all of those in the organisation who had worked with 'impartiality and integrity', while others at the very top had not, Forsa said at the time.
The turmoil and subsequent clean-up had a bruising and isolating effect on those who worked there, though that appears to be receding.
'There was a little bit of unhappiness, but I think people have come around to the idea,' Mullan says.
'I think everybody here accepts that it reflects the governance changes in the Act, and what the commissioners will do.'
Sign outside An Bord Pleanála's offices in Dublin. Photograph: Nick Bradshaw
The name, An Coimisiún Pleanála, reflects the fact that the 14 board members will now become planning commissioners, or Coimisinéirí Pleanála, and there will be nobody on the governing board deciding on planning cases.
This is not a rebrand, Mullan stresses.
'It's not that we fancied a new sign,' he says.
The new name reflects the change in governance.
'The main value within the staff of this organisation is integrity. That integrity existed in staff members before the governance failures and has come right through to the fore now,' Mullan says.
The impact
Will these changes to An Bord Pleanála's structure and governance have a big impact on how planning is done in Ireland?
'I don't think they're going to be transformative,' Gavin Lawlor, president of the Irish Planning Institute says.
'The changes are subtle, so there won't be any significant overt change. An Bord Pleanála is changing its name, there are governance changes in terms of how it operates and how it's structured, and it will have mandatory timelines imposed on decision making.'
Gavin Lawlor, president of the Irish Planning Institute. Photograph: Fennell Photography
The more significant reform around how planning is done in Ireland is contained in other sections of the Act.
'The objective of the Act is to provide more certainty around the timing of the outcomes of a planning application. Then on the plan-making side, it is to provide more detail, more certainty for the community as to what will happen in the future,' Lawlor says.
Local authority development plans will be extended to 10 years in duration, increasing certainty for developers and putting the focus on long-term, strategic planning.
These plans will have to align with the National Planning Framework (NPF), and the Minister for Housing James Browne has said he will be asking all local authorities to reopen their plans this year to ensure they comply with the revised NPF.
The development plans will also be guided by Urban Development Zones, which will be explicit on the height and density allowed in certain areas.
'It gives everybody a little bit more certainty around what they can expect to see when planning applications come in. What we want is a more plan-led system, a more prescriptive system, so less is left to chance,' Lawlor says.
The changes will not be swift, though.
'Within a year, the new Act will be in place, but then it takes time for those elements of the new Act to kick in, and to make meaningful difference,' says Lawlor.
He estimates that it will be 'probably three to five years' before any new development plans are in place and then another three years until the consequences are seen 'in terms of housing'.
'The Planning and Development Act was never going to be a short-term solution to the housing problem,' Lawlor says.
While slow-paced change is not exactly music to the Minister's ears – or to people trying to build, buy or rent their own home – it does appear to be a step in the right direction.
What will people notice in the changes with An Coimisiún Pleanála?
'I don't think John or Mary Citizen are going to notice anything really different other than the change in our name,' Mullan says.
'But the public are entitled to an efficient planning service, and that's what they're going to get from An Coimisiún Pleanála.'
Delivering an efficient planning service could be a much larger task than any one organisation can pull off.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
33 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Why is it costing me more to use green fuel in my car than fossil fuels?
May I draw attention to an item that seems to escape scrutiny and that is the higher per litre pump price of HVO (hydrogenated vegetable oil). I switched my 1.5-litre diesel car to HVO in early 2024, when it was cheaper but the supplier has increased it since, stating the original price was an introductory promotion. The fuel is currently costing two to three cent more per litre than the prevailing diesel price. The Department of Transport has not responded to two queries re the taxation element, which ought to reflect the lower emissions factor. This seems to indicate that Revenue considerations supersede environmental objectives, and this deserves examination. Mr W.K. READ MORE As our carbon emissions continue to rise despite everything we are being told about the perils of climate change, it is good to see some people making the necessary personal choices to reduce emissions. But I can fully understand your chagrin at having made the switch only to see you are actually paying more for your biofuel than you would be if you had stuck with diesel, a fossil fuel. The Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland said hydrogenated vegetable oil (HVO) is a renewable form of biofuel derived from vegetable oil, which is processed with hydrogen, to create a diesel substitute product. It says HVO can have a carbon footprint that is at least 65 per cent lower than conventional fossil fuel, such as diesel. For its part, Revenue tells me that HVO, like all liquid fuels, is subject to mineral oil tax. However, the tax applied to biofuels produced by biomass, including HVO, relieved of the carbon component of the tax. What does that mean? Well, the diesel you used to use has an motor oil tax charge of €595.68 per thousand litres, or just shy of 0.6 cent per litre. HVO has a motor oil tax charge of €425.72 per thousand litres as it is excused the €169.96 carbon element of the diesel tax rate. That comes to just over 0.4 cent per litre. So, all other things being equal, your HVO should cost 0.17 cent less per litre. For other people reading this, it is worth bearing in mind that the figures will vary slightly if your biofuel is replacing petrol or if you are using it for heating. It will be different again for those using blended fuels where the dispensation applies only to the portion that is biofuel. You can find all the details here . Revenue also notes that the relief from the carbon component of motor oil tax is granted to the supplier at the top of the chain. This means the price paid by wholesalers and retailers already allows for that ...which is why you should expect to benefit from the relief. Moving on from motor oil tax, fuels are also liable in Ireland to value added tax (VAT). Irish VAT rates are obliged to work within EU rules although there is some wriggle room in places. In this case, motor fuels are subject to the standard rate of VAT – currently 23 per cent. Ireland does use the discretion available to it to tax HVO at a lower rate of VAT – 13.5 per cent – but only when it is used as a heating oil, not in cars. So where does that leave us? Well, you're paying fractionally less tax on your HVO and you have the comfort of knowing that it sharply reduces the emissions from your car. However, that does not mean it is cheaper. There are two factors here. First, HVO is more expensive to produce than diesel. The industry says this is due to higher production costs and the challenge of sourcing raw material in industrial quantities. In fact, if one UK supplier is to be believed, you should be expecting to pay 10-15 per cent more for HVO than diesel but I understand the UK gives HVO no relief such as is available in Ireland under motor oil tax. The other factor is that it is not as efficient as diesel for your car. That means you will need to purchase around 7.3 per cent more HVO to cover the same mileage as you would with diesel. This is why most HVO in Ireland is, I understand, used by commercial fleets rather than by individual motorists. For companies, the offsetting by the green credentials may make it more attractive despite the added costs. But it is also why consumers need to ensure they are fully informed of the longer-term budgetary impact before making a decision to switch to such fuels. You note you switched at a time when the supplier was offering HVO at a price lower than diesel. I would have hoped the supplier made it clear this was an introductory offer but it appears from your letter that they didn't. That's not a great way for a long-term supplier of fuel to build a relationship of trust. From what I can gather, it will cost you more to run your car with HVO than with diesel. And that is even with the preferential tax rate. You suggest Revenue considerations appear to supersede environmental objections. On the basis of the motor oil tax relief, that's not entirely fair, although it is true to say the incentive to go green is modest – perhaps too modest given the additional base costs outlined above. The Government faces a choice. Either it increases the incentives available to accelerate take-up among the public, or it relies on people caring more for the environmental (and likely financial) benefits for future generations than their own pocket. On a related note, if Government departments are simply ignoring queries that come into them, it is dispiriting. The Department of Transport is among the department supposedly leading the Government's charge to hit what now appear to be unattainable climate change targets by the end of the decade. You would think they should be encouraging moves in that direction and pointing people in the direction of the information that helps them make informed choices. Ignoring people inevitably irritates people and makes them less receptive to messages the Government tells us it considers important. The information you sought was readily available from Government departments – Revenue was able to provide me with the details and point me to references within 24 hours – so it really was not beyond the department to direct your query appropriately and provide you with the basic information sought. Please send your queries to Dominic Coyle, Q&A, The Irish Times, 24-28 Tara Street Dublin 2, or by email to with a contact phone number. This column is a reader service and is not intended to replace professional advice
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Rent controls to be eased for new builds in planned ‘pressure zones' reform
Restrictions on rent increases are to be eased for newly-built homes but the current caps would remain in place for existing tenancies under plans to be considered by the Government this week. Decisions on the major overhaul of the Rent Pressure Zone (RPZ) system are expected to be made by the Coalition over the next 48 hours. Any easing of the RPZ system is likely to be politically contentious and will be closely scrutinised by Opposition parties. The reforms are being considered following a review of RPZs which was introduced in 2016 to cap rent increases in areas where there is a high demand for housing and rental homes. READ MORE Under the current system, rent increases in locations designated as RPZs cannot be greater than the rate of inflation or 2 per cent – whichever is lower. There has been some concern that the RPZ system has negatively impacted on the level of private investment in new housing developments. Under the proposals being considered by Government, the current RPZ annual caps would not apply to new buildings constructed after a certain date – a measure aimed at increasing private sector investment to deliver more housing. The Irish Times understands that rents in the new-builds would instead be tied to inflation. The current rent increase cap of 2 per cent annually would remain in place for existing tenancies, though landlords would be able to change the rents between tenancies, something they currently are not allowed to do. The changes to the RPZ system would be accompanied by enhanced protection for renters in relation to security of tenure amounting to a minimum of six years. There would be a restriction on no-fault evictions during this six year period – a measure that will require legislation. The landlord would be allowed to reset the rent every six years to the market rate. The Coalition leaders and senior Government ministers are expected to discuss the plans during a meeting on Monday evening. Ultimately the proposals would then go to Cabinet on Tuesday morning for a final decision. A Housing Commission report, published last July was critical of RPZs and proposed changing them to a 'reference rent' system that pegs rent increases to nearly homes of a similar quality.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Despite the politics, Ireland is Israel's second biggest export market for goods
Perhaps the most surprising statistic to tumble out of the ether in recent days – and into Ireland's increasingly fractious debate on the Occupied Territories Bill – relates to Israel 's exports to Ireland. Figures from the UN's trade database, Comtrade, reveal that Ireland, despite its outspoken stance on Israel, is Tel Aviv's second most important export market for goods behind the US. The Comtrade figures show Israel exported $61.7 billion worth of merchandise in 2024. The biggest importers of those Israeli products were the US with $17.3 billion, followed by Ireland with $3.3 billion and China with $2.9 billion. This makes Ireland, Israel's most important European market for goods exports ahead of the Netherlands ($2.7 billion), Germany ($2.4 billion), the UK ($1.6 billion), Belgium ($1.5 billion) and France ($1.4 billion). READ MORE The figures provide a curious counterpoint to the frayed diplomatic relations between Dublin and Tel Aviv. The Central Statistics Office (CSO) provisionally estimates that Ireland imported €3.83 billion ($4.4 billion) of goods from Israel last year, which is even higher than Comtrade's estimate. Over 95 per cent of this trade (€3.65 billion) falls into the 'electrical machinery, apparatus, and appliances' category, the CSO said.. In Comtrade's categorisation, the bulk of the trade is covered by the 8542 category which applies to 'electronic integrated circuits and microassemblies'. Anecdotal evidence suggests this – in the main – relates to chip manufacturer Intel in Leixlip importing inputs from its sister Intel plant in Kiryat Gat, Israel, which would not be affected by the Occupied Territories Bill provisions. Ireland's dialled-up rhetoric against Israel (Taoiseach Micheál Martin now explicitly accuses it of genocide, having previously accused it of 'genocidal acts') sits uneasily with the economy's links to corporate America. However, apart from a warning from former US ambassador to Ireland, Claire Cronin, last year that Ireland's proposed Occupied Territories Bill (banning the sale or import of goods from illegally occupied Palestinian territory) would have 'consequences', both the US and Ireland have largely ignored their potential point of division, perhaps to Israel's annoyance. Government sources claim Ireland's business ties with the US 'aren't overly strained' by the Government's stance on Israel and that tariffs are the main focus at present. With Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu now lashing out at allies France, Britain and Canada, accusing them of being 'on the wrong side of history' and 'emboldening Hamas' for criticising Tel Aviv, Ireland's stance has more political cover. Shifting global opinion Last month, EU foreign ministers from 17 member states (a majority) backed a Dutch proposal to review the EU-Israel Association Agreement, the free trade agreement that allows Israel sell some €15 billion a year of arms, wine, cosmetics and other items to Europe on preferential terms. This marked something of a turning point in the bloc's attitude to Israel. A year ago, when Ireland and Spain, the European governments most vocal about Israel's actions in Gaza, pushed for a review, they garnered little support. But Israel's three-month blockade of Gaza, stopping food and aid getting into the Palestinian enclave, has burnt through the political capital Israel traditionally has with the EU and with EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen who has – until now -sought to preserve EU-Israeli ties. In a marked difference in tone last week, she described Israel's attacks on civilians as 'abhorrent' and something that 'cannot be justified under humanitarian and international law'. The EU's review will examine whether Israel is in breach of article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, which defines respect for human rights as an 'essential element' of the agreement. Given the scale of Israeli atrocities in Gaza, backed by findings from the UN, international courts and other agencies, it's hard to see how Israel could not be found to be in breach. The review might be complete before the next EU foreign ministers' meeting on June 23rd, creating a potential flashpoint in EU-Israeli relations. How EU sanctions against Isreal – if it comes to that – will wash with the US and impact delicate trade negotiations is impossible to say. The EU as a bloc is Israel's largest trading partner, accounting for 29 per cent of its trade in goods in 2022, so trade sanctions would be consequential for Tel Aviv. But insiders suggest that while the review will be critical of Israel, the EU will resist going down the sanctions route given the opposition to those in some quarters. Hungary, which intends to leave the International Criminal Court (ICC) in protest at its issuing of an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, recently hosted the Israeli prime minister on a state visit despite of and in defiance of the warrant. 'I don't think EU sanctions will be forthcoming in the short term. There isn't unanimity for this,' a Government source said, albeit noting that negative noise among EU member states is growing.
