logo
Manitoba school divisions tabling property tax hikes for 2nd year in a row

Manitoba school divisions tabling property tax hikes for 2nd year in a row

CBC28-02-2025

Social Sharing
At least half of Winnipeg's English-speaking school divisions and one in western Manitoba are tabling property tax hikes to raise revenue to cover wage settlements, growing student enrolment and increasing capital expenses, despite a boost in provincial funding.
Last year, Manitoba's NDP government lifted a multi-year freeze, ordered by the former Progressive Conservative government, on the property taxes school divisions can levy.
The province's education department confirmed earlier this month divisions will be allowed to raise taxes again for the 2025-26 school year.
For the second consecutive year, the Seven Oaks School Division is tabling a tax hike in its 2025-26 operations budget, superintendent Tony Kreml told CBC.
It's proposing a 4.5 per cent increase to its mill rate (the amount of tax payable per $1,000 of taxable assessed value). That's up from a two per cent hike approved by Seven Oaks last year, and would amount to an extra $118 a year for the average household in the division, Kreml said.
While the division got a three per cent provincial funding hike, there's still a shortfall on a budget that climbed to $200 million for 2025-26 — up 7.15 per cent from last year, he said.
"We face increasing costs, just like everybody does," said Kreml.
"There have been wage settlements that we have to take into account," along with "high utilities, gas, technology — we're seeing increased transportation pressures also," he said.
Seven Oaks is also budgeting to hire five new teachers and 15 new educational assistants, and to continue waiving fees for lunch supervision and offer a fixed fee for school supplies.
The Winnipeg School Division — Manitoba's largest — is proposing a five per cent tax increase, which would amount to about $78 more a year for a property valued at around $269,000, according to a budget presentation.
Last year, the division passed a 3.4 per cent increase, which amounted to an extra $51 a year for the average household in the division.
Under the proposed tax hike, the school division's $528 million budget would include roughly $313 million in provincial funding and around $203 million from the municipal levy, with the balance coming from federal funding and other sources.
Pembina Trails School Division tabled its budget with a two per cent increase to the property tax, amounting to a $40 increase for the average homeowner before provincial tax rebates, according to the summary of the school division's draft budget.
The division's $246 million budget for 2025-26 is up 13.1 per cent over the previous year, while Pembina Trails got a 1.5 per cent funding increase from the province.
The division said that while funding sources don't match enrolment growth or address fixed costs and salary settlements, it has been able to focus on decreasing class sizes and added teaching positions through "a slight increase in property taxes."
Pembina Trails declined to comment on the proposed hike for the upcoming year, but a message on its website attributed to superintendent of education Shelly Amos said the proposed budget, including the tax increase, "presents an opportunity to further address the needs arising from growing enrolment."
The Louis Riel and St. James-Assiniboia school divisions are expected to table their budgets Thursday night.
A spokesperson for River East Transcona School Division said it will hold a public meeting on its budget on March 10.
Divisions 'playing catch-up': minister
Outside Winnipeg, the Brandon School Division is recommending a 6.78 per cent tax hike, or an increase of $121 annually for the average single-family home, according to a news release.
The division said enrolment continues to grow at a greater rate than prior to 2020, and for the upcoming school year, it is projecting around 210 more students — roughly two per cent growth.
The draft budget also includes an increase in teaching and support staff positions.
Manitoba Education Minister Tracy Schmidt said school divisions are expected to keep affordability top of mind when considering tax hikes, but the province recognizes they have autonomy to make decisions to address their needs.
"We know that school divisions are playing catch-up after more than seven years of unpredictable frozen funding under the previous government," Schmidt said.
Progressive Conservative finance critic Lauren Stone said the tax hikes are a result of mismanagement of education funding that leaves families picking up the shortfall, with divisions passing increases of up to 17 per cent last year.
"We need a long-term sustainable funding model for education," Stone said. "We're seeing these wild swings in school divisions [and] tax hikes as a result of these NDP decisions."
Under the PC government, homeowners got a $350 tax credit and a 50 per cent education tax rebate. But Stone said the party had committed to eliminating education property taxes altogether.
Under a change announced by the NDP in its budget last year, homeowners will now get a property tax credit of up to $1,500 — a move Stone criticized.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

B.C. officially opens involuntary treatment beds on grounds of Alouette correctional facility
B.C. officially opens involuntary treatment beds on grounds of Alouette correctional facility

Vancouver Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

B.C. officially opens involuntary treatment beds on grounds of Alouette correctional facility

The B.C. NDP on Tuesday unveiled new beds that will allow authorities to force people with severe mental health and addictions to undergo treatment with the opening of a new facility at the Alouette Correctional Centre in Maple Ridge. Containing 18 beds across two buildings on the site of the women's jail, the facility will provide specialized care for individuals, both men and women, struggling with extreme mental-health challenges as well as severe brain injury from repeated drug overdoses. 'These two homes are the first of their kind in British Columbia, designed for individuals with incredibly complex mental-health disorders, who have been certified for long-term involuntary care under the Mental Health Act,' B.C. Health Minister Josie Osborne told reporters. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'In many cases, residents may also be living with concurrent disorders such as substance-use brain injuries, which can affect behaviour and safety.' The announcement follows April's opening of 10 beds at the Surrey Pretrial Centre for people held by the jail while awaiting trial. Unlike that location, the beds at Alouette Correctional will not be for individuals in custody but rather those being held at secure health-care facilities under the Mental Health Act by Vancouver Coastal Health. Postmedia News asked for the number of people who have already been admitted to the facility at Surrey Pretrial but didn't hear back before deadline. Dr. Daniel Vigo, B.C.'s chief scientific adviser for psychiatry, toxic drugs and concurrent disorders, said the goal is to allow for specialized treatment to be provided in a secure setting while also freeing up hospital beds for other patients. 'We are currently working on some specific roadblocks with health authorities, with Health Canada, working closely with addiction doctors to desegregate mental health and substance-use care across the system so that people with severe mental illness are never excluded due to their complexity,' said Vigo. Claire Rattée, B.C. Conservative mental health and addictions critic, said any step toward building the care system is welcome but that the NDP approach has been too slow and lacks transparency. She said there is still a large portion of the population that struggles with extreme mental health and addiction challenges that will not be eligible for admission to either of the involuntary care facilities at Surrey Pretrial or Alouette Correctional because they're neither being held by the justice system or admitted under the Mental Health Act. 'It leaves out a large portion of the population that needs compassionate care and intervention,' said Rattée. 'We've seen repeatedly, and this issue is just getting worse and worse and worse in the province, that there are times where intervention needs to be happening for that person's own safety and health, and for the safety and health of others.' Even as the province works to expand the system, however, the federal government is distancing itself from the provision of involuntary care. Speaking to reporters in Ottawa on Tuesday, federal Health Minister Marjorie Michel said there is no evidence that forcing treatment on someone against their will actually helps. She said she is willing to review provincial programs before determining her view on whether the practice should be allowed. 'I will sit down and see results, because I think we need to work closely together, but mostly we need scientific evidence,' said Michel. 'I will not tell you (that) to force them to be treated is a way to solve the problem. I don't think for now we would have any kind of scientific evidence on this practice.' The federal health minister's comments echo concerns from drug-user advocate groups and the Canadian Mental Health Association in B.C. These groups say the province's focus should be on building out harm reduction and the voluntary care system instead of relying on involuntary care. A Charter challenge launched by the Council of Canadians with Disabilities over the Mental Health Act's provision for forced treatment in 2016 is also currently before the courts. 'We hold the position that there are circumstances as a last resort, where the state intervening in someone's care is necessary and important, but the clarity about when that should begin and when that should end, and the consistency with which it is applied does warrant attention in B.C.,' said Jonny Morris, CEO of the Canadian Mental Health Association B.C. 'It's really thinking about all of the conditions that would enable good, strong, high-quality voluntary care, and, if involuntary treatment is required, all of the safeguards and conditions that need to be in place.' With files from The Canadian Press

Conservatives push back on new B.C. law banning MLAs from holding local office
Conservatives push back on new B.C. law banning MLAs from holding local office

Global News

time5 hours ago

  • Global News

Conservatives push back on new B.C. law banning MLAs from holding local office

The BC Conservatives are pushing back on new legislation that bars sitting MLAs from simultaneously holding another elected office. The NDP's Eligibility to Hold Public Office Act passed last week with the support of the BC Greens, and will force BC Conservative MLAs Misty Van Popta and Korky Neufeld to resign, respectively, from positions as a Township of Langley city councillor and Abbotsford school trustee. Van Popta told Global News she felt the NDP had targeted her with the legislation. 1:56 Vancouver voters choose 2 progressive city councillors in byelection 'It's not something (my constituents) wanted. I heard loud and clear at the doors when I campaigned openly that I would temporarily hold both positions to not trigger a byelection, that I was willing to work extra hard for them to save taxpayer money,' she said. Story continues below advertisement 'I was playing within the rules, I was playing within what was allowed and what was done for decades before me, this is not a new concept, an MLA holding a local position.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The bill was authored by Esquimalt-Colwood NDP MLA and former Sooke city councillor Darlene Ratchford. Ratchford, who resigned her municipal role upon election to the legislature, said she was surprised to learn quitting the local job wasn't mandatory. 'British Columbians expect their MLAs to show up and participate and that was the intention of this bill. I was actually quite surprised when I was elected as an MLA I just assumed you had to step down from local government,' she said. Ratchord said her bill was to ensure that MLAs were giving '110 per cent' at the legislature, and to close a 'loophole' that allowed them to collect two paycheques. She added the new law brings B.C. in line with other provinces like Ontario, Quebec and Manitoba in banning dual mandates. 1:59 Vancouver byelection advance voting sees record turnout 'Thirteen of us (municipal officeholders) were elected during the provincial election as MLAs and 11 stepped down and did the right thing,' she said. Story continues below advertisement But Neufeld said by forcing the resignations, the province is now requiring Abbotsford and Langley to hold byelections with just over a year before the next municipal election. They're estimated to cost $300,000 for the school board post and $500,000 for the township councillor. 'Let the local municipalities, the local school boards where people are elected to define whether a person should resign and trigger a by-election, ' he said. 'It's overreach in my opinion for the province to mandate this, and now our school board is going to have to fork out $300,000. Well you tell me where $300,000 would stretch in a classroom.' No dates have been announced for the Abbotsford and Township of Langley byelections. British Columbians will next go to the polls for their municipal elections in the fall of 2026.

NDP on TMX: We didn't want it. They built it. So let's use its full potential
NDP on TMX: We didn't want it. They built it. So let's use its full potential

Vancouver Sun

time6 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

NDP on TMX: We didn't want it. They built it. So let's use its full potential

VICTORIA — The B.C. NDP government responded with mostly discouraging words this week to growing national speculation about a new pipeline to transport the country's oil to the West Coast. Prime Minister Mark Carney explored the idea of 'an oil pipeline to tidewater' with industry executives in Calgary on Sunday and with provincial and territorial leaders in Saskatoon on Monday. Ontario Premier Doug Ford described the pipeline as 'absolutely critical' to weaning Canada off excessive dependence on the U.S. market. Stay on top of the latest real estate news and home design trends. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Westcoast Homes will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith spoke of a 'grand bargain' to deliver a 'million-barrel-a-day pipeline to the northwest B.C. coast' and '$20 billion a year in revenues' to government coffers. Then there were the comments of B.C. deputy premier Niki Sharma, who represented Premier David Eby at the Saskatchewan meeting. Asked point blank if the New Democrats would be 'OK with fast-tracking' a pipeline to transport Alberta bitumen to Prince Rupert or Kitimat, Sharma replied: 'Well, you know what, at this stage, you've heard the premier say — we have a difference of opinion about whether or not a bitumen pipeline should go in … the northern part of the province.' Besides, said Sharma: 'There's no (pipeline) proponent at this time, there's no project that is really there to look at. Let's focus on those projects that are ready, with strong investment and alignment.' She's right that there is no current proposal for such a pipeline. One may be forthcoming after Carney's meeting with industry executives and Smith's lobbying on carbon capture projects in Alberta. In a followup statement, Sharma added: 'We are focusing on these shovel-ready projects, not theoretical projects with no proponents. There is also an existing, underused pipeline that Canadian taxpayers paid $34 billion for, with capacity to spare. She meant the Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion or TMX, which the New Democrats vowed to fight 'with every tool in the tool box' and failed to stop. Eby also made a disparaging reference to TMX at the recent conference of Western premiers. 'That pipeline is not at full capacity right now,' said Eby. 'Why wouldn't we ensure that that public infrastructure was fully used first before dividing ourselves on a project where there is no proponent.' Eby and Sharma exaggerate the degree to which the TMX is 'underused … with capacity to spare' after one year of operation. The Canadian Energy Regulator reports that the line has operated at about 80 per cent of its 890,000 barrel-per-day capacity since coming online in May 2024. Moreover, the performance improved in the first quarter of this year. 'The pipeline ran at about 85 per cent capacity during the three-month period ending in March,' Chris Varcoe reported in the Calgary Herald this week. The Globe and Mail's Emma Garney further reported that the line 'hit a high of 90 per cent' in March. The demand is such that Trans Mountain has already begun test work to boost capacity by up to 10 per cent by the end of 2026. A longer-term project would add pumping stations to boost it to 1.14 million barrels a day, later in the decade. So much for the B.C. NDP notion that the $34 billion pipeline is languishing through insufficient use. But rather than consult the country's energy regulator or the national newspapers, perhaps Eby and Sharma were taking their lead from Steven Guilbeault. Guilbeault served as environment minister in the Justin Trudeau Liberal government, where he flourished as a fan of carbon taxation and an opponent of fossil fuel expansion. Carney reassigned him to the Canadian Heritage Department at about the same time as the PM reduced the carbon tax to zero and began talking up the need to expand resource production. It didn't stop the new heritage minister from wandering outside his lane last month to announce that Canada has no need of more pipelines because TMX was operating at '40 per cent capacity' and the world was approaching 'peak oil production.' In the first instance, Guilbeault clearly didn't know what he was talking about and in the second, there's much room to debate about when peak oil will be reached. Still, there is a capacity issue regarding the TMX terminal in Burnaby, though not one that involves the pipeline. The terminal is already busy with tankers, having loaded some 741 in the first quarter of the year at a rate that fell just short of one a day in March. But tankers are unable to load fully because of the risk of grounding in Burrard Inlet. The New Democrats have recognized the limitation and come out in support of a federal proposal to dredge Burrard Inlet to a depth that full tankers can traverse. Leading the call is Energy Minister Adrian Dix. As NDP leader, Dix's snap decision to oppose TMX in the midst of the 2013 election campaign contributed to his loss to Christy Clark. Now that the line is running, Dix supports maximizing its use. 'We built it. We paid for it. We should use it,' he says, taking a realistic view of a project that cost him much. vpalmer@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store