logo
ICE says migrants are ineligible for bail hearings which could leave them in jail for years while courts hearings play out

ICE says migrants are ineligible for bail hearings which could leave them in jail for years while courts hearings play out

Independent7 hours ago
Immigration and Customs Enforcement has ushered in a policy that will render undocumented migrants ineligible for bail hearings, meaning they could be detained for months or years as their case plays out, according to a memo.
The Trump administration's policy seeks to 'supercharge' the administration's already sweeping campaign of arrests and deportations, immigration attorneys say, as ICE has received billions of dollars to increase the number of migrants in detention.
Previously, migrants were typically allowed to request a bond hearing before an immigration judge. But the Department of Homeland Security has 'revisited its legal position on detention and release authorities,' acting ICE director Todd M. Lyons announced in a memo dated July 8,the Washington Post first reported.
Migrants who entered the U.S. illegally should be detained 'for the duration of their removal proceedings,' Lyons said in the memo.
The policy will apply to millions who have lived in the U.S. for decades and many of them will have children who are American citizens, immigration attorneys said.
Migrants 'may not be released from ICE custody' except in rare instances where an immigration officer releases them on parole. That decision will not be made by a judge, Lyons wrote.
ICE expects to face legal challenges to the move, Lyons added in the memo.
The Independent has contacted the Department of Homeland Security and ICE for comment.
The policy change comes as President Donald Trump's spending package has significantly increased ICE's detention capacity, handing the agency $45 billion to detain migrants over the next four years.
Federal officials plan to use the ICE windfall to roughly double the nation's immigration detention capacity, bringing the total to between 80,000 and 100,000 detention beds.
Tom Jawetz, a former DHS official in the Biden administration, told Reuters that the policy change was a 'radical departure that could explode the detention population.'
Immigration attorney Aaron Korthuis said the policy 'is looking to supercharge detention beyond what it already is.'
Other immigration attorneys and advocates said that denying migrants a bond hearing will make it more challenging to fight their case as they wait in detention facilities where communicating with clients is a problem, such as Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz.'
'I think some courts are going to find that this doesn't give noncitizens sufficient due process,' immigration attorney Paul Hunker, a former ICE chief counsel in the Dallas area, told The Post. 'They could be held indefinitely until they're deported.'
Immigrants were being denied bail hearings in more than a dozen courts across the U.S. since the memos were issued last week, the American Immigration Lawyers Association told the outlet.
'This is their way of putting in place nationwide a method of detaining even more people,' Greg Chen, senior director of government relations for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, told the outlet. 'It's requiring the detention of far more people without any real review of their individual circumstances.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mike Johnson says Ghislaine Maxwell should testify before Congress
Mike Johnson says Ghislaine Maxwell should testify before Congress

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Mike Johnson says Ghislaine Maxwell should testify before Congress

Top congressional Republican Speaker Mike Johnson has shockingly come out in favor of the Jefferey Epstein files being released, despite the administration claiming the 'client list' doesn't exist. The Republican shared on a podcast with conservative pundit Benny Johnson that he would like more transparency from the White House surrounding the highly sought after files on the deceased sexual offender. Asked if he would support efforts to have Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell testify before Congress, the speaker said 'I'm for transparency.' He also appeared open to congress issuing subpoenas to the FBI and Department of Justice to force them to turn over any previously undisclosed files. 'We're intellectually consistent in this... I trust him (Trump). He put together a team of his choosing and they're doing a great job,' the Republican said. 'It's a very delicate subject but we should put everything out there and let the people decide.' 'The White House, and the White House team, are privy to facts that I don't know. I mean this isn't my lane, I haven't been involved in that. But I agree with the sentiment that we need to put it out there.' He also specifically mentioned Attorney General Pam Bondi's previous remarks noting she had Epstein-related documents on her desk before the DOJ claimed last week that no 'client list' exists. 'Pam Bondi, I don't know when she originally made the statement, I think she was talking about documents, as I understood it they were on her desk,' Speaker Johnson claimed. 'I don't know if she was specific about a list or whatever. But she needs to come forward and explain that to everybody ... I am anxious to get this behind us.' His sentiment appeared to cut against the White House's reluctance to engage on the topic. Last week Trump balked after a reporter asked him about Epstein, and Trump posted over the weekend a sprawling Truth Social post seemingly questioning voter's interest in the case. However, as pressure has grown on Attorney General Pam Bondi to release sealed documents on the financier's crimes and jailhouse death, Trump has seemingly relented and is now for additional files being released. 'The attorney general has handled that very well. She's really done a very good job. I think when you look at it, you'll understand that. I would like to see that also, but the credibility is very important,' he said about the Epstein files Tuesday. Firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., along with other conservatives have been pushing for more information on the Epstein case. 'I fully support the transparency on this issue,' Greene said Tuesday. 'I also think Pam Bondi is doing a great job.' On Monday evening one Republican, Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina, voted for a amendment to a bill that would've forced Bondi to release unseen Epstein files on a public portal within 30 days of passage. Norman joined all the Democrats on the Rules Committee push the files into the light of day, however, most Republicans voted down the amendment. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, did not cast a vote in the matter. Roy and Norman are both members of the House Freedom Caucus, a conservative flank of the House GOP that - in line with their anti-swamp antics - are eager to see what is contained in the elusive documents. Democrats, meanwhile, have seen Republican floundering over the files' release as a sign of division - and they are seeking to exploit it for political gain. 'It makes no sense why they want to hide the evidence against Epstein, and the potential client lists that the attorney general is talking about,' the amendments author, Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., told the Daily Mail. He heaped praise on Greene and Norman for being supportive of the documents' release. 'They should release the files and let the chips fall where they may for whoever for Democrats or Republicans,' Rep. Jimmy Gomez, D-Calif., similarly told the Daily Mail. 'It's really, I think, kind of insulting to their own base, because it's like they campaigned on it,' he added. 'Either they were lying from the get go, or they're covering something up that's in there that they don't want to get out.'

US Senate to vote on Trump funding cuts, AIDS program funding preserved
US Senate to vote on Trump funding cuts, AIDS program funding preserved

Reuters

time31 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US Senate to vote on Trump funding cuts, AIDS program funding preserved

WASHINGTON, July 15 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate is due to begin voting on Tuesday on President Donald Trump's request to slash billions in spending on foreign aid and public broadcasting previously approved by Congress, the latest test of Trump's control over his fellow Republicans. However, Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought told reporters it will no longer include a plan to cut funds designated for PEPFAR, a global fund to fight HIV/AIDS, bringing the size of the package of cuts to $9 billion from $9.4 billion. Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the chamber's Republican majority leader, said he expected the first procedural voting on Tuesday. He had said that some members of his party had wanted changes in the bill. The Senate has until Friday to act on the rescissions package, originally a request to claw back $8.3 billion in foreign aid funding and $1.1 billion for public broadcasting. Otherwise, the request will expire and the White House will be required to adhere to spending plans passed by Congress. Approving the Senate bill without the PEPFAR cuts means the measure must go back to the House of Representatives for a vote before it can be sent back to Trump to sign into law. Thune said he expected the House would act quickly to pass the measure. The amounts at stake are extremely small in the context of the sprawling federal budget, which totaled $6.8 trillion in the fiscal year ended September 30. Yet the proposed cuts have raised the hackles of Democrats and a handful of Republicans who saw an attempt to erode Congress's Constitutionally mandated authority over spending. The foreign aid initiatives in Trump's request for cuts included lifesaving support for women and children's health and the fight against HIV/AIDS that have long had strong bipartisan support. The package also cuts funds supporting public broadcasting, which can be the main source of news and emergency information in rural parts of the U.S. Critics of the cuts said the amounts of money involved were small but funded essential programs that should not be cut. "What is going on here? Does anyone stand up to these horrible, horrible cuts that hurt the American people?" Senator Charles Schumer of New York, the chamber's Democratic leader, said on Monday. Trump has threatened to withhold his endorsement from any member of Congress who does not vote for the measure without changes. Standalone presidential rescissions packages have not passed in years, with lawmakers reluctant to cede their constitutionally mandated control of government spending. During Trump's first term in 2018, Congress members rejected Trump's request to revoke $15 billion in spending. Trump's Republicans hold narrow majorities in the Senate and House. So far, they have shown little appetite for opposing his policies. The rescissions legislation passed the House by 214-212 last month. Four Republicans joined 208 Democrats in voting against it. Some Republican senators had expressed concern about some of Trump's requests. Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who chairs the Appropriations Committee, had said she opposed Trump's request to cut funding for the global programs to fight HIV/AIDS. Democrats have warned that the foreign aid and broadcasting cuts, which overturn spending agreements between Republicans and Democrats, could make it more difficult to negotiate the package of spending bills that must pass by September 30 to fund the government next year and avoid a shutdown. "How are we supposed to negotiate a bipartisan deal if Republicans will turn around and put it through the shredder in a partisan vote?" asked Senator Patty Murray from Washington, the top Democrat on the appropriations committee. Appropriations bills require 60 votes to move ahead in the Senate, but the rescissions package needs just 51, meaning Republicans can pass it without Democratic support.

Elmo responds after hacker shares ‘disgusting' social media posts
Elmo responds after hacker shares ‘disgusting' social media posts

The Independent

time32 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Elmo responds after hacker shares ‘disgusting' social media posts

Elmo 's official X account was compromised by a hacker over the weekend, who posted antisemitic and racist content. The hacker's posts included branding Donald Trump as ' Netanyahu 's puppet' and demanding the release of Jeffrey Epstein -related files. Sesame Workshop, the organisation behind Sesame Street, confirmed the hack and stated they were working to restore full control of the account. All offensive and 'disgusting' posts have since been deleted, and Elmo's account later posted a message of kindness. The incident occurred amidst ongoing discussions about the Jeffrey Epstein files, with Elon Musk criticising Donald Trump and a Democratic strategist suggesting Trump orchestrated the file release.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store