Steering Circularity Amid Not-So-Sustainable Policy Shifts
One of those dynamic differences considers the regulatory role that the states and private sector may be forced to play if sustainability is to stick. Suppose the less eco-focused executive and legislative branches do, in fact, place more onus on the states to drive regulation forward. In that case, they will need more capital to successfully execute at a local level.
More from Sourcing Journal
Supporting Supplier Relationships to Achieve Traceability
Meet Puma's Latest Recycled Polyester Partner
Coach and Gen Phoenix Talk Circularity and Partnership
During SJ's Sustainability Summit, Chelsea Murtha of the American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA) and Rachel Kibbe of the Circular Services Group (CSG) and American Circular Textiles (ACT) discussed how local and national legislation can tackle the hurdles hindering sustainability strategies in the face of a less sympathetic federal government.
'I don't think it's a surprise to anyone in this room that you're not going to get very far on Capitol Hill or with the White House right now by saying, 'This is a great sustainability initiative,'' Murtha, the AAFA's senior director of sustainability, said. 'But that doesn't mean there aren't [other] things you can talk about; things they've indicated are very important to them: U.S. manufacturing.'
Giving 'a lot of credit' to her co-panelist—the founder and CEO of CSG and ACT—Murtha discussed the power of flipping the script to position sustainability initiatives as U.S. manufacturing and conservation efforts to gain traction.
'I've watched [Kibbe] in rooms with Republican legislators who are all very excited about her circularity initiative because that's not how she's talking about it,' she continued. 'There are ways to talk about this and get through to folks who would dismiss a sustainability initiative. You can just have a manufacturing initiative that happens to have sustainability impacts [by] starting to lean on things that connect conservation to affordability.'
It's true: Kibbe has talked about the Americas Act, for instance, taking a bipartisan lens to emphasize U.S. manufacturing—such as investing in its systems and infrastructures as well as supporting its trade partners—to ultimately underscore the environment's business case instead of its morality clause.
'Narrative is always critical; I mean, that's how you communicate things to each other,' Kibbe said before referencing a few 'horrifying' discoveries when working on the aforementioned bill. 'That made me really start to reframe the way I look at and listen to narratives—not to say that narratives can't be dangerous; we're seeing that play out as well, but I think that's critical.'
While Kibbe is focused on securing the industry's seat at the federally-funded table, Murtha is working to 'galvanize' the private sector to advocate for itself—so it can be both 'heard and represented as a squeaky wheel to the federal government' and to ensure the textile sector isn't 'left out of those types of opportunities,' Kibbe said.
'There's a lot of areas where this can go wrong,' she added. 'The devil is going to be in the rule writing process.'
Both panelists, however, stressed the importance of revamping existing trade policies that hinder sustainable practices as well as the value in advocating for strategic, incremental changes to achieve longer-term goals.
'There are these sort of wonky, Draconian trade policies that were established eons ago to support domestic manufacturing that haven't been fixed or updated and are now working against us,' Kibbe said, referencing recycled cotton and the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA). 'These sort of little things, like death by 1,000 cuts, are big issues that, I think, can brush us aside as an industry if we don't coalesce and come together.'
Murtha, too, paused to remind attendees of reality.
'I don't want to overstate, though, the ability to achieve things; it's not as if these are magic words that will fix all the problems,' Murtha said. 'But they are a good place to start when having conversations.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Elon Musk reportedly eyeing JD Vance for 2028 as he hits the brakes on plans for a new political party
Elon Musk is reportedly putting the brakes on launching his new political party in order to maintain ties with prominent Republicans — especially Vice President JD Vance, who the billionaire is eyeing to back in 2028. Musk had vowed that his 'America Party' would challenge the two-party system, however, he told those close to him that he'd rather focus on his businesses than pull voters away from his Republican allies in Washington, the Wall Street Journal reported. The Tesla CEO is particularly keen on keeping ties with Vance, who is widely speculated to inherit the MAGA movement after President Trump completes his second term. 3 Elon Musk attends a news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. AP Musk has told associates that forming the 'America Party' would damage that relationship, according to the paper. Musk, the richest man in the world, has expressed to those in his circle that he would financially back Vance if he made a run for the White House in 2028. He dumped nearly $300 million on Trump and other Republican campaigns in the 2024 elections, propelling Trump to a second presidential victory. Still, Musk hasn't completely ruled out moving forward with the new party and is waiting to see how the 2026 midterm elections shake out, the tech mogul's allies told the Journal. 3 Vice President JD Vance (C) exits the Oval Office in the opposite direction as President Trump and Musk (R) walk away before departing the White House on his way to his South Florida home in Mar-a-Lago in Florida on March 14, 2025. AFP via Getty Images 3 Musk jumps on the stage as President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally at the Butler Farm Show, Oct. 5, 2024, in Butler, Pa. AP Musk first threatened to start a new political party last month during his public spat with Trump over his Big Beautiful Bill Act — which Musk called a 'disgusting abomination.' He initially proposed targeting '2 or 3 Senate Seats and 8 to 10 House districts' giving them just enough influence to impact key votes on controversial legislation. Musk, without commenting further on the Journal's report, posted on X, 'Nothing @WSJ says should ever be thought of as true.'
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Spanberger releases new ad focused on lowering costs
Former Rep. Abigail Spanberger's (D-Va.) gubernatorial campaign rolled out an ad focused on lowering costs in Virginia on Wednesday, marking less than one month before early voting kicks off ahead of November's elections. In the 30-second spot titled 'Tour,' Spanberger discusses how the issue of lowering costs in housing, healthcare and energy was top of mind in her conversations with voters across Virginia. 'We've got tough challenges that can't be solved in 30-second ads, but I've rolled out plans and I'm ready to get to work to lower costs. And that's what I'll do as governor,' Spanberger says in the ad. The Hill was the first outlet to view the ad, which will air in the Richmond and Norfolk media markets and statewide on digital platforms. A Roanoke College poll released on Tuesday showed 54 percent of likely Virginia voters said inflation was the most important issue in the campaign. The ad comes less than a month before early voting kicks off in Virginia on September 19. Spanberger has consistently held a commanding lead over her opponent, Republican Lieutenant Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears (R), throughout the campaign. The latest polling average released earlier this month by The Hill's partners at Decision Desk HQ shows Spanberger leading Earle-Sears 45.2 percent to 36 percent. However, the same Roanoke College poll released on Tuesday showed a narrowing race between the two candidates, with Spanberger leading 46 to 39 percent among likely voters. Fourteen percent of voters said they were undecided, while one percent said they would vote for someone else. The last Roanoke College poll of the race was released in May and showed Spanberger leading 43 percent to 26 percent.
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Georgia Moves Closer to Eliminating Income Tax
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Lawmakers in Georgia have met to discuss the possibility of axing personal income tax. Supporters say eliminating the state's income tax could attract businesses and residents, continuing recent tax relief efforts. Critics warn it would force service cuts or higher sales taxes, hitting low- and middle-income households hardest. Why It Matters Georgia has been amending its personal income tax rates in recent years. Governor Brian Kemp this year signed into law income tax rebates of up to $500 and a rate cut to 5.19 percent starting in January for all income earned in 2025. The measure is part of a broader plan to lower the rate to 4.99 percent. The law also replaced Georgia's system of tax brackets with a flat income tax. According to the Governor's Office of Planning and Budget, individual income taxes are expected to amount to around 47 percent of Georgia's state revenue for the current budget year, which started on July 1. Currently, only eight states don't tax individual income, according to the Tax Foundation. What To Know The effort to abolish the Peach State's individual income taxes is being led by Lieutenant Governor Burt Jones, a Republican, who argued in a Tuesday meeting that reducing income taxes to zero would help the state stay competitive, particularly among southern states like Florida and Tennessee which have no income tax, and Mississippi and North Carolina, both of which are working toward eliminating personal levies. Jones said lawmakers have already given back billions of dollars to taxpayers in recent years through tax cuts, rebates and other measures. Some $7.6 billion has been returned to Georgia taxpayers through property tax relief, motor fuel tax relief, and income tax rebates and cuts, according to Kemp. "But we must go further," Jones told the Senate Special Committee on Eliminating Georgia's Income Tax. "We must seize this opportunity to lead the South, not trail behind it." The Georgia State Capitol in Atlanta on December 30, 2024. The Georgia State Capitol in Atlanta on December 30, 2024. GETTY Danny Kanso, senior fiscal analyst at the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute, said that for most Georgia households, eliminating the income tax would effectively be a "massive" tax increase. To offset the deficit, he said, the state would need to triple the sales tax and apply it to new products, calling that "a very tall order to replace the state's largest source of revenue." "[It] doesn't really make sense when you hear we're going to lower taxes, eliminate sources of revenue, and somehow we're also going to raise more money," Kanso said. "That's not something we've really seen work in the past." The committee also heard from Democrats, who warned that eliminating the income tax could force Georgia to either cut services or raise sales taxes, measures they said would hit low- and middle-income residents the hardest. "The same people who favor lowering taxes want the ambulance to be there in four minutes when their loved one is having a health crisis," said State Senator Nan Orrock. "That requires an investment." The committee also heard from Grover Norquist, president of the conservative group Americans for Tax Reform. Norquist argued that states like Florida, which has no income tax, continue to generate revenue even after cutting personal levies. He said that when businesses see states moving to eliminate the tax, they begin investing there, and residents follow. What People Are Saying Georgia Lieutenant Governor Burt Jones said on Tuesday: "If we want to continue to stay competitive here in the state of Georgia, and continue to be the number one state to do business, we've got to be looking for ways to keep us competitive and make it where we have a competitive advantage over states that we are competing with all the time." Danny Kanso, senior fiscal analyst at the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute, said in Tuesday's meeting: "The proposal would have to increase taxes on far more Georgians than it would reduce taxes on, and so it's a little bit of a solution in search of a problem that would likely cause ripples all across the state and across the economy as well." What Happens Next The committee has set a goal of delivering a workable plan to eliminate income taxes ahead of next year's legislative session, which begins in January 2026.
