Plan for England's largest wind farm at Walshaw Moor 'scaled back'
Plans for the largest onshore wind farm in England have been scaled back by a developer.Calderdale Energy Park said it would apply for permission to build 41 turbines instead of the 65 originally planned on land near Hebden Bridge in West Yorkshire.A consultation period has now begun and people have been invited to submit their views on the project over the next six weeks.A spokesperson for the company said it had also "removed the solar panel element" from the revised designs.
The company first revealed the plans in 2023 and said the scheme would generate enough electricity to power more than 286,000 homes a year.However, environmental campaigners have said the development would disturb peat bogs on Walshaw Moor and release carbon into the atmosphere.The firm's spokesperson said: "We're pleased to be able share our updated proposals for Walshaw Moor and look forward to hearing from local people about our ambitions."Our latest plan includes up to 41 turbines - a reduction from 65. We have also removed the solar panel element from the design."Calderdale Energy Park presents a key opportunity to support the government's target to achieve at least 95% of low carbon energy generation by 2030."
'Suitable sites'
Large parts of Walshaw Moor are blanket bog and protected peatland.Sandra Rout, from campaign group Stop Calderdale Wind Farm, said: "Building wind farms on protected peatland, which is a natural carbon sink, is counterproductive - it will worsen the climate and nature crisis by releasing CO2."In addition to the turbines, this site would incorporate 22 miles (35 km) of access roads and a substation."She said the group feared the plans would lead to increased risk of flooding at Hebden Bridge and nearby towns."There are plenty of other suitable sites for wind farms, as identified in a report by the RSPB," she said."We are calling for government-led action to plan where this technology goes."The application to build the wind farm will be decided by the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, Ed Miliband MP, after the site was designated a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP).It means that although Calderdale Council can be consulted, councillors will not have the final say on whether the project proceeds.Currently the largest wind farm in England is at Keadby in Lincolnshire, where there are 34 turbines.The largest in the UK is at Whitelee near Glasgow with 215 turbines.
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Miliband warned that green tech project faces collapse without £4bn injection
A green technology project pioneered by Ed Miliband faces collapse without an additional £4bn in funding, industry chiefs have warned. Olivia Powis, the chief executive of the Carbon Capture and Storage Association, said the fledgling technology must receive support from Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, at her spending review on Wednesday despite having been recently awarded almost £22bn in public subsidies. It wants the money – funded by consumers and taxpayers – to expand the two carbon-capture projects already approved by Mr Miliband, the Energy Secretary, and to kick-start two more, including one in Scotland. Ms Powis said there was a 'critical need' for further funding commitments from the Government. She warned that, without the extra cash, even the two schemes approved by Mr Miliband may never go ahead. She added: 'The UK supply chain is ready to respond with the skills, innovation and capabilities needed to make UK carbon capture a world-leading industry. 'But continued government commitment and a pipeline of future projects is essential to ensure that domestic suppliers can compete, scale up and create lasting jobs across the country – otherwise we will see investors and this industry go overseas.' Approving the initial £21.7bn last autumn, Ms Reeves described it as a 'game-changing technology [that] will bring 4,000 good jobs and billions of private investment into communities across Merseyside and Teesside'. However, MPs have warned that the technology is 'unproven' and 'high-risk'. Jeremy Pocklington, the permanent secretary at the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, told the public accounts committee last December that 75pc of the money to fund carbon capture would come from levies on consumer and business energy bills and the rest from taxes. Experts warn that CO2 capture may only be 50 to 60pc efficient, meaning some CO2 still enters the atmosphere. Projects backed by the Government so far include the HyNet scheme in Merseyside and Net Zero Teesside, for which contracts were signed last year. The industry wants cash to expand those projects and add another two: the Acorn project on Scotland's east coast and the Viking project based in the Humber. Mr Powis said: 'We estimate this new industry will create 50,000 new highly skilled jobs and retain another 50,000 jobs in existing industries like steel. 'It will contribute to new industries like sustainable aviation fuels, and generate a cumulative £94bn in value for the economy by 2050.' 'Even the Greens reject it' But Richard Tice, the deputy leader of Reform UK, said the policy would add to consumer bills and do little for the environment. He said: 'We should scrap this technology. This is an outrageous demands for unproven technology that will make zero difference to climate change. Even the Greens reject it.' Carla Denyer MP, co-leader of the Green Party, added: 'Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is being used as green-wash by the fossil fuel industry, allowing them to continue extracting coal, oil and gas. 'This technology is a distraction from what we should be focusing on, namely, boosting renewable energy and storage, energy efficiency and home insulation programmes and working with nature and land managers to capture carbon naturally.'
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Nigel Farage ready for ‘fight' as he vows to defy Labour's net zero orders and open new coal mines in Wales
NIGEL Farage today vowed to defy Labour's Net Zero orders and open new coal mines in Wales. The Reform chief declared he's ready to 'fight' Sir Keir Starmer to achieve his 'ambition to re-industrialise' the country, if he wins power in the Senedd next year. 2 2 In Port Talbot, Mr Farage said he wants to revive the town's steel blast furnaces and use fuel from new coal mines to power them. Net Zero zealot Ed Miliband announced a ban on new coal mining licenses in November last year. But firing the starting gun on Reform's 11-month campaign for the Welsh parliament, Mr Farage argued that Labour's Westminster government wouldn't stop him in Cardiff. The chief Brexiteer said: 'We can always have a fight, can't we? 'We can always have a fight and who knows, there may be situations where we just do things. 'We will have to cross that bridge when we come to it.' In a bid to woo the Welsh and outflank Sir Keir from the traditional left, Mr Farage argued there are 'specific types of coal for certain uses that we still need in this country'. The Reform leader blasted Labour for turning their nose up at local industry while continuing to import steel from abroad. Mr Farage insisted his party can win the Senedd elections in May 2026 because Labour are 'really are failing in Wales'. Having been in control of the Welsh parliament since its 1999 inception, the Reform boss said Sir Keir's party has 'nowhere to hide'. YouGov's most recent polling of the Senedd, from last month, puts nationalist Plaid Cymru on 30 per cent, with Reform five points behind on 25. Meanwhile, Labour has slumped to just 18 per cent, with only 40 per cent of those who voted for Sir Keir looking to do the same again. Mr Farage said his party is 'rapidly' growing in Wales – but is still a 'work in progress' and doesn't yet have a candidate for the top job of First Minister. The party leader added: 'Figures will emerge over the course of the next few months who through merit will no doubt be in a position where they can qualify to be our lead member. 'We are not at that point of evolution just yet.'
Daily Mail
11 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Brits back cuts to foreign aid, benefits and Net Zero to fund the NHS and police - amid fears Rachel Reeves is plotting tax hikes instead
Brits back cuts to foreign aid, benefits and Net Zero to bolster spending in other areas, according to a poll. YouGov research has given an insight into the public's priorities as Rachel Reeves prepares to unveil departmental budgets for the next three years. Fears are mounting that the Chancellor will have to impose more tax hikes later in the year, as the stalling economy and demands for more defence cash squeeze the government finances. According to the survey, foreign aid was the most popular target for cuts - despite having already been slashed by billions of pounds to bolster defence. Some 65 per cent endorsed trimming the development budget, including a majority of supporters of all major parties. More welfare cuts were the preference of 41 per cent, although 18 per cent wanted higher spending, The Times reported. Despite a brewing revolt by Labour MPs, even among the party's voters 31 per cent were behind trimming benefits costs. Just over a fifth supported higher spending and 40 per cent said the level was about right. Curbing spend on Net Zero was backed by 40 per cent, but 30 per cent said those budgets should be maintained and 20 per cent said they should be higher. Ms Reeves is due to lay out departmental allocations running up to 2029 - the likely timetable for the next general election - on Wednesday. But the generous fiscal envelope set at the Budget last Autumn has been put under massive pressure by the economic slowdown, calls for more defence cash, and Labour revolts on benefits. Ms Reeves has been signalled she will announce real-terms increases to budgets for police as she tries to quell Home Office resistance. However, that is likely to be offset by cuts to other areas, with the NHS and defence sucking up funding.
