EXCLUSIVE Baby killer Constance Marten set to appeal using legal aid, despite case already costing taxpayers £2.8m
The 38-year-old former socialite, who has a £2.4million fortune, plans to claim yet more legal aid to challenge the jury's verdict in her retrial, despite the Court of Appeal rejecting an earlier bid to clear her name.
In an extraordinary farce, Marten is expected to appeal on the basis that the trial judge did not warn the jury quickly enough to ignore her own words after she blurted out that her lover Mark Gordon, 51, was a convicted rapist.
The Mail understands that her lawyers will contend that the Recorder of London 's handling of Marten's bombshell admission unfairly prejudiced the jury.
Gordon is set to follow suit, despite praising the fairness of Judge Mark Lucraft during the trial and promising he would 'waive' his right to appeal.
The Old Bailey retrial almost collapsed when Marten revealed that Gordon had spent 22 years in prison for a knifepoint rape in Florida.
Judge Lucraft had previously imposed reporting restrictions on Gordon's convictions as a teenager for armed kidnapping, four sexual assaults, armed burglary and aggravated battery.
But Marten ignored the ban, claiming that police were out to get them when officers launched a national manhunt to find the couple after they went on the run with their fifth baby Victoria, causing her death in a freezing tent in 2023.
Marten told jurors their four older children had already been taken into care, adding: 'Mark has a violent rape conviction and spent 22 years in prison so my fear is they'd immediately scapegoat him which is what they usually do.'
The judge condemned Marten's 'deliberate attempt to sabotage the trial', but he decided to continue with the case after Gordon insisted 'I'm not worried about prejudice' and promised not to appeal on the matter.
In a ruling which was never made public, Judge Lucraft said: 'Many questions arise. Amongst them I raised the question of what would happen down the line on an appeal if there was a conviction of the first defendant (Gordon) in these circumstances?
'At this point Mr Gordon said he wished to address the Court.
'When he did so he said he would waive any point on any appeal and was quite satisfied that any direction to the jury would be fair and that he wished the trial to continue.
'Mr Gordon spoke about the delay and the cost to the public of another trial.'
Yet just moments after being convicted, Gordon went back on his word, vowing that he would appeal the verdict and yelling: 'I'm not surprised by the verdict. It was faulty, it was unlawful. This is not over, it has just begun.'
Marten shouted: 'It's a scam', before walking out of the court in fury.
The case has already cost taxpayers more than £2.8million, including the £1.2million investigation and £1.6million estimated legal costs.
In February, the Court of Appeal rejected the couple's bid to challenge their child cruelty conviction in the first trial, which ended last year with jurors unable to reach a verdict on manslaughter.
On Monday, the couple were finally convicted of manslaughter in a retrial and will be sentenced on September 15.
The unprecedented case is now the subject of a national child safeguarding review to consider whether new laws should be brought in to protect unborn children.
Detective Superintendent Lewis Basford, who led the case, believes that lives could be saved if officers had the power to bring in protection and family contact orders before a baby is born to parents considered at high risk of harming their children.
He said: 'At the moment police are powerless to protect that child until a baby draws their first breath.
'If there was a change in the law, we could put contact orders in place to monitor the pregnancy and protection orders could be in place before that child is born so they could immediately be taken into care.
'If you look at cases like Baby P [a 17-month-old British boy who died in London in 2007 after suffering over 50 injuries] this could save lives.'
Yesterday a Department for Education spokesman said the review would look at what more could be done to help prevent future tragedies.
She said: 'Victoria's life was cut devastatingly short by those who should have been caring for her - and it is right that justice has now been served.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
a minute ago
- The Independent
Former National Crime Agency officer stole bitcoin from dark web drug dealer
A former National Crime Agency officer who stole Bitcoin seized from the operator of an illegal dark web marketplace has been jailed for five-and-a-half years. The NCA was investigating the Silk Road 2.0 site – which allowed users to buy drugs and other illicit goods after the original Silk Road was shut down by the FBI in 2013 – and arrested Liverpool-based Thomas White in 2014. Intelligence officer Paul Chowles took the details of White's "retirement wallet" and stole 50 Bitcoin before sending it to a cryptocurrency"mixing" service called Bitcoin Fog to obscure the source, prosecutors said. Chowles, 42, appeared in Liverpool Crown Court having pleaded guilty to one count of theft, one count of transferring criminal property, and one count of concealing criminal property. Prosecutor Craig Hassall said the Bitcoin Chowles stole was worth just under £60,000 (around US$80,000) at the time of the theft in May 2017 and is now worth over £4 million, though Chowles had realised nearly £145,000. Chowles was dismissed by the NCA this month for gross misconduct after his guilty pleas, having been arrested in 2022. The NCA initially thought White, who was jailed in 2019 for over five years, had managed to access his Bitcoin wallet and remove the 50 missing Bitcoin, Hassall said. The remaining 47 Bitcoin in White's wallet were sold by the NCA for roughly £500,000, and the funds paid towards a 1.5 million-pound confiscation order made against White. But police and the NCA began to investigate after White said he was not responsible for moving the 50 Bitcoin, and usernames and passwords linked to White's cryptocurrency accounts were found in Chowles' notebooks when he was arrested. Judge David Aubrey said Bitcoin worth nearly £470,000 was seized from Chowles, telling him: "Had you not been arrested, you would have continued to reap the rewards of your wrongdoing." Detective Chief Inspector John Black, from Merseyside Police 's Force Intelligence Bureau, said: "We know criminals have sought to use cryptocurrency as a way to launder money from illegal activities including drug dealing and fraud. "It will be extremely disappointing to everyone that someone involved in law enforcement could involve themselves in the very criminality they are tasked with investigating and preventing. "This case should illustrate in the starkest terms that nobody is above the law. When it became clear that one of the NCA's own officers had stolen Bitcoin, our officers conducted extensive enquiries to unearth a trail of evidence that Chowles had attempted to hide. This was supported fully by the NCA. "He took advantage of his position on this investigation to line his own pockets while devising a plan that he believed would cover his tracks. He was wrong. "I want to reassure the public that Merseyside Police have specialist officers with the experience and expertise to track the movement of funds designed to avoid detection. "Above all, our officers have the determination to make sure criminals do not profit in any way from breaking the law while other honest and hard-working members of the public work to provide for their families."
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
MasterChef judge reveals what it was REALLY like on BBC set with John Torode and Gregg Wallace after working with TV duo for 20 years
A MasterChef judge has revealed what it was really like on the BBC set with John Torode and Gregg Wallace after working with the TV duo for 20 years. William Sitwell, 55, has been a regular on the cooking competition for around 20 years, as an extra judge who comes in for the quarter final episodes. The food critic and journalist appeared on Vanessa Feltz 's self-titled Channel 5 chat show today to speak out on the controversy that has recently beset the programme. John, 59, was axed from the cooking competition in an announcement from the broadcaster on Tuesday afternoon over a historic allegation of racism. Meanwhile, Gregg, 60, was sacked earlier this month after a report upheld 45 of 83 complaints of inappropriate behaviour against him. Their colleague William, speaking on Vanessa, defended the programme and its long-time hosts to the presenter, 63. Their colleague William, speaking on Vanessa, defended the programme and its long-time hosts to the presenter, 63 'I wouldn't argue with any of the allegations, that's not for me to do that', he began. 'All I can say is based on my experience of being on that show for 20 years - and I've worked in quite a few offices, newspaper offices, which are quite harsh environments - the MasterChef studio is the kindest, most courteous, most loving, caring place I've ever worked.' This comes from having seen it from both sides, he said, as both a judge and a contestant - he participated in a so-called battle of the critics a couple of years ago. William said: 'They literally hold your hand right up to the moment the cameras start rolling, they want you to perform the best and everyone's incredibly kind and helpful. 'Once the filming starts, you're on your own, right?! And if you get in the doo doo, that's up to you because that's TV and that's the fun of it. 'But my experience was it was just the opposite of a toxic atmosphere. 'And everything you read now, you'd think it was this terrible violent place of abuse, it's just far from it. 'That's not to say, I wouldn't question any of the allegations, that's not for me to do and I wouldn't attempt to do that.' This comes from having seen it from both sides, he said, as both a judge and a contestant - he participated in a so-called battle of the critics a couple of years ago. Pictured: William, right, with Gregg, left, on MasterChef Of John in particular, William (pictured) commented: 'I feel for him because I think he's a very decent guy, he's a very well-informed, charming, diligent, intelligent man' The MasterChef judge also spoke out specifically on both John and Gregg. The same report that saw Gregg sacked also found John had once used an 'extremely offensive racist term', allegedly during some drinks after filming. John posted to Instagram on Tuesday evening to say he had 'no recollection' of the incident and did not believe it had happened. He added: 'The allegation is that I did so sometime in 2018 or 2019, in a social situation, and that the person I was speaking with did not believe that it was intended in a malicious way and that I apologised immediately afterwards.' A witness of the moment has claimed John apologised instantly and 'was mortified' and he 'didn't use the term as a slur'. No one complained at the time, but the incident was brought up during Gregg's inquiry, they added. Emphasising the lack of clarity about when and how the moment happened, as well as the lack of offence the original person took at it, Vanessa asked William's feelings on it all. He replied: 'I have no idea, it sounds a bit foggy. When he would come in at the quarter final stages, there would be 'a really great atmosphere because you get to know the contestants', he explained 'I feel for him because I think he's a very decent guy, he's a very well-informed, charming, diligent, intelligent man and I'm sad if something like that happened. 'For me, it's a degree of sadness because I think it's a great show, I think it's an important show, I think it's a key part of British culture, I think it reflects British culture.' It comes after John was left 'heartbroken' by discovering he had been dropped from MasterChef online. A source told The Sun: 'He read about it on the BBC News website. 'Obviously he's heartbroken. He feels he's been made a scapegoat off the back of the Gregg Wallace report.' Just after the news broke, the chef released a statement confirming he had not 'heard from anyone at the BBC' or the show's production company Banijay UK. His agent was reportedly called just 11 minutes before the BBC's announcement - and so 'hadn't a chance to call him' before word got out. William appeared to take a swipe at this, when Vanessa introduced the topic of John's sacking: 'Apparently so. I think they forgot to tell him but that's the way the world works, isn't it?' He also spoke on complaints made against Gregg, one of which includes an allegation he once took his trousers down in front of a female coworker in a dressing room, in what she described as 'disgusting and predatory' behaviour. 'He never took his trousers down in front of me', the judge said. 'But what he always did – and I read about this when he quit – he is like a sort of Bernard Manning character, he cannot help but use the opportunity of seeing people to test out new gags, he is this sort of gag machine. 'And I don't get upset by his crazy jokes but I can see how other people might do.' Asked if he ever thought any of the jokes were too much, he said: 'No, because I can deal with it, I'm not easily offended.' Speaking about both his fellow presenters, William added, when asked by Vanessa if he ever saw anyone upset on set: 'Not at all, not at all.' When he would come in at the quarter final stages, there would be 'a really great atmosphere because you get to know the contestants', he explained. 'And I only ever saw warmth between the contestants and [Gregg] and also exactly the same with John. 'So, I never saw anything untoward or ever felt uncomfortable in any of the studios.' Interestingly, William had no doubt the show would have a future, when asked: 'Definitely. 'This is a show that is also in 85 different countries, hundreds of millions of people watch it... 'I think that the UK is one domain where MasterChef is shown. It's a global business, it's one of the biggest global food brands, it's one of the biggest global brands. 'So, the brand itself is not in danger.' William described the creation of MasterChef by executive Franc Roddam in 1990 with great nostalgia and fondness. He said it marked a concerted effort to show off true British food culture - best reflected by amateur cooks, working at home - to its Hollywood naysayers. These pure origins made the current scandal even sadder, the judge explained. A BBC spokesperson said: 'John Torode has identified himself as having an upheld allegation of using racist language against him'. Pictured: The statement John posted on social media 'The sadness for me is that it's reflected the development, the exciting development in the food scene...,' he said. 'And it's a shame that it's now under this cloud for all the wrong reasons.' In a statement regarding John on Tuesday afternoon, the BBC said it does not 'tolerate racist language of any kind' and takes the finding on him 'extremely seriously'. The move came after BBC director-general Tim Davie notably failed to back John and said he 'expects action to be taken' following the racism allegations. He delivered the remarks as the BBC released its annual report - an occasion overshadowed by controversies for the second year in a row. A BBC spokesperson said: 'John Torode has identified himself as having an upheld allegation of using racist language against him. 'This allegation - which involves an extremely offensive racist term being used in the workplace - was investigated and substantiated by the independent investigation led by the law firm, Lewis Silkin. John Torode denies the allegation. 'He has stated he has no recollection of the alleged incident and does not believe that it happened. The much-loved cookery show (pictured), which launched in 2019, features John, 59, and his wife Lisa as they showcase their favourite recipes 'He also says that any racial language is wholly unacceptable in any environment. 'The BBC takes this upheld finding extremely seriously. We will not tolerate racist language of any kind and, as we have already said, we told Banijay UK, the makers of MasterChef, that action must be taken. 'John Torode's contract on MasterChef will not be renewed.' Banijay UK has also now said it has decided not to renew his contract. ITV are standing by under fire John, with sources at the channel telling MailOnline it will continue to broadcast John and Lisa's Weekend Kitchen as scheduled on Saturday. The much-loved cookery show, which launched in 2019, features John, 59, and his wife Lisa as they showcase their favourite recipes. An ITV source said: 'There is no change to the ITV schedule and John and Lisa's Weekends will be broadcast as usual and will continue to air for the next three weeks.' It means the third episode of the tenth series of the show will be broadcast on ITV1 at 11.40am on Saturday. There are also plans for the broadcaster to welcome John back later in the year with John & Lisa's Christmas Kitchen in December. Meanwhile, BBC director general Mr Davie has insisted MasterChef can still prosper despite the loss of Gregg and John. He said: 'The BBC in some ways are quite simple on this, if someone is found to not live up to our values we expect the independent company, Banijay in this case, to take action and report back to us on what they have done. 'These are not BBC employees, but we absolutely expect action to be taken.' The director general added: 'I think it's a great programme that's well loved by audiences is much bigger than individuals. 'It absolutely can survive and prosper, but we've got to make sure we're in the right place in terms of the culture of the show.' A Banijay spokesperson said: 'In response to John Torode's statement, it is important to stress that Banijay UK takes this matter incredibly seriously. 'The legal team at Lewis Silkin that investigated the allegations relating to Gregg Wallace also substantiated an accusation of highly offensive racist language against John Torode which occurred in 2018. It comes after his co-star Gregg (pictured on Good Morning Britain in 2023) hit out at the BBC after a probe upheld more than half of the complaints of inappropriate behaviour against him as he warned he 'won't be the last' to be cancelled 'This matter has been formally discussed with John Torode by Banijay UK, and whilst we note that John says he does not recall the incident, Lewis Silkin have upheld the very serious complaint. Banijay UK and the BBC are agreed that we will not renew his contract on MasterChef.' John is said to have been the subject of multiple allegations before only one - relating to 'racist language' - was upheld, The Telegraph has reported. It comes after his co-star Gregg hit out at the BBC after a probe upheld more than half of the complaints of inappropriate behaviour against him as he warned he 'won't be the last' to be cancelled. The report into Gregg's behaviour on the cooking show upheld 45 out of 83 complaints made, including one count of 'unwanted physical contact', leaving the BBC to admit it 'could and should have' acted sooner on the MasterChef host. The damning investigation also found two complaints about the behaviour of 'other people' - including John - were upheld. While apologising for any 'distress' he caused, Gregg took aim at the MasterChef broadcaster, which he claims valued 'protecting its legacy' over 'protecting people'. Warning it was 'dangerous' to be a 'working-class man with a direct manner' in the world of broadcasting, he said he 'won't be the last' to face cancellation. The presenter said: 'In the end, the BBC left me exposed to trial by media and the damage it leaves in its wake. 'To those who've shown kindness, thank you. It mattered. This has been brutal. 'For a working-class man with a direct manner, modern broadcasting has become a dangerous place. I was the headline this time. But I won't be the last. 'There will be more casualties if the BBC continues down this path, where protecting its legacy matters more than protecting people. 'For my part, with full legal support, I will consider my next move.'
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Burnley father and son jailed after cocaine found in fridge
A father-and-son drug-dealing duo were caught when police found a fridge full of drugs, a suitcase stuffed with £250,000 and a rucksack containing cocaine worth £90,000. David Berry, 66, of Burnley, was described by Lancashire Police as a "significant player" in selling illegal drugs while his son William, 24, was also heavily were apprehended when police, responding to reports of men carrying a machete, found the rucksack. The fridge containing cocaine and amphetamine was discovered along with the cash, a knife, and scales at David Berry's breaker's was jailed at Preston Crown Court for 10 years while William Berry was given a 15-month term, suspended for two years. Police received a call on 14 August 2024 from a resident who said he had seen two men in a back yard on Brunshaw Road, Burnley, with a machete and a searching for the two men in the property, officers discovered more than 6lb (3kg) of cocaine with an estimated street value of £90,000 in a rucksack that had been left in the the pair were arrested three months later a number of weapons, mobile phones and a large block of cocaine were recovered. A set of keys for David Berry's breaker's yard in Pentridge Mill were also recovered from him, police said. During a search of the roof over office space in the unit, officers found a suitcase which contained about £250, cash was wrapped in plastic bags and large tins. One of the tins had the name "Will" written on it, police said.A hydraulic press, plates and moulds with white powder on them were later found.A fridge containing six large bags of cocaine and amphetamine with an estimated street value of £14,000 was also found, along with a knife, scales and packaging. Police said further searches turned up large amounts of a suspected "cutting" William Berry was arrested he was found with cannabis, mobile phones and £10,000 in examination of the phones showed he was heavily involved in drug dealing and had his own Telegram channel offering large amounts of cannabis on a regular basis, police said. David Berry, of Roughlee Grove, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to supply cocaine, conspiracy to supply amphetamine and acquire, use or possess criminal property of approximately £250, son, of Belmont Grove, admitted being concerned in the supply of cannabis and two counts of acquiring, using or possessing criminal property - one approximately worth £250,000 and the other £10,000. Det Sgt Stu Peall said: "David Berry was a significant player in the sale of illegal drugs."Hopefully the public will be reassured by the sentence handed down, which reflects the seriousness of his offending." Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
