
S.F. Mayor Daniel Lurie will loom large over the city's next recall fight
San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie finds himself in a difficult position now that the campaign to recall Supervisor Joel Engardio has officially qualified for the ballot.
Engardio, a staunch moderate, has been a loyal supporter of Lurie's policies, backing his legislative efforts and appearing by his side at news conferences. But the Sunset District supervisor is facing political peril: Organizers are seeking to oust Engardio over his enthusiasm for a major road closure that was unpopular among his constituents.
With the question of whether Engardio should be removed from office heading to Sunset voters in September, Lurie must decide whether to back Engardio and risk being on the losing side of the voters' will. Alternatively, the mayor could choose to stay out of the recall fight and send a potentially chilling message to Engardio and other allies.
'It's a dilemma,' said political consultant Eric Jaye. 'On the one hand, you risk your reputation with the voters. On the other hand, you risk your reputation with other politicians. And politicians like fellow politicians who are willing to stand up and be counted when the going gets tough for them.'
The animating issue behind the recall battle is the fact that Engardio supported the closure of the Upper Great Highway to cars and most voters in his district did not. Lurie opposed the successful ballot measure last year that permanently shuttered the road to vehicles to make way for Sunset Dunes Park. He also drew broad support for his mayoral campaign from voters throughout the west side, including the Sunset.
However, as mayor, Lurie has advanced a major rezoning of the west side to allow for denser housing construction in a swath of the city that has seen little residential development in recent decades. The move upset some west side residents, and it could be a factor in the effort to remove Engardio, who has made positive comments about the mayor's rezoning plan.
'I would be stunned if this vote didn't turn on that issue,' Jaye said. 'You have a constituency of people who are concerned about traffic and a constituency of people concerned about Engardio ignoring the will of his district. We're going to see whether or not Engardio and Lurie are ignoring the will of neighborhood voters with their massive upzoning.'
But Todd David, a supporter of Engardio, doubted that any effort to link Lurie's rezoning initiative to the highway closure would be an effective recall strategy.
David was one of the principal organizers of Proposition K, the measure that permanently turned the Great Highway into a promenade for pedestrians, runners and cyclists. He said an attempt to combine the highway discontent with mayoral rezoning frustration would probably fail to win over voters who did not already sign the recall petition.
'You're not bringing along a whole bunch of new people,' he said. 'There are outliers who will never support an upzoning in their neighborhood that are just a 'no change' crew, and I think that 'no change' crew is the crew that signed the recall. Overwhelmingly, people support more new housing in their neighborhood, including the Sunset.'
So far, Lurie has not indicated how he might proceed. He has not weighed in on the recall qualifying for the ballot or signaled whether he will publicly back Engardio in the September election. In an earlier interview with the Chronicle, he said that, when it came to the Great Highway closure, he 'understand(s) everybody's concerns … but as a city, we have to move forward.'
'We will continue to monitor and make adjustments where we can as we see any impacts,' Lurie said.
Engardio, meanwhile, told the Chronicle on Friday that he was 'in touch with the mayor and his team and we will have conversations soon.'
'I've been working closely with the mayor to pass legislation that addresses pressing issues that Sunset residents care about like public safety, housing, and our local economy,' he said in a statement.
If Engardio were to be removed by voters in his district, the mayor would face another hard choice. At that point, he'd be tasked with appointing Engardio's successor.
The decision would allow Lurie to handpick someone aligned with him, ensuring that the Board of Supervisors' political balance does not shift in the short term. But Lurie would also need to be mindful of the fact that the appointee would serve only until an election in June.
The mayoral appointee would presumably run in that election, but they could face stiff competition from a progressive eager to build off the recall momentum to recapture the seat. When Engardio won the district in 2022, he defeated progressive Supervisor Gordon Mar by just 460 votes. So Lurie would probably want to appoint an Engardio-like moderate who doesn't have Engardio's political baggage from the Great Highway closure.
'The mayor is doing an incredible job, and he is able to get a lot done because he has a majority of pro-growth, pro-safety people on the board' of supervisors, said Sachin Agarwal, a co-founder of the moderate group Grow SF that supported Engardio's 2022 supervisor run. 'The most important thing we can do is continue to have that majority, and whether that's Joel or someone the mayor supports, we need someone who is focused on the basics.'
Regardless of what Lurie does, David, the Engardio supporter, said he thinks the embattled supervisor can prevail by pointing to the ways he's tried to deliver on essential issues. For example, Engardio worked to secure funding for merchants to help them deal with impacts of controversial street construction, and he backed the return of algebra curriculum to eighth grade as well as the continuation of merit-based admissions at Lowell High School, David noted.
As for Lurie's potential role, David said the mayor has had 'an outstanding working relationship with the Board of Supervisors.'
'I think it would be in the mayor's interest to want to continue to have a strong ally on the board,' he said. 'If, God forbid, Joel got recalled, then the mayor also would get to appoint somebody, but that person's name ID would be much lower than Joel's going into election season.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
14 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Forget the Great Highway. This is what the S.F. recall of Engardio is about
Regarding 'S.F. recall is overkill' (Letters to the Editor, May 30): By focusing on the closure of the Great Highway to vehicle traffic, those against the recall of San Francisco Supervisor Joel Engardio are missing the point. Engardio failed to represent the wishes of his constituents when he spearheaded the campaign for Proposition K, which closed the Upper Great Highway to cars for a park. Engardio had no interest in a compromise solution like the one that had been in place for weekend closures. Instead of working to improve pedestrian safety and easing traffic congestion, he has made both issues worse. Engardio appears to be more interested in pleasing his big-money backers like Yelp CEO Jeremy Stoppelman, Ripple founder Chris Larsen, tech investor Ron Conway and Twilio co-founder John Wolthuis than the constituents in his district. Engardio has said traffic is not as bad as people had expected. Some studies found it to be much worse. Over 10,000 valid signatures were submitted to get the recall on the ballot. The voters of the Sunset District decide Engardio's fate. Kenneth Jones, San Francisco How Dems can win President Donald Trump has been caught in another scandal: He recently pardoned a man — who had pleaded guilty to tax crimes — a month after his mother attended a $1-million-a-head MAGA fundraiser at Mar-a-Lago. This is a blatant quid pro quo that would have led to the impeachment and conviction of any other president. With Trump, it is par for the course. Sadly, few Trump supporters will care about this suspicious action. However, MAGA folks will take great joy in watching Trump detractors whine and complain about this fishy pardon. As one of my friends wondered, are we witnessing the death of outrage? As a scholar who studied political rhetoric for four decades, I believe the rules of the game have changed, and the rhetorical playing field is no longer the same. The moral of the story is clear: Democrats can't regain control if their message is exclusively or primarily 'not Trump'; they must convince Americans that they will fix the problems that negatively impact people's lives. This can be contrasted with what Trump has and hasn't done. Such a message offers the best persuasive strategy for Democrats. Richard Cherwitz, Camas, Wash. Keep lid on Dead tickets While tickets for the Dead & Company concerts in Golden Gate Park this August are listed at $245 for single-day admission and $635 for three-day passes, many fans worry Ticketmaster will quietly introduce dynamic pricing — sending costs skyrocketing in real-time based on demand. This controversial model has already priced out many fans for Bruce Springsteen and Taylor Swift shows. If implemented for Dead & Company, it would turn a community celebration into an exclusive, high-cost event — on public land that's supposed to belong to everyone. San Francisco should take a stand. The city should demand transparency from promoters and prohibit surge pricing at events in public parks. Dead & Company's shows should reflect the inclusive spirit of the band and the city that helped shape it. Let's make sure these shows are a celebration for all — not just the wealthy few. Dan Steiger, San Francisco Pictures tell story I see these events live every day because I walk for exercise in areas where there is drug use. It's disgusting and needs to be shown to emphasize the need to clean up the streets. Putting lipstick on a pig does not change the pig. Good for San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie for trying to address the problem. Catherine Maxey, San Francisco Prioritize teaching English Regarding 'S.F. parents are trying to start first K-8 Mandarin immersion charter school. It won't be easy' (San Francisco, May 24): I was disturbed to read about Mandarin-immersion education for children. Judging by the lack of literacy and poor communication skills of today's youth, we should be immersing our students in English, which should be the official language of the United States of America.


San Francisco Chronicle
3 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
S.F. Mayor Daniel Lurie will loom large over the city's next recall fight
San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie finds himself in a difficult position now that the campaign to recall Supervisor Joel Engardio has officially qualified for the ballot. Engardio, a staunch moderate, has been a loyal supporter of Lurie's policies, backing his legislative efforts and appearing by his side at news conferences. But the Sunset District supervisor is facing political peril: Organizers are seeking to oust Engardio over his enthusiasm for a major road closure that was unpopular among his constituents. With the question of whether Engardio should be removed from office heading to Sunset voters in September, Lurie must decide whether to back Engardio and risk being on the losing side of the voters' will. Alternatively, the mayor could choose to stay out of the recall fight and send a potentially chilling message to Engardio and other allies. 'It's a dilemma,' said political consultant Eric Jaye. 'On the one hand, you risk your reputation with the voters. On the other hand, you risk your reputation with other politicians. And politicians like fellow politicians who are willing to stand up and be counted when the going gets tough for them.' The animating issue behind the recall battle is the fact that Engardio supported the closure of the Upper Great Highway to cars and most voters in his district did not. Lurie opposed the successful ballot measure last year that permanently shuttered the road to vehicles to make way for Sunset Dunes Park. He also drew broad support for his mayoral campaign from voters throughout the west side, including the Sunset. However, as mayor, Lurie has advanced a major rezoning of the west side to allow for denser housing construction in a swath of the city that has seen little residential development in recent decades. The move upset some west side residents, and it could be a factor in the effort to remove Engardio, who has made positive comments about the mayor's rezoning plan. 'I would be stunned if this vote didn't turn on that issue,' Jaye said. 'You have a constituency of people who are concerned about traffic and a constituency of people concerned about Engardio ignoring the will of his district. We're going to see whether or not Engardio and Lurie are ignoring the will of neighborhood voters with their massive upzoning.' But Todd David, a supporter of Engardio, doubted that any effort to link Lurie's rezoning initiative to the highway closure would be an effective recall strategy. David was one of the principal organizers of Proposition K, the measure that permanently turned the Great Highway into a promenade for pedestrians, runners and cyclists. He said an attempt to combine the highway discontent with mayoral rezoning frustration would probably fail to win over voters who did not already sign the recall petition. 'You're not bringing along a whole bunch of new people,' he said. 'There are outliers who will never support an upzoning in their neighborhood that are just a 'no change' crew, and I think that 'no change' crew is the crew that signed the recall. Overwhelmingly, people support more new housing in their neighborhood, including the Sunset.' So far, Lurie has not indicated how he might proceed. He has not weighed in on the recall qualifying for the ballot or signaled whether he will publicly back Engardio in the September election. In an earlier interview with the Chronicle, he said that, when it came to the Great Highway closure, he 'understand(s) everybody's concerns … but as a city, we have to move forward.' 'We will continue to monitor and make adjustments where we can as we see any impacts,' Lurie said. Engardio, meanwhile, told the Chronicle on Friday that he was 'in touch with the mayor and his team and we will have conversations soon.' 'I've been working closely with the mayor to pass legislation that addresses pressing issues that Sunset residents care about like public safety, housing, and our local economy,' he said in a statement. If Engardio were to be removed by voters in his district, the mayor would face another hard choice. At that point, he'd be tasked with appointing Engardio's successor. The decision would allow Lurie to handpick someone aligned with him, ensuring that the Board of Supervisors' political balance does not shift in the short term. But Lurie would also need to be mindful of the fact that the appointee would serve only until an election in June. The mayoral appointee would presumably run in that election, but they could face stiff competition from a progressive eager to build off the recall momentum to recapture the seat. When Engardio won the district in 2022, he defeated progressive Supervisor Gordon Mar by just 460 votes. So Lurie would probably want to appoint an Engardio-like moderate who doesn't have Engardio's political baggage from the Great Highway closure. 'The mayor is doing an incredible job, and he is able to get a lot done because he has a majority of pro-growth, pro-safety people on the board' of supervisors, said Sachin Agarwal, a co-founder of the moderate group Grow SF that supported Engardio's 2022 supervisor run. 'The most important thing we can do is continue to have that majority, and whether that's Joel or someone the mayor supports, we need someone who is focused on the basics.' Regardless of what Lurie does, David, the Engardio supporter, said he thinks the embattled supervisor can prevail by pointing to the ways he's tried to deliver on essential issues. For example, Engardio worked to secure funding for merchants to help them deal with impacts of controversial street construction, and he backed the return of algebra curriculum to eighth grade as well as the continuation of merit-based admissions at Lowell High School, David noted. As for Lurie's potential role, David said the mayor has had 'an outstanding working relationship with the Board of Supervisors.' 'I think it would be in the mayor's interest to want to continue to have a strong ally on the board,' he said. 'If, God forbid, Joel got recalled, then the mayor also would get to appoint somebody, but that person's name ID would be much lower than Joel's going into election season.'


San Francisco Chronicle
3 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Mayor Daniel Lurie proposes merger of two scandal-ridden S.F. departments
What once were two scandal-ridden San Francisco city departments will be one, if Mayor Daniel Lurie has his way. Included in Lurie's $15.9 billion annual budget plan he introduced Friday is a proposal to fold the Department on the Status of Women into the Human Rights Commission. Both agencies were the subject of high-profile scandals over the last year that led to the departures of their respective leaders. Lurie's official budget proposal said the combined entity would be called the Agency on Human Rights and it was intended to help 'improve outcomes for residents and grant recipients.' Consolidating the two departments would allow them to 'collaborate on community-facing grant services and their charter-mandated functions to defend civil rights,' the mayor's budget document said. The Human Rights Commission, the department that manages the city's social equity initiatives, oversees the Dream Keeper Initiative that former Mayor London Breed created to invest tens of millions of dollars in the city's Black community. But the department's former director resigned last year after news reports revealed problematic spending practices and highlighted her personal connection to the head of a nonprofit funded by the department. The Department on the Status of Women, meanwhile, has historically funded programs to fight gender-based violence but in recent years shifted to focus more on supporting women in politics. Its former director was removed in April following an administrative probe into a side job she held without making a timely disclosure and a contract her department awarded to a friend. The investigation found she had committed what Lurie called 'unlawful activities and mismanagement.' Lurie proposed folding the women's department into the Human Rights Commission as part of his plan to close the city's roughly $800 million two-year deficit, which must be reviewed and approved by the board of supervisors in the coming weeks. Details of the merger need to be worked out, but the two commissions that oversee the departments are expected to remain in place. Mawuli Tugbenyoh, acting director of the Human Rights Commission, acknowledged that the proposed merger was a 'significant change' but said it provided an opportunity to bring together two agencies with strong histories of advocacy. He said in a statement that there are 'no immediate changes to staff roles or day-to-day operations planned.' 'Over the coming weeks and months, HRC will work with staff across both departments to ensure we move forward together in a way that reflects our collective values, honors the expertise of our teams, and centers our shared mission,' Tugbenyoh said in his statement. He said his staff had already been through 'a year of enormous change and transition' and promised that 'we will navigate the way ahead with an eye on strengthening our ability to serve communities most in need." Officials from the Department on the Status of Women had not responded to requests for comment about the proposed merger as of late Friday afternoon. Lurie's office had no comment beyond the mayor's remarks about his overall budget plan, when he said he wanted to address the city deficit 'head-on.' 'A crisis of this magnitude means we cannot avoid painful decisions, and I am prepared to make those decisions,' Lurie said in his budget speech. 'We are doubling down on the core services that drive our economy, showcase the beauty and diversity of our neighborhoods, and enhance the quality of life for all San Franciscans.' At the Human Rights Commission, questions surfaced last year about then-Director Sheryl Davis' handling of the department after journalists revealed that she was living with the leader of Collective Impact, a nonprofit that was one of the biggest recipients of funding from the Dream Keeper Initiative. Stories also showed that the department flouted purchasing rules, revealed conflicts of interest and raised questions about whether Davis used her position to boost her personal brand. The stories led to Davis taking a leave of absence and Breed ultimately asking for her resignation, as well as an audit of the troubled department and the city canceling contracts with Collective Impact. Months later, the Department on the Status of Women was also enmeshed in scandal, after the Chronicle revealed that its director, Kimberly Ellis, had directed city funding to her friends and preferred organizations, including to a political group that later hired her as a consultant. After the Chronicle's investigation, Lurie asked the Commission on the Status of Women, which oversees the department, to remove Ellis. Ellis has denied the allegations as baseless and sued the city, arguing that she was the victim of a 'calculated campaign to remove her from office' for reporting misconduct by a subordinate.