
I had no idea I had hep C for 40 years – my GP failed to tell me I tested positive as it slowly destroyed my life
FRANK Jamieson says his GP practice failed to tell him he had a potentially deadly virus - more than 20 years after he tested positive.
'It has ruined my life", the 58-year-old, from Inverclyde, in Scotland, said.
1
"I have suffered from depression for a long time and have lost everything".
Frank was only told last October that he had hepatitis C, which he likely contracted 40 years ago during a leg operation after a road accident in 1984.
Hep C is a blood-borne virus which, left untreated, can cause liver cancer and liver failure.
It usually displays no symptoms until the virus damages the liver enough to cause liver disease, at which point it can cause fatigue and difficulty concentrating.
'My health was so bad, and I had no idea why," Frank said.
"It turned out they were all symptoms of hep C,' he added.
It is also linked to cardiovascular disease, mental health issues, kidney disease and musculoskeletal pain.
Frank's infection is part of the wider contaminated blood scandal, which saw thousands in Scotland and the UK infected with hepatitis C and HIV from NHS blood products in the 1970s and 80s.
He later discovered his GP surgery, Ardgowan Medical Practice in Greenock, knew he tested positive back in 2002, with results confirmed in January 2003.
'The surgery had my results but they never passed them on,' Frank said.
Infected Blood Inquiry: Police should look into prosecutions says Labour MP
'After all those years of going to the doctor, and that information being on my file, they are blaming me.'
Frank's positive test came just as he and his now wife were preparing for another round of IVF.
'I had my blood tests taken in late 2002 because my now wife and I were set to go through another round of IVF,' he said.
'We had two unsuccessful tries on the NHS and were going to pay for a third.'
But that Christmas, both lost their jobs when the company closed, halting their plans.
'Our lives fell apart. We still got married, but we couldn't afford the IVF, so we weren't able to try again,' Frank explained.
What is the infected blood scandal?
More than 30,000 people in the UK were infected with HIV and hepatitis C after being given contaminated blood products in the 1970s and 1980s.
As many as 140,000 bereaved parents, children and siblings of victims may also be able to claim compensation in their own right
Two main groups of NHS patients were affected by what has been called the biggest treatment disaster in the history of the NHS.
Firstly, haemophiliacs - and those with similar disorders - who have a rare genetic condition which means their blood does not clot properly.
People with haemophilia A have a shortage of a clotting agent called Factor VIII, while people with haemophilia B do not have enough Factor IX.
In the 1970s, a new treatment using donated human blood plasma was developed to replace these clotting agents.
But entire batches were contaminated with deadly viruses.
After being given the infected treatments, about 1,250 people in the UK with bleeding disorders went on to develop both HIV and hepatitis C, including 380 children.
About two-thirds later died of Aids-related illnesses. Some unintentionally gave HIV to their partners.
Another 2,400 to 5,000 people developed hepatitis C on its own, which can cause cirrhosis and liver cancer.
It is difficult to know the exact number of people infected with hepatitis C, partly because it can take decades for symptoms to appear.
A second group of patients were given contaminated blood transfusions after childbirth, surgery or other medical treatment between 1970 and 1991.
The inquiry estimates that between 80 and 100 of these people were infected with HIV, and about 27,000 with hepatitis C.
In total, it is thought about 2,900 people have died.
He added: 'Hepatitis C can cause infertility. We would have known that then if we'd had the results.'
The practice told Frank patients had to call within seven days for test results - but they have no record of him ever making that call.
'I asked them, where were the results all those years? Were they sitting in a drawer until I phoned?' he added.
The virus caused Frank severe health problems, including nerve and joint pain and Raynaud's phenomenon - symptoms that appeared five years ago.
'I have been suicidal'
Fortunately, Frank, who worked as an engineer until ill health forced him to give up work, is now free of hep C after undergoing anti-viral treatment.
He is now under the care of the SAMH charity (Scottish Action for Mental Health) as well as the NHS's local community mental health team.
They are helping him manage his depression and ongoing health challenges.
'I have been suicidal,' he said. 'Right now, I don't want to be here.'
Frank hopes to raise awareness so others in Inverclyde don't suffer the same fate.
'There might be other people out there who have missed blood test results, who have hep C or something else and who don't know,' he warned.
Now free of the virus after antiviral treatment, Frank is determined to hold his GP practice accountable.
'I want justice. I want to be heard, and I want Ardgowan Medical Practice to take responsibility for what happened,' he said.
His complaints to the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman were rejected due to the passage of time.
But Frank is pursuing support through the Scottish Infected Blood Support Scheme - a body that helps people infected by NHS blood products with compensation and support.
'My journey is just beginning,' he said.
Ardgowan Medical Practice declined to comment when approached by the Greenock Telegraph.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
30 minutes ago
- Sky News
Weight loss jabs - what else don't we know?
👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈 The government's health agency, the MHRA, is warning women that they shouldn't use weight loss jabs while pregnant and that the drugs can also affect the reliability of the pill, which has led to a rise in so-called "Ozempic babies". On today's Sky News Daily Niall Paterson talks to Dr Nikita Kanani, a GP and former medical director for primary care at NHS England, about the risks, whether there are other concerns about using them and if there should be tighter restrictions on online sales of the jabs.


Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
NHS chiefs forced to rip up trans guidance
NHS chiefs have been forced to rip up their pro-trans guidance after it was rendered illegal by the Supreme Court ruling. The NHS Confederation, which represents trusts, has quietly withdrawn guidance telling hospitals that they should allow trans people to use their chosen toilets and changing rooms. The group told The Telegraph it had taken the guide down from its website because it had become 'dated' since the Supreme Court judgment that the word sex in the Equality Act means biological sex. Reached in April, the decision means trans women, who were born male, should use men's toilets and changing rooms, contradicting the previous stance of a string of public sector organisations. The confederation's advice is now being updated in line with the Supreme Court ruling and new guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission, and will be published later. On Thursday night, women's rights charities demanded that the confederation apologise for the guidance, which they claimed may have led to unfair decisions, such as the case of Darlington nurses who were disciplined for demanding single-sex facilities. They said that rather than deleting the guidance, the confederation should actively inform all trusts that it was now null and void. Maya Forstater, the chief executive of Sex Matters, said: 'Its guidance encouraged a hostile, humiliating and unsafe environment for NHS workers and patients. It was published with much fanfare but withdrawn by stealth. 'NHS Confederation should now apologise publicly for undermining women's rights and the culture of care. It should also undertake to contact all NHS trusts, telling them that its guidance was flawed and that policies based on it should now be torn up.' A growing number of public bodies are changing their guidance in light of the Supreme Court judgment, including the Football Association, which has said trans women would be banned from women's sport. However, neither NHS England nor the NHS Confederation have put forward new guidance. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, has said he wants the new guidance in place by the summer. The confederation's now-withdrawn guidance stated: 'In all types of workplaces, trans and non-binary people should be supported to use the bathrooms they feel most comfortable using. At no time is it appropriate to force staff to use the toilet associated with their assigned sex at birth against their will.' It also tells management, senior healthcare leaders and human resources directors to take a 'zero-tolerance attitude' to transphobia. The confederation also promoted individual trusts' guidance, such as Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust, which said: 'You are entitled to use single-sex facilities in accordance with your gender identity. 'For non-binary people, this may mean using gender-neutral or accessible facilities, or using a combination of different facilities. A non-binary person can choose to use facilities they are most comfortable using, if gender neutral facilities are not present.' 'Will not change our commitment' A spokesman for the confederation said: 'We have withdrawn our guide from our website as elements of it were dated following the ruling of the Supreme Court in April and interim guidance from the EHRC. 'Our intention remains to provide our members with information that helps them best support their staff and patients, and so we will update and reinstate our guide as soon as the EHRC has updated its Code of Practice, which will need to be approved by the UK Government, and when NHS England has then updated its guidance for what the changes mean for NHS organisations. 'The withdrawal of our guide does not change our explicit commitment to support our members to reduce the unacceptably high levels of bullying, abuse and discrimination at work that trans and non-binary staff and patients face.' The spokesman said the guidance had not been taken down immediately after the Supreme Court ruling because the initial response had been to keep it on the NHS Confederation website with acknowledgements that certain elements of it had become dated. It was later decided that to avoid the risk of any confusion, it was best to remove the guide in its entirety and update it later. Ms Forstater said: 'NHS Confederation's now-withdrawn guidance on trans issues is among the worst we have seen. Not only did it encourage hospitals to break the law on workplace facilities, it directed NHS managers to regard anyone who correctly cited the law as a 'transphobe' and to treat them with a 'zero tolerance' approach. 'This is the approach that led to NHS staff such as Sandie Peggie and the Darlington nurses being disciplined in their workplaces simply for asserting their right to safety, dignity and privacy in single-sex facilities. 'Hospitals should always have been places where staff understood that sex matters. But NHS Confederation has been dragging its feet since the Supreme Court judgment was handed down.'


Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Voters head to polls for Hamilton by-election
Voters are going to the polls in a by-election where Reform aims to gain its first victory in Scotland The contest in Hamilton, Larkhill and Stonehouse was triggered by the death of the SNP's Christina McKelvie, a former minister, who had represented the seat in the Scottish Parliament since its creation in 2011 Labour has historically been the SNP's main challenger in the seat and its Westminster equivalent was won by Labour's Imogen Walker – who is married to Sir Keir Starmer's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney – in a massive swing away from the SNP in July 2024's general election. But with Labour plummeting in national polls, Reform UK has suddenly become the primary challenger to the SNP in the constituency. Reform UK's candidate is Ross Lambie, a 41-year-old South Lanarkshire councillor who controversially defected from the Conservative Party in March. The architect has claimed that 'legacy parties' are to blame for wasteful spending and has campaigned for oil drilling in the North Sea. Thursday's by-election is viewed as a bellwether contest ahead of 2026's Scottish Parliament election, with some polls showing Reform could overtake both Labour and the Tories to become the main opposition party. The SNP is currently leading polls at 32 per cent, with Reform UK second on 21 per cent and Labour third on 19 points, according to a Survation poll carried out in May. Despite the encouraging figures, Nigel Farage, the Reform leader, played down the party's chances in the contest, telling reporters during a visit to Scotland on Monday it was 'not impossible' but 'improbable' that his party would win. Last Thursday, John Swinney, the First Minister, intervened by telling Labour voters to argue that the only way to stop Mr Farage's party winning was to vote SNP. He claimed that the Labour campaign had collapsed in the area and described Mr Farage as a 'clear and present danger to our country'. Dame Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour's deputy leader, hit back by describing the comments as 'desperate and dishonest spin' and insisted the by-election was a 'direct fight' between Scottish Labour and the SNP. She added: 'John Swinney wants to make this by-election about Reform because he has no ideas for the future and cannot defend his government's record.' The polls opened at 7am on Thursday and were scheduled to close at 10pm, with a result expected at 2am on Friday. Labour activists from across the UK travelled to the constituency on Thursday as part of a 'get out the vote' campaign, with many groups spotted leafleting across Hamilton town centre. The party has the advantage of large numbers of enthusiastic activists it can call on to knock doors and rally undecided voters, something which Reform UK lacks. Professor Sir John Curtice said the SNP remained favourites to win the seat, but if the constituency followed national polling, it will be a 'close contest'. He told BBC Good Morning Scotland on Tuesday: 'It ought to be close between SNP and Reform, and maybe Reform will do somewhat better than in the national polls 'But we are looking at a winner with less than a third of the vote and winning by a small margin.'