Congress wants Medicaid recipients to work. Georgia provides a model
As Congressional Republicans seek to pass a budget bill enacting President Donald Trump's agenda, they're looking to require able-bodied Medicaid recipients to work in order to receive their health care coverage. Georgia is presently the only state in the nation with work requirements for its Medicaid population.
Here, Medicaid provides government-funded health care for some low-income people, with about 30 categories of eligibility including certain pregnant women, older widows and primary caregivers.
Instead of embracing traditional Medicaid expansion, Gov. Brian Kemp sought to grow the number of insured Georgians through a conservative framework; his program provides Medicaid to people earning up to 100% of the Federal Poverty Level - about $15,000 for a single person - if they work at least 80 hours per month or meet academic or other requirements.
But rather than leading to more Medicaid recipients working, Georgia's experience hasled to people who could be eligible for the program unable to receive Medicaid, mostly because of bureaucratic red tape.
While experts say Kemp's program, called Georgia Pathways to Coverage, has different aims, it could still provide lessons in both politics and policy.
Health care as a carrot
Pathways is designed to usehealth care as an incentive to get able-bodied individuals into the workforce on a limited basis. Eventually, the thinking goes, those part-time workers would transfer into full-time employees and become eligible for company-sponsored private health care plans, moving them off the government's rolls.
According to Kemp's Office, at least 1,025 Pathways members have been referred to "better, private health care coverage" through Georgia Access, the state's health care exchange, because their income increased.
"With this success it's no surprise that others are starting to emulate our innovative approach to health care coverage," said Garrison Douglas, a spokesperson for Kemp.
Chris Denson, the director of policy and research at the Georgia Public Policy Foundation, said Pathways is a way to increase health care coverage that is in line with the governor's vision withoutexpanding Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act.
States that expand Medicaid for people earning up to 138% of the Federal Poverty Level, about $21,000 for an individual, havereceived additional federal funding to pay for it. About 40 states have expanded; Georgia has not.
In Congress, lawmakers are looking for cuts that reduce the federal deficit, which is currently more than $1 trillion. Implementing work requirements nationwide among the existing able-bodied Medicaid population has been a Republican goal among those who believe there is waste and abusein Medicaid.
"Medicaid has grown beyond its original intention to cover the aged, the blind, the disabled population, children, single mothers, and has grown to cover able-bodied individuals. That has long been an issue within conservative health circles," Denson said.
As part of discussions last year around easing regulations to establish new hospitals in Georgia, state Sen. Matt Brass, a Republican from Newnan, had voted for a form of Medicaid expansion. His thinking has shifted since then, and he supports work requirements and the Pathways program.
"If you're going to use public money to pay for something, outside of those who are deaf, blind and disabled, you need to have some skin in the game," hesaid. "As long as you're working and a contributing member of society, then absolutely, I'm good with providing health care to help you do that."
Challenges with enforcement
Democrats understand that requiring Medicaid recipients to work for their benefits sounds like a good idea. A poll from the health research group KFF found that 62% of adults support work requirements.
"That actually makes sense to a lot of people. That sounds reasonable," said state Rep. Michelle Au, a Democrat from Johns Creek.
The problem, she said, is not with the work, it's with the administrative burden of reporting.
"There are people who actually are working and meet those hour eligibilities that still are not eligible for access through Pathways because of how onerous and difficult the reporting requirement is," she said. "It's building in a barrier to patients getting care."
KFF found that support for work requirements drops to 32% "when those who initially support the proposal hear that most people on Medicaid are already working and many would risk losing coverage because of the burden of proving eligibility through paperwork."
Kemp's team initially expected fewer than 100,000 people to be enrolled in the program. As of earlier this year, there were about 6,500.
Heather Payne is one of the patients struggling to get care. After she began having strokes a few years ago, she was no longer able to work her nursing job and has been waiting to get her disability application to be approved. She can't get Medicaid while her disability application is active, and she can't get Medicare without a disability status.
Payne, 53, who lives in Dalton, recently decided to go back to school. Attending a public or private university of technical college is considered a qualifying activity for Pathways.
But in addition to working clinical rotations, she's only taking nine credit hours right now, short of the 11.5 credit hours needed to be eligible for Pathways.
"I would have to take a full-time program at my school and work my clinical rotations to get the clinical experience I needed, to qualify to get Pathways," she said.
Other Georgians have said the portal to report work is a "nightmare," administrative support is lacking, and applicants are not given clear reasons why they are denied benefits.
When Arkansas implemented work requirements for Medicaid during the first Trump administration, one study found that 18,000 people lost coverage mostly because of the reporting requirements. The state then moved to a model where it purchased private health insurance plans for low-income people, but Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders asked the federal government in January to return to implementing work requirements.
When Pathways launched, Georgians were required to again prove their eligibility under the work rules every month.
A Georgia commission of health policy experts recommended in a December report that Pathways align with other human services programs that conduct annual verification to "improve participant user experience." In the Pathways renewal request that Kemp's office submitted in March, the state requested to remove the monthly reporting requirement and replace it with annual reporting at their time of renewal.
However, the "big, beautiful bill" the House approved would require reporting at least every six months.
Laura Colbert, the executive director of Georgians for a Healthy Future, said frequent checks are difficult and expensive. There is more churn within the system because people are often falling in and out of care.
Path forward
Proponents of work requirements say they offer flexibility while looking for employment
"If you can't find a job, there's no reason why you can't volunteer your time to help others," Brass said.
But, "if you're between jobs, you want them to be applying, and interviewing and doing all these things," Au said. "How are you supposed to find another job" if you're busy volunteering?
"Medicaid is not an employment program," she said. "The programmatic goal of Medicaid as a federal program is to provide health insurance coverage."
Republicans want to pass a budget bill through Congress by July 4.
_____
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
a few seconds ago
- Newsweek
Ghislaine Maxwell's Prison Conditions Come Under Scrutiny
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Ghislaine Maxwell's transfer to a minimum security prison "reeks of a coordinated protection racket run at taxpayer expense to shield the president," a senator said. Maxwell was jailed for 20 years in 2022 for various crimes related to sex trafficking over her role in grooming girls for Jeffrey Epstein to abuse. Questions have been asked after she was moved to a minimum security prison in Texas shortly after meetings with the Deputy U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche over two days in July. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, former Rhode Island attorney general, asked for all documents relating to the transfer as he raised concerns about Maxwell's potential "access to the community" from a minimum security facility despite being a convicted sex offender. Whitehouse is a prominent Democrat who has leveled a range of accusations at President Donald Trump before, including in May when he told MSNBC that the president's tariff policies opened the door to potential corruption. The Bureau of Prisons told Newsweek in an email: "The Bureau of Prisons responds directly to Members of Congress and their staff. Out of respect and deference to Members, we do not comment on our Congressional briefings or share our Congressional correspondence with the media. "Additionally, for privacy, safety, and security reasons, we do not discuss the conditions of confinement for any incarcerated individual." Newsweek contacted the Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice (DOJ) and White House as well as Maxwell's lawyer for comment. Ghislaine Maxwell attends the ETM 2014 Children's Benefit Gala at Capitale, in New York City, on May 6, 2014. President Donald Trump takes questions from reporters at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington on... Ghislaine Maxwell attends the ETM 2014 Children's Benefit Gala at Capitale, in New York City, on May 6, 2014. President Donald Trump takes questions from reporters at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington on August 5, 2025. More Paul Zimmerman/WireImage/Why It Matters Trump has been under pressure from his own base over a review he ordered into the Epstein files, with many MAGA supporters feeling they were led to believe bombshell new information was coming, including an "Epstein client list." The backlash began after a DOJ and FBI memo in July indicated no new charges against Epstein's associates and said there was no evidence of Epstein blackmailing rich and powerful men, as alleged by victims. It added: "This systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list.'" Trump then faced greater scrutiny over his own friendship with Epstein, though Trump said in 2019: "I had a falling out with him. I haven't spoken to him in 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you." What To Know Polling by YouGov between August 9-11 also showed 47 percent of Americans believe Maxwell should not have been moved to a minimum security prison compared to 14 percent who backed the transfer and 38 percent who said they were not sure. It comes as Allison Gill, host of the Mueller She Wrote podcast, reported she had been given some of Maxwell's prison information by an anonymous source. Gill said Maxwell was eligible to leave the prison for work which, if true, echoed Epstein being "allowed to leave prison as part of the sweetheart deal he got from Alex Acosta," who as then U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida brokered Epstein's heavily criticized plea deal in 2008. Maxwell's lawyer, David Oscar Markus, replied to the suggestion on X: "Another day, another false rumor about Ghislaine meant to unnecessarily inflame folks." Another day, another false rumor about Ghislaine meant to unnecessarily inflame folks. — David Oscar Markus (@domarkus) August 12, 2025 Whitehouse, a Senate Judiciary Committee member, told Newsweek: "Ghislaine Maxwell's quiet transfer to a 'Club Fed' prison does not comport with the seriousness of the sex crimes she was found guilty of. It just so happens that the transfer was facilitated one week after Maxwell's highly unusual meeting with the deputy attorney general. "This whole thing reeks of a coordinated protection racket run at taxpayer expense to shield the president from the fallout from his years-long friendship with a notorious sex trafficker. The American people deserve real answers on this sordid saga." Trump was recently asked at a press conference about the transfer and said: "I didn't know about it at all. I read about it just like you did. It's not a very uncommon thing." What People Are Saying Whitehouse wrote to Federal Bureau of Prisons Director William K. Marshall asking for a plethora of documents, including documents related to: "Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, any member of the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, or any other Department of Justice official not employed by the Bureau of Prisons." In his letter, published on his website, he wrote: "Roughly one week after Mr. Blanche's meetings, Ms. Maxwell was suddenly transferred from a low-security facility in Tallahassee, Florida, to a minimum-security prison camp in Bryan, Texas. "Ms. Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence for participation in a scheme with Epstein to traffic and sexually exploit minors. "By default, Bureau policy requires individuals like Ms. Maxwell, whose criminal history involves sex offenses, to be placed, at a minimum, at low-security facilities because they 'are not appropriate for placement at an institution which would permit inmate access to the community (i.e., MINIMUM security).' "Ordinarily, Bureau officials in Tallahassee would need to request waiver of this policy as part of their request to transfer Ms. Maxwell to a minimum-security facility, subject to approval by Bureau officials in Grand Prairie, Texas." Gill reported that Maxwell was granted a sex-offender waiver allowing her to move to a minimum security prison.


Bloomberg
a few seconds ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Hopes to Have Meeting With Putin and Zelenskiy
President Donald Trump says he had a very good call with European leaders ahead of his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump hopes to have a meeting with Putin and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskiy soon after his trip to Alaska. 'Now there may be no second meeting, because if I feel that it's not appropriate to have it, because I didn't get the answers that we have to have, then we're not going to have a second meeting,' Trump said. He spoke to reporters at the Kennedy Center in Washington, DC. (Source: Bloomberg)


CNBC
a few seconds ago
- CNBC
Trump shrugs off suspected Russian hack of U.S. federal courts: 'Are you surprised?'
President Donald Trump on Wednesday shrugged off a question about a new report that Russia is at least partially responsible for hacking the electronic system that manages U.S. federal court case documents. "Are you surprised?" Trump said during a press event at The Kennedy Center. "They hack in, that's what they do," he said about Russia. "They're good at it, we're good at it, we're actually better at it." Revelations of the breach came days before Trump is set to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska about Russia's war against Ukraine. Trump said that he "could" bring up the hack during the meeting. The New York Times reported Tuesday that evidence shows that an entity in Russia appeared to have hacked the court case document system and "recently compromised sealed records." That system, in addition to containing publicly available court documents, also has hidden records, including information on individuals charged with national security crimes. "Some of the searches included midlevel criminal cases in the New York City area and several other jurisdictions, with some cases involving people with Russian and Eastern European surnames," the Times reported. The hack is believed to be part of a years-long effort, the Times reported. The U.S. Courts system last week announced that it "is taking additional steps to strengthen protections for sensitive case documents in response to recent escalated cyberattacks of a sophisticated and persistent nature on its case management system." "The Judiciary is also further enhancing security of the system and to block future attacks, and it is prioritizing working with courts to mitigate the impact on litigants," the system said. An internal memo to Justice Department officials and staffers from the court system, which the Times reviewed, warned that "persistent and sophisticated cyber threat actors have recently compromised sealed records." "This remains an URGENT MATTER that requires immediate action," the memo said.