'Not A Serious Analysis': Reeves' 'Baffling' Spending Plan Slammed By Leading Economists
Rachel Reeves' spending review has been slammed by leading economists who said it was not a 'serious department analysis'.
The chancellor unveiled her plans to spend an extra £300 billion over the next three years on Wednesday, divvying out huge sums of cash to the NHS, net zero and defence – while also squeezing other Whitehall budgets.
The government has said this is all an investment in Britain's renewal, and insisted that these decisions are fully-financed after Labour hiked taxes in last year's Budget.
However, the director of think tank the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) Paul Johnson tore into her announcement on Thursday.
'If you were baffled by the chancellor's speech yesterday, so were we,' he said during the IFS's analysis livestream on YouTube. 'It did not appear to be a serious effort to provide useful information to anybody.'
He also seemed to criticise the premise that the economy is now in better place than it was a year ago, hence Labour's decision to spend again – and reverse some cuts.
'Despite some of the rather odd recent claims, neither the economic forecasts nor the public finances have improved relative to the genuinely difficult situation we knew about a year ago,' Johnson said. 'Rather the reverse. Hence some difficult choices.'
Large council tax hikes have been included in the government expectations for the review, which also 'assumes that council tax bills will rise by 5% a year', according to the IFS chief.
That means bills will rise at their fastest rate 'over any parliament since 2001-05.'
Johnson laid into the cuts Reeves is imposing on other Whitehall departments in order to boost the NHS, defence and net zero, too.
He said: 'Every department is facing the same administrative costs, 10% for all of them over the three years, and then another 5% in 2029-30.
'All of that is irrespective of how much they've grown, irrespective of planned spending increases, irrespective of anything at all.
'That is not the result of a serious department analysis.
'I hesitate to accuse the Treasury of making numbers up but…'
He noted that total departmental spending is set to grow at 2.3% a year above economy-wide inflation.
That's lower growth than was recorded over the 2019-2024 parliament, when it increased at 3.6% per year.
'This is a long period during which spending will be growing faster than the economy,' he said.
Johnson even questioned the suggestion that the NHS had fared particularly well, noting: 'Health spending nearly always gets topped up. Growth of 3% a year is below the historic average.'
Mounting pressures on spending, including the U-turn on winter fuel allowance for pensioners and the backlash against disability benefit cuts, means Reeves is expected to either introduce more cuts or hike taxes in the autumn Budget to pay for it all.
Johnson noted: 'Nobody should be in any doubt that the chancellor has had some incredibly tough decisions to take.
'With spending plans set, and 'ironclad' fiscal rules being met by gnat's whisker, any move in the wrong direction will almost certainly spark more tax rises.'
Nick Ferrari Calls Rachel Reeves 'The Klarna Chancellor' After She Splashed The Cash In Spending Review
Blow For Rachel Reeves As UK Economy Shrank By 0.3% After Trump Tariffs
Rachel Reeves Takes Axe To Whitehall Departments To Pay For Health And Defence Cash Splurge
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
The Senate GOP's hard-liners are suddenly sounding softer on the megabill
The Senate's conservative hard-liners vowed to wage holy war against the 'big, beautiful bill.' Now they appear to be coming to Jesus. The recent rhetorical downshift from some of the loudest GOP critics of the pending megabill underscores the political reality for conservatives: As much as they want to rail publicly about the legislation and the need to address any number of pressing national emergencies in it, very few are willing to buck President Donald Trump on his biggest priority. None of them are ready to cave just yet. But the White House and their GOP colleagues increasingly believe that three senators in particular — Sens. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Mike Lee of Utah and Rick Scott of Florida — are now on track to support the bill. Johnson, in particular, has softened his once-fierce criticism of the legislation in recent days. 'We all want to see President Trump succeed,' he said in a brief interview this week. 'Everybody is trying to help. That's why, if I seem to have been striking a more hopeful tone, it's because I am more hopeful.' Just a couple of weeks ago, Johnson was demanding near-unworkable levels of spending cuts and warning that the bill would drive the nation off a fiscal cliff. Then the Trump administration and members of Republican leadership went to work. Johnson made a pitch to Trump during a recent one-on-one phone call to let him work with administration officials on his deficit reduction plan. That led to a meeting with Vice President JD Vance and Kevin Hassett, the director of the National Economic Council. A person with knowledge of the meeting, granted anonymity to speak candidly, said afterward that the White House is 'optimistic that there's a path to getting Johnson to yes.' Trump also privately urged Johnson during a meeting with other Finance Committee Republicans last week to speak more positively about the bill. The callout came after Trump officials — and Trump himself — grew annoyed watching Johnson savage the bill on television. His message: You should be out there selling this bill proudly, he told Johnson, according to two White House officials granted anonymity to describe the meeting — arguing that even if he doesn't love every detail, there was plenty in the bill for Republicans to be proud of. 'When the president says, 'Ron, you've been so negative, that's just not even helpful,' I want to be helpful,' Johnson said, acknowledging Trump's message in the meeting and admitting he has 'downplayed what is good in the bill.' One of the White House officials summarized the approach to Johnson: 'Don't be negative to create leverage for yourself,' the person said. 'If you want to negotiate, like, we can negotiate in private. We're all reasonable people.' The hands-on efforts to win over Johnson are part of a larger effort to try to help the fiscal hawks find a soft landing — and at least the semblance of some concessions that will be able to hold up as wins in the end. That's played out in face-to-face meetings with administration officials, negotiations over pet provisions and discussions about how to continue the fight to cut budget deficits down the road. Being able to win over their deficit hawks would be a huge boon to Majority Leader John Thune, who has acknowledged that he's got one hard 'no' vote in Sen. Rand Paul, who firmly opposes the bill's debt-ceiling hike. Thune can only afford to lose three GOP senators, with Vance breaking a tie. That has given the fiscal hawks leverage, since the GOP leaders can't afford to lose all of them, and that's on top of the other potential headaches they have to navigate elsewhere in the conference. To hear the fiscal hawks tell it, they are sounding a more positive note about their ability to support the bill because the administration is starting to take their demands seriously. To help appease their holdouts, GOP leaders have tried to scrounge up additional savings beyond what is included in the House bill. 'I believe we'll get a deal done. I'm doing everything I can to represent my state,' Scott said in a brief interview. GOP leaders are working to assuage Lee by tucking one of his top priorities into the bill. The deregulatory proposal, known as the REINS Act, was initially expected to run afoul of Senate rules for the party-line reconciliation process, but leaders have been working to try to find a version that could pass muster. House conservatives, meanwhile, have grown increasingly worried that the Senate, with the blessing of their fiscal-hawk allies, will send back a bill that waters down some of their hard-fought victories. The House Freedom Caucus has laid out public demands, while its members have met privately with Lee, Scott and Johnson to strategize about additional spending reductions and maintaining their policy wins. The Senate hard-liners aren't ready to concede just yet. Senate Budget Chair Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has promised Johnson he will advance a second reconciliation bill, giving conservatives another chance to enact cuts. But Johnson said that wouldn't be enough to get him on board. Instead he wants a 'forcing mechanism' to maintain a longer-term push to return to 2019 spending levels. He's letting the White House brainstorm other ideas and described himself as 'reasonably flexible.' Lee said in a statement he's 'been working with my colleagues and the White House to make the Big Bill Beautiful.' But added: 'It's not where it needs to be yet.' 'We need to sell federal land to help fix the housing crisis, terminate benefits that flow to illegals, end the Green New Scam, and get rid of the Medicaid provider tax. I want to see this effort cross the finish line, but we need to do more,' he added. Even as they continue to push, their colleagues see the signs of late softening — and aren't surprised whatsoever. 'They'll fold,' said a GOP colleague who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) said that Republicans have 'made progress' with Johnson and 'I wouldn't count him out.' And two others, Sens. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) and John Kennedy (R-La.), said they expect Lee, Scott and Johnson to come around when the bill comes up for a final vote, even if they don't ultimately love every provision. 'They're very gettable,' Kennedy said. 'At some point people are just going to have to decide, is this good enough?' Rachael Bade and Meredith Lee Hill contributed reporting.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Spending Review criticised by Tory police leaders
Three Conservative Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) in the south of England have criticised the chancellor's long-term spending plans. Rachel Reeves announced on Wednesday that police funding would rise by 2.3% a year to fund 13,000 more neighbourhood officers. But Thames Valley PCC Matthew Barber and Hampshire and Isle of Wight PCC Donna Jones said the increase was funded by an assumed increase in council tax, while Dorset PCC David Sidwick said policing was at risk without "significant investment". Reeves told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme she did not "accept" the need for cuts to police jobs. Reeves' comments were in response to Labour's London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan saying the Spending Review would lead to cuts to frontline policing. Police budgets are made up of funding from both central government and a portion of council tax called the police precept. PCCs can raise this precept by £14 a year for a Band D council tax bill without having to have a referendum. This is in addition to a 5% general rise. "When they talk about spending power, that's predicated on me increasing council tax by £14 every year for the next three years on local taxpayers," said Barber. "The chancellor says no tax rise is needed to fund her spending plans [but] she's simply passing the buck from one place to another, and taxpayers end up picking up the bill." Jones said the plan to increase neighbourhood policing by 13,000 officers was "now merely a pipe dream". "What it is going to mean is that smaller police forces across the country will probably be forced to reduce their head count for police officers, and probably entirely get rid of police community support officers," she said. Sidwick said Dorset residents "already pay over and above what other areas do for their police force" because rurality and seasonality were not considered in the funding formula. "That is not right," he said. "I understand there are tough decisions the government must make - we've had to make many in Dorset due to years of underfunding - but it is clear that serious and very real concerns from all corners of policing have once again not been heeded by those in power." A Home Office spokesperson said: "We are committed to ensuring that police forces have the resources they need to keep our streets safe. "Council tax levels are a local decision, and elected police and crime commissioners will consider the appropriate level for their local priorities. "Further details for next year will be set out in the autumn as part of the annual police funding settlement." You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram. Winners and losers: Who got what in the spending review? Justice system starved of money, police leaders say Hampshire PCC Thames Valley PCC Dorset PCC
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
BBC Question Time Audience Member Brands Reform 'The Comedy Club' As Zia Yusuf Awkwardly Looks On
Former Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf was left squirming after an audience member on Question Time branded his party 'the comedy club'. The man's remark was greeted with applause on the BBC1 programme on Thursday night. Yusuf, who is now in charge of Reform's so-called 'DOGE unit' aimed at cutting out public sector waste, was left looking on awkwardly as the man made his remarks. 'It's not whether Reform will end up in the comedy club – they are the comedy club,' the man said. Addressing Darren Jones, the chief secretary to the Treasury, he went on: 'You said that Labour got in because people wanted change. They didn't. Labour got in because they wanted Labour in charge. 'And why did they want Labour in charge? Because of what you stand for. I think you need to change the narrative. You took over from the Tories, who destroyed this country in 14 years, and you've given [Reform UK] a window to spout the stuff they do. ″[Yusuf] is now the DOGE lead, like Elon Musk and Trump. It's a matter of time before him and Nigel Farage are going to fall out. What you need to do is change the narrative.' Man in blue calls out ReformThen tells Labour to do better# — Farrukh (@implausibleblog) June 12, 2025 Zia Yusuf Says Reform Would Deport All Illegal Immigrants – But Nigel Farage Has Said That's 'Impossible' 'You've Been Muscled Out': Nick Robinson Goads Zia Yusuf For Quitting As Reform Chairman Reform UK Mocked After Zia Yusuf Returns Just 48 Hours After Quitting
