The Latest ‘Superman' Trailer Has Me More Worried Than Ever
Superman
Credit: DC / Warner Bros
Tickets for Superman are now on-sale. I purchased mine through a special Amazon Prime / Fandango promotion for Prime members and get to go watch the new James Gunn movie two days early on July 8th. I'm genuinely hoping that this is a return to form for DC and the Man Of Steel, but every trailer released so far has me worried, and the latest two-minute spot has me more concerned than ever.
It's hard to put into words exactly why this is, partly because there's a lot to like about the film's direction – or what we can tell about its direction – so far. I'll start with the good.
First of all, I love the casting all around. David Corenswet is a great choice for Superman and Clark Kent, and every glimpse of him in action or delivering lines is pitch perfect. I also love Nicholas Hoult who plays the film's main villain, Lex Luthor. The rest of the cast, from Rachel Brosnahan's Lois Lane to Nathan Fillion's Guy Gardner/Green Lantern, is on-point. Anthony Carrigan as Metamorpho, Isabela Merced as Hawkgirl, Wendell Pierce, etc. etc. I could rave all day about the casting.
I also like the more upbeat, positive tone of the movie. Superman is a beacon of hope. This is a character who feels at odds with so much of modern cinema and modern culture because he's so optimistic and earnest. Even the one-liner in this trailer feels like upbeat banter rather than the snarky, sarcastic quippiness we find in so many superhero movies these days.
So what is it about this trailer that has me worried? Pretty much the same things I've noted in the past.
First, the visual effects are jarring. There are some cool moments here, but the overall effect is unpleasant. What's with all the slow-motion, Mr. Gunn? If we wanted egregious use of slow-mo action shots we could just ask Zack Snyder to return to DC. The abundance of wide-angle, fishbowl shots is also very off-putting. And what's with this shot of teeth bouncing off the camera? This just looks awful to me:
I don't hate the color pallette but I don't love it, either. I'm even glad to see such a colorful superhero movie given how inert and dark and lifeless, or just plain drab, so many DC movies have been in recent years. There's a place for dark and gritty in DC and it's called Gotham, but far too many other films in this franchise have felt colorless and bland. This bucks that trend. But perhaps it bucks it too hard, because at timesthe color-grading just looks cheap and makes the visuals look fake. Which reminds me of films like the recent Flash (though, again, more saturated and less bland).
I've gotten responses from fans who say something sarcastic like 'oh no a comic book movie that looks like a comic book!" but this isn't the problem. I'm all for comic book movies looking like comic books. I just don't love how this one is shaping up. It looks more like a commercial than a movie at times, if that makes sense. Some of the scenes – like this one with Superman laser-beaming a bunch of baddies – looks like a weird cutscene from a video game.
The CGI is just . . . it's not good, especially in shots where Superman himself is clearly almost entirely CGI. I'm not sure why people are defending it so passionately. You see fans saying things like 'it's a superhero movie with flying and superpowers and you complain that it looks fake?' But the trick with filmmaking is to create immersion, especially when you're doing magical things, whether that's dragons, magic or superhero stuff. If the special effects look fake or even too clean, you break immersion.
Then there's the cast. As I said above, it's a wonderful cast but it's also just massive. This is a two-hour movie (which is a perfect runtime!) but we have so many characters, I can't imagine any of them getting the screentime they deserve. I worry a lot about the pacing and this just turning into a frenetic mess with too much plot squeezed into too short a picture, like spreading far too much butter over too little bread.
Fans seem pretty hyped about Superman, so maybe I'm just overly cynical and need a dose of Superman's effervescent optimism myself. I want to be wrong. I want all my concerns to be laser-blasted into oblivion. If the story is good, I can probably look past all the rest, and I've enjoyed plenty of Gunn's work in the past, which assuages some of my fears. We'll know one way or another in less than a month. Here's the latest trailer:
What do you think? Let me know on Twitter, Instagram, Bluesky or Facebook. Also be sure to subscribe to my YouTube channel and follow me here on this blog. Sign up for my newsletter for more reviews and commentary on entertainment and culture.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
25 minutes ago
- USA Today
Bryce Dallas Howard never tried alcohol. Here's how she played drunk in 'Deep Cover'
Bryce Dallas Howard never tried alcohol. Here's how she played drunk in 'Deep Cover' Show Caption Hide Caption 'Superman,' Mission: Impossible,' 'F1' and summer's must-see films USA TODAY film critic Brian Truitt releases his list of summer's must-see films. The highlights include "Superman" and "Mission: Impossible." NEW YORK − Bryce Dallas Howard never sipped alcohol in her life. But that didn't stop her from acting like an alcoholic who needs an intervention in her new crime comedy "Deep Cover" (streaming now on Amazon Prime Video). "I put ice cubes in my mouth because it kind of numbs your mouth," Howard, 44, reveals to USA TODAY of her trick to play drunk. "I also really enunciate a lot, so (the ice) helps to get the slurring going." Howard's other trick? She spins in circles to get dizzy. "That made me sick," Howard's co-star, Nick Mohammed, 44, interjects. "I'd rather get drunk." Join our Watch Party! Sign up to receive USA TODAY's movie and TV recommendations right in your inbox In "Deep Cover," Howard plays Kat, an improv-comedy teacher who is recruited along with two of her students (Mohammed and Orlando Bloom) to infiltrate a criminal gang in London. The actors note that there wasn't much improv in the movie, with the exception of the aforementioned intervention scene. After seeing her out on the town gallivanting with a few shady characters, Kat's friends intervene, unaware that the teacher is actually on a secret mission at the direction of law enforcement. There was one part of Howard's character that hit closer to home: teaching. The filmmaker holds a degree from New York University and taught classes there about the entertainment industry. Howard says she recently moved back to the New York area and is in talks with the university about returning to the classroom. "I could relate to the excitement around seeing other people (learn) and seeing people kind of come alive," Howard says. "But I also had even more empathy for my character because the thing that I teach in, I also do for my living. Whereas with Kat, she was teaching something that she wanted to be doing for her living, but she wasn't really getting a shot at it." Howard wasn't the only actor to partake in debauchery: Mohammed's character Hugh has to snort cocaine during the trio's initial meeting with the gangster Fly (Paddy Considine) to prove that the trio aren't posers. As for any real-life parallels, Mohammed says he has never taken drugs. Something bizarre but unrelated to the movie did happen to him four months ago, though: He almost lost a finger. The actor, best known as Nate Shelley from "Ted Lasso," says he sliced it while trying to remove an avocado pit. Fans of "Ted Lasso" may recall that in Season 3, Mohammed played violin during a scene. The actor learned the instrument when he was a child and performed in his college orchestra. He doesn't break out the violin for "Deep Cover" and says his injury has prevented him from playing. Mohammed explained to his mother, who was a doctor, that he doesn't really have any feeling in the finger. "My mom said, 'That might come back in a year,' " Mohammed recalls of the conversation. "I was like, 'And if it doesn't?' She's like, 'If it doesn't come back in a year, it's not coming back.'" At least in this situation, it doesn't seem as if ice is going to help.
The Verge
an hour ago
- The Verge
will start streaming on Max on June 20th,
Max chicken jockey. A Minecraft Movie according to Warner Bros. Discovery. The movie was a huge hit in theaters. A MINECRAFT MOVIE Begins Streaming Exclusively On Max June 20 [
Geek Tyrant
an hour ago
- Geek Tyrant
Why Lex Luthor Hates Superman So Much, According to James Gunn and Nicholas Hoult — GeekTyrant
Lex Luthor's vendetta against Superman isn't just about jealousy, it's deeper, more existential, and, according to Superman star Nicholas Hoult and director James Gunn, relatable in today's world. In a recent interview with Fandango at MEGACON Orlando, Hoult broke down what really drives Lex's hatred of the Man of Steel, saying: 'We are weak, and that's what Superman shows us, that we are.' Hoult describes Lex as someone who built his empire on power, intelligence, and the belief that humanity could, and should, be its own savior. But then Superman drops from the sky, and suddenly Lex isn't the smartest, most admired man in the room. The attention, the faith, the admiration that Lex worked for is gone in a flash. Hoult added: 'Suddenly this person has taken all that adoration that [Lex] feels he deserved.' It's not just Superman's abilities that infuriate Lex, it's what he represents. His presence threatens Lex's entire sense of self-worth. If a godlike alien can save the day, what's the point of everything Lex has accomplished? Gunn, who's both writing and directing the new Superman film, chimed in with a modern analogy: 'I think Lex looks at Superman like a lot of print artists look at AI. He sees him as a threat to his livelihood and his legacy.' This frames Lex not just as a villain, but as someone watching the world shift beneath his feet, where everything he values and built is being overtaken by something he can't control, and didn't ask for. It's less megalomania, more existential dread. Something I can 100% relate to. Gunn continued by pointing out that for Lex, Superman isn't just a superpowered alien, he's an uninvited cultural phenomenon: 'He's a simple guy wearing a stupid costume that all of a sudden everybody loves, and every woman loves, and all of the things that [Lex] cares about now are all going to him.' There's also a pragmatic side to Lex's menace. Hoult pointed out that the challenge of making a human villain feel like a real threat to an unstoppable alien. The answer lies in Lex's brain, not brawn. 'Strategy and manipulation' are his weapons, not fists or lasers. That contrast, power vs. control, strength vs. intellect, is where the tension in Superman will come from. Hoult also made it clear he's just getting started in the role. 'There is much I want to do with Lex.' If this take on the character hits the way it sounds like it might, it will be interesting to see how his story arc will play out beyond this first Superman movie.
