Cancer deaths and tax rates linked in surprising new study: Here's how
The link was revealed in a new study published in JAMA Network Open, which aimed to explore how state-level tax revenue impacts cancer screenings and mortality in the U.S.
Researchers from The Ohio State University, Emory University in Georgia and the University of Verona in Italy analyzed 1,150 state-years of tax data over a 23-year period, between 1997 and 2019. (A state-year refers to one year of data from one state.)
New Prostate Cancer Test Pinpoints Disease Better Than Psa Option, Study Finds
They also reviewed population-level cancer screening rates and cancer-related deaths from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) databases.
The states with higher tax income were found to have increased cancer screening rates and decreased cancer mortality rates, the researchers found.
Read On The Fox News App
For each $1,000 increase in tax revenue per capita, the population had a 1.61% increase in colorectal cancer screening, a 2.17% increase in breast cancer screening and a 0.72% increase in cervical cancer screening rate, the research showed.
Alternative Cancer Treatment Could Replace Chemo And Surgery, Study Suggests
Among those who had cancerous tumors, each $1,000 increase in tax revenue per capita was linked to up to 4% decreased death rates among White patients. The same reduced risk was not found for racial and ethnic minority populations, according to the study.
"State-level tax policy is an underappreciated social determinant of health that may improve cancer screening and mortality rates," the researchers wrote.
"These findings suggest that state-level tax revenue may serve as one aspect of a multifaceted approach to improve cancer-related outcomes in the U.S. and help bridge cancer care gaps, particularly in more progressive tax policy settings."
Prior studies have identified tax policy as a predictor of public health, particularly for infant mortality risk and overall healthcare outcomes.
"Tax revenue may serve as funding that promotes the common good by ensuring access to safe, healthy environments and quality healthcare, while progressive taxes can substantially increase the disposable income of working-class households, thus enhancing their living standards and improving their health and cancer outcomes," the study stated.
Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter
Dr. Marc Siegel, clinical professor of medicine at NYU Langone Health and Fox News senior medical analyst, shared his external reaction to the study.
"One possible association could be that the higher your taxes, the more money you would have to buy healthier food and more luxury for relaxation and exercise," he told Fox News Digital.
"Having more money to pay for extra treatment, earlier diagnosis and better care can also help prevent cancer death."
The study did have some limitations, the researchers acknowledged — chiefly that the results show an association but do not prove that the high tax rates caused the decreased mortality.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
Cancer screening rates were also based on patient questionnaires, which could have some level of bias.
There is also the possibility of measurement errors in the data, the researchers cautioned.Original article source: Cancer deaths and tax rates linked in surprising new study: Here's how
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
16 hours ago
- CBS News
Nearly a third of people using over-the-counter birth control pills previously used nothing, study finds
Two years after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first over-the-counter birth control pill, new research is looking at who's switching to it and why. In the study, published Monday in JAMA Network Open, researchers used survey data from 986 people, ages 15 to 45, in 44 states who obtained the over-the-counter pill either online or at a pharmacy. They found that a significant portion of users shifted to the over-the-counter pill from a less-effective method of birth control or from using no contraception at all. Of those surveyed, they found a 31.8 percentage point increase in use by people who previously used no contraceptive method. A 41 percentage point increase was seen in those who switched from a less-effective method, like condoms or emergency contraception. Opill, the over-the-counter, progestin-only pill from drugmaker Perrigo, provides an option for obtaining oral contraceptives without needing to first see a health care provider. Allowing people to access the pill without a prescription was done in hopes of reducing barriers to access, according to the FDA's news release at the time of approval, which noted that almost half of the 6.1 million pregnancies in the U.S. each year are unintended. The new research "is one of the first studies to show that over-the-counter birth control pills are reaching the very people they're meant to help — those who face the greatest barriers to care," lead author Dr. Maria Rodriguez, professor of obstetrics and gynecology in the Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, said in a news release. Those accessing the over-the-counter pill were more likely than prescription users to be uninsured, younger (ages 15-20) and living in rural areas, according to the study. The most common reason people gave in the survey for choosing the OTC pill was that it didn't require an appointment, followed by those who said they didn't have a regular physician. "At a time when pregnancy is becoming even more dangerous in the United States — especially for people of color, those with low incomes, and those living in rural communities — our findings underscore that OTC contraception is a powerful tool for reproductive autonomy," Rodriguez said.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Man who went blind after drinking alcohol in Laos now raising awareness
A man who went blind after drinking alcohol in Laos is working with other affected families to campaign for awareness of methanol poisoning. Calum Macdonald had a night out in Vang Vieng in November last year and the next day his vision was 'engulfed in this blinding white light', he told BBC Breakfast. Police in Laos have previously detained several people in connection with the deaths of six people who are believed to have been poisoned, including Simone White, 28, from Orpington, Kent. Methanol is sometimes used by disreputable bars as a cheaper alternative to ethanol but can cause severe poisoning or death. Mr Macdonald was at a hostel where free whisky and vodka shots were offered, and he mixed them with soft drinks, he said. He told how he was on a bus crossing into Vietnam when he noticed something was wrong. He told BBC Breakfast: 'The point at which I really started to notice some strange side effects was we briefly got off the bus to cross the border into Vietnam, and we went through the border office – we had to fill out a number of forms to get across to the other side – and at that point, sort of my entire vision was engulfed in this blinding white light. 'And I just thought, you know, this is very strange. I couldn't actually see where I was walking.' He added: 'We arrived in Hanoi, and at that point, the kind of white light in my eyes had diminished, and it wasn't until we got to our hotel room and my friends and I were sitting in the room, and I said to my friends, why are we sitting in the dark here? Let's turn on a light. And they informed me that the light was, in fact, already on.' Mr Macdonald then went to hospital and said on the journey there he 'really started to struggle to breathe' and could 'barely get my words out'. He said a number of tests were carried out initially but it was not until he got back to England when he was in hospital and they 'really sort of indicated that it was definitely related to something I'd been drinking'. Mr Macdonald is now speaking out as he wants information to be available to people about methanol poisoning, especially students who might be preparing to go on a gap year. He said: 'I think I definitely feel a sense of responsibility as someone who's been lucky enough to survive this, to try and get the message out. Because I know certainly, if I'd known about it, I wouldn't be in this situation. 'And I know I have a lot of friends that have also done similar sort of gap years in travelling around even that particular area. And so definitely, I think it's quite important. 'I've had the opportunity to speak to a number of other families that have been affected by this, and they're far more knowledgeable and have been campaigning for awareness for a lot longer than I have been involved. And what they tend to say generally is that sometimes the advice isn't put in strong enough terms. 'And so I think, I guess if I was to put out a recommendation to people, although I'm certainly not an expert or a medical professional, I would probably say that if you did want to drink alcohol in some of the affected countries, probably just to avoid spirits entirely. 'I think it would be nice, even if we could get some more information directly into universities, because I think that's the age of people that are really considering doing these kinds of trips, I think that would be a great thing.' The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has been approached to comment.
Medscape
a day ago
- Medscape
Diabetes Tied to Slower Brain Recovery After TBI
TOPLINE: Diabetes was associated with reduced global cognition 2 weeks after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and less improvement in processing speed throughout the first year post-TBI compared to not having diabetes, a new cohort study showed. METHODOLOGY: The prospective cohort TRACK-TBI study included more than 1000 participants aged 17 years or older with TBI (mean age, 39 years; 67% men; 76% White individuals) who presented to one of 18 level 1 trauma centers in the US between 2014 and 2018. Participants underwent cognitive assessments at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year post-injury that evaluated verbal episodic memory, executive function, and processing speed alone and combined into a global cognitive factor score. Researchers analyzed associations between cognitive outcomes and the vascular risk factors of hypertension (17%), diabetes (7.5%), hyperlipidemia (9%), and smoking (30%). They adjusted the analysis for age, sex, race, ethnicity, education, severity of TBI, and histories of TBI and psychiatric conditions. TAKEAWAY: After adjustment for confounders, participants with diabetes had lower global cognitive factor scores at 2 weeks post-injury than those without diabetes (mean difference in change, -0.25; P < .05) and showed less improvement in processing speed over the first year post-injury (mean difference, -0.26; P < .05). Individuals with two or more vascular risk factors had lower global cognitive factor scores at 2 weeks post-injury than those without any vascular risk factors (mean difference, -0.21; P < .05), as well as worse verbal memory and processing speed (mean differences, -0.18 and -0.22, respectively; P < .05 for both). However, they had similar improvement over the first year. Cognitive performance did not differ significantly by hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or smoking status. In sensitivity analyses, participants with treated diabetes had worse cognitive outcomes than those without diabetes, including lower global cognitive factor scores at 2 weeks (mean difference, -0.32) and less improvement in global cognitive function over 1 year (mean difference, -0.29). IN PRACTICE: 'Given the modifiable nature of comorbid vascular risk factors, future work interrogating postinjury changes in vascular risk factor burden, over longer follow-up, is warranted,' the investigators wrote. SOURCE: The study was led by Andrea L. C. Schneider, MD, PhD, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia. It was published online on August 8 in JAMA Network Open. LIMITATIONS: Vascular risk factors were only assessed at enrollment, preventing the evaluation of post-injury changes in risk factor status. Information on disease duration or severity were unavailable. The study also experienced significant attrition leading to missing data. Additionally, the findings could not be generalized to milder injuries or more severe TBI cases managed beyond level 1 trauma centers. DISCLOSURES: The study was funded by the National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke and by a grant from the Department of Defense. Several investigators reported having financial or other ties with various sources. Full details are provided in the original article. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
