Union claims mayor refused plant closure meetings
The Saudi Arabian firm Sabic, one of the world's largest petrochemical manufacturers, decided to shut its Olefins 6 cracker plant in Wilton, Teesside, in June, after 46 years of operating.
A spokesperson for Unite said Sabic had been in touch with Tees Valley Mayor Ben Houchen's office on three occasions "desperately trying to organise a meeting", but never received a reply.
Houchen strongly denies the claims, saying his team had "been actively exploring ways to assist affected employees".
In a recent interview with BBC Radio Tees, he said he had been in contact with Sabic and was working directly with it to support employees.
Fazia Hussain-Brown, Unite's regional spokesperson, said the mayor had promised support when the closure was announced but workers were yet to see it.
"The employer has been in touch with Ben Houchen's office on three occasions to see what support his mayoral department can give, especially around out-placement support, and they have heard absolutely nothing," she said.
"The company in desperation asked the union to reach out to Ben Houchen."
She said both Sabic and Unite had been trying to contact the mayor's office and his statement made in the BBC Radio Tees hotseat that he had been in contact was a "blatant lie".
'Terrible situation'
Houchen denied Unite's claims and said he was exploring the possibility of flying out to Saudi Arabia to meet with Sabic management in an attempt to save the plant.
"Despite these claims, I have indeed been in contact with Sabic and my team has been actively exploring ways to assist affected employees and support the wider community," he said, calling the situation "terrible".
Sabic has been contacted for comment.
Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Sabic confirms closure of plant with jobs to go
Saudi chemical giant to invest in Teesside plant
Related internet links
Tees Valley Combined Authority
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kevin O'Leary Says New Executives Get No Stock Options, No Benefits, And No Full-Time Title Until They Prove Themselves, Just Like The Swiss
Kevin O'Leary says he has completely changed the way he hires executives, and is apparently taking inspiration from Swiss business culture. The investor and television personality explained in a recent post on X, 'No stock options, no benefits, no full-time title... until they prove it. I learned this from the Swiss, and it's revolutionized our operations.' A Six-Month Trial Instead Of A Full-Time Commitment O'Leary described the approach in a video, using the example of hiring a new CEO for a growing venture. Once he narrowed the field to two candidates, he asked one: 'Would you consider becoming a contractor for six months as opposed to a fully empowered employee, and we'll pay you 30% more than your base contract's going to be? No stock options, no benefits for the six-month period. But wouldn't you like to test us first?' Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Bill Gates Warned About Water Scarcity. The idea, he said, is to give both sides the chance to 'road test' each other, making sure the candidate integrates well with the existing team and the parent company. 'Don't you want that experience?' he recalled asking. In this case, the candidate agreed. O'Leary calls it an "apprentice" model, common in Switzerland and across Europe, where the focus is on confirming a cultural fit before offering a permanent position. 'We don't do [this] in America,' he said. 'And we should do it.' He noted that about two-thirds of candidates complete the trial and move on to full-time roles with stock options and benefits. The remaining third leave on good terms, having gained valuable experience but deciding the position isn't right for them. 'We're not firing anybody,' he said. 'Those Swiss guys got it right.' Trending: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can Business Is Binary, Says O'Leary For O'Leary, this hiring method is just one example of his direct approach to business. "Business is binary. There are winners and losers. You either make money or you don't," he posted on X last year. He believes success requires relentless effort, especially for young entrepreneurs. "If you want to succeed in business you have to work 25 hours a day because there's someone across the world who will kick your a*s if you don't." He advises those in their 20s to forget about work-life balance while building a business, stressing that the competition is global and tireless. "You're competing with people in Mumbai or Shanghai who are willing to work 24 hours a day, eight days a week," he said last year.O'Leary adds that the early years are the best time to make sacrifices, because "In your 20s, you can afford the time, the focus and all the stress that comes with building something from the ground up. You should start thinking about taking some time off only after establishing that foundation." For O'Leary, sacrifice, preparation, and persistence are non-negotiable. Whether it's a new hire or a new venture, the standard remains the same: prove yourself. Read Next: 2,000 High Earners Manage $6B With This AI Platform — UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Kevin O'Leary Says New Executives Get No Stock Options, No Benefits, And No Full-Time Title Until They Prove Themselves, Just Like The Swiss originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Plastics Manufacturing At Crossroads: Pivot To Lead Or Lose
The latest UN plastics treaty collapse underscored what markets already know: a $400 billion stranded asset risk that forward-thinking petrochemical leaders must now confront strategically. While legacy producers viewed blocking production caps as protecting industry interests, market forces don't wait for diplomatic consensus. The transition window for plastics producers and pushers alike is narrowing, and who controls that transformation will determine market winners for the next three decades. The Plastics Risk Portfolio Reality Check The plastics industry faces mounting exposure across financial, regulatory, and reputational dimensions. The data reveals systemic vulnerabilities: only 9% of plastic waste is successfully recycled globally, microplastics now contaminate human blood as confirmed by groundbreaking research, and current projections show plastic production almost tripling by 2060. Meanwhile, oil majors increasingly depend on petrochemicals as their primary growth hedge against transport electrification. This isn't environmental ideology—it's risk management. Carbon Tracker has identified $400 billion in planned petrochemical expansions built on assumptions of infinite demand growth, while regulatory reality tells a different story. The EU's PPWR mandates 30% recycled content by 2030, California's SB 54 bans non-recyclable packaging, and consumer sentiment has shifted decisively toward sustainability metrics in purchasing decisions. The strategic question isn't whether to change course, but how to optimize portfolio transition while preserving long-term revenue streams. Legacy models that expose firms to mounting financial, reputational, and regulatory risk need managed evolution, not overnight abandonment. Plastics Strategy as Capital Market Differentiation Global investors are increasingly differentiating between high-risk commodity plastics and resilient specialty applications. BlackRock and LGIM now vote against directors of firms failing to address plastic-related risks. Project financing for petrochemical expansions faces enhanced ESG scrutiny, as demonstrated by investor concerns around major Gulf Coast projects. Lloyd's of London's exclusion of microplastic liability coverage signals broader insurance market caution. Firms that move first in rebalancing portfolios toward higher-value, lower-risk applications will secure cheaper access to capital. The market is rewarding strategic repositioning while penalizing commodity exposure—a trend that will only accelerate as ESG integration deepens across global finance. Plastics Portfolio Optimization: Winners and Losers Strategic manufacturers are already rebalancing based on regulatory exposure and long-term demand fundamentals. Rather than wholesale abandonment, smart money is shifting toward value-preservation strategies that target virgin plastic cuts of 20% by 2027 under emerging regulations: High-value durables: Automotive, aerospace, medical, and renewable energy infrastructure applications offer better regulatory protection and margin stability than commodity packaging. PVC and polystyrene exposure: These face accelerating regulatory pressure. IKEA's aggressive phaseout—plastic packaging eliminated for new ranges in 2025, complete elimination by 2028—signals corporate buyer behavior. Strategic exit while assets retain value makes financial sense. Multi-layer films: Major brands are abandoning these recycling-incompatible formats. PepsiCo's 2025 backtrack reveals the credibility gap—slashing virgin plastic cut targets from 20% to 2% while claiming 97% recyclable packaging by 2030. Compare to Unilever's €1 billion investment in reusable packaging systems, already showing 12% cost savings in pilot markets, proving circular models can be profit centers rather than compliance costs. Engineering plastics: Specialty applications provide longer runway and higher barriers to substitution, making them natural portfolio anchors during transition. The Plastics Innovation Scale-Up Opportunity Petrochemical majors possess unique advantages in commercializing next-generation technologies. While startups develop promising innovations, established players have the balance sheets and engineering capacity to scale them globally. The technology landscape offers adjacency opportunities rather than existential threats: Carbon utilization: CO₂-to-chemicals technologies transform waste streams into feedstock, leveraging existing infrastructure while improving carbon footprints. LanzaTech's UK expansion in 2025 demonstrates how major players can scale these faster than venture-backed newcomers. Advanced recycling: Chemical recycling and enzyme-based depolymerization require the kind of industrial-scale deployment that suits petrochemical engineering capabilities. Carbios' enzyme facility became operational despite 2025 restructuring, while Loop Industries launched Twist resin with a 70,000-ton facility planned. Microbial manufacturing: Cemvita Factory's breakthrough in using engineered microbes to produce industrial chemicals from CO₂ and waste streams could reach commercial scale within the decade, offering petrochemical companies new bio-based production pathways. Feedstock diversification: Bio-based and captured-carbon feedstocks expand the resource base rather than threatening it, creating opportunities for companies with processing expertise and global distribution networks. UBQ Materials' 2025 masterbatch launch exemplifies how waste streams become valuable inputs. The question isn't whether these technologies will scale—it's who will control their commercialization. First-mover advantages in licensing, partnership, and deployment could define the next industrial cycle. Leveraging Regulatory Fragmentation as Bridge Strategy Global policy fragmentation creates near-term arbitrage opportunities while markets converge toward sustainability standards. Petrochemical leaders are uniquely positioned to exploit these asymmetries while building transition capabilities: Europe's strict EPR rules reward recycled content expertise. California's packaging restrictions favor mono-material innovation. Emerging markets maintain growth potential for essential applications while developed markets focus on circularity. BP's own Energy Outlook acknowledges that declining oil use in road transport is being offset by increasing petrochemical demand, but smart players are preparing for the eventual policy convergence. This fragmentation won't last indefinitely, but it provides a transition window for companies that invest now in capabilities they'll need globally later. Building circular expertise in sympathetic markets creates competitive advantages when regulations harmonize. Companies that invest now in next-generation sorting systems like TOMRA's 2025 deep learning AI for aluminum recovery will be positioned to capture value as feedstock quality requirements increase globally. BP's 2025 Energy Outlook confirms oil demand peaked in 2025 at 102 million barrels per day, with petrochemical demand offsetting transport decline but plateauing by decade's end. Preserving Social License to Operate As global awareness of environmental justice rises, companies that proactively address community siting, health impacts, and international waste flows will preserve operating licenses and avoid costly litigation. The traditional export of difficult-to-recycle materials to developing nations creates mounting reputational and legal exposure. Forward-thinking companies are investing in domestic circular systems while partnering with international communities rather than simply relocating problems. This isn't just ethical positioning—it's risk mitigation against consumer boycotts, investor flight, and regulatory backlash as environmental justice movements gain political influence. Beyond ESG Theater: Plastics Metrics That Matter ESG reporting has become performance theater designed to deflect rather than direct real change. The metrics that matter for survival cut through the noise: annual virgin plastic reduction percentages, microplastic leakage per product unit, and community impact assessments that resist superficial disclosure games. Companies serious about transformation are adopting cradle-to-cradle design principles, where materials flow in closed loops rather than linear waste streams. They're licensing breakthrough technologies rather than developing incrementally. They're building durable license-to-operate through genuine community partnerships. Most importantly, they're setting concrete targets: 20% virgin plastic reduction by 2027, zero microplastic leakage by 2030, and measurable community health improvements in production zones. Financial advantages for early movers: Strategic Futures: The Plastics Leadership Opportunity The industry faces three plausible scenarios by 2030, each offering different positioning opportunities: Regulatory Acceleration: Rapid policy convergence around EPR and production limits favors companies with advanced circular capabilities and low-risk portfolio composition. Managed Transition: Gradual policy evolution allows time for technology deployment and market development, rewarding strategic partnerships between petrochemical leaders and innovation companies. Technology Breakthrough: CO₂-to-chemicals, advanced recycling, or bio-feedstock innovations achieve cost parity faster than expected, creating opportunities for early deployment partnerships. In each scenario, petrochemical majors who position themselves as energy-to-materials champions of the 21st century rather than defensive incumbents will capture the largest share of transition value. The companies that lead circular innovation rather than simply comply with it will define the next industrial era. The winning strategy combines managed portfolio evolution with aggressive technology deployment. Rather than abandoning core capabilities, leaders will redeploy them toward sustainable feedstocks, circular business models, and high-value applications that align with rather than fight against regulatory trends. Critically, circular feedstocks expand rather than shrink petrochemical demand pools—they simply change the input sources while leveraging existing processing expertise. By 2030, expect three pivotal shifts that will reshape competitive dynamics: • Policy Convergence: The EU will implement a plastics border adjustment mechanism by the early 2030s, forcing global convergence on recycled content standards and inspiring similar measures in North America and Asia. • Petrostate Reinvention: At least one Gulf petrostate—likely Saudi Arabia or the UAE—will reposition as a global circular hub, investing heavily in CO₂-to-chemicals and advanced recycling to preserve export relevance in a carbon-constrained world. • Innovation Breakthroughs: TOMRA's 2025 deep learning AI systems, Carbios' operational enzyme facility, LanzaTech's UK scale-up, and Cemvita's microbial manufacturing platform will achieve commercial scale within five years, redrawing competitive advantage across the value chain. Additionally, Loop Industries' Twist resin launch and UBQ Materials' masterbatch deployment signal industrial breakthrough timing. The transformation won't be driven by treaties alone—capital markets, regulators, and technology innovators are reshaping the rules of industrial survival faster than diplomatic processes ever could. Expect at least one $10 billion petrochemical expansion to be mothballed or canceled under investor pressure before 2030, validating Carbon Tracker's stranded asset thesis. The Plastics Policy Clock The Strategic Pivot Point This isn't about corporate virtue signaling—it's about optimizing portfolios for long-term value creation under changing market conditions. The petrochemical industry's inflection point has arrived. Companies can defend obsolete positions, adapt portfolios reactively, or lead the transition and capture first-mover advantages in next-generation materials. The UN's failure created a transition window, not a reprieve. Carbon Tracker research shows the industry is betting its future on demand growth that regulatory and market forces will constrain. The smartest leaders aren't waiting for policy clarity—they're building capabilities that will thrive under any plausible regulatory scenario. The choice is strategic: adapt portfolios now to secure relevance through 2050 and beyond, or risk portfolio stranding as markets evolve. The companies that redeploy petrochemical expertise toward circular systems, sustainable feedstocks, and high-value applications won't just survive the transition—they'll define it. The question is not whether this pivot happens, but which companies seize it first—and which are left behind. The next industrial cycle will be built on resource optimization, not resource depletion. The question is not whether the plastics pivot happens, but which manufacturing companies seize it first—and which are left behind.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool Push Defender for Contract Decision Amid Real Madrid Interest
Liverpool Push for Ibrahima Konate Decision as Real Madrid Monitor Situation Liverpool face a defining few weeks in their negotiations with Ibrahima Konate, with his long-term future hanging in the balance. The French defender, 26, is entering the final year of his contract, and while the club are keen to tie him down, Real Madrid are watching developments closely. As reported by DaveOCKOP, the situation has reached a critical stage. 'And with Real Madrid circling, can exclusively reveal that Liverpool is trying to extend his deal before the summer transfer window closes. The Reds want Konate to make his mind up before the transfer window closes.' Liverpool know that clarity is essential. Having seen the drawn-out sagas involving Mohamed Salah and Trent Alexander-Arnold, the hierarchy do not want another marquee name running down his contract while uncertainty dominates. Photo: IMAGO Wage Demands at the Centre of Negotiations Konate currently earns around £70,000 per week from the contract he signed in 2021. His representatives are pushing for a significant increase, with reports suggesting he wants closer to £200,000 per week. Central to his camp's stance is the structure of the deal, with a preference for guaranteed wages rather than heavily performance-based incentives. Liverpool, naturally cautious about overextending their wage bill, are negotiating carefully. Yet Konate's performances last season under Arne Slot strengthen his case. Featuring in 92.5% of all available minutes, he showcased the consistency and durability that had previously been questioned due to fitness concerns. Madrid Interest and Possible Sale The looming threat comes from Real Madrid, who have made no secret of their admiration for the Frenchman. Liverpool are fully aware that if no agreement is reached in the coming weeks, they may need to sanction a sale. Reports suggest a figure in excess of £35m could be enough to tempt the club into doing business, rather than risk losing him for nothing when his contract expires next summer. For a player entering his prime, the possibility of moving to the Bernabéu may prove persuasive. Photo IMAGO Contingency Plans in Place Liverpool's pursuit of defensive reinforcements adds further intrigue. Marc Guehi has have both been linked with moves to Anfield, a potential signing that could serve as cover should Konate depart. It is a delicate balancing act for Arne Slot and the recruitment team: strengthen the squad, but not at the expense of losing one of their most reliable performers. Time Running Out With the September 1st deadline looming, Liverpool must find resolution. Konate's ability to anchor the defence, combined with his leadership and athleticism, makes him central to Slot's project. But if his demands are not met, the club face a stark choice: agree to terms, or cash in while they still can. The next few weeks will be telling. Liverpool's defence was the cornerstone of their title-winning campaign last season, and losing Konate now would not only disrupt continuity but also embolden rivals. For the club, certainty is everything. Photo: IMAGO Our View – Anfield Index Analysis For Liverpool fans, this situation will feel both familiar and frustrating. Too often in recent years the club has allowed contract sagas to dominate the narrative, from Salah's long-running negotiations to Alexander-Arnold's eventual renewal. Supporters will be keen to see lessons learned, ensuring Konate's case is handled swiftly. There is recognition among fans that Konate has earned his leverage. Last season he was outstanding, putting concerns over fitness behind him and becoming a key figure in Slot's defence. His partnership with Virgil van Dijk gave Liverpool both solidity and reassurance, and losing him would undoubtedly weaken the squad at a crucial time. At the same time, some supporters will feel wary of the wage demands. While Konate deserves a pay rise, the figure of £200,000 per week may feel excessive for a player who still has to prove long-term durability. Fans know the club must strike a balance between rewarding key players and protecting financial stability. The prospect of Real Madrid lurking in the background is unsettling. Liverpool have built their reputation on resilience in the market, but losing Konate to Madrid would sting. For many supporters, the solution is clear: resolve the contract quickly, reward his importance, and focus on strengthening the squad rather than risking another destabilising saga.
