Advocacy groups won't appeal Ontario court's dismissal of Charter challenge to long-term care law
The case, launched by the Advocacy Centre for the Elderly (ACE) and the Ontario Health Coalition (OHC), was heard in the Superior Court of Justice in September.
The two parties argued Bill 7, the More Beds, Better Care Act, — which was passed in 2022 — violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms so the law should be overturned. The provincial government, however, maintains the law is necessary to free up much-needed hospital beds.
In mid-January, the court sided with the province and decided to dismiss the case.
In an interview with CBC News on Wednesday, Ontario Health Coalition executive director Natalie Mehra said OHC can't afford the legal costs to appeal.
The OHC is paying the majority of legal fees in this case, of "close to $200,000," according to Mehra. She said they're still fundraising to pay it off.
She also said an appeal is always challenging to win.
"It's very disappointing and really heartbreaking," Mehra said.
"We know that patients really are suffering as a result of the coercion, trying to find somewhere to move from hospital into a long-term care home that is a decent home, that provides the care that they need, that is close to loved ones."
In the published decision from January, Justice Robert Centa said the law doesn't contravene the Charter. The bill "does not interfere with an ALC [alternate level of care] patient's 'right' to choose where they live," and the $400 daily charge for a continued hospital stay is "not coercive," Centa wrote.
Natalie Mehra, executive director of the Ontario Health Coalition and a longtime advocate for public health care, says they'll continue to 'ramp up our fight' to get the province to prioritize the rights of elderly patients. (Joe Fiorino/CBC)
Instead, Bill 7 has a "sufficiently important objective," the justice added.
"I found that the purpose of Bill 7 is to reduce the number of ALC patients in hospital who are eligible for admission to a long-term care home in order to maximize hospital resources for patients who need hospital-level care."
Mehra said ACE and the OHC were "shocked" by the ruling, especially the idea that a $400 daily charge isn't coercive.
"These are elderly patients, they're on fixed incomes, $400 a day is $12,000 a month — that is beyond the means of the vast majority of people in Ontario. It really means that they don't have a choice in our view."
An Ontario patient charged $26K under legislation
Since the law was implemented in 2022, CBC News has spoken with people who were impacted, including Michele Campeau, whose elderly mom was charged $26,000 under the legislation last year. Campeau had refused to move her mom out of a Windsor hospital and into a long-term care home the family didn't want.
CBC News reached out this week to Campeau for comment, but hasn't heard back. When she last spoke to CBC News in January, Campeau said she wasn't planning to pay the fee and didn't agree with the court ruling.
Patients, their caregivers and seniors advocates have said the law is unfair and doesn't give elderly people, who might be in their final stage of life, the right to choose where they want to live.
But health-care leaders who provided expert evidence during the court case have said the law helps free up hospital beds for people who need them.
A spokesperson for Ontario's minister of health previously told CBC News the law "ensures people across the province receive the care they need, in a setting that is right for them."
"It frees up hospital beds so that people waiting for surgeries can get them sooner. It eases pressures on crowded emergency departments by admitting patients sooner and it connects more people to the care they need when they need it."
Michele Campeau, left, visits her mother, Ruth Poupard, 83, at Hôtel-Dieu GraceHealthcare in Windsor on April 3. Campeau had refused to move her mom out of hospital and into an LTC home the family didn't want. (Dax Melmer/The Canadian Press)
'Ramp up our fight'
Despite the OHC's decision, Mehra said they're not giving up.
She said they will continue to advocate for patients and "ramp up our fight" to get the province to prioritize the rights of elderly patients.
Beyond overturning the law, she said, they'll advocate for the government to improve home care, increase capacity in hospitals and LTC homes, and move forward with building new and modern homes that people want to live in.
"The fact that the solution has been to target patients rather than to deal with the capacity issues in our health system ... it's wrong, it's morally wrong, to treat people at the end of their lives in that way," she said.
"We have to fight with everything we have to force political change."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Wire
04-08-2025
- Business Wire
Guardian Pharmacy Services Strengthens Pacific Northwest Presence with Acquisition of Oregon-based Managed Healthcare Pharmacy
ATLANTA--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Guardian Pharmacy Services, Inc. (NYSE: GRDN), one of the nation's leading long-term care (LTC) pharmacy services companies, today announced its acquisition of Managed Healthcare Pharmacy, a leading LTC pharmacy in Oregon with locations in Eugene and Medford. This transaction marks a significant milestone for Guardian, establishing its first physical footprint in the state and expanding its presence in the Pacific Northwest. The newly acquired pharmacy serves residents in assisted living and behavioral health communities, as well as individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. "This acquisition allows us to expand our presence in the Pacific Northwest with a team already known for exceptional care and trusted partnerships,' said Fred Burke, president and CEO of Guardian Pharmacy Services. Established in 1991, Managed Healthcare Pharmacy is one of Oregon's largest LTC pharmacies, with a strong track record of service in LTC communities across the state and into Washington. All existing leadership and staff will remain in place, and the pharmacy will continue operating under its existing name. 'We continue to grow in regions where senior living operators value more dependable, high-touch support from established LTC pharmacies,' said Fred Burke, president and CEO of Guardian Pharmacy Services. 'Managed Healthcare Pharmacy has built a strong reputation in Oregon and Washington for its clinical expertise and deep commitment to the communities it serves. This acquisition allows us to expand our presence in the Pacific Northwest with a team already known for exceptional care and trusted partnerships.' As with Guardian's other acquisitions, Managed Healthcare Pharmacy will benefit from the company's locally operated business model, supported by its centralized corporate team. This enables the local pharmacy to remain focused on exceptional customer service and the specialized needs of the communities and residents they serve, while Guardian assists with the many complex behind-the-scenes business functions, including data analytics, HR, IT, payor relations, national sales and more. About Guardian Pharmacy Services Guardian Pharmacy Services is one of the nation's leading long-term care pharmacy services companies. Through its locally-based business model, Guardian partners with long-term care facilities ('LTCFs') to deliver medications and a comprehensive suite of technology-enabled services designed to enhance care and improve adherence to drug regimens, helping to reduce the cost of care and improve clinical outcomes. With a growing network of more than 50 pharmacies nationwide, Guardian is dedicated to providing exceptional service to over 189,000 residents and approximately 7,000 LTCFs across 38 states (as of March 31, 2025). Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our anticipated growth and expectations related to synergies and integration of the acquired pharmacy's operations and employees. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, including those described in Guardian's periodic reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time, and which are publicly available at and via our website, Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Guardian undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Yahoo
02-08-2025
- Yahoo
A Calgary woman was unable to complete a breathalyzer test. Now, she can't drive
A Calgary woman says she had her driver's licence suspended after being unable to complete a breathalyzer test — and some experts say the situation is more common than you might think. Pam Lacusta, 58, was driving on Stoney Trail in April when she was pulled over by Calgary police, who administered a breathalyzer test. Lacusta attempted the test 30 times and couldn't complete it. The officer handed her an administrative penalty for failing to provide a proper breath sample — a penalty that carries the same consequences as driving while impaired. Now, Lacusta must complete a driver's education course and install an interlock device in her car before she can drive again. Her prior insurance now refuses to cover her. "I feel like I'm being punished for something that I never did," said Lacusta, who said she doesn't drink for religious reasons. Later on the day she was ticketed, Lacusta took a urine test at a private clinic at her own expense to prove she wasn't drinking. She sent CBC News a copy of the negative results. Edmonton-based paralegal Sandra Weber said she hears of situations like Lacusta's fairly regularly. Weber said people may struggle to complete a roadside test due to medical conditions like lung cancer or asthma, compounded by the stress of completing a test in front of an officer. Once someone has received a penalty for failing to complete a breathalyzer, she said, it can be difficult to fight. "It's up to the recipient … to prove that there was something wrong with the machine or something that the police had done wrong," said Weber, who works with Moreau Law. "It's a very challenging situation and without any medical evidence it's very difficult to overcome these types of tickets." Lacusta did appeal her penalty with a provincial adjudicator, who turned her down. Lacusta said her difficulty with the test may have been due to a recent Botox injection that kept her from making a proper seal with her mouth. She also later learned that she had two suspected rib fractures, but not in time to include that information in her appeal. 'Not enough puff' Recent research out of the University of Sheffield in the U.K. suggests there may be people without severe lung or breathing problems who nevertheless struggle to complete breathalyzer tests. "There is a small, but significant, subset of people who just don't have enough puff to be able to operate the machine successfully," said lead researcher Galen Ives, who noted that older people, short people and women are more likely to struggle. Ives said police should be more willing to offer blood or urine tests as an alternative to people who try and fail to complete breathalyzer tests, though he acknowledged there would be practical hurdles to testing at a second location. A spokesperson for the Calgary Police Service said she couldn't comment on Lacusta's situation, but said anyone who believes they are medically unable to complete a breathalyzer test should tell the officer at the scene. A spokesperson for the provincial minister of justice said if people can't provide breath samples they may be asked to provide blood or urine samples "where certain legal requirements are met." Lacusta said blood and urine tests were not offered in her situation, and she believes they should be more widely available to people who can't provide a breath sample. For now, she's relying on her friends and her bicycle to get around the city, but still hopes to fight her penalty and have her clean driving record restored.
Yahoo
01-08-2025
- Yahoo
A Calgary woman was unable to complete a breathalyzer test. Now, she can't drive
A Calgary woman says she had her driver's licence suspended after being unable to complete a breathalyzer test — and some experts say the situation is more common than you might think. Pam Lacusta, 58, was driving on Stoney Trail in April when she was pulled over by Calgary police, who administered a breathalyzer test. Lacusta attempted the test 30 times and couldn't complete it. The officer handed her an administrative penalty for failing to provide a proper breath sample — a penalty that carries the same consequences as driving while impaired. Now, Lacusta must complete a driver's education course and install an interlock device in her car before she can drive again. Her prior insurance now refuses to cover her. "I feel like I'm being punished for something that I never did," said Lacusta, who said she doesn't drink for religious reasons. Later on the day she was ticketed, Lacusta took a urine test at a private clinic at her own expense to prove she wasn't drinking. She sent CBC News a copy of the negative results. Edmonton-based paralegal Sandra Weber said she hears of situations like Lacusta's fairly regularly. Weber said people may struggle to complete a roadside test due to medical conditions like lung cancer or asthma, compounded by the stress of completing a test in front of an officer. Once someone has received a penalty for failing to complete a breathalyzer, she said, it can be difficult to fight. "It's up to the recipient … to prove that there was something wrong with the machine or something that the police had done wrong," said Weber, who works with Moreau Law. "It's a very challenging situation and without any medical evidence it's very difficult to overcome these types of tickets." Lacusta did appeal her penalty with a provincial adjudicator, who turned her down. Lacusta said her difficulty with the test may have been due to a recent Botox injection that kept her from making a proper seal with her mouth. She also later learned that she had two suspected rib fractures, but not in time to include that information in her appeal. 'Not enough puff' Recent research out of the University of Sheffield in the U.K. suggests there may be people without severe lung or breathing problems who nevertheless struggle to complete breathalyzer tests. "There is a small, but significant, subset of people who just don't have enough puff to be able to operate the machine successfully," said lead researcher Galen Ives, who noted that older people, short people and women are more likely to struggle. Ives said police should be more willing to offer blood or urine tests as an alternative to people who try and fail to complete breathalyzer tests, though he acknowledged there would be practical hurdles to testing at a second location. A spokesperson for the Calgary Police Service said she couldn't comment on Lacusta's situation, but said anyone who believes they are medically unable to complete a breathalyzer test should tell the officer at the scene. A spokesperson for the provincial minister of justice said if people can't provide breath samples they may be asked to provide blood or urine samples "where certain legal requirements are met." Lacusta said blood and urine tests were not offered in her situation, and she believes they should be more widely available to people who can't provide a breath sample. For now, she's relying on her friends and her bicycle to get around the city, but still hopes to fight her penalty and have her clean driving record restored.