Enhanced training recommended for PSNI officers after young autistic woman removed from shop
THE NORTH'S POLICE Ombudsman has recommended that PSNI officers receive enhanced training around responding to autistic people and people with individual communication needs.
It follows an investigation into an incident in a CeX store in Lisburn in December when a
young autistic woman was physically removed from the premises by four police officers and her father.
Footage of the incident was posted online by the woman's older sister, Eileen Mitchell, and showed her being carried out of the CeX shop on Bow Street.
In the social media post, Mitchell said her younger sister wanted to buy a second-hand Thomas the Tank Engine DVD, which cost £2.
However, when the woman and her parents went to pay, they were told by a staff member that the till was already closed for the day and that the purchase couldn't be made.
Mitchell wrote that her younger sister 'didn't understand this and became very upset, crying in the shop'.
She added that the situation 'escalated' and 'the police were called'.
'Incidents like this shouldn't happen,' she wrote at the time.
'We need more compassion, better training for staff and authorities, and systems in place to protect those who can't advocate for themselves.'
The young woman's mother made a complaint to the Police Ombudsman, which centred on whether the officers complied with their training in respect of autism.
Her mother also questioned the effectiveness of the training they had received.
The Policing Ombudsman
said that its investigation 'identified no misconduct by the police officers involved'.
Advertisement
However, Nikki Davis, Director of Investigations with the Police Ombudsman's Office, said the incident was 'undoubtedly distressing' for the young woman and called for 'enhanced training'.
The Ombudsman said the young woman 'entered through half-closed shutters, the shop's tills were no longer operational and she was unable to buy a DVD'.
The non-verbal young woman was asked to leave, and from there the situation escalated and the police were called, said the Ombudsman.
It said that body worn video shows that the first two police officers 'made it clear that she needed to leave as the shop was closed, and that their preference was for her parents to remove her'.
It said that the young woman's father 'then tried to move her physically' and that officers 'became physically involved only after the young woman's father continued to experience difficulties managing on his own'.
However, it added that 'when reviewed in its entirety, the body worn video, together with CCTV footage, showed that the police officers who responded to the incident understood that the best approach was for her parents to encourage her to leave the shop'.
'When those efforts were unsuccessful, and their own attempts to escort the young woman from the shop also failed, the officers, along with her father, physically removed her.'
The incident lasted for around 18 minutes from officers entering the store and the Ombudsman said that 'their action was a last resort'.
The Ombudsman stated that while no breach of the PSNI code of ethics had been made, the incident 'exposed a gap in current PSNI training'.
As a result, it recommended that PSNI officers should receive 'enhanced training which equips them to engage with, and respond to, any autistic person, but especially a person who speaks few or no words and may communicate in other ways'.
The PSNI Assistant Chief Constable Ryan Henderson welcomed the Ombudsman's report and said the incident presented a 'very difficult and complex set of circumstances for everyone involved'.
Henderson said that while there is training for front line officers in dealing with vulnerable members of the public, 'there is no specific input for front line officers on strategies for dealing with those they encounter who may be non-verbal'.
He said the PSNI will now 'consider how best to incorporate this element into future training'.
'Our officers are routinely called to challenging situations and as in this case we will always seek a patient approach when dealing with people with complex needs,' he added.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
a day ago
- The Journal
Over 53,000 rental homes 'effectively taken off' private market due to HAP scheme, report finds
A NEW REPORT has highlighted a number of areas of concern in relation to the Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) scheme, uncovering systemic failures, widespread delays, and a worsening impact on the rental housing market. The investigation, carried out by the Ombudsman, found that the HAP scheme has effectively removed thousands of properties from the private rental sector – contributing to rising rents and making it harder for people to find housing, both within and outside the scheme. Among the most pressing issues identified was the delay in processing HAP applications. The report highlighted that in some cases, applicants experienced long waits between applying and receiving confirmation or payment. As a result, some lost out on rental properties while waiting for approval. The Ombudsman, Ger Deering, said that his office 'has received numerous complaints from members of the public who believed they had been disadvantaged by the current system.' Another isue note in the report was the duplication between the HAP and social housing application processes. Applicants must often submit the same documentation twice, once for social housing support and again for HAP, despite the fact that approval for social housing should automatically entitle them to HAP assistance. The report also pointed to disparities in how HAP tenants are treated compared to tenants in direct social housing. HAP recipients are frequently given less security and face greater financial uncertainty. Additionally, the report criticised local authorities for failing to provide clear, consistent information about key elements of the scheme — including how much rent tenants are expected to pay and what discretionary increases might be available. As of the end of 2024, HAP was supporting 53,742 households across the country. Advertisement According to the Ombudsman, this has effectively withdrawn the same number of properties from the private rental market, intensifying competition and inflating rental prices. 'This has contributed to the sustained increase in the rate of rents, which in turn has made it more difficult to source properties for both HAP tenants and those renting independently,' the report states. The scheme, launched in September 2014, was designed as a replacement for the Rent Supplement system and is administered by Ireland's 31 local authorities. HAP provides a direct payment to landlords on behalf of eligible tenants, with caps in place based on household size and location. Local authorities can raise the cap by up to 35% in certain cases, though this often still falls short of actual rental costs. As rents continue to rise, many HAP recipients are now paying large top-ups to their landlords in addition to the rent they pay to local authorities, a situation that charities have warned is unsustainable. The Ombudsman has recommended that HAP payments be backdated to the start of a tenancy once an applicant is approved for social housing support. He has also called for a thorough review of the scheme to streamline the application process, improve transparency, and ensure fairer treatment for tenants. Deering added that an 'information pack' provided to HAP applicants, and should include indicative rent figures, information on the HAP cap and an explanation that there may be an increase available, depending on the situation 'This information should be presented in a simple and accessible format,' the report states. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
HAP caps should be revised regularly to reflect rental market, Ombudsman says
Overly complex processes and the duplication of work by local authorities causing delays to housing assistance payment (HAP) applications, alongside the refusal of legitimate applications, were among the issues discovered by an Ombudsman investigation. Ombudsman Ger Deering said his office received numerous complaints from the public, and identified shortcomings through voluntary housing and homeless groups regarding the scheme before its investigation. Launched in 2014, the HAP payment to landlords was intended to cover the full cost of a household's rent. Due to significant increases in rent rates, however, two-thirds of HAP households were paying the difference between the HAP cap and the actual cost of rent in 2023. Some 53,742 households were in receipt of HAP at the end of 2024, meaning the same number of rentals have been removed from the private rental sector, the Ombudsman said, contributing to a sustained increase in the rate of rents. READ MORE The availability of rental properties coming under the HAP limits is declining as rents increase, prompting a recommendation from the Ombudsman that caps should be revised on a regular basis to reflect the rental market. [ More than 100 families in Dublin at risk of homelessness as tenant-in-situ applications paused Opens in new window ] Among the findings of its investigation into HAP's administration was a 'duplication of work' being done by local authorities resulting in potential delays. Although households approved for social housing support are immediately eligible for HAP, they must make separate applications, resulting in repetition. The report also highlighted the 'overly complex' requirement for local authorities to seek approval from the HAP shared services centre (SSC) before amendments to HAP records or applications for approval can be made. It noted that the SSC processed 5,821 amendments in one sample month during the investigation. The investigation also found further 'unnecessary delays' when it comes to validating applications and verifying landlords' proof of ownership. Delays increase the risk of inability to secure properties, it said. Separately, the Ombudsman found that some local authorities are refusing HAP applications despite all evidence suggesting a tenancy is legitimate, while others have approved HAP where it should not have been. Local authorities have 'broad discretion' when determining whether a tenancy is genuine, with decisions not always accounting for each case being different or nuanced. In particular, it said local authorities place 'undue weight on family relationships even where all other evidence suggests the tenancy is legitimate'. Separately, despite being legislatively considered socially housed, HAP tenants do not have access to the same benefits as their counterparts in standard social housing such as tailored arrears repayment plans. These inequities pose a risk of HAP tenants falling into a 'poverty trap,' it said. 'This unfairness is compounded by the fact that they do not have the security of tenure that their counterparts in other forms of social housing have,' the Ombudsman said.
The Journal
2 days ago
- The Journal
Enhanced training recommended for PSNI officers after young autistic woman removed from shop
THE NORTH'S POLICE Ombudsman has recommended that PSNI officers receive enhanced training around responding to autistic people and people with individual communication needs. It follows an investigation into an incident in a CeX store in Lisburn in December when a young autistic woman was physically removed from the premises by four police officers and her father. Footage of the incident was posted online by the woman's older sister, Eileen Mitchell, and showed her being carried out of the CeX shop on Bow Street. In the social media post, Mitchell said her younger sister wanted to buy a second-hand Thomas the Tank Engine DVD, which cost £2. However, when the woman and her parents went to pay, they were told by a staff member that the till was already closed for the day and that the purchase couldn't be made. Mitchell wrote that her younger sister 'didn't understand this and became very upset, crying in the shop'. She added that the situation 'escalated' and 'the police were called'. 'Incidents like this shouldn't happen,' she wrote at the time. 'We need more compassion, better training for staff and authorities, and systems in place to protect those who can't advocate for themselves.' The young woman's mother made a complaint to the Police Ombudsman, which centred on whether the officers complied with their training in respect of autism. Her mother also questioned the effectiveness of the training they had received. The Policing Ombudsman said that its investigation 'identified no misconduct by the police officers involved'. Advertisement However, Nikki Davis, Director of Investigations with the Police Ombudsman's Office, said the incident was 'undoubtedly distressing' for the young woman and called for 'enhanced training'. The Ombudsman said the young woman 'entered through half-closed shutters, the shop's tills were no longer operational and she was unable to buy a DVD'. The non-verbal young woman was asked to leave, and from there the situation escalated and the police were called, said the Ombudsman. It said that body worn video shows that the first two police officers 'made it clear that she needed to leave as the shop was closed, and that their preference was for her parents to remove her'. It said that the young woman's father 'then tried to move her physically' and that officers 'became physically involved only after the young woman's father continued to experience difficulties managing on his own'. However, it added that 'when reviewed in its entirety, the body worn video, together with CCTV footage, showed that the police officers who responded to the incident understood that the best approach was for her parents to encourage her to leave the shop'. 'When those efforts were unsuccessful, and their own attempts to escort the young woman from the shop also failed, the officers, along with her father, physically removed her.' The incident lasted for around 18 minutes from officers entering the store and the Ombudsman said that 'their action was a last resort'. The Ombudsman stated that while no breach of the PSNI code of ethics had been made, the incident 'exposed a gap in current PSNI training'. As a result, it recommended that PSNI officers should receive 'enhanced training which equips them to engage with, and respond to, any autistic person, but especially a person who speaks few or no words and may communicate in other ways'. The PSNI Assistant Chief Constable Ryan Henderson welcomed the Ombudsman's report and said the incident presented a 'very difficult and complex set of circumstances for everyone involved'. Henderson said that while there is training for front line officers in dealing with vulnerable members of the public, 'there is no specific input for front line officers on strategies for dealing with those they encounter who may be non-verbal'. He said the PSNI will now 'consider how best to incorporate this element into future training'. 'Our officers are routinely called to challenging situations and as in this case we will always seek a patient approach when dealing with people with complex needs,' he added. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
