Meta, Apple fined 700 million euros for violating EU antitrust rules
LONDON, April 23 (Reuters) - European Union regulators on Wednesday imposed fines on Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab and Meta (META.O), opens new tab totalling 700 million euros ($877 million) for violating new antitrust rules, the first sanctions under landmark legislation aimed at curbing Big Tech's power.
Here is some reaction to the penalties:
Make sense of the latest ESG trends affecting companies and governments with the Reuters Sustainable Switch newsletter. Sign up here.
"Today's announcements are yet another example of the European Commission unfairly targeting Apple in a series of decisions that are bad for the privacy and security of our users, bad for products, and force us to give away our technology for free."
META IN AN EMAILED STATEMENT:
"The European Commission is attempting to handicap successful American businesses while allowing Chinese and European companies to operate under different standards.
"This isn't just about a fine; the Commission forcing us to change our business model, effectively imposing a multi-billion-dollar tariff on Meta while requiring us to offer an inferior service."
"FORTNITE" MAKER EPIC GAMES CEO TIM SWEENEY:
"Great news for app developers worldwide! (...) Today's decision benefits all developers - European developers and American developers alike. It highlights the need for America to similarly pass the Open App Markets Act to bring competition back to digital markets.
"Lobbyists and shills funded by American Big Tech had better not misportray Europe's modest fine for Apple's lawbreaking as a "European tax on American companies". To do so would be to try to gaslight the administration into a trade war to protect Apple's lawlessness."
ANDREAS AUDRETSCH, DEPUTY PARLIAMENTARY LEADER OF GREEN PARTY IN GERMAN FEDERAL PARLIAMENT:
"The fines (...) are clearly too low. The Commission should have taken tougher action; in previous proceedings, the Commission had imposed significantly higher fines in the billions.
"There must be no doubt that the Commission is prepared to exhaust all legal means to enforce European law. This is particularly important at a time when Donald Trump and U.S. tech oligarchs are deliberately trying to undermine European law.
"There must be no subjugation of Europe. If Apple and Meta let the 60-day deadline pass without paying the fines, further steps must be taken."
COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (CCIA) EUROPE'S SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND HEAD OF OFFICE DANIEL FRIEDLAENDER:
"The DMA's (Digital Markets Act) credibility is being weakened by its unpredictable enforcement and shifting demands, combined with sweeping product-design mandates from the European Commission that disrupt the user experience and limit EU businesses' ability to reach consumers."
"(...) The DMA has become highly politicised, and could even force some companies to provide services at a loss. There is a huge opportunity for regulatory simplification in Europe – so far, however, the DMA decisions are going in the opposite direction."
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PRIVACY PROFESSIONALS' (IAPP) DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH & INSIGHTS JOE JONES:
"The fines land at a time of heightened scrutiny by the current U.S. Administration on the application of EU laws to U.S. companies.
"(...) Open questions include not only how will addressed companies respond to EU regulatory enforcement but how will overseas governments, including and especially the U.S., respond. The U.S. Administration has declared it will consider responsive actions like tariffs to combat certain foreign government policies levied against U.S. companies.
"The EU's digital rulebook not only has grown in size but has grown more complex as well as robust in its application, with fines and corrective measures being imposed.
EUROPEAN CONSUMER GROUP BEUC DIRECTOR GENERAL AGUSTIN REYNA:
"Today's decisions are important to show Big Tech that if they choose to operate on the EU's Single Market they must play by our rules.
"Apple and Meta have had ample time to comply with the (DMA) but instead have delayed compliance and tried to twist the rules to their advantage. Consumers deserve better choices, and businesses need fairer market conditions in digital markets, so the Commission must enforce the law.
"The (DMA) is a gamechanger in terms of opening up digital markets to more competition. The Commission must enforce the (law) effectively so that gatekeepers comply with all its provisions and consumers can reap the benefits of more and better choice in digital services."
RASMUS ANDRESEN, BUDGET AND FINANCIAL SPOKESPERSON FOR THE GREENS/EFA IN EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT:
"It is a long-overdue and important step that the EU Commission is finally using its regulatory power to rein in the U.S. tech giants.
"(...) With this action, Europe is sending a clear signal: the digital internal market is not a lawless space for billion-dollar tech companies. It is about fairness, real competition, and the protection of consumer rights and small businesses.
"Trump's calls for an end to EU tech regulation are extremely dangerous. It is good that the EU Commission is responding with the application of legislation. We decide on our own rules.
"But competition rules alone are not enough. We also need consistent and fair taxation of tech companies. It is unacceptable that an entire industry makes massive profits while simultaneously avoiding its responsibilities to society. The EU Commission should finally present a proposal to fairly tax the large tech companies in Europe."
GERMAN ECONOMY MINISTRY SPOKESPERSON:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Apple fans blast new iOS 26 update
Published: | Updated: After months of anticipation, Apple has finally unveiled its next major iPhone update - iOS 26. The design overhaul, announced at Apple's Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC), brings translucent, glass-like effects to app icons, the lock screen, and home screen. Craig Federighi, Apple's senior vice president of Software Engineering, described this so-called 'Liquid Glass Design' as 'gorgeous'. However, it hasn't gone down well on social media, where users have dubbed the glass-like elements as ugly and difficult to use. 'Liquid Glass Design is the ugliest thing Apple has ever done!' one user vented. Another added: 'Apple's new glassy UI [user interface] design literally hurts my eyes to look at. The notifications are a literal eye sore.' And one vented: 'Apple has done it again; they have managed to make their UI worse than last year. 'I don't know who is in charge of the Apple aesthetics, but whomever they put in charge should be fired immediately.' The Liquid Glass update for iOS 26 is one of the biggest overhauls Apple has made to its design in recent years. It's also the first time a design has been universal across all platforms, with Liquid Glass is available on iPhone, iPad, Mac, the Apple Watch, and even on Apple TV. To reflect this unified design, Apple has also updated its software naming system to reflect the date rather than how many previous releases there have been - making all of Apple's latest software version '26'. Liquid Glass replaces Apple's standard blocky, flat icons with a dynamic theme meant to look like a 'translucent material that reflects and refracts its surroundings'. Icons, buttons, sliders, switches, text, and media controls will all be more transparent and will distort the background behind using real-time rendering. Craig Federighi, Apple's senior vice president of Software Engineering, said: 'iOS 26 shines with the gorgeous new design and meaningful improvements to the features users rely on every day, making iPhone even more helpful.' However, the design change has not been met with enthusiasm by Apple's dedicated fans. One irate commenter vented: 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This force-fed, ugly, bloatware-filled Apple update is a disgusting abomination.' A common complaint among Apple fans was that the new design didn't live up to the standards of sleek, intuitive design that customers have come to expect. One commenter wrote: 'Been playing with new OS since morning and it's like they left a few interns in a room with crayons. 'It's hard to put in words, but it totally lacks Apple elegance.' 'Steve Jobs would've fired everyone on that team,' another chimed in. Another commenter suggested Liquid Glass 'might be the worst UI design Apple has released yet.' While another said: 'Readability is completely hampered. I cannot read or see button clearly here. This is going to be a complete mess. Apple fans might have expected WWDC to bring some major new updates for Apple's AI offering, Apple Intelligence, after these were promised last year. But the event brought only minor updates alongside Liquid Glass including live translation for Messages, Facetime, and Phone. The update also extends visual intelligence to users' iPhone screens so they can search or take actions on anything they are viewing across apps. Users can ask ChatGPT what they are looking at or search using Google and Etsy to find similar products. iOS 26 is currently only available as a developer beta - an unfinished version of the software not for public release - with the full version expected around September later this year.
ITV News
2 hours ago
- ITV News
Jersey becomes first non-member of United Nations to host humanitarian aid meeting
Jersey has become the first non-member of the United Nations (UN) to host international talks, addressing humanitarian aid for those in crisis. The island was selected to co-chair the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) Pooled Fund Working Group (PFWG) to discuss how smaller donors can reach the most severely affected countries through a coordinated approach. Officials from across the globe have joined discussions which include key decisions on how taxpayers' money in Jersey can provide life-saving support. Edward Lewis, Executive Director of Jersey Overseas Aid, explains: "Jersey is seen in the international sector; they wouldn't come here if they didn't think we had something to say and something to contribute. "The whole idea is widening the donor base and getting a broader constituency, which is really important in terms of having an effective response. "And for the next couple of days at least, Jersey is going to play a leading role." Currently, the island allocates approximately 0.3% of its budget to overseas aid - more than £17 million. Jersey Overseas Aid has also sent more than £7 million of aid to countries including Sudan, Syria, and Ukraine since 2016. David Throp, Chief of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), says: "The system as a whole has been going through financial difficulties. "We have seen cuts from big players, such as the Americans and other big European countries; every pound helps us save another life. "By putting the money together, we can do something bigger, better, more thought-out, and more influential on the beneficiaries and populations we're trying to assist. "Jersey has been very good at bringing leadership to the discussions. The island has been punching above its weight in guiding us." Alice Armanni-Sequi, one of the senior UN officials, says she's enjoyed the talks in Jersey so far, adding that getting the pooled funds right is vital for those in need. She explains: "We cover a range from food, shelter, health services, water, which is so critical and nutrition. "The list goes on, but the formula will depend on the location, so the great thing about the pooled funds is that we can really come up with the right recipe at the local level that really represents what people need." David adds: "Most of the funds, in particular the larger funds, are located in some of the more protracted emergencies. "We do have countries like the democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan, South Sudan, Afghanistan, the occupied Palestinian territories, where it is not a sudden onset and a quick finish - a more fundamental structural problem in the society. "The good thing about the model is that we can put these funds in place and phase them out as and when needed, depending on the changes in the situation." Mazen Fadhl Maddi represents the Field Medical Foundation (FMF) Yemen, and knows first hand how overseas aid is a lifeline for those who need it. He explains: "It saves lives. I have seen it personally - I have gone to the camps. "We are also giving communities resilience. The money translates into a lot of sectors, a lot of assistance, such as food assistance and nutrition. We have huge numbers of acute malnutrition in Yemen." Chair of Jersey Overseas Aid Commission, Carolyn Labey, says that while Jersey's contribution increases in line with the island's GDP, contributions can go further. She says: "We have connected our budget to GDP, so when the economy grows, our budget grows. "Our budget is currently fixed at 0.3% of GDP, and that isn't quite the OECD average, which is 0.36%. "The overall aim is to reach 0.7%, but there is a way to go there." The States of Guernsey aims to allocated 0.2% of its budget to overseas aid by 2030, however it is not part of the Pooled Fund Working Group, hence why no officials are attending this weeks meeting.
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Harvard gets new legal backing from 5 Ivies and over 12,000 alumni
Twenty four universities, including five Ivy League schools, and more than 12,000 alumni took measures to back Harvard University in its legal battle against the Trump administration, which has threatened it with slashing billions of dollars in grants. Princeton, Yale, Dartmouth, Brown and the University of Pennsylvania, along with several other schools, filed an amicus brief on Monday in support of the nation's oldest university, arguing that the funding freeze would impact more than just Harvard, due to the interconnectedness of scientific research, and would ultimately hinder American innovation and economic growth. Also on Monday, the group of 12,041 Harvard alumni filed a separate brief describing the withholding of funds as a 'reckless and unlawful' attempt to assert control over the school and other higher education institutions. 'The escalating campaign against Harvard threatens the very foundation of who we are as a nation,' the alumni said in the brief. 'We embrace our responsibility to stand up for our freedoms and values, to safeguard liberty and democracy, and to serve as bulwarks against these threats to the safety and well-being of all.' The amicus briefs aim to provide expertise or insight to the court, but the schools and individuals are not parties in the lawsuit itself. The filings come after Harvard in April rejected the government's list of 10 demands, including auditing viewpoints of the student body, a move that the administration says is aimed at addressing antisemitism on campus. After the government threatened to freeze $2.2 billion in multiyear grants and $60 million 'in multi-year contract value,' Harvard hit back with a lawsuit. The brief filed by the universities included other prominent institutions like Georgetown, Johns Hopkins and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The only Ivy League schools missing were Cornell and Columbia universities. The schools argued that the partnership between the government and academia has long led to critical advancements, from the The Human Genome Project to the Covid-19 vaccine. And that funding cuts to one school could endanger research at others. Harvard, MIT and Princeton, for example, have received funding from the National Institutes of Health for a project that could potentially yield tools to treat Alzheimer's disease. 'The work cannot continue at individual sites; MIT cannot use machine learning to uncover patterns, for example, without data from Princeton and Harvard,' the brief said. The universities said in the brief that the cuts would only cause more harm to the United States' ability to compete in science and academia. 'These cuts to research funding risk a future where the next pathbreaking innovation — whether it is a cure for cancer or Alzheimer's, a military technology, or the next Internet — is discovered beyond our shores, if at all,' the brief said. Sally Kornbluth, president of MIT, said in a letter to the school's community that it was critical to make a legal argument against the funding cuts. 'Although the value to the public of federally funded university research feels obvious to us at MIT, we felt compelled to make the case for its countless benefits to the court and, in effect, to the American people,' Kornbluth said. The Harvard alumni filed their brief in support of the school's motion for a summary judgement submitted last week. If granted, the summary judgment would allow the court to decide the case without a full trial. The alumni, which include comedian Conan O'Brien, author Margaret E. Atwood and Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., wrote in the brief that the administration's 'end goal is to narrow our freedoms to learn, teach, think, and act, and to claim for itself the right to dictate who may enjoy those freedoms.' The alumni also slammed the administration's concerns over antisemitism as rationale over the funding freeze. 'We unequivocally condemn antisemitism and every other form of discrimination and hate, which have no place at Harvard or anywhere else in our society,' the alumni said in its brief. 'Yet charges of antisemitism — particularly without due process and proper bases and findings by the Government — should not be used as a pretext for the illegal and unconstitutional punishment and takeover of an academic institution by the Government.' The government's demands on Harvard, the alumni said in the brief, 'have little or nothing to do with combating antisemitism' or any other form of discrimination on campus. 'Rather, its demands stifle the very engagement, teaching, and research that bring communities together, heighten our understanding of one another, and advance solutions that directly benefit us all,' the brief said. The show of legal support comes amid a monthslong back-and-forth between the administration and Harvard University. Most recently, the school sued the administration after Trump issued a proclamation last week denying visas for foreign students trying to come to the U.S. to attend the prestigious school.
