Modern football driving fans away, research reveals
The survey questioned fans on their football fandom - reasons for supporting their club, where in the football pyramid their club plays, and how often they attend matches, as well as football content consumption preferences and behaviours. The findings show that modern fans engage with football in many different ways and their joy and frustrations extend beyond the stadium experience.
However, a dedicated section around enjoyment of football produced the most telling statistics, with eye-opening figures set to inform LiveScore's ongoing mission to Fuel Fans' Passion for Sport.
Different motivations, same passion
It's important to recognise that not all UK football fans are the same. What motivates, inspires, and excites a Premier League fan from the northeast may differ significantly from what drives an EFL League One supporter on the south coast. Fans' perspectives on their own fandom are shaped by a range of factors.
(Image: LiveScore) For instance, 77% of EFL League Two fans support the club most local to them. This figure drops to 30% among Premier League fans, who are mostly influenced by family ties (45%) in determining where their support lies.
What unites all fans, especially in this country, is the passion for the game. Our survey results found a majority – 68% – of all football fans identify as a 'passionate' or 'core' fan, meaning they either attend matches or watch football on TV, or both, regularly. This could be as a Premier League, EFL, National League, or Scottish football fan. While 67% of UK football fans support Premier League clubs, 57% of them also follow at least one other team to some degree. This highlights that fan identities are often complex.
The findings and conclusions below reflect the views shared by most fans, according to the survey results, and highlight areas where football stakeholders can come together to improve the modern-day experience of the beautiful game.
Money, Money, Money
The modern game is increasingly shaped by money. While investment in football has arguably raised the quality on the pitch, it has also driven up ticket and TV subscription prices — and allowed broadcasters to frequently shift kick-off times. Even the most loyal fans are growing frustrated.
The survey reveals over half (53%) of all football fans believe that high ticket prices are diminishing their enjoyment of the sport. While a staggering 81% of fans don't consider tickets to matches as good value for money.
This comes as the likes of Arsenal, Chelsea, and Manchester United, three of the country's most well supported clubs, all announced ticket price increases heading into the 2025/26 season.
For those not attending matches in person, as much as 37% of fans miss matches entirely due to lack of relevant TV subscriptions. Meanwhile 1 in 10 rely on free highlights or illegal streams to watch football.
This upcoming season, it will cost Premier League fans, on average, a staggering £966.38 to watch their team on TV.
The commercialisation of the Premier League is a key reason for driving up the price of football in the UK.
The oldest age group surveyed (55+), many of whom experienced football fandom before the Premier League era, were most likely to agree (55%) that money is negatively affecting their enjoyment of the game.
Time to talk kick-off time
The Saturday 3pm kick-off is a firm favourite across football fans, with 58% choosing it as their top preference of match time. This rises to 60% in the 35-54 age group, and 75% for 55+.
Despite this, fixture scheduling is increasingly shaped by broadcast demands. Sky Sports' record-breaking exclusivity deal for the 2025/26 Premier League season will see its live match coverage rise from 128 games in 2024/25 to 215.
Many of these additional fixtures are expected to be scheduled for Friday nights, Sundays, and Monday nights. This includes broadcasting multiple 2pm Sunday matches, which will often feature clubs participating in the Europa League and Conference League.
However, only 5% of 18–34-year-olds selected this (2pm Sunday) as their preferred kick-off time. The figure drops to 4% for those aged 55 and over, and to 3% for those aged 35–54. Our data shows that this is the least preferred kick-off time among football fans.
While fans strongly favour Saturday 3pm, not all are in the stadium. In fact, 1 in 3 football fans don't attend matches at all, and just 34% say they are satisfied with how many games they're able to see live. For these supporters, especially those priced out or unable to get tickets, access to televised matches is essential.
At the centre of this tension is the UK's 3pm broadcast blackout, introduced in the 1960s to protect in-person attendances, particularly in the lower leagues. The rule remains in place despite growing questions about its relevance in today's game.
The concern remains that lifting the 3pm blackout, while serving Premier League fans, would be to the detriment of lower league attendances where gate receipts remain crucial to lower league club incomes. Would local fans turn their backs on lower league turnstiles on Saturdays at 3pm in favour of watching the topflight, or indeed their own club, on TV?
For the 3pm blackout to apply, over 50% of fixtures in England's top two divisions need to kick off at that time over a weekend. This will not be the case on the opening weekend of the EFL Championship this season (9-10 Aug) with the Premier League season not yet underway, and 6 of the 12 second tier matches kicking off outside of Saturday 3pm.
Although a small sample size (during UK school holidays and with no Premier League football on show), this could be a first indicator of how fan attendances are impacted, from Championship level down to non-league, by all EFL fixtures being televised live.
Tradition or Barrier?
The survey results show the two key reasons for not attending fixtures (81% of all responses) were ticket prices, and ticket availability.
These issues almost exclusively apply to the top two tiers, with 61% of EFL League One fans and 78% of EFL League Two fans saying they can easily get tickets. This figure reduces slightly to 68% of National League fans while rising again to 79% of those supporting clubs below that.
By contrast, the survey results show just 39% of EFL Championship fans and as low as 21% of Premier League fans experience easy access to tickets.
As referenced, Premier League fans account for 67% of all football fans in the UK (per the survey results), with as many as 8 in 10 of all football fans in the youngest survey age category (18-34). This group relies heavily on televised coverage.
The key question for decision makers is, therefore, whether he 3pm blackout still serves its purpose of protecting attendances across the entirety of the football pyramid, or if lower league fans' match-going commitment is irrelevant to it.
(Image: LiveScore) For the majority (82% of fans support clubs in the top two divisions in England per the survey results), the 3pm blackout cuts off access to the most in-demand kick-off time, making it one of the biggest barriers to enjoyment of the game.
As broadcast coverage grows and modern fan habits continue to shift, the 3pm blackout may come under fresh scrutiny. The data suggests it's time to re-examine how the rule aligns with today's fan experience, while still respecting the importance of tradition and protection of lower-league clubs.
Regions Driving Fan Engagement
London fans tend to be among the most engaged in the country, with 41% reporting they attend live games weekly. That's more than double the national average of 18%. Similarly, 57% of London supporters say they are satisfied with how often they attend matches, compared to 34% of fans overall.
Digital engagement mirrors this trend, where 70% of fans in the capital watch live matches or highlights online weekly, exceeding the average fan rate of 61%.
Chelsea fans are particularly notable, with 50% attending live matches weekly, significantly above the 18% average. By contrast, their fellow London clubs Arsenal (15%) and Tottenham (13%) fall behind Manchester clubs; City (22%) and United (21%), both exceeding the fan average.
A key factor driving Chelsea fans' high attendance may be ticket availability. Nearly half of Blues fans (49%) say it is easy to get tickets for matches, well above the 30% national average.
Pinpointing the precise reason for this is complex but, while easier said than done, these findings suggest that improving ticket availability is key to boosting fan attendance across other regions as well. Premier League champions Liverpool recently revealed 1 in 5 tickets at Anfield next season are reserved for hospitality or corporate packages, highlighting how the biggest clubs continue to prioritise profitability over accessibility for core fans.
Refuelling Fans' Passion
The survey results highlight key pressure points affecting UK football fans' enjoyment of the national sport in 2025. Moments such as the empty stadiums during the Covid-19 pandemic and the widespread backlash to the proposed European Super League have underlined the enduring power and importance of fans at the heart of the game.
Whether in stadiums or on screens, in pubs or on social feeds, fans are the constant. Across the tiers, they bring football to life through their passion, and the countless ways they engage both on and off the pitch.
Yet the data reveals a deep and ongoing sense of frustration and disillusionment with the direction modern football is taking.
LiveScore urges clubs, governing bodies, and broadcasters to work together to protect the fan experience. By making thoughtful, data-driven decisions, with supporters placed at the centre, the industry can reignite fans' passion and safeguard the future of our beautiful game.
To access the full survey from LiveScore, you can find it in the link here: https://livescoregroup.com/press-news/livescore-publishes-uk-fan-survey/
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
2 minutes ago
- Metro
Daniel Sturridge says Man Utd ace was 'best player on the pitch' against Arsenal
Daniel Sturridge hailed Manchester United summer signing Matheus Cunha as the 'best player on the pitch' after the opening-day defeat to Arsenal. United, who finished 15th in the Premier League last season, produced an improved performance at Old Trafford but still fell to a defeat, Riccardo Calafiori scoring the only goal of the game. Calafiori was on hand on the line to head home in the 13th-minute after Altay Bayindir flapped at Declan Rice's inswinging corner. Both teams had chances to score after Calafiori's opener but the game finished 1-0 with Mikel Arteta's side returning to north London with three points. While United suffered yet another home defeat under Amorim, there were signs of progress from the Red Devils, particularly with summer signings Cunha and Bryan Mbeumo. Metro's new weekly football newsletter: In The Mixer. Exclusive analysis, FPL tips and transfer talk sent straight to your inbox every Friday – sign up, it's an open goal. 'I thought Cunha lit the place up today,' ex-England striker Sturridge said on Sky Sports. 'He was Man United's best player and for me, maybe the best player on the pitch. 'What he will bring is something different to United, they haven't had someone like him. He will get fans on the edge of their seat. He's going to be a special player for the team. 'United showed a different side to Arsenal that we haven't seen in that they were a bit more open, especially in central areas. 'All in all United's attack will be going away and thinking to themselves, 'On another day I could be walking away with one or two'. 'If I was Mbeumo I would be going to bed thinking, 'Wow, I should have left with a goal today'.' Ex-Manchester United captain Roy Keane was also 'encouraged' by aspects of the hosts' performance but said there were still 'problems' throughout the team. 'The expectations at United now are so low, that even Gary [Neville] said on commentary, everyone is OK with a 1-0 defeat,' he said. 'They've got to do better. 'It does worry me. Some of the new signings, there was encouragement with that. They were getting you up the pitch with a bit of power. 'Things will improve, it's tough against Arsenal, but no goals and another defeat. There's still problems there with Manchester United.' Old Trafford boss Ruben Amorim, meanwhile, felt his team 'deserved more' against Arsenal and claimed United were the 'better team'. 'We deserved more and we were the better team, that is clear but in the end we lost,' he said. 'We need to work on the things we need to improve. We need to defend set pieces. But we did a lot things right. More Trending 'There are a lot of things without seeing the video that we need to work. I am really proud of my players. 'We were more aggressive and brave. In certain moments I think Bryan [Mbeumo] and Cunha helped a lot. 'We stuck to the plan even when the stadium is nervous, we continued to play the way we played and that will help us in the future.' Manchester United will look for their first points of the new season next Sunday when they face Fulham at Craven Cottage. For more stories like this, check our sport page. Follow Metro Sport for the latest news on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. MORE: 'Invisible' – Liverpool legend criticises two Chelsea players after Crystal Palace draw MORE: Man Utd and Liverpool enter transfer race for Republic of Ireland international MORE: Picture of Man Utd star outside Old Trafford vandalised ahead of Arsenal clash
Metro
2 minutes ago
- Metro
Roy Keane explains why Arsenal fall short in Premier League title races
Roy Keane has named a key reason why Arsenal have fallen short to Liverpool and Manchester City in recent Premier League title races. The Gunners have finished as runners-up in the top-flight for the last three seasons in a row – with Liverpool clinching the trophy last time around. In the two campaigns before that, Arsenal missed out to City, with the north London club having not won the Premier League title since 2004. Keane, speaking after Arsenal beat his former club Manchester United 1-0 on Sunday, feels the reason is because the Gunners do not kill games off in the same way that Arne Slot's side or Pep Guardiola's men do. 'You wonder why Arsenal are still coming up short – it's because they are still happy to sit back at 1-0,' Keane said on Sky Sports. Metro's new weekly football newsletter: In The Mixer. Exclusive analysis, FPL tips and transfer talk sent straight to your inbox every Friday – sign up, it's an open goal. 'And then you think, is that the reason you drew so many games last year? You compare that to Man City and Liverpool. 'They are always looking to go on and get the second or the third. Even on a bad day they can score two or three goals.' Keane added: 'The sign of a really good team is when you're not at your best and you win football matches. 'The worry for me in the second half is there were opportunities to really go at Man Utd, but they seemed off it from that point of view. 'Arsenal need to be clinical in their play and really go for that second or third goal.' Arsenal boss Mikel Arteta admits his side were 'clearly not' at their best at Old Trafford – but was delighted with the 'resilience' the Gunners showed. Speaking to the BBC, Arteta said: 'We came here away and won which is a big result. We were clearly not at our best. More Trending 'We attacked the box and we reacted well to unusual mistakes. The team reacted time after time in an incredible way. Very proud of that because that is why we got the opportunity to win the game. 'We showed a resilience and a will to win. They put you on the ropes here, you will have to have moments when you suffer. To find a way to win at this ground, I'm very happy with the team. '[The new signings] have made a good impact on the team, they had a great attitude. 'Physically some of them are still not at the level we require for 95 minutes but we will get there.' MORE: Daniel Sturridge says Man Utd star was 'best player on the pitch' against Arsenal MORE: 'Indefensible' – Joe Hart slams Manchester United star after Arsenal defeat MORE: 'Invisible' – Liverpool legend criticises two Chelsea players after Crystal Palace draw
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Man United had an obvious weakness against Arsenal and what happened was inevitable
Unless Manchester United can defend a corner, they will not turn one. Until Ruben Amorim 's big decisions succeed, the verdicts on his reign may be unflattering. A new season brought an improved United in various respects, but a third win at Old Trafford for Arsenal under Mikel Arteta. A club who once clinched a Premier League title on United turf can hope the road to another began with the same scoreline and at the same venue. 'A big, big result,' said Arteta. But Arsenal were given a helping hand by Altay Bayindir and, indirectly, Amorim. The Turkey international's lame punch allowed Riccardo Calafiori to head in from a yard; if Viktor Gyokeres, the debutant striker, was supposed to be the final piece in Arteta's jigsaw, there was something typical of his teams in that the goal came from the left-back. The manner of the goal was familiar for both clubs. The Arsenal fans' first chorus of the season of 'Set-piece FC' came after 13 minutes. If the same tag is attached to United, it would a criticism. They conceded from a corner in last week's friendly against Fiorentina. They let in 15 Premier League goals from set-pieces last season, the majority after Amorim's appointment and his assistant Carlos Fernandes took charge of dead-ball situations. Bayindir was beaten direct from a corner by Tottenham's Son Heung Min in the Carabao Cup in December. This was only slightly less embarrassing. But it was a story of three goalkeepers. David Raya was terrific, excellent saves from United's new forwards Matheus Cunha and Bryan Mbeumo the pick of seven stops, and a reassuring presence. Arteta got his own goalkeeping decision very right two years ago, ruthlessly replacing Aaron Ramsdale with Raya. The Spaniard's quest for a third consecutive Golden Glove began well. Arsenal could thank two goalkeepers for their three points. Meanwhile, Andre Onana was a spectator. Injured, he had missed United's friendlies. Fit again, Amorim decided to omit him, arguing afterwards: 'It's not the case of dropping Onana. It's not putting Andre Onana in [after] just one week without seeing the game, without time, with training.' Yet before kick-off his explanation was that he wanted to reward Bayindir for his performances in pre-season. Whether logical or a leftfield choice, that backfired in his first display of the actual campaign. United could argue that William Saliba fouled Mason Mount as Declan Rice's corner came in; yet Bayindir's attempt to deal with it was feeble. Amorim was defensive and touchy. 'I'm saying that you choose to push a player or to get the ball in that moment,' he said. 'So he chooses to get the ball, but he's getting pushed. He cannot defend it himself.' He harked back eight months to say that, had VAR been used in the Carabao Cup, Son's goal against Bayindir would have been disallowed. He looked back to Bayindir's last encounter with Arsenal, to his triumphant FA Cup tie in January. 'Who saved the penalty? Who saved the game?' he barked. 'Bayindir was unbelievable in that game. So I consider everything.' What he won't consider, he suggested, is buying at the back, even if Gianluigi Donnarumma is available. 'I'm happy with the three goalkeepers,' he said. Onana's omission, on a day when Rasmus Hojlund did not make the matchday squad, had suggested an exit for both. Amorim implied the Cameroonian was only out for the game, not for good. Wronged or a wrong choice, Bayindir's reunion with Arsenal came at a cost. His problems were ill-timed when Amorim's team were looking for a new script for a new season. In some respects, United progressed. 'We proved today that we can win any game in the Premier League, especially against a great team like Arsenal, and we were the better team,' Amorim said. United had possession and pressure, far more shots and touches in the penalty area and a higher xG. They took the game to Arsenal and had encouraging debuts from Mbeumo, who was their best player, and Cunha. They still lost. After nine league defeats at Old Trafford last season, they have one already. 'We created some chances but we didn't score so that is the main negative of the day,' said Bruno Fernandes. That was despite the £200m upgrade to the forward line. But Benjamin Sesko was held in reserve, his bow coming as a substitute; it meant there was no direct comparison with Viktor Gyokeres, the two men who comprised Arsenal's striking shortlist, with the Swede going off before the Slovenian came on. Gyokeres' was a relatively quiet debut. He scored 65 goals for Amorim at Sporting CP and didn't even have a shot against the Portuguese's United. In contrast, his £65m signing was terrific. Mbeumo was indefatigable and electric, making speedy bursts in the inside-right channel. Encouragingly for United, his new colleagues kept finding him. Annoyingly for them, his former Brentford teammate Raya parried his downward header, just as he had when Cunha almost scored from an acute angle. 'The save from Cunha was a tough one,' said Raya. 'I don't know how I saved it.' Raya was only beaten when Patrick Dorgu whistled a low shot against the far post. He was required, in part, because United's new signings gave Saliba and Gabriel Magalhaes a tough afternoon. 'Defensively we weren't at our best, so that was a hard fight,' said Raya. Arteta added: 'You know when you are not at your standards, which today we weren't, we can still come away and find a way to win the game.' It is a habit United must envy. Fifteenth last season, they find themselves 15th now. If the table is largely meaningless, if performances can count for more than results at this time of the season, United got the performance, Arsenal the result. And it was Arteta who looked the happier with that.
