Three Nazi extremists convicted of planning terrorist attack in England
Three Nazi extremists who amassed an arsenal of 200 weapons and discussed targeting mosques and synagogues in England have been convicted of planning a terrorist attack.
Among the haul of weapons was a 3D gun that was almost ready to be fired. The planned attack was averted when an undercover officer infiltrated the self-styled Nazi cell.
The three men were Christopher Ringrose, 34, from Cannock, Marco Pitzettu, 25, from Derby, and Brogan Stewart, 25, from West Yorkshire, who formed a virtual cell and had never met.
They admired Adolf Hitler and spouted anti-immigrant rhetoric, shared material from the far-right activist Tommy Robinson and discussed attacking places housing migrants to Britain.
They were convicted by a jury at Sheffield crown court of multiple terrorism and firearms offences and warned by the judge they faced lengthy jail sentences.
Among their weapons were deactivated guns that they were trying to restore, crossbows, hunting-style knives and a tomahawk.
The 3D gun was built from instructions found on the web and needed only a firing pin, bolt and barrel to be turned into a lethal weapon.
They identified an Islamic centre in Leeds to attack, and discussed abducting and torturing an Imam, the route they would take, how they would avoid detection and their escape.
Stewart chose himself as the 'Fuhrer' or leader and laid down uniform rules for members to be clad in Nazi-style clothing.
He called the group Einsatz 14, referencing Nazi paramilitary death squads, and appointed Pitzettu and Ringroseas 'armourers'.
The group, which believe in a race war, criticised other extremist far-right groups for not taking action.
Using the messaging app Telegram, Stewart wrote that other far-right groups just 'sit around and talk'.
'I want to get my own group together because action speaks louder than words,' he wrote.
Stewart added: 'I would love to beat faggots up too' and 'I want to storm the government buildings and hang the politicians. The government are full of Jews and other enemies.'
The group were arrested on 20 February 2024 after being infiltrated by an undercover officer called Blackheart.
Targets they had discussed for harassment and attacks included mosques, Islamic education centres and synagogues.
Ringrose, a manager at a car parts supplier, posted a photo of his one-year-old son wearing a skull mask and the words 'choose violence' while Pitzettu, a mechanic, shared videos of the Christchurch mosque massacre.
Stewart, the self-appointed leader, had never had a job and lived with his mother.
In a group telephone call on 5 February, two weeks before their arrest, Stewart laid out an attack plan to 'cruise around' looking for 'human targets' near an Islamic education centre, 'do what whatever we do then back at mine for tea and medals and a debrief'.
Stewart said he wanted the members to 'hang out, bring ourselves closer together and just cement that brotherhood'. But the meeting was cancelled because of bad weather.
Opening the trial, prosecutor Jonathan Sandiford KC said: 'The defendants had identified potential locations and targets and it was the imminent threat of an attack that led to the defendants being arrested.'
The court heard Stewart said of the group's ideology: 'Personally, I've taken inspiration from the SS,' and added: 'I also hope that we can extort political rivals and potentially plan operations to meet migrants landing on our beaches and deal with them.'
DCI James Dunkerley, head of Counter Terrorism Policing North East, said: 'They were a group that espoused vile racist views and advocated for violence, all to support their extreme rightwing mindset.
'All three took real-world steps to plan and prepare for carrying out an attack on innocent citizens.'
Bethan David, head of the Crown Prosecution Service's counter-terrorism division, said: 'These extremists were plotting violent acts of terrorism against synagogues, mosques and an Islamic education centre. By their own admission, they were inspired by SS tactics and supremacist ideology.
'Had Christopher Ringrose managed to completely finish building the 3D-printed semi-automatic firearm that he had started to, it could have been used leading to devastating consequences.'
They will be sentenced on 17 July.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
36 minutes ago
- Sky News
The Wargame - episode one: False Flag
👉 Click here to listen to The Wargame on your podcast app 👈 Tensions with Russia escalate, and an imaginary week in the near future takes a turn for the unexpected. The prime minister calls an emergency Cobra meeting. A major five-part series from Sky News and Tortoise imagines how a Russian attack on the UK could play out - and invites real-life former ministers, military chiefs and other experts to figure out how to defend the country. Written and presented by Sky News' security and defence editor, Deborah Haynes.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Winter fuel humiliation: After huge U-turn Rachel Reeves bizarrely claims she was 'right' to cut handout - while Sir Keir Starmer is ridiculed for suggesting move is now possible because Labour's 'fixed' stricken economy
Labour 's spending plans descended into chaos last night as Rachel Reeves backed down over winter fuel. The Chancellor said all pensioners with incomes of less than £35,000 will get the payment this winter following a huge public backlash over last year's cuts. The humiliating climbdown means nine million pensioners will receive the handout – worth up to £300 a household – at a cost of £1.25billion. Ms Reeves refused to apologise for the original decision to slash the number of those eligible for the payment – a move which triggered a collapse in Labour's poll rating. She insisted she had been 'right' to cut the payment last year. And, despite having repeatedly attacked opponents for making 'unfunded' spending pledges, she refused to say how she will pay for the U-turn. Labour MPs seized on the Chancellor's political weakness and lined up to demand that she now scrap the two-child benefit cap and cancel plans to cut disability benefits at a combined cost of £8.5billion a year, fuelling fears of further tax rises. Downing Street claimed the U-turn was possible because the economy had now 'turned a corner', despite the fact the Office for Budget Responsibility has halved official growth forecasts for this year. Sir Keir Starmer insisted Labour had ' fixed the foundations of the economy', in spite of rising unemployment and inflation. Reform leader Nigel Farage, who pledged this month to restore the payment in full, said Labour's U-turn was triggered by 'blind panic' at its collapsing poll ratings. The Treasury said the winter fuel reverse would not lead to a 'permanent rise in borrowing'. Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said this was likely to mean 'permanent additional taxes'. The move came ahead of tomorrow's spending review, when the Chancellor will announce a spending spree totalling an extra £300billion over five years – equal to £8,100 for every taxpayer in Britain. Labour minister Sir Chris Bryant said the review would mark 'the end of austerity'. But Tory business spokesman Andrew Griffith said Labour was 'massively adding to the national debt our children will have to pay and ensuring that taxes will rise and growth will fall'. Economists last night warned that the financial markets could turn on Labour if ministers were unwilling to keep spending on a 'sustainable path'. The Chancellor's decision to means test the winter fuel allowance was one of Labour's first steps in office last July. It meant that around 10million pensioners lost the previously universal benefit last winter. The decision also helped trigger a plunge in Labour's ratings and was widely blamed for the party's dismal performance in last month's local elections, when it lost two-thirds of the seats it was defending. A More in Common poll yesterday found that just 14 per cent of voters now think the Chancellor is doing a good job. Ms Reeves yesterday said she had 'listened to people's concerns'. Kemi Badenoch urged ministers to apologise for the 'callous' decision to cut eligibility for the payment last year. The Tory leader said: 'Pensioners were forced to choose between heating and eating last winter. Keir Starmer should apologise to them.' Tory work and pensions spokesman Helen Whately said the U-turn was 'most humiliating climb down a government has ever faced in its first year in office'. Ms Whately added that the cut had contributed to an extra 100,000 visits by pensioners to A&E departments last winter. 'Their mistake has hurt people and it is cowardly not to own up to it,' she said. But, asked if she would apologise, Ms Reeves said: 'The irresponsible thing to have done last year was to allow the public finances to carry on on an unsustainable footing.' She added: 'I'm always going to put stability in our economy first.' At present, only pensioners with an income of less than £11,800 are eligible for the winter fuel payment. This will treble to £35,000 this winter. It will continue to be £200 per household or £300 for the over-80s. The winter fuel retreat emboldened Labour rebels pushing for increased welfare spending. Left-winger Nadia Whittome said the episode had been a 'fiasco' for the Government and urged ministers to now abandon £5billion of cuts to disability benefits that are designed to curb the ballooning welfare budget. Bradford East MP Imran Hussain said it would be wrong to continue with 'devastating' cuts to disabled support. Former leadership contender Rebecca Long-Bailey welcomed the U-turn but said it was also 'right to lift children out of poverty' by scrapping the two-child benefit cap. The decision to restore the winter fuel payment to three-quarters of pensioners was welcomed by campaign groups. Caroline Abrahams, of Age UK, said Ms Reeves' reversal 'will be a huge relief to many'. Who will now get winter fuel payments? If you are over state pension age and your income is less than £35,000 your household will now be eligible. How much is it worth? The annual payment is worth £200 per household, or £300 if someone who lives there is over 80. How do I get it? The payment will be made automatically to all pensioner households and then recouped from any that aren't eligible. Who will have to repay it? If your income is above £35,000, your payment will be 'recovered' by HMRC or you can opt out. What if my partner's income is below £35,000? Payments will be assessed on individual, not household, income. Payments are split if a household has two pensioners. In the case of a couple where one has an income above the threshold and one below it, half the total will be paid to the pensioner with the lower income. Can I just turn it down? If you know that you definitely won't qualify for a winter fuel payment, as your income is more than £35,000, you can opt out to avoid the hassle of paying it back. What if I need to pay it back? Pensioners whose income is above £35,000 and who don't opt out will need to pay all of it back. It will be repaid either via a self-assessment tax return, for those who complete one, or automatically through PAYE. The Treasury said: 'No one will need to register with HMRC for this or take any further action.' Is this plan for all of the UK? The Treasury announced this move for England and Wales, but Scotland and Northern Ireland might make separate new arrangements. Last winter, Scotland replaced the Winter Fuel Payment with the Pension Age Winter Heating Payment. Northern Ireland made a one-off £100 payment to pensioners who lost their winter fuel payments. How much will this cost? The cost of reinstating Winter Fuel Payments for those now eligible is estimated at £1.25billion in England and Wales. Compared to when the payments were a universal benefit for pensioners, the savings will now only be around £450million annually.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Mail's shocking 'cash for visas' scam expose shows the UK is an 'immigration free for all', Shadow Justice Minister Robert Jenrick warns
Robert Jenrick demanded Labour end the immigration 'free-for-all' yesterday after the Mail revealed how crooked legal advisers run cash for visas scams. The Shadow Justice Secretary hailed our 'crucial' undercover investigation which exposed how companies are charging up to £22,000 per person to provide 'skilled' jobs in the UK for underqualified foreign workers. Our probe discovered range of brazen tricks being used to dupe the Home Office into providing sponsorship licences enabling convenience stores, barbers, warehouses and bars across the country to bring in overseas labour on false pretences. It is so lucrative that many firms have started up just to profit from hiring foreign staff and then exploit them for cheap labour. Immigration advisers working as fixers for the firms coach immigrants how to lie to officials, overstating their levels of education and experience to secure the visa. Mr Jenrick said: 'This crucial Daily Mail investigation shows our immigration system is a free-for-all. 'Scammers are lining their pockets while the public have yet more low-skilled migration forced upon them. 'It's gone on for decades and the public are sick to death of it.' He called for the adviser exposed by the Mail to face the 'toughest possible punishment.' 'The Government will only bring this farce to an end if they radically reduce numbers to historic levels officials can properly control.' Mr Estibeiro told our undercover reporter that he works with businesses in Bradford, Leicester, Northampton and Peterborough, but only takes payment for his services via third party bank accounts to avoid any paper trail linking the firm to his scam Border security minister Dame Angela Eagle launched an urgent investigation into our probe. She also immediately suspended the sponsorship licence of Leicester-based immigration advice firm Flyover International after the Mail revealed its managing partner tricks the Home Office into believing employers need a certificate of sponsorship to take on overseas workers. Joe Estibeiro told our undercover reporter that he works with businesses in Bradford, Leicester, Northampton and Peterborough, but only takes payment for his services via third party bank accounts to avoid any paper trail linking the firm to his scam. He makes it appear that employers can't find any British residents to fill 'skilled' jobs by first advertising the positions in the UK and only recording interviews with the worst candidates to use as evidence if they are investigated by the Home Office. The overseas workers he recruits officially earn around £3000 a month to meet the government's minimum salary requirements for skilled worker visas. But he described how after the money is paid into their account they have to withdraw all but £900 and secretly hand it back to their boss. Mr Estibeiro even claimed the Government didn't care if companies bring in unqualified staff on skilled worker visas, insisting: 'The Home Office is just interested in the money.' More than 131,000 businesses are now on the Home Office's list for licensed sponsors for the permits which includes market traders, dog groomers – listed as 'canine beauticians' - curtain fitters and even scores of kebab shops. Critics warned the open duplicity could sink Sir Keir Starmer's immigration crackdown which made new restrictions on the skilled worker visas a major part of his aim to end the economy's addiction to cheap overseas labour. Dame Angela said: 'Since taking office there have been 40 per cent fewer visa applications, we have removed nearly 30,000 people with no right to be here and arrests from illegal working raids are up 51%. 'We announced in the Immigration White Paper that backs British workers and ends the economy's addiction to cheap overseas labour. 'And under our new Borders legislation, the Immigration Advice Authority will get new powers to immediately suspend registered advisers and organisations suspected of carrying out the most flagrant abuse of the system, bringing them in line with legal regulators.' A Home Office source claimed when Mr Jenrick was immigration minister he had failed clamp down on the criminal gangs fueling illegal immigration. The source added: 'If he needs reminding what the Labour government has done to tackle this, we've introduced a new law to prevent suspected crooks like the one found by the brilliant journalism in the Daily Mail - so the Immigration Advice Authority will get new powers to immediately suspend registered advisers and organisations.' Flyover International is owned by another man who is understood to be taking the matter seriously and investigating and says that Mr Estibeiro was not officially hired to work in the UK end of the business. Mr Estibeiro denied involvement in any 'illegal or unethical' activity and said he was 'solely involved in student recruitment' and insisted he always told anyone who enquired about Certificates of Sponsorship for skilled worker visas that 'we do not deal with such matters.'
